Re: Exactly what is "tor"?

在 2021-04-30星期五的 23:42 -0700，ToddAndMargo via users写道： > Hi All, > > I went to tor's web site, but could not figure out > what exactly it was or how to use it with my browser. If you need to know what Tor is, wikipedia would be more helpful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)

Exactly what is "tor"?

Hi All, I went to tor's web site, but could not figure out what exactly it was or how to use it with my browser. -T ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 12:31, Jack Craig wrote: On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 9:05 PM Ed Greshko mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: On 01/05/2021 11:46, Jack Craig wrote: > adding 108.220.213.121 to /etc/resolv.conf  also doesnt seem to help... That file has nothing to do with the DNS server

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 12:59 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 19/04/2021 03:18, Jack Craig wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:52 PM Doug H. > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021, at 10:56 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 16/04/2021 17:19, Ed Gresh

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 9:05 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 11:46, Jack Craig wrote: > > adding 108.220.213.121 to /etc/resolv.conf also doesnt seem to help... > > That file has nothing to do with the DNS server. > I thought that list of NSs was the NS list used to resolve any lookup, yet

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 11:46, Jack Craig wrote: adding 108.220.213.121 to /etc/resolv.conf  also doesnt seem to help... That file has nothing to do with the DNS server. -- Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread. ___ users mailing list

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 11:28, Jack Craig wrote: On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 3:03 PM Ed Greshko mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: > > >     [egreshko@meimei ~]$ host cnn.com > 108.220.213.121 >     Using domain server: >     Name:

Re: on to letsencrypt

adding 108.220.213.121 to /etc/resolv.conf also doesnt seem to help... On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 8:28 PM Jack Craig wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 3:03 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 01/05/2021 04:32, Jack Craig wrote: >> > almost, but no seegar,... >> > >> > i and continuing to have dig loo

Re: on to letsencrypt

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 3:03 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 04:32, Jack Craig wrote: > > almost, but no seegar,... > > > > i and continuing to have dig lookups for linuxlighthouse.com < > http://linuxlighthouse.com> a is timing out(refused or servfail) > > > > anyone see my misconfiguratio

Re: btrfs system slow down with 100GB file

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 7:56 PM Roger Heflin wrote: > 388217 * 10ms = about 3800 seconds to read that file or about > 26MB/sec, but with all of the seeks most of that time will be idle > time waiting on disk (iowait), and it is very possible that parts of > the file have large extents and other p

Fwd: Re: (SOLVED) Problems upgrading to Fedora 34 openjfx and openjfz8 conflict

To whoever meets openjfx and openjfz8 conflict while upgrading from F33 to F44 By suuport received from Ed Greshko the following will solve the conflict do sudo dnf erase openjfx sudo dnf erase opnjfx8 then download an install F34 system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=34 --allowerasing

Logitech webcam works in cheese and mplayer -- not zoom under Firefox nor Chrome

I am running a fully updated F34 on x86_64 hardware. I have a Logitech QuickCam Pro 9000 web cam (webcam + microphone). I can view the video stream with cheese. I can view the video stream with mplayer. When I start zoom, I can get no video. zoom version 5.6.16888.0424-1 heese version 2:3.38

Re: Problems upgrading to Fedora 34

On 01/05/2021 09:05, Todd Zullinger wrote: Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/05/2021 06:36, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote: This the result: [efeoli@localhost ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8 There is a typo in the command, it's openjfx, not openjfix. An "i" snuck into the example command. Thanks.  I

Re: Problems upgrading to Fedora 34

Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/05/2021 06:36, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote: >> This the result: >> [efeoli@localhost ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8 There is a typo in the command, it's openjfx, not openjfix. An "i" snuck into the example command. >> package openjfix is not installed >> openjfx8-8.

Re: btrfs system slow down with 100GB file

388217 * 10ms = about 3800 seconds to read that file or about 26MB/sec, but with all of the seeks most of that time will be idle time waiting on disk (iowait), and it is very possible that parts of the file have large extents and other parts of the file are horribly fragmented. And that ignores an

Re: btrfs system slow down with 100GB file

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 6:16 PM Roger Heflin wrote: > I don't know why but the spinning disk is being crushed. > Well, a little googling after my post it appears the database is LMDB, which is a COW db. So I can see how a COW DB on top of a COW FS may be a problem, but I have marked the director

Re: download gets partial data [maybe resolved]

On 01/05/2021 01.02, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: In the last day I am having a problem downloading files. Using ff I downloaded the f34 Workstation image but the download stopped after 1.1GB of 1.9GB. I tried to download directly from the mirror and I get: $ curl -LO 'https://fedora.mirror.digita

Re: btrfs system slow down with 100GB file

I don't know why but the spinning disk is being crushed. if you divide the mb/sec by the reads you get around 4k per read (that is about as bad as you could do). if you multiply the reads/sec * r_await you get all of the time accounted for. And since each read is taking around 8-10ms (around the

Re: btrfs system slow down with 100GB file

A little thread necro... I stopped the blockchain daemon for a while and recently restarted it and am now seeing GUI freezes while it resyncs even though the file itself is marked +C... Here's the output of the requested commands: https://pastebin.com/9i0DaVpf Thanks, Richard ___

Re: Problems upgrading to Fedora 34

On 01/05/2021 06:36, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote: This the result: [efeoli@localhost ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8 package openjfix is not installed openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64 [efeoli@localhost ~]$ It looks as if openjfx8 was not removed. Perhaps I did not serached well? OK 

Re: Problems upgrading to Fedora 34

This the result: [efeoli@localhost ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8 package openjfix is not installed openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64 [efeoli@localhost ~]$ It looks as if openjfx8 was not removed. Perhaps I did not serached well? A las Viernes, 30-04-2021 en 16:24 Ed Greshko escribió: On 01

Re: Problems upgrading to Fedora 34

On 01/05/2021 06:17, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote: I am certain that I am still on F33. The download wenr fine, but the transaction test shows the error below and will not allowe installation, even with both packages removed, so it is clear that I am not running F34. Would this be abug a

Re: Problems upgrading to Fedora 34

I am certain that I am still on F33. The download wenr fine, but the transaction test shows the error below and will not allowe installation, even with both packages removed, so it is clear that I am not running F34. Would this be abug and reported to bugzilla? Or is there a way to have the upgrade

Re: Problems upgrading to Fedora 34

On 01/05/2021 04:48, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote: Thnak you so much Ed for the guidance. I was able to download the Fedora 34 distribution, removed the openjfix and openjfx8 packages, plus the two files that appear in the error message Error: Transaction test error:   file /usr/lib/.buil

Re: on to letsencrypt

On 01/05/2021 04:32, Jack Craig wrote: almost, but no seegar,... i and continuing to have dig lookups for linuxlighthouse.com a  is timing out(refused or servfail) anyone see my misconfiguration?? one error i need to address, my domain is 'linuxlighthouse.com

Re: Problems upgrading to Fedora 34

Thnak you so much Ed for the guidance. I was able to download the Fedora 34 distribution, removed the openjfix and openjfx8 packages, plus the two files that appear in the error message Error: Transaction test error:   file /usr/lib/.build-id/c7/dcd663e38adaac7a2d8d137c46f337ab5543cf from install o

Re: on to letsencrypt

almost, but no seegar,... i and continuing to have dig lookups for linuxlighthouse.com a is timing out(refused or servfail) anyone see my misconfiguration?? one error i need to address, my domain is 'linuxlighthouse.com' i have mistakenly tried to include ws.linuxlighthouse.com & www.linuxlight

Re: zabbix server/agent on F34

On 4/30/21 12:46 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: So is this a bug in the zabbix-selinux package or the zabbix_agentd package? Have you opened the SELinux Troubleshooter to see what suggestions it has, and if so, have you followed them. Doing so will probably get the program working, and you can st

Re: F34 problems

to, 2021-04-29 kello 15:46 -0600, Chris Murphy kirjoitti: > I'm not certain this is the same bug, you might file a new one against > Anaconda. Because the keyboard layout set in the installer should be > the same one picked up by plymouth, otherwise you get a nasty mismatch > and can't unlock the e

Re: F33->F34: paps output has changed

On Friday, April 30, 2021 12:45:40 PM EDT Max Pyziur wrote: > I would be interested in suggestions from other paps users on their > preferred Heh. Never tried this program before. I always use a2ps instead. But... I tried --font="monospace 6" --columns=2 for code and it's very readable. Nicer

zabbix server/agent on F34

I installed F34 in a VM and installed the zabbix server and agent.  I have updated the system to the latest.  When I run the zabbix server and agent I get a lot of SELinux alerts. SELinux is preventing zabbix_agentd from getattr access on the fifo_file /run/initctl   Source Context system_u:s

Re: download gets partial data

On Sat, 1 May 2021 01:02:25 +1000 Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > In the last day I am having a problem downloading files. > > Using ff I downloaded the f34 Workstation image but the download > stopped after 1.1GB of 1.9GB. [snip] > This looks like some sort of systemic problem somewhere. Anyone else

F33->F34: paps output has changed

Greetings, Thank you to the Fedora team for the F34 roll-out; upgrades were seamless: seemingly a trend not an anomoly. I'm a paps users (paps is a PostScript converter from plain text file using Pango), having at one time used enscript. My general CLI invocation has been: paps --columns=3

Re: failure accessing www.podtrac.com

Adding the option to wget did not work. A suggestion that the problem was corrupted DNS prompted a reboot, which resolved the issue. Thanks. On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 10:23:41 -0400 Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 4/29/21 10:16 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > Does anyone have an explanation for this network

Re: wayward wayland.

> On 28 Apr 2021, at 22:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 10:23 -0600, home user wrote: >> On 4/27/21 8:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >>> Then the next time you boot enter your hardware's setup mode and >>> check >>> the time. Make sure that it is >>> set to GMT/UTC time

How can I see a custom grub entry to be the default?

I have a PC that has Windows 10 and Fedora install in duel boot configuration. I have been using this grub config file to add the ability to boot to Windows using grub. : [1] root $ cat /etc/grub.d/09_custom #!/bin/sh exec tail -n +3 $0 # This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries.

Re: email

On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 10:29 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 11:21 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Spam. Can we assume this has been blocked? > > > > Apparently not spam, just a mistake. Apologies. > > No worries. > > This may also be a

download gets partial data

In the last day I am having a problem downloading files. Using ff I downloaded the f34 Workstation image but the download stopped after 1.1GB of 1.9GB. I tried to download directly from the mirror and I get: $ curl -LO 'https://fedora.mirror.digitalpacific.com.au/linux/releases/34/Workstation

Re: email

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 11:21 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> Spam. Can we assume this has been blocked? > > Apparently not spam, just a mistake. Apologies. No worries. This may also be a good time to point out the note added to the list footer a month or so ago:

keyboard

Hello, Is there a way to set the favorite keyboard layout before login to a desired value (and not have to change it manually)? It seems that the documentation https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-Configuring_the_Language_and_Keyboard-Layouts.html

Re: email

On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 11:21 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 17:35 -0600, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users > wrote: > > Sending in email > > efe...@bioacyl.com > > Spam. Can we assume this has been blocked? Apparently not spam, just a mistake. Apologies. poc

Re: email

On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 17:35 -0600, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote: > Sending in email > efe...@bioacyl.com Spam. Can we assume this has been blocked? poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-l