2013/7/30 Raman Gupta :
> On 07/30/2013 12:00 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 30.07.2013 05:47, Raman Gupta wrote:
>>> I cannot blacklist the module, because the "snd_hda_intel" module that
>>> drives the Intel sound card on my motherboard also recognizes the ATI
>>> cards, according to lspci-v.
>>>
>>> [...
2012/3/10 Joel Rees :
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
>> 2012/3/9 Alan Cox :
>>>
>>> So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system,
>>> while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the
&
2012/3/9 Alan Cox :
>
> So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system,
> while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the
> keys. If you own the keys it becomes a useful security feature to some
> users.
>
> Alan
Put in other words: You cannot do a
2012/3/9 Alan Cox :
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:07:55 +0100
...
> will be locked down by default and require some undefined
> screwing around to unlock. For x86 the spec currently does require they
> can be unlocked...
...
> Module signing itself isn't just useful for that though - its a matter of
> wh
I saw that the x86 modules can (_should_) be signed int the future. We
all know the pros and cons of signing but I'm wondering if all this
_crap_ has anything to do with the microsoft's idea to use a signed
bootloader, drivers, etc in the latest windoof 8. I think all of you
have heard that there's
2011/9/30 David Lehman :
> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:57 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
>> As the title says, I'd like to reinstall fedora 15 with the netinstall
>> image because it's about 100mb (kernel and initrd) instead of the
>> install dvds. My problem is that
2011/9/29 Craig White :
> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 15:03 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:41:22 -0600,
>> Pete Travis wrote:
>> > Bash will expand $(inane -r) for you - you can pass it any kernel you have
>> > headers installed for.
>> >
>> > I wanted to jump in to sugges
2011/9/28 Bruno Wolff III :
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 21:25:56 +0200,
> "Joshua C." wrote:
>>
>> That's the whole idea behind it. It's on a intel-p67 chipset with the
>> build-in intel-raid1. I tend to use an mdadm array but I'm not sure
>>
2011/9/28 Pete Travis :
> Bash will expand $(inane -r) for you - you can pass it any kernel you have
> headers installed for.
>
> I wanted to jump in to suggest you reconsider motherboard driven fakeraid.
> The mainboard becomes a single point of failure, and replacing it or
> migrating the array c
2011/9/28 Phil Meyer :
> On 09/28/2011 02:57 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>> As the title says, I'd like to reinstall fedora 15 with the netinstall
>> image because it's about 100mb (kernel and initrd) instead of the
>> install dvds. My problem is that
As the title says, I'd like to reinstall fedora 15 with the netinstall
image because it's about 100mb (kernel and initrd) instead of the
install dvds. My problem is that those files located in
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/15/Fedora/x86_64/os/isolinux/
have long been o
2011/7/6 Peter Jones :
> On 07/05/2011 10:08 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/5 Jakub Jelinek:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:41:41PM +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2011/6/12 Joshua C.:
>>>>>
>>>>> As
2011/7/5 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:41:41PM +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
>> 2011/6/12 Joshua C. :
>> > As the subject says I cannot recompile grub. Everytime I get "checking
>> > whether the C compiler works... no". I explicitely instal
2011/7/4 Brendan Jones :
> On 07/05/2011 07:41 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>> 2011/6/12 Joshua C.:
>>> As the subject says I cannot recompile grub. Everytime I get "checking
>>> whether the C compiler works... no". I explicitely installed all
>>> packag
2011/6/13 Andrew Parker :
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Joshua C. wrote:
>> After upgrading to f15 the nm-applet cannot automatically connect to
>> hidden wlan networks. It sees them and I can connect to them manually.
>> The "connect automatically" che
2011/6/12 James McKenzie :
> The kernel is first mounted read only so that it can be validated as not
> corrupt and then remounted as read-write if it passed the check. I
> would not change this unless you are certain that the kernel will never
> become corrupted. This does not happen with the L
As the subject says I cannot recompile grub. Everytime I get "checking
whether the C compiler works... no". I explicitely installed all
packages from
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/grub/0.97/74.fc15/data/logs/x86_64/root.log
and have attached those in the packages.log file. The only th
2011/6/12 James McKenzie :
> You can't. The filesystem is marked as RO. Is this a CD/DVD media? If
> it is NOT, you have to mount the media as Read-Write so that the label
> can be updated.
>
> James.
No, this started after I upgraded from f14 to f15. My grub entry says:
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-
When booting I get "Starting Show Plymouth Boot Screen failed, see
'systemctl status plymouth-start.service' for details." The plymouth
seems to work fine though. Here is more information:
$ systemctl status plymouth-start.service
plymouth-start.service - Show Plymouth Boot Screen
Loaded
After I upgraded ot f15 I see that all messages are sent to dmesg but
after several days the /var/log/messages is still empty. So my logs
get deleted after every restart. How to fix this?
--joshua
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
h
Hi
I'm greeted with "Unable to fix label of /run: read-only file system."
every time I boot the system. After relabelling the system several
times and upgrading to the lastes selinux-policy (-29.fc15) I still
get this. There's though no obvious impact on the performance.
Does anyone have any idea
2011/1/30 Matthew Saltzman :
> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 20:16 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote:
>
>> Using audacity for example . At first i could here no sound . But then
>> when i went to preferences and chose the usb camera , things worked
>> correctly . So i guess we can assume that the system itse
Hi,
looking through the logs of the latest nightly compose builds I saw
that the x86_64 isos consist of i386 packages. Has someone switched
them over by accident?
--joshua
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproje
2010/9/2 James McKenzie :
> Joshua C. wrote:
>> From my point of view it looks like a fedora bug, not a wine bug. I
>> haven't tested the code from winehq but there were some commits with
>> some font changes in the lastest koji.
>>
>> I got the same error
2010/8/31 James McKenzie :
> Joshua C. wrote:
>>
>> I found something very interesting. As I said eralier I tried the same
>> packages some months ago and everything worked fine. So I just tested
>> all the packgaes until i found the "working" one. To clarify b
2010/8/30 James Mckenzie :
> "Joshua C." wrote:
>>
>>Actually I need to run a simple batch file. That's why I used a
>>kde-livecd-f14-x86_64 and installed wine-core.i686 wine-wow.i686,
>>wine-common and wine-fonts. All dpendencies were pull automatic
2010/8/30 James McKenzie :
> Joshua C. wrote:
>> 2010/8/29 James McKenzie :
>>
>>> Joshua C. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I needed to use wineconsole and after installing the latest available
>>>> package
2010/8/29 James McKenzie :
> Joshua C. wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I needed to use wineconsole and after installing the latest available
>> packages (1.3.1-1) I got the following message when trying to start
>> wineconsole cmd:
>> err:wineconsole:WINECON_Fata
Hi
I needed to use wineconsole and after installing the latest available
packages (1.3.1-1) I got the following message when trying to start
wineconsole cmd:
err:wineconsole:WINECON_Fatal Couldn't find a decent font, aborting
Installing different fonts and "export LANG= en_US.UTF-8" didn't help.
2010/8/8 Michael Miles :
> JD wrote:
>> On 08/08/2010 10:21 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I myself was going to replace my Phenom 2 965 with the 1090T as it was a
>>> simple chip replacement but I decided to wait for the Bulldozer series.
>>> The 1090T is a big improvement but in reality i
Hi,
I’ve been planning on buying a new machine but I’m not that sure what to take.
We’ve been seeing test and reviews on the internet between amd and
linux. I can say that when it comes to pure (single) core apps then
intel might have the lead. When it comes to scalability then amd is on
the move
2010/5/31 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 22:01:12 +0200
> "Joshua C." wrote:
>
>>
>> I expected this but without seeing the failed logs one can only guess.
>
> Sorry, perhaps a 'state' file or something would be good to have.
I don't kn
2010/5/30 Frank Murphy :
> On 30/05/10 15:08, Joshua C. wrote:
> --snip--
>>
>> This is not exactly correct. It foo+1 isn't in the build system then
>> the automatic script will throw out an error.
>
> No because how will an auto script know to expect foo+1.
&g
2010/5/30 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 10:54:37 +0200
> "Joshua C." wrote:
>
>> Under http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/ are
>> supposed to be the nightly-builds of the "latest" code. However, a
>> quick look at the lo
2010/5/30 Frank Murphy :
> It's also based on tester feedback.
> Package foo doesn't work.
> If Package foo+1 doesn't make it into the build system for a week,
> there's a weeks builds down the swanee.
> That's why eyes rather than automation is used.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Frank Murphy
This is no
2010/5/30 Frank Murphy :
> On 30/05/10 09:54, Joshua C. wrote:
> --snip--
>>
>> Can someone explain why? It's just a signle script to be run. I really
>> cannot understand where the problem is to build every night the isos?
>
> More than likely the Release of F1
Under http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/ are
supposed to be the nightly-builds of the "latest" code. However, a
quick look at the logs shows that those are build once in a week or
even not that "often".
Can someone explain why? It's just a signle script to be run. I really
cann
37 matches
Mail list logo
