Re: [SOLVED] suppose I remove nvidia card?

On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 09:35:20PM +, Bob Marčan via users wrote: On Mon, 05 May 2025 17:13:10 -0400 "Jon LaBadie" wrote: On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 02:48:29PM -0600, home user via users wrote: >(sigh)  time to try to catch up, at least a little. > ... A year or 2 ago my 660 card was actin

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 8:18 PM, home user via users wrote: # gpart /dev/sdb Begin scan... Possible partition(DOS FAT), size(14782mb), offset(3mb) End scan. Checking partitions... Partition(DOS or Windows 95 with 32 bit FAT, LBA): primary Ok. Guessed primary partition table: Primary partition(1)    type: 0

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 9:29 PM, Mike Wright wrote: On 5/5/25 20:18, home user via users wrote: [... snip ...] # fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 14.44 GiB, 15504900096 bytes, 30283008 sectors Disk model: Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (mi

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 20:18, home user via users wrote: read all the way to the end; don't stop too soon! On 5/5/25 8:46 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 5:57 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/5/25 6:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 5:08 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/5/25 5:41 PM, Samuel Sieb

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On 5/4/25 3:53 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, I have two servers affected by: restore: : ftruncate: Invalid argument https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359295 This is pretty critical to me.  And pretty much anyone using dump/restore.   The maintainer seems to be ignoring t

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On 5/5/25 3:08 PM, Will McDonald wrote: On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 18:54, ToddAndMargo via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: On 5/5/25 3:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2025-05-04 at 15:53 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I

Re: recovering back-up.

read all the way to the end; don't stop too soon! On 5/5/25 8:46 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 5:57 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/5/25 6:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 5:08 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/5/25 5:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 3:55 PM, home user via use

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On Mon, 05 May 2025 14:19:05 -0700 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote --- > Dump/restore is an ancient set of commands from the days of reel-to- > reel tape drives, and is designed for backup of entire volumes. There > are several superior backup systems around now, but for an existing >

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On Mon, 05 May 2025 16:25:51 -0700 Will McDonald wrote --- > On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 23:53, ToddAndMargo via users > wrote: > > I have two servers affected by: > > > > restore: : ftruncate: Invalid argument > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359295 > > dump/restor

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 5:57 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/5/25 6:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 5:08 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/5/25 5:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 3:55 PM, home user via users wrote: Here's a mount attempt: - - - - - # fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 14.44 GiB,

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 6:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 5:08 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/5/25 5:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 3:55 PM, home user via users wrote: Here's a mount attempt: - - - - - # fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 14.44 GiB, 15504900096 bytes, 30283008 sectors Disk model

Re: HP laserjet 3600n

I have the same issue with a different HP printer.  Trying to do ./hplip-3.25.2-plugin.run results in error: fedora-41 version is not supported, so all dependencies may not be installed. However trying to install using fedora-40 version packages. Then later I get SELinux must run in permiss

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 6:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 5:08 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/5/25 5:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 3:55 PM, home user via users wrote: Here's a mount attempt: - - - - - # fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 14.44 GiB, 15504900096 bytes, 30283008 sectors Disk model

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 5:08 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/5/25 5:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 3:55 PM, home user via users wrote: Here's a mount attempt: - - - - - # fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 14.44 GiB, 15504900096 bytes, 30283008 sectors Disk model: Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 6:27 PM, Go Canes wrote: On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 7:41 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: [...] mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt [...] Unless you are already root that probably should be "sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt" I'm already root. -- ___ users mailing list -- u

Re: recovering back-up.

On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 7:41 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > [...] > mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt > [...] Unless you are already root that probably should be "sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt" -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 5:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/25 3:55 PM, home user via users wrote: Here's a mount attempt: - - - - - # fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 14.44 GiB, 15504900096 bytes, 30283008 sectors Disk model: Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 51

Advanced Github Notifier Firefox plugin layout issue

Is anyone using this Firefox plugin? https://github.com/freaktechnik/advanced-github-notifier I'm just wondering if anyone else is seeing the same problem, or not. The rendering of notifications, in the notification popup, is slightly garbled. It looks like the rendered font is a little bit

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 3:55 PM, home user via users wrote: Here's a mount attempt: - - - - - # fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 14.44 GiB, 15504900096 bytes, 30283008 sectors Disk model: Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 23:53, ToddAndMargo via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > I have two servers affected by: > > > > restore: : ftruncate: Invalid argument > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359295 > > dump/restore is actively supp9rted in "upstream", but not > in

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/5/25 3:37 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/2/25 3:58 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/2/2025 4:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: never been able to figure out how to manually (from the command line) mount something.  File browsers do that for me nicely. "sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt" Thank-you, Sam

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On 5/4/25 3:53 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, I have two servers affected by: restore: : ftruncate: Invalid argument https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359295 This is pretty critical to me.  And pretty much anyone using dump/restore.   The maintainer seems to be ignoring t

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 18:54, ToddAndMargo via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 5/5/25 3:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2025-05-04 at 15:53 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I have two servers affected by: > >> > >> restore: : ftruncate: In

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/2/25 3:58 PM, home user via users wrote: On 5/2/2025 4:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: never been able to figure out how to manually (from the command line) mount something.  File browsers do that for me nicely. "sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt" Thank-you, Samuel. I was expecting a follow-up to t

Re: [SOLVED] suppose I remove nvidia card?

On Mon, 05 May 2025 17:13:10 -0400 "Jon LaBadie" wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 02:48:29PM -0600, home user via users wrote: > >(sigh)  time to try to catch up, at least a little. > > > >The card was in there solidly.  I had a hard time getting it out. It > >would have been difficult and time c

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 10:54 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 5/5/25 3:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2025-05-04 at 15:53 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I have two servers affected by: > > > > > > restore: : ftruncate: Invalid argument > > >

Re: on dnf update, system hung in restorecon

On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 17:23 +0100, Barry wrote: > > > On 5 May 2025, at 10:41, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > Just tried that and system came back immediately. > > See the man page. Without a path to check the command does nothing. > I am not sure what is an appropriate command line to use. >

Re: [SOLVED] suppose I remove nvidia card?

On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 02:48:29PM -0600, home user via users wrote: (sigh)  time to try to catch up, at least a little. The card was in there solidly.  I had a hard time getting it out. It would have been difficult and time consuming to try re-installing it. My choice is also me trying to think

Re: recovering back-up.

On 5/3/2025 3:17 AM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: On 3 May 2025 at 17:20, Tim via users wrote: Subject:Re: recovering back-up. To: Community support for Fedora users Date sent: Sat, 03 May 2025 17:20:54 +0930 Send reply to: Co

Re: [SOLVED] Re: suppose I remove nvidia card?

(sigh)  time to try to catch up, at least a little. On 4/28/2025 12:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 21:37 -0600, home user via users wrote: Removing the card worked. That's evidence, an argument, not proof, that the card was bad. Did you also try putting it back in again? No. The car

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On 5/5/25 3:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sun, 2025-05-04 at 15:53 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, I have two servers affected by: restore: : ftruncate: Invalid argument https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359295 This is pretty critical to me. And pretty much any

Re: on dnf update, system hung in restorecon

> On 5 May 2025, at 10:41, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Just tried that and system came back immediately. See the man page. Without a path to check the command does nothing. I am not sure what is an appropriate command line to use. Any one else know? Barry -- ___

Re: Firefox/thunderbird problem

On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 03:51 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Quick fixes if your Firefox slows down, > . Hmm, just looked at some of that, there was a bit of a how to tie your shoelaces feel to it. -- uname -rsvp Linu

Re: sub for dump/restore?

On Sun, 2025-05-04 at 15:53 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Hi All, > > I have two servers affected by: > > restore: : ftruncate: Invalid argument > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359295 > > This is pretty critical to me. And pretty much anyone > using dump/restore. The m

Re: on dnf update, system hung in restorecon

On 5/3/25 10:05 AM, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 1:16 PM Robert Moskowitz wrote: Today, on attempting resuming after suspending my system before boarding my plane.  My system hung. So I powered cycled, and since I have not done an update in over a we

Re: Firefox/thunderbird problem

On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 4:27 PM François Patte wrote: > > Since last update, my firefox and thunderbird are going more and more > slowly: they take 3 mn to start, when I click on a link in a mail it > takes about 2 mn to get it in firefox (which is already started). > > firefox 137.0 thunderbird 12