On 11/29/2013 7:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 11/30/13 08:07, David wrote: >> On 11/29/2013 7:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >>> On 11/30/13 07:40, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: >>>> On 29/11/13 18:32, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: >>>>> On 29/11/13 18:21, Steven Stern wrote: >>>>>> So, when I reply from the gmail web interface, messages thread >>>>>> appropriately. As do messages from thunderbird. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- -- Steve >>>>> Those two thread with each other but not with the earlier messages with >>>>> that same subject name. >>>>> >>>>> Looking at the source "In Reply" is different than the earlier messages. >>>>> >>>>> Bob >>>>> >>>> I should have said they do not thread with the original messages from poma >>>> and g. I didn't realize you were using stuff from AP. Nothing threads with >>>> those apparently ... >>>> >>> OK friends..... I tested in the following manner to confirm what others >>> have said. >>> >>> First... >>> >>> 1. Copied a message, using T-Bird's functions, from my home system's inbox >>> to gmail's inbox. The message copied contained a References: header with 2 >>> entries and a Message-ID: header. >>> >>> 2. Used the reply function in gmail's web interface and replaced the "To:" >>> address with my home email address and then sent it. >>> >>> 3. Examined the headers of the mail received it now contains a References: >>> header with 3 entries including the Message-ID: header info referenced in >>> #1 and it had its own unique Message-ID:. >>> >>> Second I repeated the test but I used the "Edit Subject" from the drop-down >>> but I *did not* actually edit the Subject. >>> >>> When I Examined the headers of the mail received it contained *no* >>> References: header. >>> >>> So, to me at least, it is obvious what is being done and causing Threading >>> Problems. Deliberate or not, it is annoying and one would hope this bit of >>> knowledge would help people to avoid this situation in the future and this >>> thread will eventually expire as it should. >>> >> >> Perhaps it should be reported to Google (Gmail) Ed? >> > > I don't think so. IMO, if you're indicating that you're wanting to change > the subject it is like going off on a tangent and no longer relevant to the > original thread. It would be overly complex for google to have to determine > if you've actually did change the subject line to then decide if it should > remove the References: header. >
So, for example, how would one, legitimately , add 'Solved' to a Subject: line and still expect it to follow the thread? All of the time allowing Newbie and whatever. Ignoring the trolls. :-) -- David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
