On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Well, isn't FF 13 a Beta?
Mozilla releases Firefox 13 ahead of schedule
http://tech2.in.com/news/software/mozilla-releases-firefox-13-ahead-of-schedule/313252
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary ac
On 06/05/2012 02:46 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> When I want to have it available to everyone I unpack in a directory I make
>> called
>> /usr/local/firefox and adjust the PATH variable accordingly.
> Thanks, that sounds good.
>
> Can we expect
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> When I want to have it available to everyone I unpack in a directory I make
> called
> /usr/local/firefox and adjust the PATH variable accordingly.
Thanks, that sounds good.
Can we expect to have RPMs for F17 available, eventually?
FC
--
use
On 06/05/2012 02:26 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> What's the right procedure to manually install Firefox 13 on top of F17?.
>
> It's been so long that I had forgotten it's simple a tar file. Where
> do I unpack it?.
>
> Apparently in F17 firefox is spread between /usr/bin/firefox and
> /usr/lib/fire
On 06/05/2012 07:46 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Swapnil Bhartiya
wrote:
Done exactly that. I did not add vga=0x317 as my monitor is 1900x1080
I rebuilt the grub configuration as you suggested.
Note: I am multi-booting with Ubuntu so that I do have a system workin
What's the right procedure to manually install Firefox 13 on top of F17?.
It's been so long that I had forgotten it's simple a tar file. Where
do I unpack it?.
Apparently in F17 firefox is spread between /usr/bin/firefox and
/usr/lib/firefox instead of on its own subdir like /opt/firefox
FC
--
u
On 06/04/2012 10:39 PM, Thibault Nélis wrote:
On 06/05/2012 05:20 AM, JD wrote:
Well, I was thinking of distros.
Since I will not be the creator of the Linux ISO
which I will be downloading and burning onto a DVD,
how can I create those keys and insert them into the
DVD without going through the
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Swapnil Bhartiya
wrote:
> Done exactly that. I did not add vga=0x317 as my monitor is 1900x1080
>
> I rebuilt the grub configuration as you suggested.
> Note: I am multi-booting with Ubuntu so that I do have a system working
> unless I fix Fedora issue. I did not i
On 06/05/2012 05:20 AM, JD wrote:
Well, I was thinking of distros.
Since I will not be the creator of the Linux ISO
which I will be downloading and burning onto a DVD,
how can I create those keys and insert them into the
DVD without going through the whole rigmarole
of building the OS and the who
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>> akmods run *every* boot as a service.
>
> AFAIK, all it does if the module is already there is detect it. I
> didn't think it rebuilt on every boot--only if the module is missing.
Bad word selection on my part.
It runs on every boot, it
On 06/05/2012 04:47 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:06:24 -0700
JD wrote:
On 06/04/2012 05:03 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
This has been explained in this thread before.
It is logically impossible to have a so-called "secure-boot" for
both a free OS and a non-free OS on the same
On 06/04/2012 07:15 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Swapnil Bhartiya
wrote:
With that said, a couple of questions:
0. Please post your hardware configuration.
GPU: GeForce GTX 275
Intel i5
8GB RAM
I've got a two machines using GTX 2xx cards.
HW should be safe, I reck
On 06/05/2012 05:10 AM, JD wrote:
I wonder if China will go along with the MS plans!
Much of our HW is made in China. What's to prevent
China from inserting back door code in the HW? I
mean that would totally make secure boot a laughable
thing.
Well this scheme where the manufacturer inserts a
I'm using Fedora 17, LXDE, x86_64.
[akira@localhost ~]$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0020 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub
Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0020 Int
On 06/04/2012 07:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
No one has wanted to be this 'authority'. Perhaps someone will come
out appear now given all the press. However, you should hopefully be
able to just create and sign your own keys if you like, so no need to
have an authority for that unless you want Mi
On 06/04/2012 04:05 PM, JD wrote:
On 06/04/2012 03:35 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Seems there are good reasons to remove any Microsoft keys after all..
http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/06/flame-malware-was-signed-by-rogue-microsoft-certificate/
"rogue"
Amazing! I smell Class Action Lawsuits in
On 06/04/2012 07:38 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/06/04 19:05, JD wrote:
On 06/04/2012 06:53 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Possibly, in the worst case, in a distant future it will be a little
bit
difficult to find consumer-grade hardware, like laptops, which have the
necessary bits – either a switch
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:06:24 -0700
JD wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 05:03 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >
> > This has been explained in this thread before.
> >
> > It is logically impossible to have a so-called "secure-boot" for
> > both a free OS and a non-free OS on the same platform. Since, by
> > d
On 2012/06/04 19:05, JD wrote:
On 06/04/2012 06:53 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Possibly, in the worst case, in a distant future it will be a little bit
difficult to find consumer-grade hardware, like laptops, which have the
necessary bits – either a switch to disable secure boot, or an easy way
On 06/04/2012 06:53 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Possibly, in the worst case, in a distant future it will be a little
bit difficult to find consumer-grade hardware, like laptops, which
have the necessary bits – either a switch to disable secure boot, or
an easy way to install the right keys – t
JD writes:
On 06/04/2012 05:03 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
JD writes:
I lost you guy!
I mean I do not understand how the creation of a single linux distro
signature authority for all linuxes, undermines whatever MS does to secure
it's OS.
Are the two necessarily mutually exclusive (i.e. the
On 06/04/2012 05:03 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
JD writes:
I lost you guy!
I mean I do not understand how the creation of a single linux distro
signature authority for all linuxes, undermines whatever MS does to
secure it's OS.
Are the two necessarily mutually exclusive (i.e. they cannot both b
JD writes:
I lost you guy!
I mean I do not understand how the creation of a single linux distro
signature authority for all linuxes, undermines whatever MS does to secure
it's OS.
Are the two necessarily mutually exclusive (i.e. they cannot both be used on
dual or milti-boot systems?
This h
On 06/04/2012 03:35 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Seems there are good reasons to remove any Microsoft keys after all..
http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/06/flame-malware-was-signed-by-rogue-microsoft-certificate/
"rogue"
Amazing! I smell Class Action Lawsuits in this.
--
users mailing list
users@li
On 06/04/2012 02:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> yes and no the instructions from wiki are working fine if you make a
> own grub-entry and do not forget remove it after conversion BUT you
> need someone for a pwoer-cycle after the upgrade because "reboot" ends
> in a kerenl-panic directly after upgra
> Winderful Wibble Motherboard with locked down UEFI: R2D2 $127.95
> Wunderful Wibble Motherboard with unlockable UEFI: R2D2-U $127.95
> Wunderful Wibble Motherboard with UEFI: R2D2-N $99.95
>
> With a simple BIOS transplant the board can move between configurations.
> The BIO
Seems there are good reasons to remove any Microsoft keys after all..
http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/06/flame-malware-was-signed-by-rogue-microsoft-certificate/
"rogue"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
On 2012/06/04 14:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:48:44 -0700
JD wrote:
On 06/04/2012 01:44 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
This may have been covered but if you are among the majority (I
would guess) that do not have UEFI machines the question is kind of
moot is it not? I am assuming t
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:48:44 -0700
JD wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 01:44 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > This may have been covered but if you are among the majority (I
> > would guess) that do not have UEFI machines the question is kind of
> > moot is it not? I am assuming that Fedora 18 will run on thes
On 06/04/2012 02:38 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 04.06.2012, JD wrote:
It's all about control control control - which translates into
money money money which buys power and influence.
Hell, it always has been..
Of course - once one foot is in the door, soon the
other (and others) will follow.
T
On 06/04/2012 01:44 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
This may have been covered but if you are among the majority (I would
guess) that do not have UEFI machines the question is kind of moot is
it not? I am assuming that Fedora 18 will run on these machines
without the UEFI boot firmware. Am I correct?
On 04.06.2012, JD wrote:
> It's all about control control control - which translates into
> money money money which buys power and influence.
Hell, it always has been..
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 10:28 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> I have a fresh install of F17 that has some confusion about its
> timezone. The date displays as MDT (which is correct), but every time I
> boot the machine, it displays six hours ahead. Not coincidentally I'm
> sure, that is the offset betwee
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 14:58 -0700, JD wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 12:20 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 06/03/2012 12:03 PM, x414e54 wrote:
> >> Even my friends, I tell them about linux, and they are very skillful
> >> with computers but have no intention to use anything that is not
> >> pre-installed on th
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 13:15 -0400, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Swapnil Bhartiya
> wrote:
> >> 4. Why are you using akmods-nvidia instead of kmod-nvidia? Any
> >> particular reason for "build" the RPMs locally?
> >
> > http://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/315/what-is-t
On 06/05/2012 03:44 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> /usr/lib/libao.so.4
>>
>> not libao.so.2
> So it's not backwards compatible?. Otherwise I could create a symlink...
>
Not backwards compatible.
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, af
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> /usr/lib/libao.so.4
>
> not libao.so.2
So it's not backwards compatible?. Otherwise I could create a symlink...
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject
On 06/05/2012 03:17 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I got as far as to get a F17 RPM built, but it complains about a
> missing libao.so.2
>
> AFAIK F17 has got libao installed.
Well, yes. But it a newer version
/usr/lib/libao.so.4
not libao.so.2
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, a
OpenJUMP rpms for Fedora
Does such a thing exist?
Thanks.
Max Pyziur
p...@brama.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_gu
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 21:54 +0300, jarmo wrote:
> Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:19:42 -0430
> Patrick O'Callaghan kirjoitti:
>
> > I recently upgraded F16->F17 using preupgrade. I booted into F17 and
> > everything seemed to work until I tried rebooting, whereupon I got a
> > Kernel panic with a lot of stu
I'm trying to get DVBcut to work in F17
http://dvbcut.sourceforge.net/download.html
I got as far as to get a F17 RPM built, but it complains about a
missing libao.so.2
AFAIK F17 has got libao installed.
So what is missing here?.
I have checked and there's references to libao.so.2 in the F16 RPM
Quoting JD :
On 06/04/2012 03:27 AM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
Hi,
I think is the same as the trusted computing bullshit, pretense to
gain money and keep away non-ms stuff.
Question why now? Why they want that so badly?
Z
My feeling is that the current economic gloom and doom is a fertile
ground
On 06/04/2012 03:27 AM, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
Hi,
I think is the same as the trusted computing bullshit, pretense to
gain money and keep away non-ms stuff.
Question why now? Why they want that so badly?
Z
My feeling is that the current economic gloom and doom is a fertile
ground in which megal
Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:19:42 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan kirjoitti:
> I recently upgraded F16->F17 using preupgrade. I booted into F17 and
> everything seemed to work until I tried rebooting, whereupon I got a
> Kernel panic with a lot of stuff about missing files (mdadm, sh,
> cat, ...) and a panic b
On 06/04/2012 03:22 AM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of JD
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 11:40 AM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: Red Hat Will Pay Micr
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 09:42 -0700, Edward M wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 08:09 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:
> > The firmware there but is doesn't find it :-
> >
> > /usr/lib/firmware/dvb-usb-dib0700-1.20.fw
> >
> > The directory
> >
> > /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.7/usb1/1-2 exists but not firmware
>
>
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Swapnil Bhartiya
wrote:
>> With that said, a couple of questions:
>> 0. Please post your hardware configuration.
>
> GPU: GeForce GTX 275
> Intel i5
> 8GB RAM
I've got a two machines using GTX 2xx cards.
HW should be safe, I reckon.
>> 2. Have you followed the nVi
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 10:28 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> until the next reboot, at which point it's off by six hours again.
Tacky to answer myself, but I figured it out. I needed to run:
# hwclock --systohc
...to get the hardware clock updated. ntpdate only updates the system
clock.
--Greg
--
I finally found the answer with the right Google keywords.
It appears that the mime database just needed to be rebuilt.
The last update must have screwed it up.
I applied as root:
update-mime-database /usr/share/mime
chmod 664 /usr/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache
Everything came back after l
On 06/04/2012 08:09 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:
The firmware there but is doesn't find it :-
/usr/lib/firmware/dvb-usb-dib0700-1.20.fw
The directory
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:1a.7/usb1/1-2 exists but not firmware
try modprobe dvb_usb_dib0700
then modinfo dvb_usb_dib0700
see if tha
I have a fresh install of F17 that has some confusion about its
timezone. The date displays as MDT (which is correct), but every time I
boot the machine, it displays six hours ahead. Not coincidentally I'm
sure, that is the offset between MDT and GMT, so what I'm seeing is
correct GMT time but disp
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 23:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 11:09 PM, Andrew Gray wrote:
> > The firmware there but is doesn't find it :-
> >
> > /usr/lib/firmware/dvb-usb-dib0700-1.20.fw
>
> Quick question. Is that a typo?
>
> I'm running the 32bit OS, but that file on my system
> That's just it - 95% of computer users use windows.
Depends on your definition of a) "use" and b) "computer"
You might want to compare the size of the Android market and the Windows
market (and the Android market itself has lots of lock down problems)
Alan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
I'll start by saying that I'm running F17 on large number of (vastly
different) machines, of that, 2 are using nouveau and 4 are using the
nVidia binary drivers.
(I usually use the binary drivers only if I require high-performance OpenGL)
The reason I mention it, is that it's unlikely that I mi
On 06/04/2012 11:09 PM, Andrew Gray wrote:
> The firmware there but is doesn't find it :-
>
> /usr/lib/firmware/dvb-usb-dib0700-1.20.fw
Quick question. Is that a typo?
I'm running the 32bit OS, but that file on my system is at
/lib/firmware/dvb-usb-dib0700-1.20.fw
--
Never be afraid
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 07:33 -0700, Edward M wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 07:18 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:
> > udevd[507]: specified group 'plugdev' unknown
>
>
> try by creating group called plugdev with groupadd
I have added the group now it reports :-
kernel: [87747.531286] usb 1-2: USB disconnect
On 06/04/2012 07:18 AM, Andrew Gray wrote:
udevd[507]: specified group 'plugdev' unknown
try by creating group called plugdev with groupadd
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/us
Hi
Just installed Fedora 17 x86_64 the initial kernel and F16 recognized
the Pinnacle 72e USB DVB. The latest kernel 3.3.7-1 f17 x86_64 doesn't
seem to recognize the Pinnacle DVB USB !!
kernel: [84144.365024] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 15
using ehci_hcd
kernel: [84144.479890]
well I'm running a 64 amd/amd, might go back to 16 just to get
stable... or try again with no rpmfussion... but kinda need it for the
french class...
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 12:43:16 -0430
> Dokuro wrote:
>
>> hello all! and thanks for fedora,
>>
>>
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> I recently upgraded F16->F17 using preupgrade. I booted into F17 and
> everything seemed to work until I tried rebooting, whereupon I got a
> Kernel panic with a lot of stuff about missing files (mdadm, sh,
> cat, ...) and a panic backtr
I applied an update last night and now most of the file associations are gone.
Most icons are gone from the shell. The desktop background images are not
recognized (I cannot even browse back to them, since it no longer recognizes
any image formats (JPG, etc). I tried to open a JPG in image vi
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>On a related note: how does one capture the console output when a panic
>like this occurs? It isn't in any log files (maybe by this time there
>isn't a filesystem) and it's a chore to have to copy it all by hand,
>which is why I haven't bothered in this case.
I use a
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I recently upgraded F16->F17 using preupgrade. I booted into F17 and
> everything seemed to work until I tried rebooting, whereupon I got a
> Kernel panic with a lot of stuff about missing files (mdadm, sh,
> cat, ...) and a panic backtrace. This was completely reprodu
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Swapnil Bhartiya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am revisiting the same problem that I faced with Fedora 16, and the reason
> I could not use it. I installed 'akmod' and 'nvidia settings' from Yumex and
> when rebooted the screen was stuck at
>
> em1: link becomes ready
>
> I lo
On 06/04/2012 08:49 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
So it looks like the issue was that grub.cfg should have been changed
during the preupgrade, but wasn't. Has anyone else seen this?
Yep. Happened to me, too. I saw it mentioned somewhere in a bugzilla
issue about the kernel panic you mentione
I recently upgraded F16->F17 using preupgrade. I booted into F17 and
everything seemed to work until I tried rebooting, whereupon I got a
Kernel panic with a lot of stuff about missing files (mdadm, sh,
cat, ...) and a panic backtrace. This was completely reproducible.
I then noticed that the runn
Swapnil Bhartiya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am revisiting the same problem that I faced with Fedora 16, and the
> reason I could not use it. I installed 'akmod' and 'nvidia settings'
> from Yumex and when rebooted the screen was stuck at /
>
> em1: link becomes ready/
>
> I logged into tty3 and then re
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Swapnil Bhartiya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am revisiting the same problem that I faced with Fedora 16, and the reason
> I could not use it. I installed 'akmod' and 'nvidia settings' from Yumex and
> when rebooted the screen was stuck at
[snip]
>
> and now system is booting
Okay, so just to be clear, you mean that you have *not* copied files
from a f15 filesystem to a new f17 system, but actually have copied
files (with a file manager, GNOME Nautilus) from an external system to a
unique filesystem that is used by both f15 and f17 that you dual-boot on
the same dis
On 06/04/2012 01:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.06.2012 13:36, schrieb Swapnil Bhartiya:
I am revisiting the same problem that I faced with Fedora 16, and the reason I
could not use it. I installed
'akmod' and 'nvidia settings' from Yumex and when rebooted the screen was stuck
at /
em1: li
Am 04.06.2012 13:36, schrieb Swapnil Bhartiya:
> I am revisiting the same problem that I faced with Fedora 16, and the reason
> I could not use it. I installed
> 'akmod' and 'nvidia settings' from Yumex and when rebooted the screen was
> stuck at /
>
> em1: link becomes ready/
>
> I logged into
Hi,
I am revisiting the same problem that I faced with Fedora 16, and the
reason I could not use it. I installed 'akmod' and 'nvidia settings'
from Yumex and when rebooted the screen was stuck at /
em1: link becomes ready/
I logged into tty3 and then removed akmod nvidia
[root@localhost ~]#
On 06/04/2012 12:22 PM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of JD
So, if all the linux distros put their "heads" together and create a single
Linux signature authority, which w
j.witvl...@mindef.nl writes:
Just hope that "official" versions of W8, do not require such uefi-structure
beneath them, otherwise you have a problem with vmware/kvm/xen.
Gee, you think?
pgpuFEuvTwd9w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
Thibault Nélis writes:
On 06/02/2012 10:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
But I thought that this was the plan of action, isn't it? Sign a shim
that boots Fedora. Presto, secured boot, with Microsoft's blessing.
So, did you just change your mind, and realize that:
1) It makes no sense, and
2) Mi
Hi,
I think is the same as the trusted computing bullshit, pretense to
gain money and keep away non-ms stuff.
Question why now? Why they want that so badly?
Z
2012/6/4 :
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org]
Thibault Nélis píše v Po 04. 06. 2012 v 11:25 +0200:
> Did you copy the data at the filesystem level or at the volume level?
> (In other words, did you copy the files themselves or the whole
> volume/partition block by block?)
I copied files in gnome. Data are on the same filesystem/disk space
(
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of JD
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 11:40 AM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: Red Hat Will Pay Microsoft To Get Past UEFI Restrictions
On 06/04/2012 01:
On 06/02/2012 12:37 PM, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
Bonjour!
I installed ucview to record images from a webcam. It stops recording
after 2,2 GB.
At 2,147,483,647 exactly? That looks like a classic 32-bit signed
integer overflow.
Is that the normal behaviour?
If that's what it
On 06/02/2012 07:11 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
Changing it in the UEFI interface before boot sounds much more
reasonable,
A post in the other thread suggests that I might be wrong BTW, or at
least that it would depend on the vendor.
but please don't call me "Shirley."
Roger, roger.
--
t
--
users
I'd say Flash doesn't have a great reputation (I assume plugin-container
is running Flash here) and that's one the reasons why. I also have a
constant load even when the video is paused, in the order of 0.7-1.3%.
About PulseAudio though.. it's definitely not normal (at least I don't
see that
Also, maybe this would suffice to identify them, in case you can't
install the package:
$ ls -l /dev/disk/by-{id,label}
--
t
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: htt
On 06/04/2012 01:47 AM, Thibault Nélis wrote:
.
In my opinion, a better question would be "When will alternative
organizations to Microsoft will appear to offer the same services?",
and with that one I'd actually worry they might never come, even
though we need them.
So, if all the linux d
Coreboot / TianoCore is indeed the way to go.
Presentation from earlier this year (just Coreboot), for the interested:
http://video.fosdem.org/2012/maintracks/janson/Coreboot.webm
--
t
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
Did you copy the data at the filesystem level or at the volume level?
(In other words, did you copy the files themselves or the whole
volume/partition block by block?)
In the former case, I wouldn't worry too much, it might just be the
result of the natural defragmentation of your files. To r
On 06/02/2012 07:24 PM, JD wrote:
On 06/02/2012 10:08 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
I sure do! The only PC's I've ever owned that were pre-built were
laptops. I'm not a hardware geek, but one of my friends is, and when
it's time to upgrade, we get together, buy parts and he puts them
together. I pay him w
On 06/02/2012 10:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
But I thought that this was the plan of action, isn't it? Sign a shim
that boots Fedora. Presto, secured boot, with Microsoft's blessing.
So, did you just change your mind, and realize that:
1) It makes no sense, and
2) Microsoft is not going to s
On 06/04/2012 01:45 AM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/04/2012 12:07 AM, Zhangsan wrote:
>
> Did you follow the directions from the wiki?:
>
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_16_-.3E_Fedo
> ra_17
yes exactly. What's your content of
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.or
On 06/04/2012 12:07 AM, Zhangsan wrote:
>
> Did you follow the directions from the wiki?:
>
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_16_-.3E_Fedo
> ra_17
yes exactly. What's your content of
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-17&arch=x86_64 .
Am 04.06.2012 09:16, schrieb Trever L. Adams:
> Hello All,
>
> Most upgrades, I can do with yum install preupgrade, etc. I see the /usr
> merge script, etc. run on DVD based upgrades.
>
> I have an AMANDA server which is very difficult to put monitor, keyboard
> and mouse on. Is there a proper,
Hello All,
Most upgrades, I can do with yum install preupgrade, etc. I see the /usr
merge script, etc. run on DVD based upgrades.
I have an AMANDA server which is very difficult to put monitor, keyboard
and mouse on. Is there a proper, and hopefully easy, way of doing an in
place, yum only based
>
> Did you follow the directions from the wiki?:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_16_-.3E_Fedo
> ra_17
yes exactly. What's your content of
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-17&arch=x86_64 .
Mine is the following:
http://www.metalin
92 matches
Mail list logo
