On 03/23/2016 04:31 PM, George N. White III wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:57 PM, François Patte
mailto:francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr>> wrote:
Bonsoir,
I am wondering what is in mind of packagers I have just fought for a
couple of days to have the printing service worki
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:57 PM, François Patte <
francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
> Bonsoir,
>
> I am wondering what is in mind of packagers I have just fought for a
> couple of days to have the printing service working on a fresh fc23
> install.
>
> 1- cups-browser.service is not
Bonsoir,
I am wondering what is in mind of packagers I have just fought for a
couple of days to have the printing service working on a fresh fc23
install.
1- cups-browser.service is not enabled by default. cups.service is
enabled but you cannot add printers. ok! With a little work, you can
f
Le 23/03/2016 22:38, Joe Zeff a écrit :
> On 03/23/2016 02:30 PM, Bear Tooth wrote:
>>
>> Very Dumb Question :
>>
>> I've just installed F 23, and failed to tell it to use xfce; how
>> do I fix that?? (I seem doomed never to find anything in Gnome 3.)
>>
>
> sudo dnf group install "Xfce Deskto
On 03/23/2016 02:30 PM, Bear Tooth wrote:
Very Dumb Question :
I've just installed F 23, and failed to tell it to use xfce; how
do I fix that?? (I seem doomed never to find anything in Gnome 3.)
sudo dnf group install "Xfce Desktop"
Then log out, log back in and select Xfce from the
On 03/23/2016 02:30 PM, Bear Tooth wrote:
Very Dumb Question :
I've just installed F 23, and failed to tell it to use xfce; how
do I fix that?? (I seem doomed never to find anything in Gnome 3.)
Uhm, 'dnf groupinstall "Xfce Desktop"'?
-
Very Dumb Question :
I've just installed F 23, and failed to tell it to use xfce; how
do I fix that?? (I seem doomed never to find anything in Gnome 3.)
--
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up i
On 03/23/2016 01:43 PM, Troels Arvin wrote:
When I install Fedora from a netinstall image:
Given that I initially
- check the SHA256 checksum of the Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso
file
- check the GPG signature of the file which contained the checksum
(the Fedora-Server-23-x86
On 03/23/2016 12:43 PM, Tom Rivers wrote:
On 3/23/2016 3:10 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
usage: ssh -L [bind_address:]port:host:hostport]
Here's what I'm trying:
sudo ssh -L lo.cal.ip.adx:0:rem.ote.ip.adx:110
I successfully use the following to tunnel VNC over SSH so I can
securely connect to
When I install Fedora from a netinstall image:
Given that I initially
- check the SHA256 checksum of the Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso
file
- check the GPG signature of the file which contained the checksum
(the Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM file)
Then:
How is the authenticity
Hmmm... It was almost 19 hours from the time someone first answered to
when that answer reached me.
I understand the responses. I no longer need "prelink"; it doesn't
really gain me anything. That saves me several minutes in each week's
patching.
Thank-you Dennis, Ed, Tom, and Jakob.
Bill
On 03/23/2016 12:10 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
Here's what I'm trying:
sudo ssh -L lo.cal.ip.adx:0:rem.ote.ip.adx:110
You don't need "sudo" to forward a port > 1024.
You do need a server to connect to, which you haven't given in the above
example.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapr
I assume the receiving machine and necessary routers are listening
/passing the necessary ports?
Sometimes it's a simple over site.
Fred Roller
On Mar 23, 2016 3:43 PM, "Tom Rivers" wrote:
> On 3/23/2016 3:10 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
>
> usage: ssh -L [bind_address:]port:host:hostport]
>
> Here'
On 3/23/2016 3:10 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
usage: ssh -L [bind_address:]port:host:hostport]
Here's what I'm trying:
sudo ssh -L lo.cal.ip.adx:0:rem.ote.ip.adx:110
I successfully use the following to tunnel VNC over SSH so I can
securely connect to a remote server at a hosting facility usi
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Mike Wright
wrote:
> On 03/23/2016 12:17 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Mike Wright
>> mailto:nob...@nospam.hostisimo.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Goal: connect to a remote pop3 server over an encrypted link.
>>
>> I'
On 03/23/2016 12:17 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Mike Wright
mailto:nob...@nospam.hostisimo.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Goal: connect to a remote pop3 server over an encrypted link.
I'm trying to setup port forwarding but keep receiving a usage
message inst
oh .. also, are you using ssh-keys, so you don't need to have a user/passwd
on the connect/command line?
thanks
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Mike Wright
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Goal: connect to a remote pop3 server over an encrypted link.
>
> I'm trying to setup port forwarding but keep recei
ok..
so the 0 is local, or remote to you the session/process doing the "ssh"
1) can you do an actual ssh into the remote without port forwarding.. i
know, basic, but it helps..
what you have looks right.. i'll have to check..
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Mike Wright
wrote:
> Hi all,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Mike Wright
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Goal: connect to a remote pop3 server over an encrypted link.
>
> I'm trying to setup port forwarding but keep receiving a usage message
> instead of success. Below is the excerpted man page rule I'm trying to use:
>
> usage: ssh
Hi all,
Goal: connect to a remote pop3 server over an encrypted link.
I'm trying to setup port forwarding but keep receiving a usage message
instead of success. Below is the excerpted man page rule I'm trying to use:
usage: ssh -L [bind_address:]port:host:hostport]
Here's what I'm trying:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Gary Stainburn <
gary.stainb...@ringways.co.uk> wrote:
> I've already tried two versions without much success.
>
> I did consider using the full cygwin install, but thought it over the top
> for
> what I wanted. I may give that another go before giving up and res
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:08:59AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Not to mention that with library randomization, it was utterly
> and completely useless. It prelinked libs to load at a particular
> address, then the kernel loaded them at another random address,
> thus requiring relocation anyway. The
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:46:38 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Yes, it has been obsoleted in F23. Not only was the performance increase
> debatable it
> also presented a security problem in that the libraries were locally modified
> making the
> verification of them difficult and putting the integrity
23 matches
Mail list logo
