On 02/15/14 10:16, Christopher Thielen wrote:
> I tried Ed Greshko's suggestion of removing the bad kernels and reinstalling
> but I still end up without Nouveau support in the newly installed kernel.
>
> I believe it's not a UEFI boot, it's a Dell Latitude D630.
>
> I did notice when I boot the o
I tried Ed Greshko's suggestion of removing the bad kernels and
reinstalling but I still end up without Nouveau support in the newly
installed kernel.
I believe it's not a UEFI boot, it's a Dell Latitude D630.
I did notice when I boot the old, working kernel, I see nouveau in the
output of 'l
On 02/14/2014 04:08 PM, Chris Murphy issued this missive:
On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/12/2014 11:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
a friend asks me if there's a way to solve the following, not out
of any sense of urgency
On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 02/12/2014 11:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>
>> a friend asks me if there's a way to solve the following, not out
>> of any sense of urgency (since there are backups) but more out o
On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:52 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 12, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> it was 2G that was overwritten, not just 2M. so i'm quite willing to
>>> believe that it's unrecoverable. but that "testdis
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:16:07 +0100
poma wrote:
> /etc/udev/rules.d/10-script.rules
I hadn't thought about using udev for this. That's a good
idea, I'll give it a shot! Thanks.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On 14.02.2014 17:52, Tom Horsley wrote:
..
> I've finally dug up some pointers to some magic intel_write_reg
> commands I can run to convince the low level intel driver
> to switch back to full range RGB, and I'd like to run them
> very very early in the boot process so my screen is readable
> even
A lot of video drivers, for sure the Intel ones, set up this
stoopid "limited range" RGB output by default, which leaves
my TV looking like it has a thin layer of gauze in front
of it.
I've finally dug up some pointers to some magic intel_write_reg
commands I can run to convince the low level inte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/14/2014 09:55 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> at this point, it's more the intellectual challenge than anything,
> and given that i have a copy of the backup file which describes
> the entire volume group in detail, i have to think it should
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Mark Haney wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 02/12/2014 11:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > a friend asks me if there's a way to solve the following, not out
> > of any sense of urgency (since there are backups) but more out of a
> > sen
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> >
> > it was 2G that was overwritten, not just 2M. so i'm quite willing to
> > believe that it's unrecoverable. but that "testdisk" utility claims to
> > be finding *something*, so i'll just let
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/12/2014 11:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> a friend asks me if there's a way to solve the following, not out
> of any sense of urgency (since there are backups) but more out of a
> sense of curiosity as to whether it can even be done.
I'm
Allegedly, on or about 13 February 2014, Digimer sent:
> I think KVM has a sale today, too. 100% off all year.
Double your money back guarantee?
--
All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
public lis
As I'm not very experienced, can you give me guidelines more detailed to do
what you suggested in your prevoius e-mail?
Thank you.
Il Giovedì 13 Febbraio 2014 19:32, Chris Murphy ha
scritto:
On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 4:10 AM, L.G. wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of poma
> Sent: 14 February 2014 09:04
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: NetworkManager control of bridges
>
> On 14.02.2014 09:52, Paul K
On 14.02.2014 09:52, Paul Knox-Kennedy wrote:
> Since F20 Beta, I have been running my bridge under NM control without
> too much trauma, but on Tuesday, it stopped working. A few other users
> seemed to have an issue at the same time, and resolved it by deleting
> all NM connections and re-adding
Since F20 Beta, I have been running my bridge under NM control without
too much trauma, but on Tuesday, it stopped working. A few other users
seemed to have an issue at the same time, and resolved it by deleting
all NM connections and re-adding them. This is still not working for me.
At the moment
17 matches
Mail list logo
