On 5/9/23, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> To be clear, what does compatible mean?
> I hope it means that an adapter does not require any electronics.
> 'Tis just an extension chord with a C-male
> on one end and an A-female on the other.
> Is that what it means?
Correct, USB-A to USB-C adapters/cords
On 05/09/2023 09:35 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/09/2023 04:48 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
(trim the quoted text down to the most recent/relevant
messages only).
This should always be done so that readers don't have to
plow through dozens of lines from various messages lookin
All -
I've tested my DMARC, DKIM, and SPF records against multiple test sites,
and it's set up correctly. I've sent email from my server to GMail, read
the headers, and all tests pass.
The problem is, as far as I can tell, EVERY server that sends mail to
mailing lists causes me to get a barr
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/09/2023 04:48 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> (trim the quoted text down to the most recent/relevant
>> messages only).
>
> This should always be done so that readers don't have to
> plow through dozens of lines from various messages looking
> for the relevant bits.
That is p
On 05/09/2023 04:48 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
(trim the quoted text down to the most recent/relevant
messages only).
This should always be done so that readers don't have to plow through
dozens of lines from various messages looking for the relevant bits.
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:35 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> I think it would be wise to send a unified message. Don't say one
> thing on the Mailing List Guidelines and another in mail messages. Say
> the same thing in both places.
Yeah, consistency is definitely a good thing,
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 09:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yeah. Perhaps 100k would be better?
> I think that would pass more of these and 100k isn't nearly as bad as
> it
> used to be.
>
100kb isn't just about bandwidth. Some of us keep a permanent archive
of the list traffic, mainly because it's m
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:35 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> [...]
> I'll try to come up with something there. If I forget,
> anyone feel free to beat me to it or suggest some changes as
> a reminder. There's two place which need adjusting, I
> believe: Keep it Short and No Attachment (which should ha
I wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Yeah, I agree... I don't have time to work on this right now, but can
>> add it to my list. Or if you want to submit a PR:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible
>>
>> There are some lists where we do pass large emails through sometimes.
>> For example the devel
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 08:28:30PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> ...snip...
>>
>> That could save some time in moderation and make things
>> clearer for list members.
>
> Yeah, I agree... I don't have time to work on this right now, but can
> add it to my list. Or if you wan
On Mon, 8 May 2023, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On 5/8/23, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Why no connectors for USB 2 at all?
USB numbers refer to the signaling/speed over the wire, USB letters
refer to the shape and size of the port. While USB 4 can only be used
with the new USB-C ports, USB 3 cou
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 08:28:30PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
...snip...
>
> That could save some time in moderation and make things
> clearer for list members.
Yeah, I agree... I don't have time to work on this right now, but can
add it to my list. Or if you want to submit a PR:
https://pagure
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 00:30 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> Tim:
> > > Huh? Aren't we using open-source software? Can't we change
> > > messages
> > > at all?
>
> Patrick O'Callaghan:
> > Not all of us who admin or moderate lists have any access to the
> > server
> > that's running the list manage
On May 9, 2023, at 02:17, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> The Lenovo Legion 5 was the only current laptop I could find with 4
> USB-A ports:
> https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/c/laptops/legion-laptops/legion-5-series
I have a Thinkpad X1 Carbon gen 11 (latest gen) on my desk now that has a USB-A
port o
Tim:
>> Huh? Aren't we using open-source software? Can't we change messages
>> at all?
Patrick O'Callaghan:
> Not all of us who admin or moderate lists have any access to the server
> that's running the list management software. I know I certainly don't.
> I can only use a web-based interface.
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 9:36 PM Michael Hennebry <
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote:
> As I cannot use my chromebook, g, I've been looking for a lpatop.
> It seems that nothing connects to USB 2.
> They might have 3 to 17 USB C connectors,
> but I have abolutely nothing that can use those.
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 20:28 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> I hesitate to suggest increasing the maximum size as all
> that does is ensure we'll have this same conversation when
> folks wonder why they can't send messages larger than 100k
> (or whatever size) to the list). But if 60k really is too
On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 18:17 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 22:39 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I don't believe it's possible. It would certainly be a welcome
> > addition, as would be a way for the admin to edit the canned
> > rejection
> > message, which currently they
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 22:39 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I don't believe it's possible. It would certainly be a welcome
> addition, as would be a way for the admin to edit the canned rejection
> message, which currently they can't do (they can edit the message
> before sending it, just not t
19 matches
Mail list logo
