Pete Travis writes:
Whatever the intent, I hope that everyone discovers it from reading actual
documentation instead of inflammatory comments on indignant speculation about
the intent behind a one sentence feature description like "
resolved: add DNS cache ". I'm not necessarily putting you
Hi,
what say `dmesg` about /dev/sdg ?
--
Pozdrawiam
Michał
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http:/
On 11/15/2014 08:27 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I've always called systemd the world's fist computer fungus - it wants
to grow over everything.
Resistance is futile! Your functionality will be assimilated.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opt
On Nov 15, 2014 6:54 AM, "Sam Varshavchik" wrote:
>
> Making the rounds of various technical mailing lists yesterday, with a
subject that's typically a variation of "Just for yucks, and giggles" is a
link to a commit to systemd's git, adding DNS caching to systemd; in one,
huge 857 line glop. Here
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 08:53:59AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Making the rounds of various technical mailing lists yesterday, with
> a subject that's typically a variation of "Just for yucks, and
> giggles" is a link to a commit to systemd's git, adding DNS caching
> to systemd; in one, huge 8
On 11/15/14 11:30, Tom Horsley wrote:
If you are running firewalld then you want to stop firewalld,
not iptables.
Yes, I've learned that, painfully!
Now I am beginning to suspect that NFS is only allowing one computer
mounted at a time? This F-20 box is connected but I can't mount it from
th
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:26:36 -0500
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> I had tested with systemctl stop iptables and that did not help.
>
> This computer does run the firewalld and works fine with the other NFS
> server.
If you are running firewalld then you want to stop firewalld,
not i
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:18:11 -0600
Chris Adams wrote:
> Yet more unreasonable scope creep for the systemd project, and this time
> reinventing the wheel for no good reason.
I've always called systemd the world's fist computer fungus - it wants
to grow over everything.
--
users mailing list
users
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> Making the rounds of various technical mailing lists yesterday, with
> a subject that's typically a variation of "Just for yucks, and
> giggles" is a link to a commit to systemd's git, adding DNS caching
> to systemd; in one, huge 857 line glop. Here's its
Mickey wrote:
> There is no Folder View settings in this version of KDE.
What are you looking for exactly? (and where did you look expecting to find
it)?
-- Rex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:53:59 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Making the rounds of various technical mailing lists yesterday, with a
> subject that's typically a variation of "Just for yucks, and giggles" isa
> link to a commit to systemd's git, adding DNS caching to systemd; in one,
> huge 857
On 11/15/14 07:56, poma wrote:
On 15.11.2014 11:07, poma wrote:
Chapter 8. Network File System (NFS)
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/ch-nfs.html
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/pd
Making the rounds of various technical mailing lists yesterday, with a
subject that's typically a variation of "Just for yucks, and giggles" is a
link to a commit to systemd's git, adding DNS caching to systemd; in one,
huge 857 line glop. Here's its entire commit message: "resolved: add DNS
On 15.11.2014 11:07, poma wrote:
>
> Chapter 8. Network File System (NFS)
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/ch-nfs.html
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/pdf/Storage_Administration_G
On 11/15/14 05:05, Tom H wrote:
This is the problem. You have firewalld running and aren't allowing
the nfs ports through.
I have no idea how to whitelist a port with firewalld but there've
been recent instructions on this list.
I had tested with systemctl stop iptables and that did not help.
Chapter 8. Network File System (NFS)
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/ch-nfs.html
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/pdf/Storage_Administration_Guide/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-7-Storage_A
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
> On 11/15/14 02:22, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
>> wrote:
>> On the server, what's the output of:
>>
>> systemctl status nfs*
>
> [root@box48 ~]# systemctl status nf
On 11/15/14 02:22, Tom H wrote:
On the server, what's the output of:
systemctl status nfs*
But I do see the following:
[root@box48 ~]# systemctl status /nfs4exports/data
nfs4exports-data.mount - /nfs4exports/data
Loaded: loaded (/etc/fstab)
Active: active (mounted) since Fri 2014-11-14
On 11/15/14 02:22, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
I have a problem connecting this Fedora-20 computer with an NFS server. I
have just set up the server on Scientific Linux 7.
":/mnt/nasdata"?
Sorry, mistyped, an artifact from Freenas wh
On 11/14/14 21:17, Joseph Loo wrote:
can you ping the server from the client?
Yes, ping, ssh, both work as expected:
[bobg@box10 ~]$ ping -c 2 192.168.1.48
PING 192.168.1.48 (192.168.1.48) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.48: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.295 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1
20 matches
Mail list logo
