On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 06:45 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/12/17 06:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 05:05 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > (I think there may be a claim of redundancy to be made
> > > about that paring of words)
> >
> > I think there may be a claim of ortho
On 04/12/17 06:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 05:05 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> (I think there may be a claim of redundancy to be made
>> about that paring of words)
> I think there may be a claim of orthography against that spelling.
> Pedantic, moi?
>
I see the knives are
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 05:05 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> (I think there may be a claim of redundancy to be made
> about that paring of words)
I think there may be a claim of orthography against that spelling.
Pedantic, moi?
poc
___
users mailing list -- u
On 04/12/17 04:48, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 04/11/2017 11:42 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>> On 04/10/2017 11:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
You mean my ISP does not handle IPv6 correctly, right?
For the short term, is there any harm to stick to IPv4?
>>> In my opinion, it is not clear that it is
On 04/11/2017 11:42 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 11:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> You mean my ISP does not handle IPv6 correctly, right?
>>> For the short term, is there any harm to stick to IPv4?
>> In my opinion, it is not clear that it is your ISP as there are probably
>> many boxes
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:26:40 -0700
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Interesting. Are you running the Gnome or KDE desktop manager (or
> something else)? I'm running KDE. My own configuration is
> 4-core true Intel processor
> 8 Gb RAM
> Fedora-25 up to date
> KDE-5.8.6
> Firefox-5
On 04/10/2017 11:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
You mean my ISP does not handle IPv6 correctly, right?
For the short term, is there any harm to stick to IPv4?
In my opinion, it is not clear that it is your ISP as there are probably
many boxes between your system and the destination. Some owned by you
On 04/10/2017 11:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Yes, openssl does take ipv6 addresses. You just need to enclose in
brackets
openssl s_client -connect [2a04:4e42::223]:443
works fine
Huh. Seems Fedora patches openssl for that[1]. Upstream openssl
doesn't support IPv6. Adding to my confusion, the
On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 13:43 -0700, stan wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:41:01 -0700
> Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>
> > I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that
> > it is unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc. and
> > disabling hardware acceleration, but wit
On 04/11/2017 08:22 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:41:01 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that it is
unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc. and disabling hardware
acceleration, but without any im
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:41:01 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> I've go so many messages like this from the most recent firefox that it is
> unusable. I have tried removing all extensions, etc. and disabling hardware
> acceleration, but without any improvement. Therefor I downgraded to
> firefo
With the great success of our collaboration during Fedora 24 and Fedora 25 to
improve localization, this is the time to make it even better for Fedora 26.
We’re having a virtual Fedora 26 translation sprint to finish translations
prior to the next Beta release. We will be gathering online from
It is possible to skip scriplets using --setopt=tsflags=noscripts but I it
can have some negative effects
Jaroslav
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Frédéric Bron
wrote:
> > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1753 Mar 23 17:17 /etc/group
>
> that's what I have
>
> > [root@prophead ~]# lsatt
13 matches
Mail list logo
