On 08/05/2012 12:38 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> Error From Video Player:
> Movie Player requires additional plugins to decode this file
> The following plugins are required: MPEG-4 AAC decoder
> H.264 decoder
> Do you want to search fo
On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 00:38:40 -0400
"Eddie G. O'Connor Jr." wrote:
> Ok so FINALLY I've gone ahead and gotten my laptop upgraded to Fedora
> 17! But I now am trying to play .mp4 / .flv/ .avi movies on it and
> getting an error message telling me that there are plugins missing. I
> also get erro
Ok so FINALLY I've gone ahead and gotten my laptop upgraded to Fedora
17! But I now am trying to play .mp4 / .flv/ .avi movies on it and
getting an error message telling me that there are plugins missing. I
also get error messages when I try to play mp3's. Even though I get
system sounds. Is th
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 12:51 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > Am I the only person who thinks that the whole idea should be dropped?
> > I never, ever, heard anyone refer to Fedora-17 as Fedora Beefy Miracle
> > (if that is indeed the right name).
>
> No,
On 08/05/2012 12:03 PM, Doug wrote:
> I just hit "Post Reply" and the editor came up, and after I was finished, I
> hit submit, and I got the same nasty message I got in the first place. (See
> my initial inquiry here.)
Let me try this one more time.
Fedora Mailing List and Kororaa Forums a
On 08/04/2012 11:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/05/2012 10:41 AM, Doug wrote:
Well, I did ask the question here, because, a) I'm having trouble with the
forum, and b) They referred their users to this list. Does anyone reading
this list know a way of contacting them
by email _without_ using
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Dave Burns wrote:
> Me confused. I want to try booting the FC17 install disk in lowres or
> text mode. To do this, apparently I should enter "linux lowres" or
> "linux text" at the "boot prompt".
>
> The fc17 install guide
> (
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/
On 08/05/2012 10:41 AM, Doug wrote:
> Well, I did ask the question here, because, a) I'm having trouble with the
> forum, and b) They referred their users to this list. Does anyone reading
> this list know a way of contacting them
> by email _without_ using their forum, since I can't seem to ge
On 08/04/2012 09:40 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/05/2012 09:32 AM, Doug wrote:
New to this list, and to Kororaa and its forum. I posted a q to the K forum and
was answered with a q. When I tried to reply to the correspondent, (several
times, several ways) i always get this:
Kororaa is a remix
On 08/05/2012 09:32 AM, Doug wrote:
> New to this list, and to Kororaa and its forum. I posted a q to the K forum
> and was answered with a q. When I tried to reply to the correspondent,
> (several times, several ways) i always get this:
Kororaa is a remix of Fedora. They have their own support
On 08/03/2012 06:09 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
While it's technically true to call such distros
"GNU/Linux", such a label ignores a large portion of the origin and
richness of those distros.
I don't think that's true. Linux is the kernel. GNU/Linux is the
(POSIX) operating system. Fedora is the
Hi, all--
New to this list, and to Kororaa and its forum. I posted a q to the K
forum and was answered with a q. When I tried to reply to the
correspondent, (several times, several ways) i always get this:
_
On 08/05/2012 07:24 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
>
> This is the second time that it happens:
> The uograde from fedora 16 to 17 fails with the message:
> The /usr merge script failed. THis is required for Fedora 17 to work. The
> upgrade cannot continue.
>
> Then, it is impossible to boor on the pr
On 2012-08-05 01:35, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.08.2012 01:24, schrieb Patrick Dupre:
Hello,
This is the second time that it happens:
The uograde from fedora 16 to 17 fails with the message:
The /usr merge script failed. THis is required for Fedora 17 to
work. The upgrade cannot continue.
Th
Hello,
This is the second time that it happens:
The uograde from fedora 16 to 17 fails with the message:
The /usr merge script failed. THis is required for Fedora 17 to work.
The upgrade cannot continue.
Then, it is impossible to boor on the previous installation.
This is a real serious bug (
On 04.08.2012, James Wilkinson wrote:
> Even though the build was OK, you still might want to do a memtest of
> your system.
I solved the problem. The culprit is prelink, which lets parts of the
package clash. Didn't find the related bugreport st once, though, and spent
some hours digging into t
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> Firefox, built from .srpm from F17-updates repository, fails to install:
> This is the error-message which shows up:
>
> "Unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox;501bceec:
> cpio: Digest mismatch"
>
> The package is original Fedora and not altered in a
> work with the Program" and I was just speaking about what I heard and
> read about "delisenced kernel headers" in android.
Which is rubbish - beware of junk spouted by PR people involved in
lawsuits. The are paid to dissemble, deceived and damage.
> unfortunately I disagree with you, there migh
I am now stuck in an unresponsive grub2: ]
grub rescue >
it responds to a few commands, such as 'ls'
but in particular it fails on
exit
which is supposed to quit, instead says
unknown command 'exit'.
I was attempting a preupgrade from one of my two f14 installs,
both of which worked, pri
I must confess that I really am much less informed than you about the
matter, I didn't know about "Mere aggregation of another independent
work with the Program" and I was just speaking about what I heard and
read about "delisenced kernel headers" in android.
> Free software is a good thirty years
> Suggested naming convention was invented by pioneers of Free Software
> to show the role of GNU and free software philosophy in creation of a
> free community-based "Operating System". they want to show OS (not
> kernel) as a representer of Free Software.
Free software is a good thirty years old
> However, a significant portion of the development of gcc and glibc
> (among many other GNU projects) over the last 20 years has come from the
> Linux community. Without Linux, gcc and glibc would be very different
> than they are today. Does that mean they should be renamed to Linux/GNU
> CC an
Once upon a time, Shibi said:
> in my opinion Linux couldn't and still cannot exist without certain
> parts of gnu project including software and licenses, especially gcc,
> glibc
However, a significant portion of the development of gcc and glibc
(among many other GNU projects) over the last 20 y
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 22:37 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:08 -0400, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:37 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 10:34 -0400, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 21:23 -0400, Matthew Salt
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 07:11 -0400, Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:37 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > Ah. The answer is, yes. It works on my Exchange EWS account and on
> > my POP3 account. For some definition of "works". Some junk is not
> > caught and some non-junk is caught. There
Why GNU/Linux? Why not GNU Linux // GNU && Linux // GNU-Linux etc?
GNU/Linux implies either GNU or Linux, right?
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 13:13:59 +0100
Subject: Re: Linux or GNU/Linux
From: discordia...@gmail.com
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
I call it Linux/Gnu.
Without the kernel it wou
> in my opinion Linux couldn't and still cannot exist without certain
> parts of gnu project including software and licenses, especially gcc,
> glibc, gpl and lgpl. and that's true for android too, unless it uses
> kernel header's without gpl licensing instead of glibc.
At the time Linux was creat
Why GNU/Linux? Why not GNU Linux // GNU && Linux // GNU-Linux etc?
GNU/Linux implies either GNU or Linux, right?
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 13:13:59 +0100
Subject: Re: Linux or GNU/Linux
From: discordia...@gmail.com
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
I call it Linux/Gnu.
Without the kernel it wouldn
I call it Linux/Gnu.
Without the kernel it wouldn't even boot.
--
Clive
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> so until someone knows what is going wrong in 3.5 the
> right decision would have been build 3.4.7 for F17 too
> instead psuh blindly 3.5 out - and after such decisions
> someone is wondering why people start ranting?
If there's one thing I k
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:37 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> Ah. The answer is, yes. It works on my Exchange EWS account and on
> my POP3 account. For some definition of "works". Some junk is not
> caught and some non-junk is caught. There is no junk in my Gmail
> account, but I don't get much
On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 15:16:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> my point was that i am testing many fedora-packages often long
> before updates-testing is seeing them and it doe snot help
> much if maintainers say "hm bugreport, however i push to stable"
>
> and YES the 3.5.x currently in F17 stable i
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:36 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> In some cases - by code volume the FSF is not the biggest contributor,
> even when you include (as they like to) all the third party code they
> took and labelled GNU. In the case of the largest and most common
> Linux
> distribution today there
33 matches
Mail list logo
