Try to use a kickstart file for the installation? Your disk apparently
is already pre-partitionned. In the kickstart file you can just assign
the partition to the mount point and off you go.
suomi
On 2014-11-03 23:11, Trey Sizemore wrote:
I have a 1TB hard drive on which I have a couple of ot
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 15:55 -0800, Marvin Kosmal wrote:
> No need for separate swap each distro..
Unless you intend to use hibernation... It dumps memory to swap as it
goes down, and resumes it from there.
--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.16.6-203.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Sat Oct 25 13:08:51
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:11:07 -0500
Trey Sizemore wrote:
> Am I missing something? Is this possible?
Ever since the new and deproved anaconda partitioning,
I've taken to always installing on a nice empty virtual
machine, then copying the new VM disk to where I actually
want it installed. A little
@@ as said
>I have a 1TB hard drive on which I have a couple of other Linux distros
i>nstalled. Distro 1 has its root on /dev/sdb1 and then swap as
>/dev/sdb2 with the home partition on dev/sdb5. Distro 2 has its root on
>/dev/sdb6, swap on /dev/sdb7, and home o
I have a 1TB hard drive on which I have a couple of other Linux distros
installed. Distro 1 has its root on /dev/sdb1 and then swap as
/dev/sdb2 with the home partition on dev/sdb5. Distro 2 has its root on
/dev/sdb6, swap on /dev/sdb7, and home on /dev/sdb8.
When I go to install Fedora 20, it s
On 11/02/2014 09:04 AM, bruce issued this missive:
> Hi.
>
> Got a network of fed/centos boxes.. The boxes are a combination of
> eth, and wifi, with ra3070 chipset.
>
> We reverse tunnel into a couple of the boxes that are wifi, as well as eth.
> The boxes have dhcp.
> We're using a dyndns kind
Hi,
I've just migrated my encrypted rootfs to a larger drive - after
changing UUIDs in a few places and recreating initramfs using dracut
everything seems to work fine again.
However, running brup2-mkconfig results in grub2 detecting my linux
installation over and over again:
grub2-mkconfig -o g
Hi Frank,
I did it..,
Thank you
regards
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:47:30 +0200
> Angelo Moreschini wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > first of all I thank all those who have tried to help me.
> > Now I have lost hope that this problem is currently solved by
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 03:30 -0800, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> That switch was only a year and change old. Just enough to take it
> out of the 1 year warranty.
Check your local trading standards. Here, one year warranties are not
exactly 365 days, they have to be extended by a reasonable amou
Ed Greshko writes:
> As I mentioned in a previous message, I would have suggested rebooting
> the GWwhich may also solve it as it may not be an actual port
> problem just that it got into a "condition". :-)
It would be nice if it were that simple. That switch was only a year
and change old
On 11/03/14 14:58, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
> The only semi-rational explanation I have for this at the moment is that
> internally my LAN address 10.13.3.247 maps to localhost.localdomain, so
> maybe connecting to 10.13.3.247 with nmap bypasses the firewall?
Yes. You can't check the firewall of a syst
11 matches
Mail list logo
