On 10/11/13 19:54, Tim wrote:
There is a chance that you could still use an outside DNS service, if
you can access one that uses a different port than your ISP is
intercepting. This would, also, depend on you either making up TCP/IP
redirection rules on your gateway so your clients queries go
On 10/11/13 19:53, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I need to convince them they have a problem, will check more next
time it goes out.
Get someone on the horn who has a minimum of an understanding, and
tell them you can't ping their DNS servers.
Yes, I intend to do that, thought I had enough info
Allegedly, on or about 10 November 2013, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia,
USA sent:
> I used to subscribe to open.dns but with this satellite system it no
> longer functions and we are required to use their dns which is part of
> some optimization system Viasat uses.
There is a chance that you coul
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
On 10/11/13 19:12, Steven Stern wrote:
Use 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 (Google Public DNS Servers) or 208.67.222.222
and 208.67.220.220 (OpenDNS)
The problem is probably with your ISP's DNS servers.
Yes, those worked well when I was able to use them, this
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
On 10/11/13 19:28, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
No, it won't allow any other DNS server, no matter what I configure it for
it always goes to theirs, that's why I gave up open.dns. This was a change
DD-WRT does
Allegedly, on or about 10 November 2013, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia,
USA sent:
> Am I missing some point here? Is there some connection between dhcp
> and dns that I am not aware of. My dhcp server is in the router and
> deals with about thirty addresses on the LAN and works faultlessly as
> far
On 10/11/13 19:28, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
No, it won't allow any other DNS server, no matter what I configure
it for it always goes to theirs, that's why I gave up open.dns. This
was a change
DD-WRT does not give you the option to use fixed DNS ser
On 10/11/13 18:24, Ed Greshko wrote:
Quite some time ago it was determined that your ISP uses "transparent DNS
proxy" to force you to use their DNS servers.
But, I really would ask them about their use of IP addresses as this is
the output of whois 182.63.128.68
inetnum:182.62.
On 10/11/13 19:12, Steven Stern wrote:
Use 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 (Google Public DNS Servers) or 208.67.222.222
and 208.67.220.220 (OpenDNS)
The problem is probably with your ISP's DNS servers.
Yes, those worked well when I was able to use them, this system goes to
it's own DNS no matter what
Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA writes:
No, it won't allow any other DNS server, no matter what I configure it for
it always goes to theirs, that's why I gave up open.dns. This was a change
DD-WRT does not give you the option to use fixed DNS servers, instead of
whatever DHCP servers it g
On 11/10/2013 02:29 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> DD-WRT configuration is set for the following:
>
> 182.63.128.68 and 182.63.128.69
Use 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 (Google Public DNS Servers) or 208.67.222.222
and 208.67.220.220 (OpenDNS)
The problem is probably with your ISP's DNS ser
On 11/11/13 06:32, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> No, it won't allow any other DNS server, no matter what I configure it for it
> always goes to theirs, that's why I gave up open.dns. This was a change when
> they began to offer this high speed service, before that I always used some
On 10/11/13 16:38, staticsafe wrote:
DD-WRT configuration is set for the following:
>
>182.63.128.68 and 182.63.128.69
>
>Normally it works well and does its job instantly as far as I can tell.
>
dresden ~ # dig google.com @182.63.128.68
; <<>> DiG 9.9.3-P2 <<>> google.com @182.63.128.68
;; g
On 11/11/13 05:38, staticsafe wrote:
> On 11/10/2013 15:29, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>> I used to subscribe to open.dns but with this satellite system it no
>> longer functions and we are required to use their dns which is part of
>> some optimization system Viasat uses.
>>
>> DD-WR
On 11/10/2013 15:29, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> I used to subscribe to open.dns but with this satellite system it no
> longer functions and we are required to use their dns which is part of
> some optimization system Viasat uses.
>
> DD-WRT configuration is set for the following
On 10/11/13 15:19, staticsafe wrote:
On 11/10/2013 15:17, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Well this is what I see:
[bobg@box10 ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 192.168.1.1
192.168.1.1 is my Linksys E3000 DD-WRT router.
DD-WRT usually runs a forwar
On 11/10/2013 15:17, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> Well this is what I see:
>
> [bobg@box10 ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
> # Generated by NetworkManager
> nameserver 192.168.1.1
>
>
> 192.168.1.1 is my Linksys E3000 DD-WRT router.
>
DD-WRT usually runs a forwarder, check your router t
On 10/11/13 15:10, staticsafe wrote:
On 11/10/2013 14:57, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Recently we have begun to have problems with our browsers stopping to
work, ask it to go to a bookmark address and nothing happens, everything
stops until an error message comes up that the addre
On 11/10/2013 14:57, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>
> Recently we have begun to have problems with our browsers stopping to
> work, ask it to go to a bookmark address and nothing happens, everything
> stops until an error message comes up that the address can not be found.
>
> Thunder
Recently we have begun to have problems with our browsers stopping to
work, ask it to go to a bookmark address and nothing happens, everything
stops until an error message comes up that the address can not be found.
Thunderbird continues to receive e-mail unless I restart Thunderbird,
then i
Am 10.11.2013 15:44, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Mark Bidewell wrote:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Probably the same problem, slower boots causing service timeouts all
over.
Thanks do you know if any progress is being made on the performance
issues?
Yes, (generally) tracke
On Nov 9, 2013 5:53 PM, "Javier Perez" wrote:
>
> Hi
> Could somebody recommend a program to view logs like Xorg.0.log, dmesg,
boot.log, messages and others
>
Not sure if it's in the repos but elogv is what I use.
>
>
> --
> --
> /\_/\
> |O O| pepeb...@gmail.com
>
On 11/09/2013 07:22 PM, David wrote:
On 11/9/2013 4:54 PM, EGO.II-1 wrote:
On 11/09/2013 02:05 PM, David wrote:
On 11/9/2013 1:39 PM, EGO.II-1 wrote:
On 11/09/2013 08:23 AM, Bill Oliver wrote:
Interesting topic, What about the person who WAS once a devoted
personbut due to the responses
Mark Bidewell wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Probably the same problem, slower boots causing service timeouts all
>> over.
> Thanks do you know if any progress is being made on the performance
> issues?
Yes, (generally) tracked here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On 11/09/2013 08:53 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
Hi
Could somebody recommend a program to view logs like Xorg.0.log, dmesg,
boot.log, messages and others
not mentioned so far are gnome-system-log and ksystemlog for the gnome
and kde desktops -
--
Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA
--
users mailing l
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Javier Perez
[pepeb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 8:53 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Log viewer
Hi
Could somebody reco
HI,
Yes, multiple log viewer available for Centos, but not for Fedora. It's
called ELSA.
HTH,
Zoltan
2013/11/10 lee
> Javier Perez writes:
>
> > Hi
> > Could somebody recommend a program to view logs like Xorg.0.log, dmesg,
> > boot.log, messages and others
>
> less
>
>
> --
> Fedora releas
27 matches
Mail list logo
