On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 11:03 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Maybe, maybe not. If one of their DNS servers was flakey, your
> complaint would not be alone. If they replaced/repaired their server,
> everyone will see the fix.
>
> And the front line phone staff may be unaware of the issue.
It depen
Bob Goodwin:
> I changed the router configuration to use 208.67.229.220:5353 and
> 208.67.222.222:5353 and see the following:
>
> [root@box10 bobg]# dig www.bbc.co.uk
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.9.3-rl.13207.22-P2-RedHat-9.9.3-5.P2.fc19 <<>> www.bbc.co.uk
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;;
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 23:09 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> If the ISP is doing transparent DNS proxy I seriously doubt that any
> of that matters.
It depends on how they're doing it. If they simply intercept port 53
traffic, then not using port 53 for your queries will bypass it. But if
they also sn
Robert McBroom wrote:
>Updating : acpid-2.0.20-1.fc19.x86_64 1/2
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.XAEOe4: line 1: fg: no job control
> error: %preun(acpid-2.0.19-5.fc19.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
> Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package acpid-2.0.19-5.fc19.x86_64
>Verifying : acpid-2.0
On 11/12/2013 07:37 PM, Robert McBroom wrote:
rpm -qa |sort|grep acpid
acpid-2.0.19-5.fc19.x86_64
acpid-2.0.20-1.fc19.x86_64
Try this:
yum remove acpid-2.0.19-5.fc19.x86_64
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapr
Pulling entry from the database--
rpm -qa |sort|grep acpid
acpid-2.0.19-5.fc19.x86_64
acpid-2.0.20-1.fc19.x86_64
Can't get the rpm to update.
rpm --rebuilddb
Yum output segment--
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package acpid.x86_64 0:2.0.19-5.fc19 will be updated
--->
Hello,
I recently recorded a lecture video at:
https://streaming.stat.iastate.edu/~stat580/video/R-video2.ogv
but the video seems to have been recorded at a supersonic speed. The
audio is fine but as a result, completely out of sync with the video.
Would anyone know of a way to bring back the
On 12/11/13 18:58, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 10Nov2013 20:18, Bob Goodwin wrote:
[...] Further more their system
does other things that I don't want to lose, namely the "free time"
during the wee hours when I can allow the Apple computers to connect
with iCloud, [...]
Regarding reigning in t
On 11Nov2013 20:21, Bob Goodwin wrote:
[...]
> Source:
> http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/01/how-viasats-exede-makes-satellite-broadband-not-suck/
>
> He makes it sound that it's essential to stick with their software,
> some parts of which are apparently contained in the modem. As I said
>
On 11/12/2013 04:03 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
And the front line phone staff may be unaware of the issue.
Speaking as somebody who did phone tech support for an ISP, that's quite
possible. Granted, we did have a page that (supposedly) listed all
known outages, but it was almost never up to
On 12Nov2013 13:19, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> [...] I have had some intermittent problems recently but since
> my complaint yesterday it has worked well. Coincidence perhaps?
Maybe, maybe not. If one of their DNS servers was flakey, your
complaint would not be alone. If they replaced/repaired their se
On 10Nov2013 20:18, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> [...] Further more their system
> does other things that I don't want to lose, namely the "free time"
> during the wee hours when I can allow the Apple computers to connect
> with iCloud, [...]
Regarding reigning in the Apple stuff, what approach are you u
On 11/12/2013 02:17 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 11/12/2013 7:30 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr. wrote:
Hello allI have been searching online looking for info in regards
to installing Fedora on a Chromebook, and while I've seen many
tutorials, (at least for Ubuntu anyways!) I have a question:
I
On 11/12/2013 7:30 AM, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr. wrote:
Hello allI have been searching online looking for info in regards
to installing Fedora on a Chromebook, and while I've seen many
tutorials, (at least for Ubuntu anyways!) I have a question:
Is it possible to install Fedora on a Chromebook
On 12/11/13 13:28, Jim wrote:
On 11/12/2013 01:19 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 12/11/13 13:03, Jim wrote:
The DNS that is in your router is what IP it goes to, which in most
cases your Internet Provider .
Yes, normally you would expect that but Viasat Exede forces you t
On 11/12/2013 10:03 AM, Jim wrote:
You can goto http://getip.com and it will tell you what your IP is. Hech
it will even show you and everybody where you live.
Actually, no. It won't. What it shows is where the DSLAM you're
connected to is, and in my case, that's several miles away.
--
use
On 11/12/2013 01:19 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 12/11/13 13:03, Jim wrote:
The DNS that is in your router is what IP it goes to, which in most
cases your Internet Provider .
Yes, normally you would expect that but Viasat Exede forces you to
their DNS no matter what you s
On 12/11/13 13:03, Jim wrote:
The DNS that is in your router is what IP it goes to, which in most
cases your Internet Provider .
Yes, normally you would expect that but Viasat Exede forces you to their
DNS no matter what you set your router for and there is nothing wrong
with the way that w
after some updates on my system I cannot see my DHCP table of my router
through webpages:I guess that is connected to some modification in
javascript management in latest Firefox.My router is a Lynksis Cisco
X3000 with latest firmware
--
Antonio M
Skype: amontag52
Linux Fedora F19(Schroedinger
On 11/12/2013 12:00 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 12/11/13 09:41, Tim wrote:
I get about a quarter or third of that time if I try other DNS servers.
My own took 1500 mS the first time, then 6 ms for subsequent attempts
(local cache is much quicker than internet propagation de
On 11/12/2013 11:12 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 05:06pm on Tuesday, November 12, 2013 (UK time), Steven Stern scrawled:
>
>> On CentOS, top shows per process memory using in kb or mb. On Fedora
>> 19, top shows per process memory usage by the byte. Is there an option
>> or setting to make F
Around 05:06pm on Tuesday, November 12, 2013 (UK time), Steven Stern scrawled:
> On CentOS, top shows per process memory using in kb or mb. On Fedora
> 19, top shows per process memory usage by the byte. Is there an option
> or setting to make Fedora's top (from procps-ng) work like CentOS' (fro
On 11/12/2013 11:06 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
> On CentOS, top shows per process memory using in kb or mb. On Fedora
> 19, top shows per process memory usage by the byte. Is there an option
> or setting to make Fedora's top (from procps-ng) work like CentOS' (from
> procps)
>
> Here's what I'm tal
On CentOS, top shows per process memory using in kb or mb. On Fedora
19, top shows per process memory usage by the byte. Is there an option
or setting to make Fedora's top (from procps-ng) work like CentOS' (from
procps)
Here's what I'm talking about:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n0d48ct2ga2eaj7/t
On 12/11/13 09:41, Tim wrote:
I get about a quarter or third of that time if I try other DNS servers.
My own took 1500 mS the first time, then 6 ms for subsequent attempts
(local cache is much quicker than internet propagation delays). Queries
for other addresses took about 100 mS, so the BBC
On Nov 11 20:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 11 12:14, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >Does anybody have an idea what the problem could be?
> >
> > Only ECC NIST Suite B curves were enabled in Fedora packages. If
> > your keys use a different curve then they wouldn
Hello allI have been searching online looking for info in regards to
installing Fedora on a Chromebook, and while I've seen many tutorials,
(at least for Ubuntu anyways!) I have a question:
Is it possible to install Fedora on a Chromebook and completely REMOVE
the ChromeOS? if so...how? ev
On 11/12/13 22:41, Tim wrote:
> Next time it happens, start playing with the dig tool. Make queries
> against your router, and against the DNS IPs the ISP provides (to the
> router), and try some external DNS servers that have different ports
> (the dig command lets you specify ports, read the man
Allegedly, on or about 11 November 2013, Bob Goodwin sent:
> He makes it sound that it's essential to stick with their software,
> some parts of which are apparently contained in the modem. As I said I
> am quite happy with the service, it normally works well and there is
> nothing better availabl
29 matches
Mail list logo
