Hi Team,
As one of the best digital library software we want to implement Fedora for
setting up digital library for our organization. However before starting I
would like to know about a few features of Fedora which are essential parts of
our requirements for setting up a library . Kindly clar
On 12/30/2013 07:01 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 28, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I tried to set relabel by using system-config-selinux,
but nothing happens I have to keep selinux=0 to be able to boot!
Try autorelabel=1, and in the future if you have selinux problems you
On Dec 28, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to set relabel by using system-config-selinux,
> but nothing happens I have to keep selinux=0 to be able to boot!
Try autorelabel=1, and in the future if you have selinux problems you don't
want to troubeleshoot use enforc
On 12/28/2013 08:32 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
That's strange, all my mail comes through gmail and I rarely see any
spam unless I go in and look at what they've filtered out. I only use
Thunderbird filters to sort messages into categories/directories.
SPAM is very subjective
On 12/28/2013 08:13 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I literally spent a whole hour and a half ...JUST adding email
addresses to the "Block" list...
Do you know that a big ratio of SPAM are with forged sender address?
Just try it in Thunderbird: manage identities, add, and setup a fake sender.
The system is unable to work with Centos 6.5 for connecting to the
network. Currently downloading FC20 to see if that makes a diffference
with the updated Kernel, or updated drivers.
Right now, when I do a centos install, the page that has the network
config is greyed out, so the install isn't see
On Dec 29, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Brian Hanks wrote:
> This went well until the reboot. Following the reboot I select the Fedup
> option, but nothing really happened. I ended up back in my Fedora 19 system
> while running the new Fedora 20 kernel.
You chose the fedup option in GRUB, but instead
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 03:59:47PM +1100, Roger wrote:
> I don't know if this may help but there is another possibility.
> Much of my Inbox spam/annoying garbage emails used similar words
> such as ...
True. But...
> I set up 3 filters, ...
You're reinventing. Spamassassin has provision for al
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 07:53:53PM -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I have a friend who's email service sporadically bounces my email.
> Why? Because I own my own domain, I use my hosting company's email
> servers instead of my ISP's and a small number of their customers
> are spammers. Whenever their sp
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:57:52PM +1030, Tim wrote:
> If I have to double-check, what's the point of it? Seriously! How
> different is that than just hitting delete on the way through reading
> your mail?
Nothing--if you've only, say, 10 messages. If you're talking about dozens
or hundreds, it
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 02:25:41PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> Doesn't your ISP have spam filters or are you the ISP?
Effectively, I am. I run my own mail server, and just use my ISP as a
pipe.
Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
dih...@dminet.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorap
On 12/29/2013 10:53 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/29/2013 07:37 PM, Tim wrote:
In the past, I've emailed friends, and my first or second posting has
gone into their spam bucket, without them doing anything about it.
I have a friend who's email service sporadically bounces my email.
Why? Because
On 12/30/13 11:26, William Biggs wrote:
> I'm trying to install intel xdk software . Has any one got it to to
> work ? If so how . it is asking for libudev.so.0 . I can not find it
>
Delete the symbolic link for libudev.so.0 in /opt/intel/XDK. Then.
ln -s /usr/lib64/libudev.so.1 libudev.so.
On 12/29/2013 07:37 PM, Tim wrote:
In the past, I've emailed friends, and my first or second posting has
gone into their spam bucket, without them doing anything about it.
I have a friend who's email service sporadically bounces my email. Why?
Because I own my own domain, I use my hosting co
Tim:
>> If I had to check up on it, I don't consider it trustworthy.
Robert Holtzman:
> You don't entertain the possibility that not all spam filters are 100%
> correct or that no software is 100% reliable, given the fact that it's
> all developed by humans, none of whom are 100% infallible?
I do
Tim:
>> If I had to check up on it, I don't consider it trustworthy.
Dave Ihnat:
> Again I'll say--no matter how good any anti-spam software is, there
> will ALWAYS be false positives. So on that basis, you don't like any
> of it?
If I have to double-check, what's the point of it? Seriously!
I'm trying to install intel xdk software . Has any one got it to to
work ? If so how . it is asking for libudev.so.0 . I can not find it
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedor
Allegedly, on or about 29 December 2013, Robert Moskowitz sent:
> it sure seems like at first install, was working,
> but could have just been another of those senior moments.
For several years, through different incarnations of Fedora, and on
different hardware, I've had computers where the lo
On 12/29/2013 08:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/29/2013 05:04 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
Oh, and I have lost to lock my desktop.
super-l
Got it thanks.
I only started seeing reference to the 'super' key with f20. Seems I
was blissfull
On 12/29/2013 05:04 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Oh, and I have lost to lock my desktop.
super-l
Got it thanks.
I only started seeing reference to the 'super' key with f20. Seems I
was blissfully ignorant until recently what to call that butto
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:24:14PM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:02:06 +0100
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> rpm -q exim sendmail postfix mailx
> package exim is not installed
> package sendmail is not installed
> package postfix is not installed
> mailx-12.5-10.fc20.x86_64
>
> As
Updated to F19, kernel-3.12.5-200.fc19.x86_64.
On boot I get a kernel panic around [2.2]. The trace that's on the
screen is about smp, timers, hpet. Can't read quickly enough to see what
actually happened.
/var/log/messages has no log of the kernel boot. Shouldn't there be one?
rsyslogd.conf
On 12/29/2013 04:40 AM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 12/29/2013 04:36 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
It means that the release version is, or should be, 19. However, I'd
suggest that you use package-cleanup --dupes and check to see if you
have duplicate versions of fedora-release-noarch.
You can use 'pa
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> Oh, and I have lost to lock my desktop.
super-l
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://f
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:30:40 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Since I can access to all the rpm files on the DVD, I expected to find a tool
> to
> verify the *.rpm files!
> Does it not exist?
> Something like rpm -Vp
rpm -K file.rpm
Or for many files: find . -name \*.rpm | xargs rpm -K
You could
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:16:19AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
snip...
>
> It's not uncommon for SpamAssassin to catch 400-700 a *day*. When really
> bad new campaigns start up, sometimes it can go over a thousand. Usually,
> only 5-10 get through, whereupon I feed 'em to sa-
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:41:40AM +1030, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> >> I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
> >> make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
>
> Heinz Diehl:
> > It depends. I've been receiving about 30 spam emails daily, on
> > average. A quick lo
Since I can access to all the rpm files on the DVD, I expected to find a tool
to
verify the *.rpm files!
Does it not exist?
Something like rpm -Vp
>
> Patrick Dupre writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
>
> I do not believe that updating via the distro DVD
On 12/28/2013 01:12 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Steven Stern
> mailto:subscribed-li...@sterndata.com>>
> wrote:
>
> On 12/28/2013 11:32 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> >
> > On 28/12/13 12:13, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
>
When I have a bluetooth device (jambox) connected, there's a bluetooth
indicator on the upper right of the screen, next to the network
connection indicator. When the device is disconnected, the bluetooth
indicator goes away. Is there a way to keep it visible whether there's a
device connected or no
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 08:49 +1030, Tim wrote:
> I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
> make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
I don't think so. The spam filtering system we use at work (based on
SpamAssassin with a web interface to view suspected spam)
On 29.12.2013, Tim wrote:
[CRM-114..]
> But you don't trust it enough, not to check...
No. Because email loss is strictly not acceptable. I always check back
manually. CRM-114, once trained, is pretty good, and it takes no more
than 10-15 secs to see if there's "real" email amongst all the spam.
Patrick Dupre writes:
Hello,
I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
I do not believe that updating via the distro DVD images is implemented any
more. You must use fedup to update.
However, it fails the test at 12.6%.
It there a risk to make an update using fedup?
Yes.
I always
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:41:40AM +1030, Tim wrote:
> But you don't trust it enough, not to check...
Even as good as my SA rules are, I check on a spot basis.
> If I had to check up on it, I don't consider it trustworthy.
Again I'll say--no matter how good any anti-spam software is, there
will
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 03:58:12AM -0500, David wrote:
> Wow! 30 per day? Just wow! You must have a spam magnet or something. :-)
>
> I use seven different accounts regularly and I don't get 20 in a month.
Heh. Some people change accounts to get away from spam. I've used
the same couple of add
2013/12/29 Tim
> Allegedly, on or about 29 December 2013, John Obaterspok sent:
> > Any hints on how I get the disks to spin down?
>
> Do a manual unmount, and leave it unmounted, perhaps?
>
>
Well, then it's easier to force them to suspend. The media disk is used via
smb/nfs occasionally. There
On 12/29/2013 08:43 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 07:55:12 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But for me:
[rgm@lx120e ~]$ cat Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop
cat: Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop: No such file or directory
You need to create it (copy it there) first:
cp /usr/s
Hi
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Of course. However, I only have a 3G+ connection!!!
>
I guess you can try fedup with the media option. It won't install any
broken packages. You should be able to download specific packages off the
network if necessary. I would rec
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Which version of fedup? Make sure you have the latest
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#Why_does_my_upgrade_to_Fedora_20_fail_.28immediately_reboot_to_my_old_Fedora.29.3F
I read this before I made my first attempt and I validated that
> - Original Message -
> From: Rahul Sundaram
> Sent: 12/29/13 04:39 PM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: fedora update
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
> > Howe
On 12/29/2013 3:29 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 29.12.2013, Tim wrote:
>
>> I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
>> make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
>
> It depends. I've been receiving about 30 spam emails daily, on
> average. A quick look into m
Hi
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
> However, it fails the test at 12.6%.
> It there a risk to make an update using fedup?
> I always have the option to download a package which may
> be damaged.
>
If you are upgr
Hello,
I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
However, it fails the test at 12.6%.
It there a risk to make an update using fedup?
I always have the option to download a package which may
be damaged.
Thank.
===
Patrick
Michael Schwendt writes:
It may not even be a bug in Nautilus either, since other components take
care of stopping/starting it (e.g. gnome-tweak-tool and gnome-shell).
What happens if you kill all "nautilus" processes, then start a terminal
(e.g. gnome-terminal) in a way that it starts in $HOM
Thank,
It works.
>
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:40:26 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > After cloning a distribution fedora 19, I have to set selinux=0
> > to be able to boot.
> > How can I do to avoid this option?
> > I tried:
> > fixfiles relabel
> > system-config-selinux
> >
>
Tim:
>> I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
>> make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
Heinz Diehl:
> It depends. I've been receiving about 30 spam emails daily, on
> average. A quick look into my spam-folder is enough to check if any
> serious email ac
--
Mark C. Allman, PMP, CSM
Founder, See How You Ski, www.seehowyouski.com
Sr. Project Manager, Allman Professional Consulting, Inc.,
www.allmanpc.com
617-947-4263, Twitter: @allmanpc
Follow allmanpc on Twitter View Mark Allman, PMP, CSM's profile on
LinkedIn
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 13:39 +000
Allegedly, on or about 29 December 2013, John Obaterspok sent:
> Any hints on how I get the disks to spin down?
Do a manual unmount, and leave it unmounted, perhaps?
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64
All mail to my mailbox
Hi
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Brian Hanks wrote:
>
>
> In response I removed kmod-VirtualBox, akmod-VirtualBox, and VirtualBox.
> Then I did a fedup --clean and reattempted fedup --network 20. This went
> well until the reboot. Following the reboot I select the Fedup option, but
> no
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 23:56:30 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
What "dependency error" did it report?
And how did you query the installed packages as well as the remote
repos for what would be available_after_ the upgrade?
Many users still misread such error messages and don't manage to work
arou
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:40:26 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After cloning a distribution fedora 19, I have to set selinux=0
> to be able to boot.
> How can I do to avoid this option?
> I tried:
> fixfiles relabel
> system-config-selinux
>
> But I never get a relabelling!
>
> What sh
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 07:55:12 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> But for me:
>
> [rgm@lx120e ~]$ cat Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop
> cat: Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop: No such file or directory
You need to create it (copy it there) first:
cp /usr/share/applications/gnome-terminal.desktop ~/De
Hello,
After cloning a distribution fedora 19, I have to set selinux=0
to be able to boot.
How can I do to avoid this option?
I tried:
fixfiles relabel
system-config-selinux
But I never get a relabelling!
What should I do?
Thank.
==
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:30:29 +0100
"Lars E. Pettersson" wrote:
> On 12/29/2013 01:24 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > As I stated mailx allows me to read system-mail in claws-mail.
>
> Have you changed anything in the mailx setup? /etc/mail.rc ?
>
> As far as I can tell I can only get system mail wh
On 12/29/2013 01:24 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
As I stated mailx allows me to read system-mail in claws-mail.
Have you changed anything in the mailx setup? /etc/mail.rc ?
As far as I can tell I can only get system mail when using an MTA, mailx
without any changes seem to do nothing here.
Lars
On 12/29/2013 03:00 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
The thread with the subject of "gnome-terminal in F20 defaults to / for the initial
directory" prompted me to do some testing and I've found an oddity.
The desktop file is as follows...
[egreshko@f20f ]$ cat Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop
But for me
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 12:24:14 +
Frank Murphy wrote:
Forgot a link:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pseries/v5r3/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.aix.files/doc/aixfiles/mailrc.htm
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:02:06 +0100
Suvayu Ali wrote:
rpm -q exim sendmail postfix mailx
package exim is not installed
package sendmail is not installed
package postfix is not installed
mailx-12.5-10.fc20.x86_64
As I stated mailx allows me to read system-mail in claws-mail.
From: Anacron
To: ro
Hello,
I have a SSD disk as system disk and a:
- HDD as backup drive that is used a couple of times each week
- HDD as media disk that is perhaps used a couple of times each day
I've tried to set the spindown to 1 hour of being idle via gnome-disks.
Problem is that it never spins down.
- I've ve
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:52:12PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 08:49:23AM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 14:17:17 +0100
> > Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > > I know I can always look in the logs, but I would probably miss
> > > something if I have to do this m
On 12/29/2013 04:36 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
It means that the release version is, or should be, 19. However, I'd
suggest that you use package-cleanup --dupes and check to see if you
have duplicate versions of fedora-release-noarch.
You can use 'package-cleanup --cleandupes' to remove any old packa
On 29.12.2013, Tim wrote:
> I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
> make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
It depends. I've been receiving about 30 spam emails daily, on
average. A quick look into my spam-folder is enough to check if any
serious email
The thread with the subject of "gnome-terminal in F20 defaults to / for the
initial directory" prompted me to do some testing and I've found an oddity.
The desktop file is as follows...
[egreshko@f20f ]$ cat Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop
[Desktop Entry]
Comment[en_US]=
Comment=
Exec=/usr/bin/g
63 matches
Mail list logo
