Going off on a tangent here, so I'm deliberately splitting a thread...
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 10:38 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Run the command:
>
> man 8 mount
>
> and see the types available for "-t" option.
>
> The "general" part of this advice is that: you're using the "mount"
> co
Has anyone here used join.me on Fedora?
As a participant it is no problem. But to manage the meeting, there is
a windows exe that gets downloaded.
I had to quickly switch to a windows system for a meeting I had to run
today. Has anyone tried this? Does this exe work in WINE?
--
users ma
On 12/22/2014 01:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 04:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/22/14 02:46, Aaron Gray wrote:
There are no ntp or ntpd or systemd-timesyncd packages on F20 !
The default time sync package is now chrony.
ntp is available in the F20 repos.
AFAI
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 21:32 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/22/14 20:50, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 04:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> On 12/22/14 02:46, Aaron Gray wrote:
> >>> There are no ntp or ntpd or systemd-timesyncd packages on F20 !
> >> The default time sync pa
On 22.12.2014 22:18, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
> On 12/22/14 22:07, poma wrote:
>> Therefore, you no longer need to re/generate an initramfs after building and
>> installing patched nouveau.
>
> Isn't the nouveau module needed in initramfs? If not, why is it put
> there in the first place?
>
>
On 12/22/14 22:07, poma wrote:
Therefore, you no longer need to re/generate an initramfs after building and
installing patched nouveau.
Isn't the nouveau module needed in initramfs? If not, why is it put
there in the first place?
Lars
--
Lars E. Pettersson
http://www.sm6rpz.se/
--
users ma
On 22.12.2014 17:52, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> Am 22.12.2014 um 00:11 schrieb poma:
>> On 21.12.2014 19:45, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
>>> Am 21.12.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Heinz Diehl:
On 21.12.2014, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> I first tried the latest and greatest nouveau driver fr
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/22/14 19:53, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I'd be happier if there were some evidence that the Fedup developers
>> were keeping a note of problems.
>
> Of course that would only come about if the folks having problems would be
> so kind as to file bugzillas.
I agree that wou
On 23/12/14 02:35, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/22/14 19:53, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'd be happier if there were some evidence that the Fedup
developers were keeping a note of problems.
Of course that would only come about if the folks having problems
would be so kind as to file bugzillas.
I tried
Gesendet von: YOGA TABLET 10 HD+
Am 22.12.2014 20:37 schrieb Heinz Diehl :
>
> On 22.12.2014, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
>
> > Heinz, it was you who pointed me to the offending patch:
> > http://tinyurl.com/mz4vsr8
> > As far as I can see, the nouveau driver hasn't changed much since then.
>
> Hmm,
On 22.12.2014, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> Heinz, it was you who pointed me to the offending patch:
> http://tinyurl.com/mz4vsr8
> As far as I can see, the nouveau driver hasn't changed much since then.
Hmm, I wrote this because it seems to me that reverting this
particular commit does work for
Am 22.12.2014 um 19:48 schrieb Heinz Diehl:
On 22.12.2014, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
I then compiled it for the new kernel, but for me the problem is still
there, a noisy fan. I will investigate further...
How about finding the first official kernel with the faulty behaviour,
bisecting the of
On 12/22/14 19:48, Heinz Diehl wrote:
How about finding the first official kernel with the faulty behaviour,
bisecting the offending commit and reporting it to the lkml people?
This bugzilla-comment contains a link to the kernel patch that seem to
create problems for some of us. The question i
Am 22.12.2014 um 19:05 schrieb Rick Stevens:
On 12/22/2014 09:58 AM, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Am 22.12.2014 um 17:52 schrieb Klaus-Peter Schrage:
Am 22.12.2014 um 00:11 schrieb poma:
On 21.12.2014 19:45, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Am 21.12.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Heinz Diehl:
On 21.12.2014,
On 22.12.2014, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
> I then compiled it for the new kernel, but for me the problem is still
> there, a noisy fan. I will investigate further...
How about finding the first official kernel with the faulty behaviour,
bisecting the offending commit and reporting it to the lkml
On 12/22/14 19:10, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/22/2014 10:03 AM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
Regarding Nicks question, here I get:
$ modinfo nouveau
filename: /lib/modules/3.17.7-300.fc21.x86_64/updates/nouveau.ko
Which is the file I compiled.
I was more interested in the "version:" line, n
On 12/22/2014 10:03 AM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 12/22/14 17:52, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
2. The make process of the nouveau module finished without error, I
copied nouveau.ko to
/lib/modules/3.17.6-300.fc21.x86_64/updates/
I did exactly this, but did not realize that the kernel had been
On 12/22/2014 09:58 AM, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Am 22.12.2014 um 17:52 schrieb Klaus-Peter Schrage:
Am 22.12.2014 um 00:11 schrieb poma:
On 21.12.2014 19:45, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Am 21.12.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Heinz Diehl:
On 21.12.2014, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
I first tried the
On 12/22/14 17:52, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
2. The make process of the nouveau module finished without error, I
copied nouveau.ko to
/lib/modules/3.17.6-300.fc21.x86_64/updates/
I did exactly this, but did not realize that the kernel had been updated
since I started my computer, so after the
Am 22.12.2014 um 17:52 schrieb Klaus-Peter Schrage:
Am 22.12.2014 um 00:11 schrieb poma:
On 21.12.2014 19:45, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Am 21.12.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Heinz Diehl:
On 21.12.2014, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
I first tried the latest and greatest nouveau driver from
freedesktop
On 12/22/2014 08:52 AM, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Am 22.12.2014 um 00:11 schrieb poma:
On 21.12.2014 19:45, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Am 21.12.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Heinz Diehl:
On 21.12.2014, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
I first tried the latest and greatest nouveau driver from
freedesktop.
On 12/21/14 19:43, Aaron Gray wrote:
It should be 4.2.8 now as there are new vulnerabilities !
The following updates was submitted for testing at 2014-12-19.
For F19 in updates-testing
ntp-4.2.6p5-13.fc19
For F20 in updates-testing
ntp-4.2.6p5-19.fc20
For F21 in updates testing
ntp-4.2.6p5-2
Am 22.12.2014 um 00:11 schrieb poma:
On 21.12.2014 19:45, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Am 21.12.2014 um 18:34 schrieb Heinz Diehl:
On 21.12.2014, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
I first tried the latest and greatest nouveau driver from
freedesktop.org "as is", but the fan problem remains, so I
still
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:19:11 -0500
sean darcy wrote:
> How do you move to chrony?
Disable ntp and enable chrony.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http:
On 12/22/2014 08:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/22/14 20:50, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 04:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/22/14 02:46, Aaron Gray wrote:
There are no ntp or ntpd or systemd-timesyncd packages on F20 !
The default time sync package is now chrony.
ntp i
On 12/22/14 19:53, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'd be happier if there were some evidence that the Fedup developers
> were keeping a note of problems.
Of course that would only come about if the folks having problems would be so
kind as to file bugzillas.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others
On 12/22/14 20:50, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 04:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 12/22/14 02:46, Aaron Gray wrote:
>>> There are no ntp or ntpd or systemd-timesyncd packages on F20 !
>> The default time sync package is now chrony.
>>
>> ntp is available in the F20 repos.
>
OK.. thank you
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Chris Murphy
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Angelo Moreschini <
> mrangelo.fed...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Joachim,
>>
>> "-t vfat" worked... [?]
>>
>>
>> [angelo_user@zorro ~]$ sudo mount --type vfat /dev/sde1 /media/tmp_USB1
>>
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 04:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/22/14 02:46, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > There are no ntp or ntpd or systemd-timesyncd packages on F20 !
>
> The default time sync package is now chrony.
>
> ntp is available in the F20 repos.
>
AFAIK chrony still connects to NTP servers, h
Tony Camuso wrote:
> Updated from F20 to F21 on two systems, one a VM, the other
> bare metal. Used nonproduct to accommodate customizations.
I had a moderate experience with Fedup on two Thinkpad laptops.
One (T510) worked perfectly, except that I could not turn off the touchpad,
until told tha
Updated from F20 to F21 on two systems, one a VM, the other
bare metal. Used nonproduct to accommodate customizations.
Had zero problems.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
F
On 12/21/2014 06:51 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Sorry, I do not understand the question: SLiM is a simple login
manager. I like it, but I don't quite see why it needs to bring in
the dependency on xterm.
You should probably
32 matches
Mail list logo
