It seems this is a bug in the e1000e driver:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040315
2014-02-05 17:17 GMT+01:00 John Obaterspok :
>
> 2014-02-05 Jorge Fábregas :
>
> On 02/05/2014 10:29 AM, John Obaterspok wrote:
>> > I've setup a VM with default networking (NAT) and this works fine
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:42 PM, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running a new FC20 system, one that was upgraded.
>
> I'm using:
>
> systemctl -t service -a -l
>
> to check services and I'm seeing several that I don't have installed,
> exim (MTA?) for example. I've tried using systemctl disa
On 18 February 2014 07:10, William Biggs wrote:
> I have a dell computer that has a build in sound card and a hdmi video
> out put . I have my led display connected to the hdmi but no sound on
> it . f20 see the hdmi as a sound card to and set it to default . I need
> to know how to set the one o
On 02/17/2014 09:05 PM, Stephen Davies wrote:
I have just used fedup to upgrade from FC17 to FC18.
When I reboot into fedup, the screen is unreadable in graphics mode so
I changed the grub configuration to use console.
Now booting to fedup gives:
dmar:IOMMU: failed to map dmar0
and hangs/c
I have a dell computer that has a build in sound card and a hdmi video
out put . I have my led display connected to the hdmi but no sound on
it . f20 see the hdmi as a sound card to and set it to default . I need
to know how to set the one on-board to default sound card ?
--
users mailing list
u
On 17/02/14 10:13 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Digimer writes:
What would be a good (as in, relatively painless) video card for
driving as many 1080p monitors as possible? I'm not concerned about 3D
performance at all... It will be to display terminals/rarely-changing
web pages only.
I know Matrox s
Digimer writes:
> What would be a good (as in, relatively painless) video card for
> driving as many 1080p monitors as possible? I'm not concerned about 3D
> performance at all... It will be to display terminals/rarely-changing
> web pages only.
>
> I know Matrox sort of specializes in multi-moni
Hi all,
What would be a good (as in, relatively painless) video card for driving
as many 1080p monitors as possible? I'm not concerned about 3D
performance at all... It will be to display terminals/rarely-changing
web pages only.
I know Matrox sort of specializes in multi-monitor setups, but
I have just used fedup to upgrade from FC17 to FC18.
When I reboot into fedup, the screen is unreadable in graphics mode so I
changed the grub configuration to use console.
Now booting to fedup gives:
dmar:IOMMU: failed to map dmar0
and hangs/crashes/freezes.
If I reboot to FC17, the system i
Hello,
I'm running a new FC20 system, one that was upgraded.
I'm using:
systemctl -t service -a -l
to check services and I'm seeing several that I don't have installed,
exim (MTA?) for example. I've tried using systemctl disable to remove
the service, and don't get anything back.
How do I prun
On 02/17/2014 04:46 PM, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 17 February 2014, Tom Horsley sent:
>> I checked every model HP was selling, and they removed CD/DVD printing
>> from all their new printers, so I abandoned HP.
>
> Just recently, I went looking for a printer that could print on discs,
>
On 02/17/2014 01:38 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
I am running a fully updated Fedora 20, installed via fedup from Fedora
19. I am also running KDE 4.12.2 from either kde-testing or
kde-unstable.
Judging from what you write, this looks like it's a KDE issue. Have you
checked on the appropriate
Hello, Everyone
Have any of you seen anything like this before, and do you know how I
can go about fixing it?:
<http://www.afolkey2.us/gallery3/index.php/Assorted/Fedora20-Screenshot-20140217-1528>
If I reboot, the corrupted elements will go back to looking like they
are supposed to.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:14:40 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 21:43:40 +0100,
>Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >There have been multiple updates since 2.2.2-3, see
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/policycoreutils
> >but they are not in the updates repo.
> >
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 21:43:40 +0100,
Michael Schwendt wrote:
There have been multiple updates since 2.2.2-3, see
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/policycoreutils
but they are not in the updates repo.
If I visit the repo with a browser, I see 2.2.2-2 with a date from Feb 12th
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:37:58 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 18:21:41 +0100,
>Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:56:11 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> >No, something's wrong with the repos. See below. The newer 2.2.5-3.fc20
> >packages
> >are gone, includ
Hello,
I have completed my upgrade. I used the fedora-upgrade package and
command to go the slow way, Fc17 > Fc18 > FC19 > FC20.
It is working.
Much thanks.
Dave.
On 2/17/14, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/17/2014 07:51 AM, Martin Airs wrote:
>> the only thing I would add, is that you probably shoul
Hi all,
I'm trying to diagnose a crash in the Nouveau driver under F20 possibly
caused by Wine.
The crashing .so in question seems to be supplied by the
mesa-dri-drivers package, so I did:
sudo debuginfo-install mesa-dri-drivers
which installs a handful of debuginfo packages, among them
m
On 02/17/2014 07:51 AM, Martin Airs wrote:
the only thing I would add, is that you probably shouldn't use fedup, because
if I remember correctly, fedup puts an entry in the grub.conf to complete the
installation after reboot, and being a remote server, you probably dont have
access to choose this
2014-02-17 17:18, Daniel J Walsh skrev:
> On 02/17/2014 10:14 AM, Jon Ingason wrote:
>> 2014-02-17 15:56, Suvayu Ali skrev:
>>> install policycoreutils-sandbox
>> I have two machines, both x86_64. On does have
>> policycoreutils-sandbox-2.2.5-3.fc20.x86_64 installed while the other
>> don't.
>
>>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 18:21:41 +0100,
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:56:11 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
No, something's wrong with the repos. See below. The newer 2.2.5-3.fc20 packages
are gone, including the newer policycoreutils-sandbox-2.2.5-3.fc20 package.
Probably a mista
On 17 February 2014 19:24, William W. Austin wrote:
>
> Apologies if this has been answered already but I didn't see this in
> the archives and a web search didn't find anything more recent than
> FC14 (and that trick didn't work under FC19)
>
> Last week I upgraded my wife's linux box from FC17
On 17 February 2014 19:21, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:56:11 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is this a packaging bug?
>
> No, something's wrong with the repos. See below. The newer 2.2.5-3.fc20
> packages
> are gone, including the newer policycoreutils-sandbox-2.2.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:58:13 + (UTC), Beartooth wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:52:24 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Show the Yum output. If it's dependency problems caused by packaging
> > mistakes, DNF won't be able to fix it either. And you are not supposed
> > to work around it. The
Apologies if this has been answered already but I didn't see this in
the archives and a web search didn't find anything more recent than
FC14 (and that trick didn't work under FC19)
Last week I upgraded my wife's linux box from FC17 to FC19. She uses
the KDE desktop.
Saturday she announced
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:56:11 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is this a packaging bug?
No, something's wrong with the repos. See below. The newer 2.2.5-3.fc20 packages
are gone, including the newer policycoreutils-sandbox-2.2.5-3.fc20 package.
> # dnf install policycoreutils-sandbox
> Resolvi
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:58:13 + (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
> I just hit a snag. Gmane, where I read this and every list I
> can, also carries fedora.announce; so I've just subscribed to it. But
> it doesn't seem to have *any* headers!
>
> While I look for help with that, is the "bad s
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 01:52:24 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Show the Yum output. If it's dependency problems caused by packaging
> mistakes, DNF won't be able to fix it either. And you are not supposed
> to work around it. The packages ought to get corrected, provided that
> it's a bug in the pa
Hello All,
I have a Brother HL-2170W printer which works very well, but which is
not of course an Apple Air-print printer. Most of my family seem to have
Apple devices. I read somewhere that it is possible to make any printer
Air-Print compatible by modifying the Cups settings. This seemed like
su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2014 10:14 AM, Jon Ingason wrote:
> 2014-02-17 15:56, Suvayu Ali skrev:
>> install policycoreutils-sandbox
> I have two machines, both x86_64. On does have
> policycoreutils-sandbox-2.2.5-3.fc20.x86_64 installed while the other
> don't.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 05:16:35PM +0200, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 17 February 2014 16:56, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > Is this a packaging bug?
> >
> > # dnf install policycoreutils-sandbox
> > Resolving dependencies
> > --> Starting dependency resolution
> > --> Finished dependency resolution
> > Er
On Monday 17 Feb 2014 10:26:35 David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you. I will be doing:
>
> F17 > F18 > F20
>
> What issues did you run into when performing your yum update? This
> will be to a remote server and over ssh.
>
> Thanks.
> Dave.
>
the only thing I would add, is that you proba
Hello,
Thank you. I will be doing:
F17 > F18 > F20
What issues did you run into when performing your yum update? This
will be to a remote server and over ssh.
Thanks.
Dave.
On 2/17/14, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:25:59 -0500
> David Mehler wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've got
On 17 February 2014 16:56, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is this a packaging bug?
>
> # dnf install policycoreutils-sandbox
> Resolving dependencies
> --> Starting dependency resolution
> --> Finished dependency resolution
> Error: package policycoreutils-sandbox-2.2.2-3.fc20.x86_64 requires
> poli
2014-02-17 15:56, Suvayu Ali skrev:
> install policycoreutils-sandbox
I have two machines, both x86_64. On does have
policycoreutils-sandbox-2.2.5-3.fc20.x86_64 installed while the other don't.
I get exactly same result as you with yum when I try to install
policycoreutils-sandbox! So there are a
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:52:16PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Hallway talk, I'm afraid. However, we talked about actually having a
> > session (or even a mini-track, if there's a lot of interest) at the next
> > Flock about the near- and medium-term future of filesystems in Fedora.
> Is Fedora.
Allegedly, on or about 17 February 2014, Tom Horsley sent:
> I checked every model HP was selling, and they removed CD/DVD printing
> from all their new printers, so I abandoned HP.
Just recently, I went looking for a printer that could print on discs,
more out of curiosity than anything else, an
Hi,
Is this a packaging bug?
# dnf install policycoreutils-sandbox
Resolving dependencies
--> Starting dependency resolution
--> Finished dependency resolution
Error: package policycoreutils-sandbox-2.2.2-3.fc20.x86_64 requires
policycoreutils-python = 2.2.2-3.fc20, but none of the providers can
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:12:36PM -0500, Doug wrote:
> On 02/16/2014 09:35 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> >I've got a project in which I'll be making many dozens of DVDs from
> >other media, and I thought it'd be really cool to use LightScribe to
> >label the discs.
> >
> >well, I come to discover that L
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:23:30 -0500 "Garry T. Williams"
wrote:
> > It does now, but it's disabled by default. To enable, add
> > "deltarpm=true" to /etc/dnf/dnf.conf. (See the dnf.conf man page.)
>
> And, unlike yum, it does the rpm rebuild from drpm overlapped with the
> downloads. Nice:
>
>
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:46:07 +
Frank Murphy wrote:
> My HP Photosmart D5460,
> can use Gimp on F17-F20 to print to the disk surface.
> Check out the HP's for Fedora'ness
Yea, I used to have an HP which could print native
but when it died, I checked every model HP was
selling, and they removed
On 2-16-14 23:01:47 Andre Robatino wrote:
> Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes:
>
> > dnf should work just fine with F20 (it does, for me), but note
> > that it does not do delta rpm downloads. Other than that, it is
> > pretty stable.
>
> It does now, but it's disabled by default. To enable, add
>
On 17 February 2014 03:23, Doug wrote:
> On 02/16/2014 09:49 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:35:25 -0500
>> Fred Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone point me to a site that may still have it? (or other
>>> suitable substitute).
>>
>> I found light scribe labels to be almost utterly
43 matches
Mail list logo
