Re: raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Tim via users
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 02:06 +, Amadeus WM via users wrote: > Anything done in hardware must be faster than in software, so if true raid > works correctly and is being recognized by the os, I think it's > preferable. Not necessarily so. And drives in hardware raid *may* only work in that har

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Tim via users
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 20:38 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > Trying to add a nameserver. > > On PC B, I have > Global > Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported > resolv.conf mode: stub > > Link 2 (enp3s0) > Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6 >

Re: raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/2/25 6:06 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote: On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 17:20:11 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: If the OS can see all 4 drives, then the "RAID" isn't hardware RAID and isn't really doing anything. Is there a reason you don't want to use the Linux software RAID? It's generally a better opt

Re: raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Samuel Sieb writes: If the OS can see all 4 drives, then the "RAID" isn't hardware RAID and isn't really doing anything. Is there a reason you don't want to use the Linux software RAID? It's generally a better option. Here's one data point on why Linux mdraid is better. Many years ago Gru

Re: raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Amadeus WM via users
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 19:40:08 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote: > It is termed "fakeraid". It is not hardware raid. The only hardware > that exists for it is a couple of entries in the bios and on the disk > saying the disk are raid. > > All of the work is done in the driver/OS. > > And generally on lin

Re: raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Amadeus WM via users
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 17:20:11 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 3/2/25 2:09 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote: >> I just built a brand new pc with a Gigabyte B650 Gaming AX v2 >> motherboard with 2xnvme drives and 2xssd drives. In UEFI I configured >> two raid-1 arrays, one for nvme and one for ssd. Then

Re: raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Roger Heflin
It is termed "fakeraid". It is not hardware raid. The only hardware that exists for it is a couple of entries in the bios and on the disk saying the disk are raid. All of the work is done in the driver/OS. And generally on linux (and windows) it has been poorly supported and always needed an add

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/1/25 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: I have 2 PC A and B. Before A what connected to the world wireless and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired). PC A lost its wireless connection. Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I want to have PC A connecte

Re: raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/2/25 2:09 PM, Amadeus WM via users wrote: I just built a brand new pc with a Gigabyte B650 Gaming AX v2 motherboard with 2xnvme drives and 2xssd drives. In UEFI I configured two raid-1 arrays, one for nvme and one for ssd. Then booted from the Fedora 41 live image and started the installatio

Re: raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Amadeus WM via users
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 22:54:04 +, Barry wrote: >> On 2 Mar 2025, at 22:10, Amadeus WM via users >> wrote: >> >> Gigabyte B650 Gaming AX v2 motherboard > > This board does not appear to have hardware raid. > You may just have BIOS RAID. > > Which linux should have detected. > > Barry I thoug

Re: raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Barry
> On 2 Mar 2025, at 22:10, Amadeus WM via users > wrote: > > Gigabyte B650 Gaming AX v2 motherboard This board does not appear to have hardware raid. You may just have BIOS RAID. Which linux should have detected. Barry -- ___ users mailing list

raid issues with gigabyte mobo

2025-03-02 Thread Amadeus WM via users
I just built a brand new pc with a Gigabyte B650 Gaming AX v2 motherboard with 2xnvme drives and 2xssd drives. In UEFI I configured two raid-1 arrays, one for nvme and one for ssd. Then booted from the Fedora 41 live image and started the installation and I expected that the installer would see

[Test Day] Fedora 42 i18n Test Week 2025-03-04

2025-03-02 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee
Hello All, Fedora QA and i18n team is hosting a Fedora Test Week to test the i18n features in Fedora 42. This is nice opportunity for anyone interested in i18n or in general to get started with contributing to Fedora Project. If you are interested, please make the note of the following : Wiki p

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Patrick Dupre via users
Trying to add a nameserver. On PC B, I have Global Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported resolv.conf mode: stub Link 2 (enp3s0) Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6 Protocols: -DefaultRoute LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Tim via users
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 09:58 -0500, bruce wrote: > hey Tim. > > saw your post. could u let us know who the offending is is so we can > avoid if possible!! Hi Bruce, My fired FTTP ISP was Telstra (Australia's service from hell), that thinks it's a premium service provider despite having outsour

Re: dnf behavior

2025-03-02 Thread Todd Zullinger
Paolo Galtieri wrote: > Folks, >  a long time ago I installed a number of i686 packages on my system.  I now > want to remove them.  When I try to remove one particular package I get some > unexpected behavior. > > I do > > dnf remove pixman.i686 > > and I get: > > Package A

dnf behavior

2025-03-02 Thread Paolo Galtieri
Folks,  a long time ago I installed a number of i686 packages on my system.  I now want to remove them.  When I try to remove one particular package I get some unexpected behavior. I do dnf remove pixman.i686 and I get: Package Arch   Version Repository   Size Removi

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread bruce
hey Tim. saw your post. could u let us know who the offending is is so we can avoid if possible!! On Sun, Mar 2, 2025, 9:50 AM Tim via users wrote: > Patrick Dupre: > > > Yes the schamatics is correct. > > I set the gateway and now it works. > > > > Now > > 1) I wish to use internet from PC A

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Tim via users
Patrick Dupre: > Yes the schamatics is correct. > I set the gateway and now it works. > > Now > 1) I wish to use internet from PC A. > I guess that I need to set a name server > But not possible manually Presuming that you just mean for using the internet... If internet sharing is working, the

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Patrick Dupre via users
Thank for the feedback.   It is just a temporally solution. I must get a new doogle at the end of next week. Before I had PC A with the 2 internet interfaces connected to PC B and PC C. The setup was easy, and new had problem.   Now From PC B nmcli connection show NAME                  

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Barry Scott
> On 2 Mar 2025, at 12:25, Will McDonald wrote: > > Your life would be made a lot simpler if you had a small switch or router, as > Tim suggested. You can even get USB-powered devices. All the ISP modems I have ever seen have a 3 or 4 port switch built in. Doesn't yours? Barry --

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Will McDonald
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 at 09:12, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I set the gateway and now it works. > > Now > 1) I wish to use internet from PC A. > I guess that I need to set a name server > But not possible manually > nmcli connection modify ipv4.dns (From: https://idroot.us/fedora-41-network-configurati

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Patrick Dupre via users
Thank for the feedback.   Yes the schamatics is correct. I set the gateway and now it works.   Now 1) I wish to use internet from PC A. I guess that I need to set a name server But not possible manually   2) How do I need to set for PC 3 From PC A From PC C I tried several things