Re: aMule in Fedora 16

Le Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:30:04 +0700, Khemara Lyn a écrit : >I cannot use aMule on Fedora 16. When I try to connect, it just hangs >there with the 'cancel' button. And the there is message at the status >bar: "Warning: You have received low-ID!". Your firewall block the input (no doubt...). Dea

Re: synchronize time

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 15:57 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Well your point is incorrect. Cups browsing did not work if UTC was > not set. TThe clocks were set correctly. The hardware clock was > operating on UTC time and the system clock was running on local time. You just don't get it, do you?! Y

Re: lvm

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 15:13 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote: > The "partition type" is something DOS/Windows uses (to a degree) and > for backwards compatability reasons, you still see MS products use > these labels. Linux, however, does not adhere to or use the partition > types at all. I do not think

Re: lvm

On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 00:56 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen: > > We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it > > may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability > > for a long time now. > > uninteresting

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/05/2012 11:51 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > systemctl restart nfs-idmap.service I too use that URL. It doesn't mention one thing... The one thing that sometimes ends up being a gotcha is non-matching Domain = lines in /etc/idmapd.conf between client and server. -- Do not condemn the judgm

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/05/2012 11:49 AM, don fisher wrote: > I think it claims UDP instead of TCP and mountvers=3. Does mountvers=3 > => nfsv3? Yes FWIW, I've dropped the portions of my brain needed to work on nfsv3. When I need refreshing after not having setup NFS for a long time I go to http://www.crazys

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/04/12 20:43, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/05/2012 11:16 AM, don fisher wrote: On 03/04/12 19:14, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.03.2012 03:12, schrieb don fisher: Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off. I set SELINUX=disable in /etc/sysconfig/selinux SELINUX has nothi

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/04/2012 05:35:17 PM, don fisher wrote: > I am running f16 and am trying to get NFS so work. I can ping the > site, > but when I try and telnet to it I receive "Name or service not > known". > > What does telnet require that ping does not? > > Thanks > don As I understand, you've disabled

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

Slight change, but after editing the iptables, I was able to mount my nfs file system. But umount will not work. It says: umount /dfpc57 umount.nfs: /dfpc57: not found umount.nfs: /dfpc57: not found But df says: dfpc57:/ nfs 678G 184G 460G 29% /dfpc57 Also mtab has what I inter

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/05/2012 11:16 AM, don fisher wrote: > On 03/04/12 19:14, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 05.03.2012 03:12, schrieb don fisher: >>> Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off. >>> I set SELINUX=disable in /etc/sysconfig/selinux >> >> SELINUX has nothing to do with the fir

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/04/12 19:14, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.03.2012 03:12, schrieb don fisher: Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off. I set SELINUX=disable in /etc/sysconfig/selinux SELINUX has nothing to do with the firewall Thanks. I did not understand what was going on. I di

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/05/2012 10:12 AM, don fisher wrote: > Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off. You have the firewall turned off on the system running the NFS service? Are you setting up NFSv3 or NFSv4? -- Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/05/2012 09:59 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > I'd guess the firewall on the RHEL4 system isn't blocking the > connection, so the connection to port 23 is simply rejected, while the > F16 system's firewall is blocking it, so that system pretends like > it's not there. That is probably true.

aMule in Fedora 16

Dear All, I cannot use aMule on Fedora 16. When I try to connect, it just hangs there with the 'cancel' button. And the there is message at the status bar: "Warning: You have received low-ID!". Could someone please set some light on this for me? Thanks for any help in advance. Regards, Khem

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

Am 05.03.2012 03:12, schrieb don fisher: > Sorry, I should have stated that I have the firewall turned off. > I set SELINUX=disable in /etc/sysconfig/selinux SELINUX has nothing to do with the firewall signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fe

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/04/12 18:59, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/05/2012 09:37 AM, Tim Evans wrote: On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote: What does telnet require that ping does not? A running telnet daemon on the destination host. Right I k

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On 3/4/2012 5:51 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: `yum install python3` just installs the "python3" package containing the Python 3 interpreter, while `yum install python3\*` installs every package that begins with "python3", e.g. the Python 3 interpreter and all library packages for it included in

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 03/05/2012 09:37 AM, Tim Evans wrote: >> On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote: >> >>> >>> What does telnet require that ping does not? >> >> A running telnet daemon on the destination host. >> > > Right > > I know this is tangential, b

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/04/12 18:48, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Tim Evans wrote: On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote: What does telnet require that ping does not? A running telnet daemon on the destination host. Yep. Try SSH. Besides being nine quintillion times more

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/05/2012 09:37 AM, Tim Evans wrote: > On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote: > >> >> What does telnet require that ping does not? > > A running telnet daemon on the destination host. > Right I know this is tangential, but this reminded me of something interesting I noticed recently.

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: > On 3/4/2012 5:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 05.03.2012 02:01, schrieb Paul Allen Newell: >>> On 3/4/2012 1:46 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: Run: yum install python3\* and see what happens. >>> >>> Aaron: >>> >>> I just went t

[SOLVED:] Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On 3/4/2012 5:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: escape shell wildcards if you do not mean or sooner or later it will hurt you by interpreting something you did not want people are working all the day with the shell learning such things by get hurted and will suggest correct commands, at leat it is yo

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Tim Evans wrote: > On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote: > >> >> What does telnet require that ping does not? > > > A running telnet daemon on the destination host. Yep. Try SSH. Besides being nine quintillion times more secure, it's generally included by def

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

Am 05.03.2012 02:32, schrieb Paul Allen Newell: > On 3/4/2012 5:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 05.03.2012 02:01, schrieb Paul Allen Newell: >>> On 3/4/2012 1:46 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: Run: yum install python3\* and see what happens. >>> Aaron: >>> >>> I just went through all the

Re: telnet to adjacent computer fails

On 03/04/2012 08:35 PM, don fisher wrote: What does telnet require that ping does not? A running telnet daemon on the destination host. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Gu

telnet to adjacent computer fails

I am running f16 and am trying to get NFS so work. I can ping the site, but when I try and telnet to it I receive "Name or service not known". What does telnet require that ping does not? Thanks don -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription optio

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On 3/4/2012 5:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.03.2012 02:01, schrieb Paul Allen Newell: On 3/4/2012 1:46 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: Run: yum install python3\* and see what happens. Aaron: I just went through all the man pages and docs on yum and couldn't see what this syntax meant. To get p

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

Am 05.03.2012 02:01, schrieb Paul Allen Newell: > On 3/4/2012 1:46 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: >> >> Run: yum install python3\* >> and see what happens. > > Aaron: > > I just went through all the man pages and docs on yum and couldn't see what > this syntax meant. To get python3, I do > "yum inst

Re: lvm

Am 05.03.2012 02:06, schrieb pringle...@gmail.com: > another thing, why are so angry? is a discussion about lvm and > partitions not if star wars is better or not than > star trek who in the world is angry? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@li

Re: lvm

> > first if you quote the mailing-list signature is difficult to read > > what is difficult to read? > > * not so long ago GRUB2 was no topic in Fedora (around 2009) > * but ext4 got stable late in 2008 > * in 2009 ext4 was fully supported for / > * but you could not boot from ext4 > * you needed

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:11:27 -0500 Genes MailLists wrote: > yes and no. imo anyway. Well, I just discovered that the "arduino" packages are apparently really ancient. I was thinking about playing with an arduino board, and the dev tools in the f16 repos are version 022 and on the official arduin

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On 3/4/2012 1:46 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: Run: yum install python3\* and see what happens. Aaron: I just went through all the man pages and docs on yum and couldn't see what this syntax meant. To get python3, I do "yum install python3" ... what does the \* get me? My apologies in advance

Re: lvm

Am 05.03.2012 01:36, schrieb pringle...@gmail.com: > > On Mar 4, 2012 9:00 PM, "Reindl Harald" > >> Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen: >> > We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it >> > may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability

Re: lvm

On Mar 4, 2012 9:00 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > > > > Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen: > > We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it > > may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability > > for a long time now. > > BTW: > > what does F

Re: lvm

Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen: > We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it > may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability > for a long time now. BTW: what does F14 matter in this context? i am in production since 2009 with ext

Re: lvm

Am 05.03.2012 00:35, schrieb Peter Larsen: > We're not longer using legacy grub. Even with F14 we shipped Grub2 (it > may even have been included earlier - not sure). We've had this ability > for a long time now. uninteresting in this context you shipped and it was good to have a sepearte /boot

Re: lvm

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 22:57 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 04.03.2012 22:20, schrieb Peter Larsen: > > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> is this a joke? > > > > Nope. > > > >> > >> you really want to install a OS and put systema nd data on the same > >> partition

Re: Help with ssl/tls handshake_failure.

Em 04-03-2012 19:18, jdow escreveu: > On 2012/03/04 16:43, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas wrote: >> Hi friends, >> >> Installed Fedora 3.2.7-1.fc16.x86_64, trying to access the site >>

Re: Help with ssl/tls handshake_failure.

Em 04-03-2012 17:12, Patrick O'Callaghan escreveu: > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:43 -0500, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas wrote: >> Installed Fedora 3.2.7-1.fc16.x86_64, trying to access the site > What is Fedora 3.2.7? [Lucelio@MAQ01 ~]$ uname -a Linux MAQ01.REDE01 3.2.7-1.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Feb 21 0

Re: Help with ssl/tls handshake_failure.

On 2012/03/04 16:43, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi friends, Installed Fedora 3.2.7-1.fc16.x86_64, trying to access the site Cadastramento para emitir NFe

Re: synchronize time

On 2012/03/04 13:57, Aaron Konstam wrote: On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 22:39 +1030, Tim wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:13 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: Whatever you theorize, here is what happened. The hardware clock was set to UTC, and the software clock was local time. However, the UTC box in system-

Re: Help with ssl/tls handshake_failure.

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:43 -0500, Lucélio Gomes de Freitas wrote: > Installed Fedora 3.2.7-1.fc16.x86_64, trying to access the site What is Fedora 3.2.7? poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On 03/04/2012 03:34 PM, Stuart McGraw wrote: > One of the reason for using Fedora is quick access > to the latest software -- sometimes even too quick > (hence the "bleeding edge" moniker.) > > But I have noticed this is not true for some things. yes and no. imo anyway. Leading edge and bleedi

CUPS and IPP...

Greetings... A redirect to a site that shows/demonstrates an 'splains how IPP works and the cups/ldp calls to get it to work would be appreciated.. --Hal. Sarasota Florida -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedorapr

Re: lvm

Am 04.03.2012 22:20, schrieb Peter Larsen: > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> is this a joke? > > Nope. > >> >> you really want to install a OS and put systema nd data on the same >> partition? do this if you want but do not tell anybody this is a >> smart setup-desig

Re: synchronize time

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 22:39 +1030, Tim wrote: > On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:13 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > Whatever you theorize, here is what happened. The hardware clock was > > set to UTC, and the software clock was local time. However, the UTC > > box in system-config-date was not checked. Re

[OT] was, Re: lvm

On 03/04/2012 01:27 PM, Peter Larsen wrote: lol - "Island of Confusions" - I like that! Thanx. That's from The Phantom Tollbooth, by Norman Juster, illustrated by Jules Feiffer. The thing about the Island of Conclusions (I must have typoed that.) is that you can only get there by leaping.

Re: Opening X.pub files

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:33:31 -0600 Aaron Konstam wrote: > Is there a fedora available program that will open (manage) X.pub files? X.pub? Do you mean Microsoft Publisher files? If so, the the only program that I'm aware of that will open a Microsoft Publisher file is Microsoft Publisher. --

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 13:34 -0700, Stuart McGraw wrote: > One of the reason for using Fedora is quick access > to the latest software -- sometimes even too quick > (hence the "bleeding edge" moniker.) > > But I have noticed this is not true for some things. > For example, in Fedora 15 python seem

Help with ssl/tls handshake_failure.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi friends, Installed Fedora 3.2.7-1.fc16.x86_64, trying to access the site Cadastramento para emitir NFe using FireFox10.0.1

Opening X.pub files

Is there a fedora available program that will open (manage) X.pub files? -- === "Nuclear war would really set back cable." -- Ted Turner === Aaron Konstam telepho

Re: lvm

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 12:44 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 03/04/2012 12:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 04.03.2012 21:13, schrieb Peter Larsen: > >> > Only on systems that are dual-booted does > >> > partitions make sense. With Grub2 we can now have a single partition for > >> > everything - a

Re: lvm

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:17 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 04.03.2012 21:13, schrieb Peter Larsen: > > Only on systems that are dual-booted does > > partitions make sense. With Grub2 we can now have a single partition for > > everything - and the reason we have the partition table is due to the

Re: lvm

Am 04.03.2012 21:48, schrieb Joe Zeff: > On 03/04/2012 12:26 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: >> You also used to run into a problem with some older BIOS where you >> needed a /boot partition at the start of the disk to be sure the >> BIOS could read it... > > In fact, this is the main reason for

Re: lvm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/04/2012 02:48 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 03/04/2012 12:26 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: >> You also used to run into a problem with some older BIOS where you >> needed a /boot partition at the start of the disk to be sure the >> BIOS could read i

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

Am 04.03.2012 21:34, schrieb Stuart McGraw: > One of the reason for using Fedora is quick access > to the latest software -- sometimes even too quick > (hence the "bleeding edge" moniker.) so update your fedora, other users are happy not get pushed everything in the matter "it builds it works"

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:34:25 -0700 Stuart McGraw wrote: > One of the reason for using Fedora is quick access > to the latest software -- sometimes even too quick > (hence the "bleeding edge" moniker.) > > But I have noticed this is not true for some things. > For example, in Fedora 15 python see

Re: is fedora really bleeding edge?

On 03/04/2012 12:34 PM, Stuart McGraw wrote: Why do many packages follow the upstream faithfully yet others seem to use a boat-anchor update policy? Is there an official policy about this or is it a matter of individual packagers' choice? Partly it's because you're using F15 not F16. The packa

Re: lvm

On 03/04/2012 12:26 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: You also used to run into a problem with some older BIOS where you needed a /boot partition at the start of the disk to be sure the BIOS could read it... In fact, this is the main reason for a separate /boot partition. Once the BIOS code was

Re: lvm

On 03/04/2012 12:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 04.03.2012 21:13, schrieb Peter Larsen: > Only on systems that are dual-booted does > partitions make sense. With Grub2 we can now have a single partition for > everything - and the reason we have the partition table is due to the > bios needs

is fedora really bleeding edge?

One of the reason for using Fedora is quick access to the latest software -- sometimes even too quick (hence the "bleeding edge" moniker.) But I have noticed this is not true for some things. For example, in Fedora 15 python seems frozen at python-2.7.1 even though -2.7.2 was released a long tim

Re: lvm

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/04/2012 02:13 PM, Peter Larsen wrote: > The boot flag did before grub have a meaning, but since legacy grub came around (even lilo if I remember right) it's also being ignored. You have to be careful about the boot flag. The BIOS may requite the

Re: lvm

Am 04.03.2012 21:13, schrieb Peter Larsen: > Only on systems that are dual-booted does > partitions make sense. With Grub2 we can now have a single partition for > everything - and the reason we have the partition table is due to the > bios needs during boot. is this a joke? you really want to i

Re: lvm

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 18:27 +, mike cloaked wrote: > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Peter Larsen > wrote: > > Patric, > > fdisk (you have to start using -cul instead of -l) reports what-ever the > > partition table contains. It's utterly ignorant to what's on the actual > > partition. So sim

Re: lvm

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Peter Larsen wrote: > Patric, > fdisk (you have to start using -cul instead of -l) reports what-ever the > partition table contains. It's utterly ignorant to what's on the actual > partition. So simply login with fdisk, do a "t" and change the partition > type to wh

Re: cant ping from behind proxy box

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 18:28 +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote: > Hi, > Sorry - newbie to fedora, and google is driving me mad ! > > I've just setup up a F17alpha box, and am trying to ping the internet > from behind my Ubuntu proxy server, which also runs bind. This list is for released versions of Fe

MD5 sum mismatch error

I am trying to install openssh-5.8p2-24.fc16.src.rpm using the command "rpm -i openssh-5.9p1-19.fc18.src.rpm " and get the following error error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/openssh-4.3p2-askpass-grab-info.patch;4f5270c9: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch Any idea why I am ge

Re: lvm

On 03/04/2012 02:54 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > fdisk -l gives: > /dev/sda9 174809088 2055290871536 83 Linux > /dev/sda10 205531136 208603135 1536000 83 Linux > /dev/sda11 208605184 221302783 6348800 83 Linux > /dev/sda12 221304832 29

Re: cant ping from behind proxy box

"ping" doesn't use proxies. Again, you're blocked by the proxy server on purpose. Put in another way, you have to provide a router to do that. Not a proxy server. On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 18:51 +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote: > On 2012/03/04 18:44, Peter Larsen wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 18:28

Re: cant ping from behind proxy box

On 2012/03/04 18:44, Peter Larsen wrote: On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 18:28 +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote: Hi, Sorry - newbie to fedora, and google is driving me mad ! I've just setup up a F17alpha box, and am trying to ping the internet from behind my Ubuntu proxy server, which also runs bind. I have

Re: cant ping from behind proxy box

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 18:28 +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote: > Hi, > Sorry - newbie to fedora, and google is driving me mad ! > > I've just setup up a F17alpha box, and am trying to ping the internet > from behind my Ubuntu proxy server, which also runs bind. > > I have set GATEWAY in /etc/sysconfi

Re: lvm

Patric, fdisk (you have to start using -cul instead of -l) reports what-ever the partition table contains. It's utterly ignorant to what's on the actual partition. So simply login with fdisk, do a "t" and change the partition type to what-ever you want. Be aware that linux ignores those types - t

cant ping from behind proxy box

Hi, Sorry - newbie to fedora, and google is driving me mad ! I've just setup up a F17alpha box, and am trying to ping the internet from behind my Ubuntu proxy server, which also runs bind. I have set GATEWAY in /etc/sysconfig/network I have put nameserver 192.168.0.1 into /etc/resolv.conf I ha

Re: recommend some info on hot to upgrade from F15 to F16 using preupgrade

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 13:23, Martín Marqués wrote: > Just ran yum upgrade --downloadonly, and saw that yum wants to install > a bunch of i686 packages, even though I don't have any packages with > that arch (all x86_64 or noarch). > > preupgrade was doing the same. Are you sure you have no 32 bi

Re: no sound after yum update of working FC16

On 03/04/2012 03:17 AM, dave perry wrote: This evening I did a "sudo yum update" which included a new kernel and kernel headers. So I reinstalled the Nvidia proprietary driver (290.10), rebooted and now I have no sound. This morning after booting the new kernel again, all is working; sound is

Re: Getting Video to work with Netscape (F14)

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 01:49 -0500, Chris Tyler wrote: > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 02:10 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > BTW, F15 is Gnome 2. > > Umm, every box I've seen running F15 that's running Gnome is running > Gnome 3... My mistake. I don't use any version of Gnome so I was relying on mem

Re: YouTube, HTML5, and Chromium. Why the sudden malfunction?

Am 04.03.2012 13:41, schrieb Zoltan Hoppar: > http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html > > It seems, they have agreed with each other, adobe gives support for > flash in chrome only, and kills slowly HTML5. and where is the point for

KDE backlight control - backlighthelper not running?

I'm seeing an odd issue with KDE and screen backlight control. I'm running Thinkpad T60, with KDE 4.7 (from updates) and unfortunately the backlight control does not work. Pressing Fn+Home/Fn+End does not seem to have any effect. I normally have to tweak hotkey mask to something like 0xff in or

Re: YouTube, HTML5, and Chromium. Why the sudden malfunction?

Hi, You should read this: http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html It seems, they have agreed with each other, adobe gives support for flash in chrome only, and kills slowly HTML5. Ahem. Yes. Also you need to know that adobe, netflix an

Re: recommend some info on hot to upgrade from F15 to F16 using preupgrade

El día 4 de marzo de 2012 09:07, Martín Marqués escribió: > 2012/3/2 Alan Cox : >> On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:01:12 -0300 >> Martín Marqués wrote: >> >>> That's all I want (what's in the subject). >>> >>> I've had some headaches with preupgrade, basically, I guess, because I >>> have /var on another p

Re: Cleaning /tmp

On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 19:36 +, James Wilkinson wrote: > One option is tmpfs. Put something like this in /etc/fstab: > none/tmptmpfs nodev,noexec 0 0 > and everything in /tmp will be deleted whenever the system is rebooted > or powered down (unless you h

Re: Need help USB modem

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 10:52 +1100, Roger wrote: > 2. There is very little to no assistance for students at their level of > understanding, it is all highly technical and way out of the mindset of > 14-18 year olds. Hey what? My experience has been that most people in that age bracket have been

Re: synchronize time

On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 10:13 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Whatever you theorize, here is what happened. The hardware clock was > set to UTC, and the software clock was local time. However, the UTC > box in system-config-date was not checked. Result was cups browsing > did not work properly That's

Re: recommend some info on hot to upgrade from F15 to F16 using preupgrade

2012/3/2 Alan Cox : > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:01:12 -0300 > Martín Marqués wrote: > >> That's all I want (what's in the subject). >> >> I've had some headaches with preupgrade, basically, I guess, because I >> have /var on another partition. > > Preupgrade randomly fails anyway. Its great when it wo

Re: sudo

On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:17, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Fixed. > In fact, :w is not enough we need to :q visudo also! Of course! visudo edits a temporary file, and copies over the changes once you quit. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedor

lvm

Hello, fdisk -l gives: /dev/sda9 174809088 2055290871536 83 Linux /dev/sda10 205531136 208603135 1536000 83 Linux /dev/sda11 208605184 221302783 6348800 83 Linux /dev/sda12 221304832 29196083135328000 83 Linux while pvscan PV /dev/s

Re: sudo

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Kazuo Ishii wrote: Why don't you set as: user1ALL=(ALL) ALL Fixed. In fact, :w is not enough we need to :q visudo also! ? 2012/3/4, Patrick Dupre : Hello, With fedora 14 I cannot make sudo works fine. sudo-1.7.4p5-2.fc14.x86_64 I edited /etc/sudoers (wi

YouTube, HTML5, and Chromium. Why the sudden malfunction?

Last month, one of the most pleasant surprises I ran across was the fact that Google finally seemed to have defaulted to HTML5 for YouTube. Virtually every video I played (I cannot remember a single counterexample) was working fully in the HTML5 player. It was a real relief, since I really do not w

Re: Getting Video to work with Netscape (F14)

On 04/03/12 03:37, r...@dwf.com wrote: But right now my impression is that trying to run the new Gnome 3 on my multiboot machines would cause more problems than its worth You do know you don't have to use Gnome at all. -- Regards, Frank "Jack of all, fubars" -- users mailing list users@lists.

Re: How to clean up Yum mess?

On 3/3/2012 2:24 PM, Arthur Dent wrote: [...] Arthur: Hope you are able to resolve situation. When I noticed the change of "no icon/alert" that there are new updates, I immediately set everything to do nothing so any yum updates would only happen when I requested. This was to make sure I did

Re: What it be..

On 3/2/2012 10:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/03/2012 02:34 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: Makes sense ... I have no idea what is happening in RHEL development and this thread seemed like a good place to ask the question. Maybe a better place to ask about RHEL future stuff would be on the Red H