hich can potentially provide better security.
If version needs to be frozen after install, it can be added to the dnf exclude
list.
Deepak
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 9:12 AM ToddAndMargo via users <
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
>
hoose to disable updating it; that
action is unrelated to Fedora, which does not distribute Oracle JDK.
Deepak
> Many thanks,
> -T
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le..
installed but it is
not seeing/loading them (we have never seen this before though)
2. A bug in dnf where it uninstalled the GUI enabled package due to some
weird conflict
Are you able to reproduce this issue, or do you still have access to the
system where the problem is happening?
Chee
7;
and you will be able to run GUI apps. Apps distributed via Fedora should
have the proper dependencies (on headless vs full package); if you
notice that once does not, please open a bug against that package.
Cheers,
Deepak
> Thanks
> ___
> us
.
>
Hi Chris,
Is it possible for us to reproduce this? If so, what are the steps?
Thanks,
Deepak
> Thanks
> Chris Kottaridis
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
et JAVACMD
> Can't get ouput from /usr/bin/build-classpath itext bcprov bcmail
> bctsp: Success
>
> What is going on? How do I fix this?
>
Hi,
What does 'java -version' output?
Deepak
> Many thanks,
> Ranjan
>
> --
> Important Notice: This mailbox
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
16:43]:
> On 22/07/13 16:26, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
> >16:10]:
> >>On 22/07/13 16:00, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
16:10]:
> On 22/07/13 16:00, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
> >15:51]:
> >>On 22/07/13 15:44, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>This is what I have:
> >>&
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
15:51]:
> On 22/07/13 15:44, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >This is what I have:
> >
> >[root@box10 bobg]# ll /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
> >lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 27 Jul 22 12:55
> >/etc/alternatives/libjava
n't seem to recognize it. Should it show up in FF
> preferneces as a plug-in? There's nothing there ...
>
Hi Bob,
Looks like it is installed fine. What does about:plugins in Firefox
display?
Cheers,
Deepak
> --
>
> http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
>
> bo
* Neal Becker [2013-02-20 07:02]:
> Anyone know if I can view cisco webex on f18 x86_64 natively? It doesn't
> seem
> to work. I can view using a windows VM.
>
What problem are you seeing? Does it load at all (and just parts of it
don't work)?
Deepak
> I'm
* Deepak Bhole [2012-10-22 11:38]:
> * Roger [2012-10-22 05:13]:
> >I do hope someone can help me here.
> >I am learning Ruby on Rails.
> >It requires javascript to be installed for both Firefox and Chromium
> >browsers.
> >Following t
ails, it appears to be only an upgrade.
>Thanks in advance
>Roger
>
Hi Roger,
Have you tried using OpenJDK that is available in Fedora? It has a fully
functional Web browser plugin (via icedtea-web package) that works with
Firefox and Chrome out of the box.
What document are you u
nds on components installed by the OpenJDK
RPMs. The only way it would be removable is if you use a wrapper RPM to
install the Oracle JDK such that it provides the necessary java*
dependencies.
Cheers,
Deepak
>Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproje
* Fernando Cassia [2012-09-18 12:40]:
>On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda
><[1]callka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> after this it works fine. Thanks a lot Deepak.
>
>The big question is not if this solved your particular case, but why
>
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:33]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:16]:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:03]:
> >
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:16]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:03]:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:55]:
> >
&
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 12:03]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:55]:
...
> >
> > Ah okay, so let's see if firefox even sees a plugin -- can you make the
> > screenshots public so I ca
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:55]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:38]:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:25]:
> >
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:38]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:25]:
> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:02]:
> >> &g
* Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:25]:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Kalpa Welivitigoda [2012-09-18 11:02]:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I use fedora 17 64 bit and my firefox version is 12.0. Java applets
> >> are not run
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 86256 May 15 20:20 libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so
>
> any help to get java plugin working firefox?
>
Hi,
What does 'readlink -f /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so' show?
Deepak
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
* Fernando Cassia [2012-07-14 00:07]:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > A mistake as well. The 03 there derives from the same macro that 1.7.0.3
> > derives its "3" from -- that macro mistakenly was not updated.
> >
> > The "fedo
* Mateusz Marzantowicz [2012-07-13 16:58]:
> On 13.07.2012 22:49, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Fernando Cassia [2012-07-13 14:50]:
> >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> >> wrote:
> >>> There is 1.7.0.5 package for Fedora 17 but it&#
es in Fedora are u5. There was a
mistake in the rpm release naming whereby the release was not bumped.
The 1.7.0.5 rpms on
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=12373 do not
provide anything additional for x86/x86_64, they are just rebuilds for
fixes for secondary archi
* Fernando Lozano [2012-05-31 15:12]:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> >java-1.6.0-openjdk and java-1.7.0-openjdk can co-exist side by side
> >happily -- you can even use alternatives to switch the default if you
> >really want to.
> >
> >We just cannot ship 6 in F17 beca
6 again and you will probably have to re-install.
java-1.6.0-openjdk and java-1.7.0-openjdk can co-exist side by side
happily -- you can even use alternatives to switch the default if you
really want to.
We just cannot ship 6 in F17 because it will EOL well before F17 does
and we cannot ship a
op Entry]
Name=IcedTea Web Start
Comment=IcedTea Application Launcher
Exec=/usr/bin/javaws.itweb %f
Icon=javaws
Terminal=false
Type=Application
NoDisplay=true
Categories=Network;WebBrowser;
MimeType=application/x-java-jnlp-file;
X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.18
Is something missing above?
Deepak
>
a/log/* and /tmp/console.log files (after
removing anything sensitive).
Cheers,
Deepak
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines:
will be optional.
The original intent was to make 7 the default in F16, but we had to
abandon that approach after discovering multiple package build failures
with 7. Since building some packages with 7 and some with 6 would break
compatibility, we decided to stay with 6 as default.
Cheers,
Dee
is weird:
> Retryin rpm install gives
> $rpm -i java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.10.b09.fc9.i386.rpm
> package java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.10.b09.fc9.i386 is already installed
>
Thats the main package. You need to install the -plugin subpackage.
Cheers,
Deepak
--
users m
* Per Anton Rønning [2011-10-11 15:50]:
> Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * John Pilkington [2011-10-09 10:23]:
> >> On 09/10/11 14:33, John Pilkington wrote:
...
...
> >>> John P
> >> Anyway I don't see icedtea rpms from any of my usual repos in f14, but
&g
* John Pilkington [2011-10-09 10:23]:
> On 09/10/11 14:33, John Pilkington wrote:
> > On 09/10/11 14:04, Per Anton Rønning wrote:
> >> Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>> * Per Anton Rønning [2011-10-06 05:12]:
> >>>> Hi suomi,
> >>>&
but haven't found anything useful.
>
The java plug-in has always been controlled by a separate alternative
than java/javac. AFAIK, libjavaplugin.so[.x86_64], java and javac are
the only alternatives you need to manage. Those are the master
alternatives that control the remaining ones.
Cheers,
De
* Per Anton Rønning [2011-10-07 12:03]:
> Ian Malone wrote:
> >
> > No, it indicates a missing Java class and probably indicates your java
> > setup is broken. Deepak suggestion of trying IcedTea is definitely
> > worth trying, though I'm not sure how far develope
eb Plugin (using IcedTea-Web 1.0.4 (fedora-1.fc15-x86_64))
Please make sure libnpjp2 does not show up in that list.
Cheers,
Deepak
> I am also uncertain about which of libjavaplugin_oji.so
> and libnpjp2.so is the correct plugin to use. Some info tells me that
> the latter one is the o
* Deepak Bhole [2011-09-15 18:19]:
> * Per Anton Rønning [2011-09-15 17:51]:
> > The problem listed in the subject line seems to be widespread. Svereal
> > people report this problem on various discussion lists.
> > As soon as Firefox tries to start a plugin, it breaks dow
to
> usr/java/jre1.6.0._27/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so,
> both in /opt and (created by myself) /opt/plugins.
> Does anyone have a suggestion as to what will fix this problem?
>
Are you seeing this with the OpenJDK plug-in too? I've beeing using FF6
with it for a whil
years successfully and now the
> system changes again and I want to be ready.
>
As Andrew Haley pointed out, java-1.6.0-openjdk provides "Java". Note
however that the plugin is not provided by that RPM. It is provided by
the icedtea-web RPM as of F15.
Cheers,
Deepak
ges for Fedora. We are working
on it however and intend to provide a parallel installable rpm (with the
OpenJDK6 rpm) soon.
Cheers,
Deepak
> Thanks, Clemens
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admi
with Flash
though. I'd try disabling flash to see if it still crashes. If not, you
know that Flash is definitely the problem and can then concentrate on
narrowing down what within flash is the issue..
Cheers,
Deepak
> It would be helpful to know if this problem is loca
history. How can I view the previous crash reports?
>
> This is definitely something that happened with a recent update.
> Firefox was working fine since I installed FC13 (just slow, as
> always), but it never crashed. Now I'm afraid to even use it.
>
After a crash, there should
#x27;t involved, the only thing I can think of
that allowed this was either the browser being started as root without
realizing it, or something prompting you for the root password.
Cheers,
Deepak
> $ rpm -qa | grep -i cisco
> (no results)
> $ rpm -qa | grep -i vpn
>
> $ ll /opt
&g
to turn off this "feature" ASAP.
>
Such a thing should/would not be allowed. Applets run as normal users
and escalated privileges would imply a severe security violation in the
base os itself.
How did you install/run the applet?
Deepak
> Thanks,
> Michael
> --
>
* Walter Cazzola [2010-09-13 10:14]:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> >Just went through the bcel package ... looks like it has a specific
> >requirement on java-gcj-compat. There is no way around that requirement
> >at your endpoint.
>
> Ok, I see
&g
* Walter Cazzola [2010-09-13 09:56]:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> >You need to create a dummy package that provides those things. The
> >jpackage compat packages will do that for you though, so once you
> >install them, it should be fine.
>
&
* Walter Cazzola [2010-09-10 12:33]:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> >* Walter Cazzola [2010-09-10 11:34]:
> >>Dear all,
> >>On my Fedora 13 machine I've to use the sun/oracle jdk distribution. To
> >>install and configure this i
t; a clean installation without useless software (it is a production guest
> for virtual box with few space at disposal).
>
> So there is a way to convince yum that I've installed java and to use it
> when I'll try to add some java related software?
>
You can try installing th
* William Case [2010-08-31 10:59]:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:49 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * William Case [2010-08-30 17:14]:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > > Just some clarification and double checking.
>
> >
> > Which Canadian Govt. website are
et it?
>
> (Irony => the site isn't working in WindowsXP Explorer either)
>
Which Canadian Govt. website are you trying to visit? There was a bug
open about that but it should be fixed in the latest OpenJDK release in
Fedora..
Cheers,
Deepak
> --
> Regard
* Erik P. Olsen [2010-08-05 18:39]:
> On 05/08/10 23:01, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Erik P. Olsen [2010-08-05 16:51]:
> >>On 28/07/10 23:21, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >>>On 28/07/10 18:11, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>>* Erik P. Olsen [2010-07-28 02:02]:
&
* Erik P. Olsen [2010-08-05 16:51]:
> On 28/07/10 23:21, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >On 28/07/10 18:11, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>* Erik P. Olsen [2010-07-28 02:02]:
> >>>On 28/07/10 01:54, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>>>On 07/26/2010 03:48 PM, Erik P. Olsen w
* Parshwa Murdia [2010-08-03 05:29]:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> > Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
> > JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do?
>
>
> Not a p
JRE (Sun Java) in
> the terminal?
Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do?
Cheers,
Deepak
> --
>
> Regards,
> Parshwa Murdia
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lis
that?
>
> No, but I have been working with Deepak Bhole on trying to solve the problem.
> It
> is probably one of the bugs which is impossible to fix.
>
Yeah, this has been one of those troubled applets :/
Erik, which was the last build you tried? I think it is worth
re-visit
n bugs and try to fix whatever we can. However the proprietary nature
of many applets makes it quite challenging -- impossible in some cases
without decompiling their code, which is something we cannot do.
What is the bug# for the Elster system not working?
Cheers,
Deepak
1: http://icedtea.c
then copy/paste the output?
Thanks,
Deepak
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
--
use
* Patrick O'Callaghan [2010-04-27 15:27]:
> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:03 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Patrick O'Callaghan [2010-04-27 12:48]:
> > > [Apologies to those who already saw this on the Fedora-KDE list. I
> > > posted there 24 hours ago and g
the same Java rpm, but
> with the
> plugin
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0.x86_64/jre/lib/amd64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
>
Konqueror does not use the IcedTea plugin, as it does not support the
necessary APIs. AFAIK, konqueror can only use its own Java plugin
(/usr/l
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> On 04/09/2010 11:00 AM, Deepak wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just burned the DVD of F12 and trying to clean install. At some point it
>> shows message that "local media found" but in the installation process,
Hi,
Just burned the DVD of F12 and trying to clean install. At some point it
shows message that "local media found" but in the installation process, it
is pulling everything from network. Why is that? Did it detected the newer
updated version from the repository?
Regards
Deepak
--
use
in rawhide. I will backport it to F12 as
soon as it is beta/more stable.
Until then, as much as I don't want to tout closed source on Fedora, the
Sun plugin is the only option for Java on Chromium.
Cheers,
Deepak
> poc
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedor
62 matches
Mail list logo
