On 08/11/16 15:59, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I am writing a .spec file for an app built with go[0].
> I first made a build following the official doc, then write a .spec file
> and built with it .rpm. Everything is OK but I have some doubts when I
> look at some other .spec files for application writ
Thanks, but your contacts and other settings were already present from an
earlier version? Because for me it hangs on binding my number, like no
internet connection.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016, 1:36 AM Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 01:11 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> > On my home laptop it's als
On 11/08/2016 01:11 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> On my home laptop it's also okay (but i haven't tried reinstall), I
> noticed that it started on my work laptop on ipv6 only network (maybe
> I'm too suspicious and the reason is different?) so at that time i
> thought a complete reinstall can fix
On my home laptop it's also okay (but i haven't tried reinstall), I
noticed that it started on my work laptop on ipv6 only network (maybe I'm
too suspicious and the reason is different?) so at that time i thought a
complete reinstall can fix that ). But my home and work systems are almost
the same
On 11/08/2016 10:46 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but there's no
> exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm a bit
> lazy to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and
> maybe support gives some answer f
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:44:00PM -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
> Did I say ANYTHING about it being bug-free? No. Maybe you should read the
> bloody post before you go spewing that diarrhea out of your mouth.
Hey, maybe time to step back from the email a little bit. This isn't
an acceptable way to t
Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but there's no
exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm a bit lazy
to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and maybe
support gives some answer finally.
The funniest thing is that it was working before
Did I say ANYTHING about it being bug-free? No. Maybe you should read the
bloody post before you go spewing that diarrhea out of your mouth.
I said that BTRFS was NOT PRODUCTION READY. (Is that big enough text for
you?)
I swear, these mailing lists are degenerating to the point of being nearly
2016-11-08 19:00 GMT+01:00, Fernando Cassia :
> Name me one piece of software that is totally bug-free. H*ck, IBM's
> JFS ate my data on OS/2 one day, on a "stable" piece of software.
I know nothing about btrfs. But I do know that there's a difference
between a piece of software "not being bug-fr
On 11/08/2016 10:00 AM, bruce wrote:
> Hey Rick!!
>
> Thanks for the reply...
>
> That was kind of going to be my thinking..
>
> I came across some apps that appear to be devOps related, one of which
> was ClusterSSH/Cluster SSH.
>
> As far as I can tell, it appears to allow you to setup the gi
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800
Rick Stevens wrote:
> My appologies for poking my nose in.
Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data point.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 11/8/16, Mark Haney wrote:
> I've been told repeatedly that BTRFS isn't production ready. I've used it
> here on a handful of servers and had nothing but trouble with it,
> stability-wise. I sure as hell wouldn't use it on /boot if I can't trust
> it for /home or /.
Name me one piece of soft
Hey Rick!!
Thanks for the reply...
That was kind of going to be my thinking..
I came across some apps that appear to be devOps related, one of which
was ClusterSSH/Cluster SSH.
As far as I can tell, it appears to allow you to setup the given
ipAdress, as well as user to run the ssh connection a
On 11/08/2016 09:40 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 09:20 AM, stan wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:02:13 +
>> Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for help anyway, I checked with lsof - seems it's using the
>>> right library
>>>
>>> lsof -p 14263 | grep libcurl
>>> Viber 14263 ks
On 11/08/2016 09:20 AM, stan wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:02:13 +
> Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
>
>> Thanks for help anyway, I checked with lsof - seems it's using the
>> right library
>>
>> lsof -p 14263 | grep libcurl
>> Viber 14263 ksy mem REG 253,1511360 1187380
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:02:13 +
Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> Thanks for help anyway, I checked with lsof - seems it's using the
> right library
>
> lsof -p 14263 | grep libcurl
> Viber 14263 ksy mem REG 253,1511360 1187380
> /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4.4.0
> ls -l /usr/li
On 11/08/2016 04:02 AM, bruce wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Trying to get my head around what should be basic/trivial process.
>
> I've got a remote VM. I can fire up a local term, and then ssh into
> the remote VM with no prob. I can then run the remote functions, all
> is good.
>
> However, I'd really like
I am writing a .spec file for an app built with go[0].
I first made a build following the official doc, then write a .spec file
and built with it .rpm. Everything is OK but I have some doubts when I look
at some other .spec files for application writen in GO, or create a spec
file for my app using
I've been told repeatedly that BTRFS isn't production ready. I've used it
here on a handful of servers and had nothing but trouble with it,
stability-wise. I sure as hell wouldn't use it on /boot if I can't trust
it for /home or /.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> On
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> That's absolutely not true. Fedora has wanted to use Btfs since... one
> of the Boston FUDCons in 2008 or 2009
>
Well, we disagree.
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary
act
Durante épocas de En
Hi.
Trying to get my head around what should be basic/trivial process.
I've got a remote VM. I can fire up a local term, and then ssh into
the remote VM with no prob. I can then run the remote functions, all
is good.
However, I'd really like to have some process on the local side, that
would all
Thanks for help anyway, I checked with lsof - seems it's using the right
library
lsof -p 14263 | grep libcurl
Viber 14263 ksy mem REG 253,1511360 1187380
/usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4.4.0
ls -l /usr/lib64/libcurl.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 2 20:21 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so
Matthew Miller writes:
> That's absolutely not true. Fedora has wanted to use Btfs since... one
> of the Boston FUDCons in 2008 or 2009. It's just never been ready,
> which is something we know because we kept asking the upstream devs and
> they kept saying "not yet, please", until they finally s
-Original Message-
From: Andre Robatino [mailto:robat...@fedoraproject.org]
Sent: dinsdag 8 november 2016 9:54
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: /boot on btrfs
> That's absolutely not true. Fedora has wanted to use Btfs since... one
> of the Boston FUDCons in 2008 or 2009. I
> That's absolutely not true. Fedora has wanted to use Btfs since... one
> of the Boston FUDCons in 2008 or 2009. It's just never been ready,
> which is something we know because we kept asking the upstream devs and
> they kept saying "not yet, please", until they finally said "look,
> please stop
25 matches
Mail list logo
