Ed Greshko:
>> It would be overly complex for google to have to determine if you've
>> actually did change the subject line to then decide if it should
>> remove the References: header.
Joe Zeff:
> How hard can it be to compare the new Subject to a copy of the old one
> and not change other header
Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, David sent:
> So, for example, how would one, legitimately , add 'Solved' to a
> Subject: line and still expect it to follow the thread?
By not using gmail... I think you're screwed, using their webmail
interface. They've taken the stance that a subject
On 30.11.2013 04:06, David wrote:
> BTW. My first experience with Email was back in DOS days. I forget the
> name of the shareware email client I bought ($20.00) but the network was
> FIDO and I paid the local BBS sysop $20.00/ month to help with his LD
> phone bill. 56K modems in those days if yo
On 30.11.2013 05:35, Steven Stern wrote:
> Adding "test" to the end of the subject line.
This list is not for testing mail!
Plus, you're breaking my thread and you are top-posting.
MEGA LamE!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change sub
On 25.11.2013 21:50, Beartooth wrote:
>
> In the past, I have always set my default browser to Dillo, which
> is very fast and very safe; and it usually shows me at least enough to
> guess reasonably well whether I want to go on, switch to another browser,
> or skip the site.
Web browse
On 30.11.2013 03:13, g wrote:
> i have never used anything for browsing other than firefox, so i
> am not aware what will happen during opening with setting of true.
>
> if it works, great. if not, then you need to ask thru support
> for xfce4.
>
> i am tending to believe that it is a problem w
Adding "test" to the end of the subject line.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/30/13 10:12, Joe Eff wrote:
> > On 11/29/2013 04:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> It would be overly complex for google to have to determine if you've
> actually did change the subject line to
On 11/30/13 10:12, Joe Eff wrote:
> On 11/29/2013 04:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> It would be overly complex for google to have to determine if you've
>> actually did change the subject line to then decide if it should remove the
>> References: header.
>
> How hard can it be to compare the new Sub
On 11/29/2013 9:52 PM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/2013 08:20 PM, David wrote:
>> On 11/29/2013 7:56 PM, g wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2013 06:07 PM, David wrote:
>>> <>
>>>
Perhaps it should be reported to Google (Gmail) Ed?
>>>
>>> wow. are you ever a virgin.
>>>
>>> what makes you think gaagl
On 11/29/2013 9:51 PM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/2013 08:19 PM, David wrote:
> <>
>
>> I was speaking of Webmail not email clients.
>
> ok. why not add [SOLVED] at end of "Subject:" line, instead of
> at start?
>
>
Hmm... First: Me. I don't use any Webmail sites so I don't know.
Using TBird
On 11/29/2013 08:20 PM, David wrote:
On 11/29/2013 7:56 PM, g wrote:
On 11/29/2013 06:07 PM, David wrote:
<>
Perhaps it should be reported to Google (Gmail) Ed?
wow. are you ever a virgin.
what makes you think gaagle cares?
I forgot the .
sure you did. :=P
--
peace out.
in a
On 11/29/2013 08:19 PM, David wrote:
<>
I was speaking of Webmail not email clients.
ok. why not add [SOLVED] at end of "Subject:" line, instead of
at start?
--
peace out.
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
tc.hago.
g
.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 11/29/2013 08:23 PM, Doug wrote:
<>
Thanx, guys. I am going to try the logging scheme. I have an awful lot
of filters. . . .
just be sure that you clear them out from time to time, else they
will be rather long.
i clean mine at least twice a day.
when i get time, i am going to write a sc
On 11/29/2013 9:23 PM, Doug wrote:
> On 11/29/2013 09:13 PM, David wrote:
>> On 11/29/2013 8:03 PM, g wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/29/2013 06:52 PM, David wrote:
>>> <>
>>>
One suggestion comes to mind. This will take time. Depends on the
>>> <>
really want but I recommend the first way as th
On 11/29/2013 09:13 PM, David wrote:
> On 11/29/2013 8:03 PM, g wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/29/2013 06:52 PM, David wrote:
>> <>
>>
>>> One suggestion comes to mind. This will take time. Depends on the
>> <>
>>> really want but I recommend the first way as the safest.
>>
>> that is a lot of trouble that
On 11/29/2013 7:56 PM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/2013 06:07 PM, David wrote:
> <>
>
>> Perhaps it should be reported to Google (Gmail) Ed?
>
> wow. are you ever a virgin.
>
> what makes you think gaagle cares?
>
>
I forgot the .
--
David
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.
On 11/29/2013 8:10 PM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/2013 06:39 PM, David wrote:
> <>
>
>> So, for example, how would one, legitimately , add 'Solved' to a
>> Subject: line and still expect it to follow the thread?
>
> threading is done by "Message-ID:", "References:", and "In-Reply-To:".
>
> when
On 11/29/2013 11:58 AM, Beartooth wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:29:58 -0600, g wrote:
<<>>
does 'dillo' have a configuration to mark it as _default_?
Not that I could find.
does it have anything similar to firefox's about:config?
open firefox, in url bar, enter;
about:config
sear
On 11/29/2013 8:03 PM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/2013 06:52 PM, David wrote:
> <>
>
>> One suggestion comes to mind. This will take time. Depends on the
> <>
>> really want but I recommend the first way as the safest.
>
> that is a lot of trouble that can be circumvented just by running
> filter
On 11/29/2013 04:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
It would be overly complex for google to have to determine if you've actually
did change the subject line to then decide if it should remove the References:
header.
How hard can it be to compare the new Subject to a copy of the old one
and not change
On 11/29/2013 06:39 PM, David wrote:
<>
So, for example, how would one, legitimately , add 'Solved' to a
Subject: line and still expect it to follow the thread?
threading is done by "Message-ID:", "References:", and "In-Reply-To:".
when you select "Subject:" for threading order, that is on
On 11/29/2013 06:52 PM, David wrote:
<>
One suggestion comes to mind. This will take time. Depends on the
<>
really want but I recommend the first way as the safest.
that is a lot of trouble that can be circumvented just by running
filter logging.
--
peace out.
in a world with out fenc
On 11/29/2013 06:07 PM, David wrote:
<>
Perhaps it should be reported to Google (Gmail) Ed?
wow. are you ever a virgin.
what makes you think gaagle cares?
--
peace out.
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
tc.hago.
g
.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
On 11/29/2013 7:26 PM, Doug wrote:
> On 11/29/2013 07:02 PM, g wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/29/2013 05:06 PM, Tim wrote:
>>> Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, g sent:
one thing for sure, a good filter cures abnormal pests.
>>>
>>> But then you forgo the pleasure of the delete key...
>>
>> not
On 11/29/2013 06:26 PM, Doug wrote:
<>
I wish there was a way of determining what filter caused a given
message to be filtered to the trash pile. If anybody knows, please
tell me.
when you open 'message filters', you select isp at top of window
where it says "Filters for:".
for each isp you
You get used to it. Wait 'til you're 82 and people don't speak clearly
like they did twenty years ago. :-)
And they are all blurred around the edges
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
On 30.11.2013 01:28, Roger wrote:
> On 11/30/2013 11:17 AM, David wrote:
>> On 11/29/2013 7:07 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>>> On 29/11/13 19:00, David wrote:
Bob. It's okay to 'talk' to yourself... as long as you don't answer.
:-)
>>> You get used to it. Wait 'til y
On 11/29/2013 7:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/30/13 08:07, David wrote:
>> On 11/29/2013 7:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 11/30/13 07:40, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 29/11/13 18:32, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote:
>>
On 11/30/2013 11:17 AM, David wrote:
On 11/29/2013 7:07 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 29/11/13 19:00, David wrote:
Bob. It's okay to 'talk' to yourself... as long as you don't answer.
:-)
You get used to it. Wait 'til you're 82 and people don't speak clearly
like they did tw
On 11/29/2013 07:02 PM, g wrote:
>
>
> On 11/29/2013 05:06 PM, Tim wrote:
>> Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, g sent:
>>> one thing for sure, a good filter cures abnormal pests.
>>
>> But then you forgo the pleasure of the delete key...
>
> not really.
>
> with thunderbird and using a f
On 11/29/2013 7:07 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 29/11/13 19:00, David wrote:
>> Bob. It's okay to 'talk' to yourself... as long as you don't answer.
>>
>> :-)
> You get used to it. Wait 'til you're 82 and people don't speak clearly
> like they did twenty years ago. :-)
>
82?
On 11/30/13 08:07, David wrote:
> On 11/29/2013 7:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 11/30/13 07:40, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>>> On 29/11/13 18:32, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote:
> So, when I reply from the gmail web interface,
On 11/29/2013 7:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/30/13 07:40, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>> On 29/11/13 18:32, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>>> On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote:
So, when I reply from the gmail web interface, messages thread
appropriately. As
On 29/11/13 19:00, David wrote:
Bob. It's okay to 'talk' to yourself... as long as you don't answer.
:-)
You get used to it. Wait 'til you're 82 and people don't speak clearly
like they did twenty years ago. :-)
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
Box 10 Fedora-19/64 XFCE Linux
--
users mailing l
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 30.11.2013 00:10, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>> On 29.11.2013 20:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
On my Fedora 19 i686 I see weird thing - when killing processes (by
commands as:
killall -9 kactivitymanagerd
killall
On 11/29/2013 05:06 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, g sent:
one thing for sure, a good filter cures abnormal pests.
But then you forgo the pleasure of the delete key...
not really.
with thunderbird and using a filter to [Mark As Read], +
[Delete Message], moves ema
On 11/30/13 07:40, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 29/11/13 18:32, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>> On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote:
>>> So, when I reply from the gmail web interface, messages thread
>>> appropriately. As do messages from thunderbird.
>>>
>>> -- -- St
On 11/29/2013 6:40 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 29/11/13 18:32, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>> On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote:
>>> So, when I reply from the gmail web interface, messages thread
>>> appropriately. As do messages from thunderbird.
>>>
>>> -- -
On 29/11/13 18:32, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote:
So, when I reply from the gmail web interface, messages thread
appropriately. As do messages from thunderbird.
-- -- Steve
Those two thread with each other but not with the earlier messages
with
On 11/29/2013 05:32 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote:
>> So, when I reply from the gmail web interface, messages thread
>> appropriately. As do messages from thunderbird.
>>
>> -- -- Steve
> Those two thread with each other but not with the earlie
On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote:
So, when I reply from the gmail web interface, messages thread
appropriately. As do messages from thunderbird.
-- -- Steve
Those two thread with each other but not with the earlier messages with
that same subject name.
Looking at the source "In Reply" is
On 30.11.2013 00:10, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> On 29.11.2013 20:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>>> On my Fedora 19 i686 I see weird thing - when killing processes (by
>>> commands as:
>>>
>>> killall -9 kactivitymanagerd
>>> killall -9 gam_server
>>> killall -9 kded4
>
On 11/29/2013 07:34 AM, AP wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 PM, g wrote:
>
>> yes, i am aware.
>
> You are not in aware of what you talk and say. Asking questions is not
> being a troll!!
>
> Further you yourself seem a troll.
>
> Annovira.
>
So, when I reply from the gmail web interface
Testing a reply from the gmail interface. Will it thread? Will it blend?
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:34 AM, AP wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 PM, g wrote:
>
> > yes, i am aware.
>
> You are not in aware of what you talk and say. Asking questions is not
> being a troll!!
>
> Further you y
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 29.11.2013 20:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>> On my Fedora 19 i686 I see weird thing - when killing processes (by
>> commands as:
>>
>> killall -9 kactivitymanagerd
>> killall -9 gam_server
>> killall -9 kded4
>> killall -9 systemd
>> killall -9 atril
>>
>> or with
Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, g sent:
> one thing for sure, a good filter cures abnormal pests.
But then you forgo the pleasure of the delete key...
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.8.13-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 13 13:36:17 UTC 2013 x86_64
All mail to my mailbox is aut
Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, Beartooth sent:
> Here, if not before, you lose me. What was ", enter"
> supposed to do??
CTRL+F is a common shortcut (on various programs) to bring up the search
box to "find" something. So, begin a search, enter the terms to search
for...
--
[tim@loc
On 29.11.2013 17:55, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Tim wrote:
>
>> Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, Robert P. J. Day sent:
>>> instead, while i *thought* i had specified that i wanted the volume
>>> group to max out on the hard drive, it was created only large enough
>>> t
On 29.11.2013 20:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> On my Fedora 19 i686 I see weird thing - when killing processes (by
> commands as:
>
> killall -9 kactivitymanagerd
> killall -9 gam_server
> killall -9 kded4
> killall -9 systemd
> killall -9 atril
>
> or with PID:
>
> kill -9 1 1322 10612 10619
>
On 29.11.2013 20:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> It is bad glibc signal() implementation or what else?
What else.
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fed
On 29.11.2013 21:10, David wrote:
> Ya'll have seen the AP is gone yet the thread goes on and on? :-)
LoL!
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Cod
On 29.11.2013 21:53, Beartooth wrote:
>
> Do we know yet whether those of us on F18 (lots of us, if my
> impression is accurate) who want to move up to F20 but prefer to avoid a
> fresh install with all its restorations from backups -- whether we'll be
> better off running fedup twice, or
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Beartooth wrote:
>
> Do we know yet whether those of us on F18 (lots of us, if my
> impression is accurate) who want to move up to F20 but prefer to avoid a
> fresh install with all its restorations from backups -- whether we'll be
> better off running fed
On 29.11.2013 09:28, g wrote:
> yes, i am aware.
Cantate Domino canticum novum, quia mirabilia fecit.
Bee awesome.:!
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of
Do we know yet whether those of us on F18 (lots of us, if my
impression is accurate) who want to move up to F20 but prefer to avoid a
fresh install with all its restorations from backups -- whether we'll be
better off running fedup twice, or upgrading with a medium?
--
Beartooth Staffw
On 11/29/2013 2:35 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 29/11/13 14:18, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>> Continually asking questions that can be answered with a simple web
>> search qualifies as trolling, especially when he's been repeatedly
>> admonished about it. He also is polluting at le
Shouldn't this kind of propios al be written as a RFC # thingie? Like The
TCP pigeon network...
On Nov 28, 2013 1:09 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2013, at 5:31 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine
> wrote:
>
> > Give a look to this proposal:
> >
> > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/Bo
hello bob,
On 11/29/2013 01:35 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
<>
I don't know about deficient but it certainly appears to be a mental
aberration of some kind and this thread probably provides the
recognition he was looking for.
you are 100% dead on.
as i said in another post,
On my Fedora 19 i686 I see weird thing - when killing processes (by
commands as:
killall -9 kactivitymanagerd
killall -9 gam_server
killall -9 kded4
killall -9 systemd
killall -9 atril
or with PID:
kill -9 1 1322 10612 10619
), then processes stay running - they are not zombies (for PID=1 be
zo
On 29/11/13 14:18, Robert Holtzman wrote:
Continually asking questions that can be answered with a simple web
search qualifies as trolling, especially when he's been repeatedly
admonished about it. He also is polluting at least 2 other lists
asking the same sort of questions. He's posted under mo
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 01:32:11AM +1030, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 28 November 2013, g sent:
> > let out one point.
> >
> > if you will note;
> >
> > X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer
> >
> > is also a thread breaker.
>
> I think that one may just be due to a bad webmail client. Some o
On 11/29/2013 12:19 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 02:30:44AM -0600, g wrote:
On 11/28/2013 11:47 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
<>
One would normally try a search before asking on a list.
'ap' is not _normal_. ;=)
I know but he's like heroin. You can't resist just one
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 02:30:44AM -0600, g wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/2013 11:47 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> <>
>
> >One would normally try a search before asking on a list.
>
> 'ap' is not _normal_. ;=)
I know but he's like heroin. You can't resist just one more hit.
--
Bob Holtzman
Your mail
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:29:58 -0600, g wrote:
> On 11/28/2013 01:09 PM, Beartooth wrote:
>> Anyway, I changed dillo to Dillo both in Alpine's settings and on my
>> PC, and links still open in Firefox. :-
>
> applying a little 'swag' because i use firefox in kde de.
>
> does 'dillo' have a config
hello tim,
On 11/29/2013 09:02 AM, Tim wrote:
<>
He has posted from at least three other addresses, in the past,
which worked properly. Just the gmx.com one that goes bad.
true.
> I can't say that I remember noticing any behaviour that indicated
> he was trolling.
nor i.
i was just comme
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, Robert P. J. Day sent:
> > instead, while i *thought* i had specified that i wanted the volume
> > group to max out on the hard drive, it was created only large enough
> > to hold the fixed-size logical volumes i selected.
Allegedly, on or about 28 November 2013, g sent:
> let out one point.
>
> if you will note;
>
> X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer
>
> is also a thread breaker.
I think that one may just be due to a bad webmail client. Some of them
are just plain awful, in a plethora of ways.
He has posted from a
Allegedly, on or about 29 November 2013, Robert P. J. Day sent:
> instead, while i *thought* i had specified that i wanted the volume
> group to max out on the hard drive, it was created only large enough
> to hold the fixed-size logical volumes i selected. so at this point, i
> would have to creat
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> So, you've got some homework to do. Figure out in which unusual way you
> reply to messages from this mailing-list so that the "References:" and
> "In-Reply-To:" headers are missing in your mails. At Google Mail, prefer
> the Reply button
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:00 PM, g wrote:
> 'ap' is not _normal_. ;=)
LOL, you yourself are not normal!! And you great name 'g'...lmao!!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedo
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 PM, g wrote:
> yes, i am aware.
You are not in aware of what you talk and say. Asking questions is not
being a troll!!
Further you yourself seem a troll.
Annovira.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
h
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:37:54 +0530, AP wrote:
> > Yes, that's very likely. Which browser is it?
>
> Opera and Firefox both.
So, you've got some homework to do. Figure out in which unusual way you
reply to messages from this mailing-list so that the "References:" and
"In-Reply-To:" headers are mi
(been a while since i've used fedora extensively, am now switching
back so first few questions might be on the simple side.)
first, during an f19 install, i chose to do an LVM install and
explicitly selected a small number of logical volumes to create but i
wanted the single volume group itse
On 11/28/2013 11:47 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
<>
One would normally try a search before asking on a list.
'ap' is not _normal_. ;=)
--
peace out.
in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
tc.hago.
g
.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change sub
hello poma.
On 11/28/2013 10:27 PM, poma wrote:
g, this is the signature of your email account, right?
> --
>
> peace out.
>
> in a world with out fences, who needs gates.
>
> tc.hago.
>
> g
> .
this is true. it is my sig.
but true also, i am not "AP "
if you check headers closer, you wil
75 matches
Mail list logo
