Re: experimental jit support in python 3.13?

On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 10:50 AM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Neal Becker wrote: > > Thanks, but just to verify I asked chatgpt how to tell if it was enabled at > > compile time and it suggested: > > import sysconfig > > print(sysconfig.get_config_var("WITH_EXPERIMENTAL_FOO")) > > which prints "None

Re: Implementing Secure Boot

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:53 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: > > I have a system with two installations of F41 and a Windows 10 > installation. Interested in moving it to secure boot which is not > currently enabled in the bios. It is an HP Z440 You have not stated a problem or asked a questi

Re: DNF Upgrade Error

On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 4:44 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > Hi, > With this mornings update, when DNF tried to download > dnsmasq-0:2.90-4.fc41.x86_64 and firefox-0:134.0-1.fc41.x86_64, DNF got a 404 > error from the mirror that looks to by my ISP's mirror, and after getting > that error it di

Re: No audio for Pixel Buds in Fedora 40

On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 9:55 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 5:29 AM Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 15:07 +1030, Tim via users wrote: >> > On Tue, 2025-01-07 at 09:59 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> > > Here is chatgpt's advice: >> > > https://chatgpt.com/

Re: tracker-miner Dragging Down System

On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 1:00 PM Will McDonald wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 17:50, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 12:36 PM Tim Evans wrote: >> > >> > Have noticed very heavy sluggishness in my F-41 system response over the >> >

Re: tracker-miner Dragging Down System

On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 12:36 PM Tim Evans wrote: > > Have noticed very heavy sluggishness in my F-41 system response over the > past week or so. Totally idle system showing steady 1.0+ system load > average; lightly used system showing 2.0+. Some apps' response delayed > 30 seconds or longer. > >

Re: qemu/kvm startup

On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 8:04 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 1/2/25 4:16 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 12:26 PM Robert McBroom via users > > wrote: > >> > >> On 12/29/24 4:40 AM, Barry Scott wrote: > >> > >&

Re: qemu/kvm startup

On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 12:26 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: > > On 12/29/24 4:40 AM, Barry Scott wrote: > > On 29 Dec 2024, at 00:12, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > libvirtd was changed to use socket activation, so it *should* start if the > libvirtd.socket is enabled and activated > > Running

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 4:34 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 12/26/24 11:34, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Butterbird is in the Flathub repos that Flatpak relies upon. See > > <https://www.google.com/search?q=what+repo+does+fedora+flatpak+use> > > and<https:/

Re: Opengl Access

On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 10:50 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-12-26 at 11:12 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > > I've done a further check of the functionality by loading Plasma under > > X11, and the Opengl initialisation error doesn't occur, so it looks like > > it is an issue specif

Re: Opengl Access

On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 3:40 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > [...] > > Just one question on this, ... but when I issue the command "sudo dnf > provides /lib64/libwayland-client.so.0" I get the message "No matches found." You don't need sudo for the command. $ dnf provides libwayland-client.so* ...

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 2:00 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 12/26/24 10:41, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 8:02 PM ToddAndMargo via users > > wrote: > >> > >> On 12/25/24 06:01, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >>> On Wed

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 8:02 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 12/25/24 06:01, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 3:46 AM ToddAndMargo via users > > wrote: > >> > >> Is betterbird hiding somewhere in the repos? > >> > >&

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 3:46 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > Is betterbird hiding somewhere in the repos? > > $ dnf provides betterbird > ... > No matches found. Let me Google that for you: . Jeff -- ___

Re: Opengl Access

On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 4:42 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > When an application is run and it says it can't access Opengl, when I issue > the command "sudo dnf provides */opengl", how do I determine what needs to be > installed when that command returns a whole host of different packages which >

Re: VirtualBox no longer working? Loads but gets error message.

On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 7:00 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > > On 20 Dec 2024 at 9:33, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote: > [...] > > Used it a couple weeks ago, but now get this error message went > > trying to start. > > > > VirtualBox can't operate in VMX root mode. > > Please disa

Re: conflicts will not let me install DeVeDe and ffmpepg

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:15 PM Michael Hennebry wrote: > > When I try to install DeVeDE, dnf complains about a lack of ffmepg, > even though I have /usr/bin/ffmpeg . > When I try to install ffmpeg, > dnf complains about conflicts between @System and rpmfusion-free: > rror: > Problem: problem w

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 5:09 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 17/12/24 12:46, Tim via users wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 09:37 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Why does dnf show the download, install and cleanup timings starting > as negative values? > > Is it a countdown to estimated time of c

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 5:38 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 15/12/24 14:32, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 6:59 PM Stephen Morris > wrote: > > When I run "sudo dnf upgrade", as an example, and it displays the stats for > the downloads, i

Re: Recent cups update not working

On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 8:36 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-12-15 at 07:24 -0500, Charles Dennett wrote: > > > > [...] > > > You don't give the make or model of the printer, or the driver you're > > > using with it. CUPS is working for me (Brother wireless printer/scanner > > > usi

Re: DNF Stats Issue

On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 6:59 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > When I run "sudo dnf upgrade", as an example, and it displays the stats for > the downloads, installs and Removes (cleanup), the elapsed time column shows > the times starting as negative and increasing to 0 and above, and then when > th

Re: Non-sensical DNF Functionality

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 7:22 PM Tim via users wrote: > > Greg: > > > This is by no means an issue. > > > The program you use to display the man page, let's assume man, > > > formats the man page source code, using the groff program in turn. > > > Part of the formatting is making intervals between

Re: Non-sensical DNF Functionality

On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 9:28 PM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Stephen Morris wrote: > > Yes, but this still highlights the final question as "sudo dnf download > > symlinks-1.7-11.fc41.src" does the download but as shown above "sudo dnf > > install symlinks-1.7-11.fc41.src" won't do the install. > > >

Re: Non-sensical DNF Functionality

On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 8:53 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 7/12/24 12:35, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 8:30 PM Stephen Morris > wrote: > > I have enabled the Fedora source repository so that I can install the > symlinks source.l >

Re: Non-sensical DNF Functionality

On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 8:30 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > Hi, > I have enabled the Fedora source repository so that I can install the > symlinks source.l > Having enabled the source repository I issued the command "sudo dnf > install symlinks-1.7-11.fc41.src" (the binary package tells me

Re: F40: NetworkManager with CA Certificate

On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:52 AM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > I have been trying to connect with NetworkManager using eduroam > > According to the instructions: I am supposed to use the following: > > > Security type: WPA2-Enterprise > Encryption type: AES > EAP method: Protected

Re: Fedora 41 systemd or its dependencies now includes qemu

On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 8:16 PM Patrick Mansfield via users wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:32:48AM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > If you aren't using any containers, then it should be fine to remove. If > > it's only a recommends, then you could probably just uninstall qemu anyway. > > Why is

Re: What Does the Symlinks Command do?

On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 4:55 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > Hi, > Following DNF producing message about dangling symlinks again even though > I removed dangling symlinks a couple of days ago, I ran "sudo symlinks -r / | > grep -i dangling" which showed dangling lock symlinks for Firefox and >

Re: DNF Upgrade Package Removal Query

On Sun, Dec 1, 2024 at 5:08 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > I got the output below when I ran sudo dnf upgrade about half an hour > ago. Looking at /usr/lib the issue is the .build_id folder doesn't exist > hence the message is reasonable. The issue I have with this is, is that > folder suppos

Re: Python 2 to 3 conversion

On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 5:27 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 30/11/24 23:27, Bob Marčan via users wrote: > [...] > The python way to isolate from the OS is to use the venv machinary. > I'm guessing from your response you are not familiar with it. > > How to build rpm: > > python setup.py bdist_rpm

Re: security issue?

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:25 PM home user via users wrote: > > (f-40, stand-alone workstation, gnome) > > A few times in the past couple of months, I've received the following > warning from "chkrootkit": > - - - - - - > bash.1[~]: chkrootkit > ROOTDIR is `/' > Checking `amd'... not found > [snip

Re: QR code scanning

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 8:55 PM Tim via users wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 16:34 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > > I want to read a code that comes to me via web page. > > My usual browser is firefox. > > I'm kind of curious what websites give you a QR code to scan, but don't > give you any l

Re: Python 2 to 3 conversion

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 11:53 PM Tim via users wrote: > > Tim: > > > Don't give XYZ your Gmail password when it asks you to log-on with > > > an email address and password. Argh. > > Patrick O'Callaghan: > > Very easy to misunderstand. The site should be clear that they want > > *their* passw

Re: Does Dragon Player support MP4 on Fedora?

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 5:06 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-11-21 at 02:29 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I have an MP4 clip that I am trying to watch on F41. When I double > > click the MP4, Dragon Player opens with

Does Dragon Player support MP4 on Fedora?

Hi Everyone, I have an MP4 clip that I am trying to watch on F41. When I double click the MP4, Dragon Player opens with two buttons: Play File and Play Stream. (It does not show the MP4 that caused Dragon Player to launch). I cannot seem to get the MP4 to play, even if I select Play File and brows

Re: Fedora 41, TrippLite UPS connecting and disconnecting continuously?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:25 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:08 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > > > > I installed fedora 41 workstation on a spare partition on > > my system, when I try to boot I get a neverending series of > > messages about the

Re: Fedora 41, TrippLite UPS connecting and disconnecting continuously?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:08 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > > I installed fedora 41 workstation on a spare partition on > my system, when I try to boot I get a neverending series of > messages about the TrippLite UPS connecting then disconnecting. > > I fixed this by unplugging the USB cable on the UPS

Re: After upgrade to F41 unable to change propeties of Plasma desktop icons

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 1:23 PM Frank Bures wrote: > > On 2024-11-20 13:06, Frank Bures wrote: > > > I was talking about right-clicking an icon on the desktop, clicking > > Properties and then trying to save the change by clicking OK. > > That's when the error message is generated. > > > > I belie

Re: Python 2 to 3 conversion

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:16 AM Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Go Canes wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 8:45 AM Patrick O'Callaghan > > wrote: > >> > >> I'm attempting to convert a small Python-2 script to Python-3. > > > > How small? It might be easy to do by-hand. I.e., if it is aborting > > o

Re: Strange DNF Scriptlet Message for F42 Received on F41

On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:21 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > What do these messages mean for F41? > > >>> Running post-install scriptlet: > >>> java-17-openjdk-headless-1:17.0.13.0.11-3.fc41.x86_64 > >>> Finished post-install scriptlet: > >>> java-17-openjdk-headless-1:17.0.13.0.11-3.fc41.x86_6

Re: Fedora F41 Hard Disk Performance

On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:46 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 18/11/24 10:36, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Yes, a full cache can cause performance issues, but I would expect to be able > to play around with the caching algorithms to control what gets cached and > what doesn't, particularly when looking

Re: might be off topic

On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 10:04 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 2024-11-16 18:35, bruce wrote: > > Hi Roger. If I understand your reply. You're saying you purchased a > > wifi adapter and I guess got a USB wifi adapter?? Am I missing something? > > No, you open it up and replace the internal wifi mo

Partial dnf-system-upgrade and broken dnf?

Hi Everyone, I attempted a dnf-system-upgrade on an old server (F40) to match the new server (F41) I've been setting up for the migration. The dnf-system-upgrade on the old server went sideways after step 3: `dnf system-upgrade reboot`. On the old server, it appears the upgrade partially happened.

Re: gcc/gsl

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 1:33 PM Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > I am not sure this issue is entirely relevant on this mailing list. > Maybe you could redirect me. > > The same application (relatively heavy code), provides different values when > it > is run and compiled on 2 different machines

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 11:07 PM Tim via users wrote: > > Samuel Sieb: > > > I have never done any of those post-install processes. > > Patrick O'Callaghan: > > Not even 'rpmconf' to merge .rpmnew files? > > Some people never customise their configurations, so even that probably > shouldn't be a c

Re: DNF Group Issue

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:28 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > In earlier versions of Fedora to F41, and earlier versions of DNF, the > command dnf group list used to list the Gnome and KDE/Plasma groups as > installed, and listed the Mate and XFCE groups as installable, now it no > longer does

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:04 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 11/11/24 1:59 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Am I doing something wrong then when I did not have to do any cleanup > > for the system to be in this state? > > As a side issue, I might be treading on thin ice here, I have never done > > any o

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 2:15 PM Charlie Dennett wrote: > > When upgrading following the instructions at > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline/, > make sure you perform the optional post upgrade tasks like Clean up retired > packages, clean up old packages, c

Re: clean-up of old kernel fragments.

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:15 PM home user via users wrote: > > On 11/8/24 5:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 11/8/24 10:15 AM, home user via users wrote: > >> While doing those "rpm -qf" commands, 2 questions came to mind. > >> 1. Suppose [dir] has sub-directories. If I do "rpm -qf [dir]/*", will

Re: Systemd-resolved

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 1:02 AM jarmo wrote: > [...] > > So, I disable systemd-resolved and manually create /etc/resolv.conf > to get my network working. Disabling a service only lasts until the next (re)boot. And it does not stop currently executing services, and the service can still be started

Re: Remove disk encryption in Maintenance Mode

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 8:03 PM Roger Heflin wrote: > > The encryption defaults changed sometime recently. I don't see the change documented at or . That's unfortunate. > The

Re: DNF Needs Restarting Repository Update

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:57 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 7/11/24 19:30, Barry wrote: > > On 6 Nov 2024, at 22:11, Stephen Morris wrote: > > I ran a sudo dnf update which updated and loaded the two F41 Updates > repositories and then put on the updates. Immediately after the update > fini

Re: DNF Needs Restarting Repository Update

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 4:57 PM Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2024, at 17:11, Stephen Morris wrote: > > why was that updated again, surely that repository was flagged as up to > > date by the prior dnf update? > > Not 100% sure but I suspect something in dnf needs-restarting is looking f

Re: DNF Needs Restarting Repository Update

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 5:26 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-11-07 at 09:11 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Hi, > > I ran a sudo dnf update which updated and loaded the two F41 > > Updates repositories and then put on the updates. Immediately after the > > update finished I ran

Re: clean-up of old kernel fragments.

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 5:04 PM home user via users wrote: > > On 11/6/24 11:12 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > [...] > >>> Related, be sure to look in /lib/modules for old kernel artifacts. > >>> There have been several bugs related to proceccessing old kernel

Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 2:55 PM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > On Wed Nov06'24 01:50:18PM, Roger Heflin wrote: > > From: Roger Heflin > > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:50:18 -0600 > > To: noloa...@gmail.com, Community support for Fedora users > > > > CC: Ranjan Maitra > > Reply-To: Community sup

Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:54 AM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > I recently got a 16TB USB disk and was trying to mount it on Fedora 40 using > spacefm. I get the following: > > Mount /dev/sdb: > > Status: Finished with error (Exit status 1). > > Object /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/block_devices/sd

Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 1:10 PM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > On Wed Nov06'24 11:59:42AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > From: Jeffrey Walton > > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:59:42 -0500 > > To: Community support for Fedora users > > CC: Ranjan Maitra > >

Re: clean-up of old kernel fragments.

On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 5:43 PM home user via users wrote: > > On 10/25/24 12:45 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:42 PM home user via users > > wrote: > >> > >> (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.

Re: Certbot fails

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:47 PM steven stern wrote: > > I'm having issues with SSL renewal via certbot. The script that's been > working for years is now failing with a "timeout" trying to fetch the > ".well-known/acme-challenge" files. I don't think anything's changed in my > configuration. I'

Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:54 AM Ranjan Maitra via users wrote: > > I recently got a 16TB USB disk and was trying to mount it on Fedora 40 using > spacefm. I get the following: > > Mount /dev/sdb: > > Status: Finished with error (Exit status 1). > > Object /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/block_devices/sd

Re: Problem during upgrade to F41

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:35 AM Frank Elsner via users wrote: > > my "dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=41" gives > > Error: > Problem: package network-scripts-openvswitch-3.2.2-1.fc39.x86_64 from > @System requires network-scripts, but none of the providers can be installed >

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:38 PM wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 12:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > RPMFusion users may want to wait for the third party repository to > > rebuild its packages for F41. > > RPMfusion repos are already on F41. Conflicting NVIDIA Packages

Re: OT: Fedora 40 to 41 update - Strange WINEHQ issue.

On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 7:13 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: > > Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well > except for WINEHQ? > The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade > the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17?? > > So, not clear why t

Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 5:14 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-11-03 at 17:02 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 4:57 PM Stephen Morris > > wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > Does this mean that with the tracer add

Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 4:57 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > [...] > > Does this mean that with the tracer addin no longer working there is no way > to get the equivalent functionality with dnf at update time? According to the dnf5 man page, you should install the 'dnf5-plugins' package. Then the 'nee

Re: Strange DNF Post Install Script Message With F41

On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 4:10 AM Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 1/11/24 10:32, Colin J Thomson wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thursday 31 October 2024 22:46:29 Greenwich Mean Time Stephen Morris wrote: > > HI, > Following Patrick's thread about dnf tracer plugin I installed that > plugin again and got the

Re: Strange DNF Post Install Script Message With F41

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:47 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > > >> Running trigger-install scriptlet: > >> glibc-common-0:2.40-3.fc41.x86_64warning: posix.fork(): .fork(), .exec(), > >> .wait() and .redirect2null() are deprecated, use rpm.spawn() or > >> rpm.execute() instead This is being worked on

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:40 PM Tim via users wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 19:16 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > > And note I was the person that worked the hard cases for a company > > with > 5,000 licenses, so if most senior linux resource at a company > > with that sort of licenses are gettin

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 9:37 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:27:43 -0700 > ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > > And Bugzilla got things fixed > > Not everything. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451562 > > Reported 2008, now listed on the historic bug register :

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Post Fedora 41 upgrade - sshd problem

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:40 PM Max Pyziur wrote: > > > On 10/31/2024 1:32 PM EDT Charlie Dennett wrote: > > > > > /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 57: Bad key types > > > 'ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,rsa-sha2-512,rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ssh-ed25519'. > > > /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 58: Bad key types > >

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:47 AM Max Pyziur wrote: > > My personal setup is three Fedora machines (two laptops), a Windows 10 > laptop, and an older desktop used for backup/storage. > > The last has been running a variant of CentOS for the longest time; backup is > done hourly on the Fedora machi

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:18 PM Dave Close wrote: > > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? > I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. I don't run X so I can't say for certain. But there's a lot of X11 gear in the standard repos: $ d

dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Hi Everyone, I just upgraded three machines to Fedora 41 using . The machines were two desktops and one server. All the machines use the default Fedora repos; and they do not use third party repos. The process went as expe

Re: dnf disable-repo???

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 5:25 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 10/28/24 13:39, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/28/24 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> fedora 41 > >> > >> What am I doing wrong here? > >> > >> # cd /etc/yum.repos.d/ > >> # ls > >> brave-browser-rpm-r

Re: clean-up of old kernel fragments.

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:42 PM home user via users wrote: > > (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3) > > Selected command output... > > -bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel > kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64 > kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64 > -bash.3[~]: > > -bash.3[~]: rpm -qa kernel

List manually installed packages for a machine migration

Hi Everyone, I have some old hardware that needs a refresh. The old machine is running Fedora 40 x86_64 fully patched. The new machine is running the same on a fresh OS install. I want to get a list of packages I manually installed on the old machine, like Certbot, Emacs and Nginx, so I can config

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 1:07 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 10/23/24 21:26, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users > > wrote: > >> > >> $ rpm -qa kernel > >> kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64 > >

Re: terminal open errors

On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 12:39 AM Tim via users wrote: > > ToddAndMargo: > > Sort of like the firefighter whose house burns down > > whilst he is out putting someone else's house out. > > Just up the road from me, the firestation's kitchen caught fire while > they were out on a job, another station

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > $ rpm -qa kernel > kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64 > kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64 > kernel-6.11.4-201.fc40.x86_64 > > Problem, only the 38 kernel shows in grub. > > How do I get the 40 kernel to show in grub? Let me Google that for

Re: How do I start MATE from the command line?

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 7:20 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > I have both MATE and Xfce installed. > Whilst I work on my xinit/lightdm problems, > I am firing up my GUI with startx. > > startx fires up xfce by default. > > How to I tell startx I want to fire up MATE? Let me Google that for yo

Re: My from address on this list

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 3:09 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/21/24 11:28 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:58 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> > >> On 10/21/24 9:09 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >>> Why does my "From:"

Re: My from address on this list

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:58 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/21/24 9:09 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > Why does my "From:" come out "Community support for > > Fedora users" when my posts show on this list? > > There are certain providers who have spam protection settings that cause > proble

Re: why am I still on 39?

On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 8:57 PM Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2024, at 20:30, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > (Fedora 41 is called Rawhide at the moment until it is released. See > <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/rawhide/>). > > Fedora Linux 41 w

Re: why am I still on 39?

On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 8:18 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > On 10/20/24 17:09, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/20/24 4:34 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >> More info: > >> > >> # dnf install fedora-beta-repo > > > > I don't know what you're expecting that to do. That package doesn't > > s

Re: urgent major problem after f39 to f40 upgrade.

On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 12:07 AM home user via users wrote: > > On 10/12/24 7:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 10/12/24 6:13 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >> I would definitely consider some post-upgrade clean-ups as detailed in > >> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 8:17 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote: > > Folks, > this is an issue that has me frustrated. I created a VM under VMware > and VirtualBox and allocated 400GB as the disk size. I installed the > F40 server iso on the VM, and it showed the disk size as 400GB, and the > install wen

Re: urgent major problem after f39 to f40 upgrade.

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 8:16 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/12/24 5:07 PM, home user via users wrote: > > [...] > >> What does "systemctl status gdm" show now? I have no idea how it got > >> disabled, but if it still is, then try "systemctl enable --now gdm". > > > > It showed "disabled". I enter

Re: filezilla and firewalls

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:44 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:43 AM Tim via users > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 15:03 +0100, Will McDonald wrote: > > > If it's definitely FTPS (as opposed to SSH-based SFTP) it looks like

Re: filezilla and firewalls

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 8:43 AM Tim via users wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 15:03 +0100, Will McDonald wrote: > > If it's definitely FTPS (as opposed to SSH-based SFTP) it looks like > > that needs ports 990 and 989. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTPS > > The Filezilla configuration is

Re: filezilla and firewalls

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 7:49 PM Tim via users wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 14:05 +0100, Will McDonald wrote: > > Can you use `openssl s_client` to validate the certificate chains in > > each scenario? > > On the one PC, only the timestamps differ... > > using working ethernet

Re: urgent major problem after f39 to f40 upgrade.

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:46 PM home user via users wrote: > > (replying to multiple posts) > [...] > > (Samuel) > > If I boot from the f-39 entry, uname -a says I'm running f-39. > > If I boot from the f-40 entry, uname -a says I'm running f-40. > > Regardless of which grub line I use to boot, rp

emacs-nox installs 622 MB of packages???

Does this look reasonable to anyone, given I am trying to install a lightweight version of emacs without the gear for window managers and desktop environments on a Fedora Server? I just need to edit files... - $ sudo yum install emacs-nox ... =

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 3:41 PM Roger Heflin wrote: > > I have personally done g1(3.5" scsi) -> g5(2.5" sas) (initrd rebuild > to use the correct drivers + dd to clone onto a SAN disk, boot up new > machine on livecd and dd back to the local disk). > > And done many g5/g6/g7/g8/g9/g10 to various d

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 2:02 PM George N. White III wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:07 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I have a Fedora Server running F40 on an old Proliant G5 with hardware >> RAID1. The machine is giving too much trou

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 11:23 AM Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > > On 27 Sep 2024 at 19:05, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > From: Jeffrey Walton > Date sent: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 19:05:31 -0400 > Subject:Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 8:57 AM Barry Scott wrote: > > On 28 Sep 2024, at 00:05, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Does anyone have experience with a migration like this? If so, can you > provide feedback? > > I have always considered it better to make a new install on new hardware

Re: Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 1:42 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > Am 28.09.2024 um 01:05 schrieb Jeffrey Walton : > > > > I have a Fedora Server running F40 on an old Proliant G5 with hardware > > RAID1. The machine is giving too much trouble so I would like to > > migrat

Move Fedora Server to new machine, RAID1 -> Single disk

Hi Everyone, I have a Fedora Server running F40 on an old Proliant G5 with hardware RAID1. The machine is giving too much trouble so I would like to migrate to newer hardware with a single SSD. Both machines are x86_64. I've been researching methods to perform the migration, but I am not clear on

Re: Valeton GP-100

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 6:59 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-09-22 at 17:05 +0100, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > > On 19 Sep 2024, at 16:56, Patrick O'Callaghan > > > wrote: > > > > > > 0024:err:ole:com_get_class_object class > > > {4ce576fa-83dc-4f88-951c-9d0782b4e376} not register

  1   2   3   4   5   >