Hi,

I think is the same as the trusted computing bullshit, pretense to
gain money and keep away non-ms stuff.
Question why now? Why they want that so badly?

Z

2012/6/4  <j.witvl...@mindef.nl>:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of JD
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 11:40 AM
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Red Hat Will Pay Microsoft To Get Past UEFI Restrictions
>
> On 06/04/2012 01:47 AM, Thibault Nélis wrote:
>> .
>>
>> In my opinion, a better question would be "When will alternative
>> organizations to Microsoft will appear to offer the same services?",
>> and with that one I'd actually worry they might never come, even
>> though we need them.
>>
> So, if all the linux distros put their "heads" together and create a single
> Linux signature authority, which will serve all the distros, and be funded
> largely by the industry (which sell linux servers - such as IBM, among
> others),
> and other for-money linux distros, such as Red Hat; then this will go a long
> way towards making linux totally independent of MS as far as key signatures
> are concerned.
> -----Original Message-----
>
> Excuse me if I'm misunderstanding,
> But somehow it looks to me that we are forced in a direction we should not be 
> heading to.
>
> Wasn't the whole idea behind this uefi-restrictions, to:
> a) improve Microsoft security record (fighting malware, rogue-drivers, worms, 
> ...)
> b) Fighting illegal versions of Windows.
>
> If you -on those uefi-systems- can only boot a legitimate (contradiction in 
> terminis) version of windows?
> Big deal!
> As long as you still can boot something else.... (I mean NON-microsoft)
> It should only means that their marketshare will be smaller (loss of "cloned" 
> versions of W8/W9/Wx)
>
> Just hope that "official" versions of W8, do not require such uefi-structure 
> beneath them, otherwise you have a problem with vmware/kvm/xen.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong...
>
> Hans
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet 
> de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt 
> u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De 
> Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die 
> verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van 
> berichten.
>
> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
> not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
> requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no 
> liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the 
> electronic transmission of messages.
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org



-- 
PGP:  06853DF7
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to