Re: [389-users] 389 server on production

2011-10-21 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 10:37 +0200, Andrey Ivanov wrote: > Hi, > > we are using 389 in production environment since 2006 or 2007. It is a > central authentication/authorization mechanism for ~2 accounts, > ~500 (occasional search from 5000) workstations, ~20-30 web > applications. > We have 3

[389-users] Synching with multiple Windows ADs

2010-07-27 Thread John A. Sullivan III
Hello, all. I know one can only have one sync agreement with an AD. However, is it possible to have a sync agreement with multiple ADs. We would like to synchronize the top of our tree with our main, multi-tenant AD and then synchronize lower levels of the domains with separate domains controlled

Re: [389-users] Windows Replication Agreement Help

2010-07-27 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 23:15 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 18:08 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 14:15 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 10:05 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: > >

Re: [389-users] Windows Replication Agreement Help

2010-07-20 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 10:05 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: > --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > > > > >> > >> ? Note that winsync will not add sub-ou containers > > > > In AD we have the standard mappings of CN=Users,DC=ad,DC=domain,DC=com and > > we are trying to sync a

Re: [389-users] getent group doesnt show any ldap groups

2010-05-06 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 14:45 -0400, Prashanth Sundaram wrote: > I got around this by changing the ldap.conf. > > pam_filter objectclass=posixAccount > pam_member_attribute uniquemember > > I haven;t tested this but you can also map the memberuid and memberof > to Uniquememember. So the nss_ldap ch

Re: [389-users] Unintended cert mapping happening

2010-03-29 Thread John A. Sullivan III
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:30 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: > John A. Sullivan III wrote: > > Hello, all. We are experiencing a weird problem and have not been able > > to fix it. We have just renamed the top level of our tree from > > dc=old,dc=biz to dc=new,dc=com. All went

[389-users] Unintended cert mapping happening

2010-03-29 Thread John A. Sullivan III
Hello, all. We are experiencing a weird problem and have not been able to fix it. We have just renamed the top level of our tree from dc=old,dc=biz to dc=new,dc=com. All went very well (well, very well until we also changed the certificates and keys to be from the new Certificate Authority - but

[389-users] How to rename DIT?

2010-03-26 Thread John A. Sullivan III
Hello, all. We've recently undergone a corporate name and domain change, let's say from oldname.biz to newname.com. Consequently, we need to rename the top level of our LDAP structure. We installed CentOS Directory Server 8.1 into dc=oldname,dc=biz and now need that entire structure to have dc=n