* Seth Kenlon [2020-02-26 12:20]:
> This website: http://adoptopenjdk.net has pretty much changed my life with
> regards to Java. It's so much better and clearer than anything Oracle or
> Sun ever had for installing Java. You should see if your customer/client is
> interested in adopting (or at le
On Thu., Feb. 13, 2020, 15:12 ToddAndMargo via users, <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 30,
>
> A customer with one of those custom programs is getting
> a pop up
>
> https://ibb.co/gZ6TZsb
>
> telling him he is going to have to start paying for Java.
>
> The s
rs,
Deepak
> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 10:07 AM, Deepak Bhole
> wrote:
>
>
> * JUSTIN TAYLOR [2016-12-26 12:15]:
> > I have a 3rd party app that use a Java GUI, so it won't run on a headless
> > JVM. I had it working until I installed a different app using dn
* JUSTIN TAYLOR [2016-12-26 12:15]:
> I have a 3rd party app that use a Java GUI, so it won't run on a headless
> JVM. I had it working until I installed a different app using dnf. It
> overwrote my JVM with a headless one and now the Java GUI app is broken. Is
> there a way to install/regis
* Chris Kottaridis [2014-05-01 13:25]:
> I have an F19 and an F20 host and when I try to start a webex on the
> F20 host it doesn't work right. It works fine on the F19 machine.
>
> The symptom is that when I start the webex in F20 it sends up a
> message about wanting to run an applet and I tell
* Ranjan Maitra [2014-01-28 15:02]:
> I have been having this error since this morning: I has no problems
> last Thursday when I last used this so some update must have created
> some problem somewhere.
>
> $ pdftk --nup 2x2 random.pdf
> /usr/bin/build-classpath: Failed to set JAVACMD
> Can't get
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
16:43]:
> On 22/07/13 16:26, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
> >16:10]:
> >>On 22/07/13 16:00, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
16:10]:
> On 22/07/13 16:00, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
> >15:51]:
> >>On 22/07/13 15:44, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>This is what I have:
> >>&
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
15:51]:
> On 22/07/13 15:44, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >This is what I have:
> >
> >[root@box10 bobg]# ll /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
> >lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 27 Jul 22 12:55
> >/etc/alternatives/libjava
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
15:28]:
> On 22/07/13 14:56, poma wrote:
> >€ alternatives --list | grep plugin
> >€ alternatives --config libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
> >
> >€ ll /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so
> >… /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so ->
> >/etc/al
* Neal Becker [2013-02-20 07:02]:
> Anyone know if I can view cisco webex on f18 x86_64 natively? It doesn't
> seem
> to work. I can view using a windows VM.
>
What problem are you seeing? Does it load at all (and just parts of it
don't work)?
Deepak
> I'm wondering if maybe installing su
* Deepak Bhole [2012-10-22 11:38]:
> * Roger [2012-10-22 05:13]:
> >I do hope someone can help me here.
> >I am learning Ruby on Rails.
> >It requires javascript to be installed for both Firefox and Chromium
> >browsers.
> >Following t
* Roger [2012-10-22 05:13]:
>I do hope someone can help me here.
>I am learning Ruby on Rails.
>It requires javascript to be installed for both Firefox and Chromium
>browsers.
>Following the instructions at
>[1]http://www.java.com/en/download/help/linux_x64rpm_install.xml
>
* Junayeed Ahnaf [2012-10-18 08:14]:
>Hello,
>I changed to oracle jre & jdk which is working fine. Now I need to
>remove openjdk, but when I give "yum remove java-openjdk" it wants to
>remove 575 MB of files (which includes vize and eclipse and LO).
>Can't I *just* remove the o
* Fernando Cassia [2012-09-18 12:40]:
>On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda
><[1]callka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> after this it works fine. Thanks a lot Deepak.
>
>The big question is not if this solved your particular case, but why
>did it happen in the first
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:33]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:16]:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:03]:
> >
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:16]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:03]:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:55]:
> >
&
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:03]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:55]:
...
> >
> > Ah okay, so let's see if firefox even sees a plugin -- can you make the
> > screenshots public so I ca
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:55]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:38]:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:25]:
> >
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:38]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:25]:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:02]:
> >> &g
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:25]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:02]:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I use fedora 17 64 bit and my firefox version is 12.0. Java applets
> >> are not run
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:02]:
> Hi,
>
> I use fedora 17 64 bit and my firefox version is 12.0. Java applets
> are not run in firefox. I have icedtea-web installed and following are
> the content of my /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugin/
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 Jun 8 21:28 libflashp
* Fernando Cassia [2012-07-14 00:07]:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > A mistake as well. The 03 there derives from the same macro that 1.7.0.3
> > derives its "3" from -- that macro mistakenly was not updated.
> >
> > The "fedo
* Mateusz Marzantowicz [2012-07-13 16:58]:
> On 13.07.2012 22:49, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Fernando Cassia [2012-07-13 14:50]:
> >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> >> wrote:
> >>> There is 1.7.0.5 package for Fedora 17 but it&#
* Fernando Cassia [2012-07-13 14:50]:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> wrote:
> > There is 1.7.0.5 package for Fedora 17 but it's not pushed to upstream
> > repos jet.
>
> Thanks Mateusz!
>
Hi,
The current java-1.7.0-openjdk packages in Fedora are u5. There was a
mis
* Fernando Lozano [2012-05-31 15:12]:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> >java-1.6.0-openjdk and java-1.7.0-openjdk can co-exist side by side
> >happily -- you can even use alternatives to switch the default if you
> >really want to.
> >
> >We just cannot ship 6 in F17 because it will EOL well before F17 does
> >a
* Fernando Lozano [2012-05-31 09:26]:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> >>I find this design decision very odd, exactly for the reasons you
> >>mentioned. Java 7 is, to my knowledge, far from universally supported. I
> >>would have waited for at least another release or two before phasing out
> >>Java 6.
> >We di
* Fernando Cassia [2012-04-13 07:26]:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:11, T.C. Hollingsworth
> wrote:
> > If you're using Firefox, just click on a JNLP file, choose Other from
> > the "Open with" dropdown, enter "/usr/bin/javaws", and check the "Do
> > this automatically" box, and you'll be all set.
* Heinz Diehl [2011-12-15 02:23]:
> On 15.12.2011, mike cloaked wrote:
>
> > It's possible that the bank web site may only work with Oracle Java
> > 1.7 (or Sun Java) but not openjdk - it may be worth installing it and
> > get the browser to use the alternative java jre.
>
> Thanks Mike, that d
* ferna...@lozano.eti.br [2011-11-04 10:05]:
>Hi there,
>I saw messages on the archives stating that OpenJDK 7 would be the
>default Java for Fedora, such as:
>http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2011-08/msg01586.html
>But the features page states that OpenJDK 6 will be the d
* Per Anton Rønning [2011-10-12 14:38]:
> Ian Malone wrote:
> > On 12 October 2011 14:09, Per Anton Rønning wrote:
> >
> >> Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository:
> >> kde-redhat. Please verify its path and try again
> >>
> >
> > Looks like there might be a few
* Per Anton Rønning [2011-10-11 15:50]:
> Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * John Pilkington [2011-10-09 10:23]:
> >> On 09/10/11 14:33, John Pilkington wrote:
...
...
> >>> John P
> >> Anyway I don't see icedtea rpms from any of my usual repos in f14, but
&g
* John Pilkington [2011-10-09 10:23]:
> On 09/10/11 14:33, John Pilkington wrote:
> > On 09/10/11 14:04, Per Anton Rønning wrote:
> >> Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>> * Per Anton Rønning [2011-10-06 05:12]:
> >>>> Hi suomi,
> >>>&
* Ian Malone [2011-10-03 17:32]:
> Hi,
>
> A long time ago (before iced tea and openjdk) I installed Sun Java on
> my Fedora system (I see the jpackage website still exists, though it's
> a bit quiet). And through subsequent upgrades I gradually ended up
> with alternatives (as in alternatives --
* Per Anton Rønning [2011-10-07 12:03]:
> Ian Malone wrote:
> >
> > No, it indicates a missing Java class and probably indicates your java
> > setup is broken. Deepak suggestion of trying IcedTea is definitely
> > worth trying, though I'm not sure how far developed it is in fedora 9.
> >
>
> I
* Per Anton Rønning [2011-10-06 05:12]:
> Hi suomi,
> No, I have not. Do you have any experience with that one?
Hi Per,
Can you please try with the IcedTea-Web plug-in and let us know if it
works? Installation is simple. First remove libnpjp2.so out of the way
and then run as root:
1. yum insta
* Deepak Bhole [2011-09-15 18:19]:
> * Per Anton Rønning [2011-09-15 17:51]:
> > The problem listed in the subject line seems to be widespread. Svereal
> > people report this problem on various discussion lists.
> > As soon as Firefox tries to start a plugin, it breaks dow
* Per Anton Rønning [2011-09-15 17:51]:
> The problem listed in the subject line seems to be widespread. Svereal
> people report this problem on various discussion lists.
> As soon as Firefox tries to start a plugin, it breaks down with a
> message "this is embarrasing" etc. I have not yet found
* Antonio Olivares [2011-05-31 20:35]:
> Dear folks,
>
> I am happily running Fedora 15 on several boxes. Our school will be
> switching from VistaNet to PowerSchool Online systems by Pearsons. We used
> to do attendance/grading on Vistanet and now we will use Powerschool online
> Gradebook
* Clemens Eisserer [2011-05-27 06:10]:
> Hi,
>
> Are there pre-built packages of OpenJDK7 for Fedora-15? Maybe in some
> repos disabled by default?
> I know it has not reached final yet, I just like the bleeding edge ;)
>
Hi Clemens,
At the moment there are no OpenJDK7 packages for Fedora. We
* Alex [2010-12-07 10:49]:
> Hi,
>
> > *** NSPlugin Wrapper ***
> > WARNING:(../src/npw-wrapper.c:2537):invoke_NPP_HandleEvent: assertion
> > failed: (rpc_method_invoke_possible(plugin->connection))
> >
> > *** NSPlugin Viewer *** WARNING: unhandled variable 18 ( > variable>) in NPN_GetValue()
>
* Alex [2010-12-06 09:34]:
> Hi,
>
> > Can you give us a bit more information?
>
> Thanks for your offer to help. Much of this was provided in my
> previous posts on this thread, but for completeness, here is all that
> I can provide:
>
> > Your architecture
>
> FC13, x86_64.
>
> > The web pa
* Michael Cronenworth [2010-10-27 16:34]:
> Kevin Martin on 10/27/2010 03:30 PM wrote:
> > What are the permissions for /opt? Are you sure that the vpnagentd wasn't
> > installed as part of some rpm?
>
> No RPM was installed. I was not prompted by PackageKit or by any other
> tool for my root
* Michael Cronenworth [2010-10-27 16:00]:
> Fedora 13 x86_64 with OpenJDK (not Sun) installed.
>
> I was required to login to a web site today to configure a VPN and the
> site installed a Cisco VPN Java applet. When it was finished installing
> and was running I noticed the processes where run
* Walter Cazzola [2010-09-13 10:14]:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> >Just went through the bcel package ... looks like it has a specific
> >requirement on java-gcj-compat. There is no way around that requirement
> >at your endpoint.
>
> Ok, I see
&g
* Walter Cazzola [2010-09-13 09:56]:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> >You need to create a dummy package that provides those things. The
> >jpackage compat packages will do that for you though, so once you
> >install them, it should be fine.
>
&
* Walter Cazzola [2010-09-10 12:33]:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> >* Walter Cazzola [2010-09-10 11:34]:
> >>Dear all,
> >>On my Fedora 13 machine I've to use the sun/oracle jdk distribution. To
> >>install and configure this i
* Walter Cazzola [2010-09-10 11:34]:
> Dear all,
> On my Fedora 13 machine I've to use the sun/oracle jdk distribution. To
> install and configure this is not a problem (downloaded the bin from the
> sun web site and run it).
>
May I ask what it is specifically that requires Sun/Oracle that
Ope
* William Case [2010-08-31 10:59]:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:49 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * William Case [2010-08-30 17:14]:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > > Just some clarification and double checking.
>
> >
> > Which Canadian Govt. website are
* William Case [2010-08-30 17:14]:
> Hi;
>
> Just some clarification and double checking.
>
> I want to use a Canadian government site with Firefox on Fedora 13. I
> get the warning message that I need Sun JVM 1.6.0_3 or greater. There
> is nothing in the repositories that I can see resembling
* Erik P. Olsen [2010-08-05 18:39]:
> On 05/08/10 23:01, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Erik P. Olsen [2010-08-05 16:51]:
> >>On 28/07/10 23:21, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >>>On 28/07/10 18:11, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>>* Erik P. Olsen [2010-07-28 02:02]:
&
* Erik P. Olsen [2010-08-05 16:51]:
> On 28/07/10 23:21, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >On 28/07/10 18:11, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>* Erik P. Olsen [2010-07-28 02:02]:
> >>>On 28/07/10 01:54, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>>>On 07/26/2010 03:48 PM, Erik P. Olsen w
* Parshwa Murdia [2010-08-03 05:29]:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> > Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
> > JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do?
>
>
> Not a p
* Parshwa Murdia [2010-08-02 08:10]:
> I have installed JRE (Sun Java) according to the website:
>
> http://sites.google.com/site/indiadoor/java-jre
>
> But the matter is that the installed version is JRE 1.6.0 Update 20
> and have disabled Open JDK, but how to update this JRE (Sun Java) in
> th
that?
>
> No, but I have been working with Deepak Bhole on trying to solve the problem.
> It
> is probably one of the bugs which is impossible to fix.
>
Yeah, this has been one of those troubled applets :/
Erik, which was the last build you tried? I think it is worth
re-visit
* Joerg Bergmann [2010-07-26 06:34]:
> Am 26.07.2010 11:41, schrieb Andrew Haley:
> > On 07/25/2010 05:43 AM, Bob Hartung wrote:
> >
> >> I have loaded Fedora13 without a hitch and am impressed by the
> >> improvements!
> >>
> >> However, I am just now beginning Java programming and I am
* Jurek Bajor [2010-06-11 13:51]:
> Hi,
> I use Fedora's Java plug-in and my system is up-to-date.
> No plug-in in add-ons in Firefox; also Java test applet on Internet confirms
> it.
Hi,
Can you please type 'about:plugins' in the firefox URL bar, hit enter,
and then copy/paste the output?
Th
* Patrick O'Callaghan [2010-04-27 15:27]:
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:03 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Patrick O'Callaghan [2010-04-27 12:48]:
> > > [Apologies to those who already saw this on the Fedora-KDE list. I
> > > posted there 24 hours ago and g
* Patrick O'Callaghan [2010-04-27 12:48]:
> [Apologies to those who already saw this on the Fedora-KDE list. I
> posted there 24 hours ago and got not a single reply, so I hope this
> doesn't count as cross-posting]
>
> I don't use Java much (basically just for the New York Times Acrostic
> puzzl
* Patrick O'Callaghan [2010-01-18 09:53]:
> F12 x86_64, updated. I'm using Google Chrome as my default browser, but
> its only in 32-bit and Java (java-1.6.0-openjdk) doesn't work, in the
> sense that Java elements on a page are simply blank and about:plugins
> shows nothing for Java. I even linke
60 matches
Mail list logo
