be the issue?
-Reinhard
From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:15 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Cc: Reinhard Nappert
Subject: Re: [389-users] MMR issue ...
On 11/13/2012 11:02 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Rich
I use 1.2.8.2
From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:18 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Cc: Reinhard Nappert
Subject: Re: [389-users] MMR issue ...
On 11/13/2012 09:24 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi,
I’ve
Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:29 PM
To: Reinhard Nappert
Cc: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.; Marc Sauton
Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication issue
On 10/12/2011 02:16 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Good.
what about the different generation ID message? Is it possible
: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:11 PM
To: Reinhard Nappert
Cc: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.; Marc Sauton
Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication issue
On 10/12/2011 02:08 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Rich,
I was thinking about the "Replica has a different generation ID tha
rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:00 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Cc: Reinhard Nappert; Marc Sauton
Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication issue
On 10/11/2011 02:41 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
How do I do this manually on server A?
The other
...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:54 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Cc: Reinhard Nappert
Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication questions.
On 09/19/2011 12:46 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi, I have a multi-master setup with three masters. All of them
Hi, I have a multi-master setup with three masters. All of them are running
1.2.8.2. I had created and deleted the replication environment at least 3 times.
The current setup looks like the following.
Svr A has replication id 1, Srv B has the replication id 3 and Srv C has the id
4. The replica
Do a ldapsearch -b
'nsuniqueid=---,dc=mydomain,dc=com' -D
-w -s base objectclass=nstombstone
This gives you all the configured (history) of replication ids. The following
is the output in my setup.
dn: nsuniqueid=---,o=base
ob
import failure, when setting replication up
On 05/24/2011 06:27 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
I do that.
Now, I have two questions:
So, what db version do you recommend?
Hi Reinhard,
Which OS you are running?
If it's RHEL5 (BDB4.3.29) or RHEL6 (BDB4.7.25), they are patched. But
Thanks,
--noriko
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi Noriko,
I run it on a CentOS 4.4 box (Linux 2.6.24). I use the db 4.2 libs with all the
patches.
Oh, yes dbverify does complain a lot. I see for all of the db files messages
like:
[20/May/2011:11:03:05 -0400] DB verify - verify failed(-30976):
/var/lib/
ersion 1.2.8.2.
Thanks,
--noriko
On 05/17/2011 11:03 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi,
I have seen the following:
I set 2 systems up in MMR. Replication worked. For some reason, I needed to
take one of the boxes out of the replication and disabled replication. Later
on, I enabled it again and creat
Hi,
I have seen the following:
I set 2 systems up in MMR. Replication worked. For some reason, I needed to
take one of the boxes out of the replication and disabled replication. Later
on, I enabled it again and created the shadowing agreement to the other box.
Now, I saw the following errors d
neral discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Cc: Reinhard Nappert
Subject: Re: [389-users] MMR issue, when deleting the replica setup.
On 05/09/2011 02:06 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi,
I noticed an issue with 389 DS 1.2.7.5, which I have not seen before. Here is
what I do:
1. I cre
Hi,
I noticed an issue with 389 DS 1.2.7.5, which I have not seen before. Here is
what I do:
1. I create a two multi-master setup.
2. I don't perform any changes on the directory.
3. I delete the replica setup on both systems -- everything is fine.
4. I create a two multi-master setup.
5. Perform
If I find out, I let you know.
-Original Message-
From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 10:36 AM
To: Reinhard Nappert
Cc: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Referral errors
On 05/05
Hi,
I have the following setup:
I have a 2 multimaster replication setup, where both masters also have a number
of shadowing agreements to other consumers. The data gets replicated to all
boxes and there are no issues. When I try to perform an update on the slaves,
it works on all, but one. Me
Hi,
I want to upgrade from 1.1.2 to 1.2.7.5, but I am not interested in using the
subtree-rename feature. Question: can I call sbin/setup-ds.pl -u with a
parameter indicating that I do not want to have this feature.
Thanks,
-Reinhard
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
Hi,
I have a working MM setup and I exported my db with db2ldif.pl with the -r
option:
db2ldif.pl -D 'cn=Directory Manager' -w password -n userRoot -r -a
/tmp/db_replica.ldif
The errors file do not indicate an issue:
[01/Feb/2011:09:23:59 -0500] - Beginning export of 'userRoot'
[01/Feb/2011:09
: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:26 PM
To: Reinhard Nappert
Cc: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Replication with 1.2.7.5
On 01/10/2011 11:16 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> After I did set it to start and did do a ldapsearch and
> nsds5beginreplicarefresh was still set to start. N
Of Reinhard Nappert
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:32 PM
To: Rich Megginson
Cc: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [389-users] Replication with 1.2.7.5
Yes, I did report a bug regarding the deletion of the replica configuration,
but my testing are not related to this. I want to re
with 1.2.x for that. I still
need to get to the bottom of this one..
-Reinhard
-Original Message-
From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:26 PM
To: Reinhard Nappert
Cc: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Replication with 1.2.7.5
]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:10 PM
To: Reinhard Nappert
Cc: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Replication with 1.2.7.5
On 01/10/2011 08:18 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Rich,
>
> I had log level set to 8192 and still there was nothing in errors.
I've tried to reproduc
, 2010 5:08 PM
To: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [389-users] slapd not responding
On 11/22/2010 03:00 PM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Should I open a bug for it?
Sure, but unless you can reproduce it with the latest code (1.2.6 or 1.2.7),
it's going to be very difficult for us t
-users] slapd not responding
On 11/22/2010 09:38 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi,
I have a 389 DS 1.1.2 server in Multi-Master mode. It happens that the server
stops responding in some circumstances. When the server was in that state, I
did a kill -11 on the pid in order to generate a coredump.
I
: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: [389-users] slapd not responding
On 11/22/2010 09:38 AM, Reinhard Nappert wrote:
Hi,
I have a 389 DS 1.1.2 server in Multi-Master mode. It happens that the server
stops responding in some circumstances. When the server was in that state, I
did a kil
.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Multi-Master Replication
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Rich, you mentioned in one of your answers regarding the limit of
> Masters in a replicated environment , quote
>
> "There really isn't a limit. The limit was only for the old Red Hat
> Directory S
: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:05 AM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] 389 DS 1.2.6. and certificates
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Hi,
> I built and installed the 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 on CentOS 4.4.
Do you mean 5.5? Or did you bu
Hi,
I built and installed the 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 on CentOS 4.4. The server
works fine.
Then, I generated the certs (using certutil) and imported them in the
cert-store. The certs are generated basically generated by the setupssl2.sh
script. When I list the certs afterwards, everything lo
delete the RUV entry,
once the replica configuration object is deleted.
-Reinhard
-Original Message-
From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Reinhard Nappert
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 2:56 PM
To: General discus
389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 5:41 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Multi-Master setup
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Actually I tried
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 12:32 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Multi-Master setup
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> So,
> Is there a way to find out if a server was used for
---Original Message-
> From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:37 AM
> To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
> Subject: Re:
ctory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Multi-Master setup
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> To explain it a bit easier, I define two "methods":
> 1. createAgreement(): <-- creates locally replication
> agreement for remote ldap
> nsDS5ReplicaType=3
> ns
r the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Multi-Master setup
Reinhard Nappert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have seen the following message in the errors log file, when I set
> MMR agreements up:
>
> [10/Aug/2010:11:46:44 -0400] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
> repl_
Hi,
I configured a master slave setup where the userRoot db has an referral to the
master configured. See dse.lif entry:
dn: cn="o=BASE",cn=mapping tree,cn=config
objectClass: top
objectClass: extensibleObject
objectClass: nsMappingTree
cn: "o=BASE"
nsslapd-state: referral on update
nsslapd-back
-
From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 6:04 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] Skipped request ...
Reinhard Nappert wrote
Hi all,
I have seen a weird behavior of my DS (1.1.2). It has a very small database
(only about 2300 objects). A client performed a one-level search retrieving the
children. The server find 114 objects, but the search was very slow:
[06/May/2010:12:23:11 +] conn=127 op=149 SRCH base= scope=
37 matches
Mail list logo
