On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> What you wrote has nothing to do with what you quoted.
The OP has known to me now...Its over but my mean to say was that some
people like "g" (who are without names), actually extend it to
increase the flame of war.
--
users mailing list
On 02.12.2013 01:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/02/13 08:02, David wrote:
>> Patrick,
>>
>> Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen
>> any complaints until recently.
>>
>> If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have
>> a good day.
>>
>
> I'm not an
>From my understanding, the thread breaking that has been occurring has been
>caused by using webmail based.
I don't understand why webmail companies
Would remove those headers.
Since iam emailing from windows phone, this may break the thread. Sorry, if it
does.
Sent from my Windows Phone
__
On 12-1-13 19:31:47 David wrote:
> So you are telling me that all of this time, while I have been
> dodging flack because mine works and theirs does not, that 'mine'
> works and theirs' does not? Really? Really?
>
> Please tell them. :-)
Actually, this is quite simple. An E-mail message that in
On 12/1/2013 7:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 12/02/13 08:02, David wrote:
>> Patrick,
>>
>> Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen any
>> complaints until recently.
>>
>> If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have a
>> good day.
>>
>
> I'm not anno
On 12/1/2013 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello every body,
>
> I am sorry for the disturbance with my replies.
> It is now 15 years that I use to use mailing list and it is the first
> time that people complains about my replies.
> What should I do ?
> Remove my signature to all my emails whi
On 12/1/2013 7:16 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On 12-1-13 19:05:12 David wrote:
>> On 12/1/2013 5:48 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
>>> On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote: Also, by the way,
>>> Microsoft ignores this RFC in its clients. :-(
>>
>> My client comes from Mozilla. So they igno
On 12/02/13 08:02, David wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen any
> complaints until recently.
>
> If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have a
> good day.
>
I'm not annoyed either, but I would refrain from calling other lis
On 12-1-13 19:05:12 David wrote:
> On 12/1/2013 5:48 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote: Also, by the way,
> > Microsoft ignores this RFC in its clients. :-(
>
> My client comes from Mozilla. So they ignore this crap too? Good for
> them.
Actually, your
On 12/1/2013 5:39 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On 12-1-13 17:03:07 David wrote:
>> That has been discussed to the ends of the universe. He and several
>> others and I use the same Mozilla Thunderbird email client. It works for
>> me and not them.
>
> I use Kmail and I also set my threading optio
On 12/1/2013 5:48 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote:
>> Without the required headers, there is no way to do proper threading.
>> It can only come close using Subject header value, date, and time.
>
> By the way, this is spelled out in RFC-2822. See
>
>
On 12/1/2013 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello every body,
>
> I am sorry for the disturbance with my replies.
> It is now 15 years that I use to use mailing list and it is the first
> time that people complains about my replies.
> What should I do ?
> Remove my signature to all my emails whi
On 12/02/13 07:46, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I am sorry for the disturbance with my replies.
> It is now 15 years that I use to use mailing list and it is the first
> time that people complains about my replies.
> What should I do ?
> Remove my signature to all my emails while it is automatically add
Hello every body,
I am sorry for the disturbance with my replies.
It is now 15 years that I use to use mailing list and it is the first
time that people complains about my replies.
What should I do ?
Remove my signature to all my emails while it is automatically added ?
I also checked my setup.
I
On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote:
> Without the required headers, there is no way to do proper threading.
> It can only come close using Subject header value, date, and time.
By the way, this is spelled out in RFC-2822. See
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt
Also, by the way, M
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 04:36:16PM +0100, M. Fioretti wrote:
> First of all, please all accept my apologies if I disappeared after
> starting this. For several reasons, the whole "project" has gone on
> hold, and I... honestly forgot there were messages that deserved an
> answer.
>
> On Thu, Nov 0
On 12-1-13 17:03:07 David wrote:
> That has been discussed to the ends of the universe. He and several
> others and I use the same Mozilla Thunderbird email client. It works for
> me and not them.
I use Kmail and I also set my threading options to try to approximate
threading by paying attention t
> On Nov 29, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 28, 2013 1:09 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 28, 2013, at 5:31 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Give a look to this proposal:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/
>
On 12/1/2013 4:53 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On 12-1-13 13:20:49 David wrote:
>> On 12/1/2013 12:11 PM, poma wrote:
>>> On 01.12.2013 15:32, Patrick Dupre wrote:
So what is the solution ?
>>>
>>> Stop breaking a thread!
>>> Stop top-posting!
>>> Stop spamming us with your address, telephon
On 12-1-13 13:20:49 David wrote:
> On 12/1/2013 12:11 PM, poma wrote:
> > On 01.12.2013 15:32, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >> So what is the solution ?
> >
> > Stop breaking a thread!
> > Stop top-posting!
> > Stop spamming us with your address, telephone and fax numbers!
>
> Two out of three.
>
> 1)
On 12/1/2013 2:12 PM, poma wrote:
> On 01.12.2013 19:48, Beartooth wrote:
>
> You've just confirmed that you do not know what you're talking about.
>
>
> As shown before, and now also you're unable to show appreciation to
> people who help you.
You having a bad weekend? A Bad week? A bad month
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tym0MObFpTI
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:38:18 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ON a fedora 19, everey time I launch
> yum update, I get:
> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/nxssh for package: qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Package: qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 (@fedora)
>
poma wrote:
> You too really don't have idea what you're talking about.
> Don't you?
personal attacks are not appropriate or welcome here. You did it twice
already in this thread. Your responses were fine without this added
commentary.
-- Rex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 02:43:50PM +0530, AP wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:40 AM, David wrote:
>
> > Ya'll have seen the AP is gone yet the thread goes on and on? :-)
>
> Because the name "g" is mental deficient.
What you wrote has nothing to do with what you quoted.
--
Bob Holtzman
You
On 01.12.2013 19:48, Beartooth wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 06:08:08 +0100, poma wrote:
>
>> On 25.11.2013 21:50, Beartooth wrote:
>>>
>>> In the past, I have always set my default browser to Dillo, which
>>> is very fast and very safe; and it usually shows me at least enough to
>>> guess reas
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 06:08:08 +0100, poma wrote:
> On 25.11.2013 21:50, Beartooth wrote:
>>
>> In the past, I have always set my default browser to Dillo, which
>> is very fast and very safe; and it usually shows me at least enough to
>> guess reasonably well whether I want to go on, switch t
On 12/1/2013 12:11 PM, poma wrote:
> On 01.12.2013 15:32, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> So what is the solution ?
>
> Stop breaking a thread!
> Stop top-posting!
> Stop spamming us with your address, telephone and fax numbers!
>
> Bee awesome.:!
>
>
> poma
>
>
Two out of three.
1) He did top pos
On 01.12.2013 15:32, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> So what is the solution ?
Stop breaking a thread!
Stop top-posting!
Stop spamming us with your address, telephone and fax numbers!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options
First of all, please all accept my apologies if I disappeared after
starting this. For several reasons, the whole "project" has gone on
hold, and I... honestly forgot there were messages that deserved an
answer.
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 14:19:53 PM +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:48 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Humm,
>
> removing wine-symbol-fonts, will remove wine!
> and rootplot, root etc
> I am not sure about such a soluton!!
I know nothing about root (aside from the fact that its documentation
subpackage is ridiculously large), but "yum r
Humm,
removing wine-symbol-fonts, will remove wine!
and rootplot, root etc
I am not sure about such a soluton!!
> - Original Message -
> From: Jonathan Dieter
> Sent: 12/01/13 03:41 PM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: evince
>
> On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:32 +0
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:32 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> So what is the solution ?
>
> I tried fedora 16, fedora 18, fedora 19 (gnome3), all give the same result
> a \Phi is shown when a \Delta should be displayed.
>
> Thank.
I've figured it out. I had wine-symbol-fonts installed, which provid
Hello,
ON a fedora 19, everey time I launch
yum update, I get:
--> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/nxssh for package: qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: qtnx-0.9-16.fc19.i686 (@fedora)
Requires: /usr/bin/nxssh
Removing: nx-3.5.0-17.fc19.i
So what is the solution ?
I tried fedora 16, fedora 18, fedora 19 (gnome3), all give the same result
a \Phi is shown when a \Delta should be displayed.
Thank.
>
> On 11/29/13 08:36, Tim wrote:
> > Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
> >> One interesting thing I discovered,
Sorry for the very OT about postgres, (only claim to fame is it's on
Feora 19), but I've been on this all day and am lost, searched
StackOverflow, Postgresql pages, etc, and I am no further. I hope a psql
database admin can explain.
I have a postgres database: registration_test owned by postg
Dear Jerome Yanga,
Can you please specify your symlink?
I've got the same problem with the same sensor, but I couldn't get it to
work!
regards
--
View this message in context:
http://fedora.12.x6.nabble.com/138a-0018-Validity-Sensors-will-not-work-tp5007918p5016808.html
Sent from the Fedora L
And here I am sending this message from Firefox and using
www.gmail.com. I don't know why it is a problem!!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedor
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:40 AM, David wrote:
> Ya'll have seen the AP is gone yet the thread goes on and on? :-)
Because the name "g" is mental deficient.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
39 matches
Mail list logo
