On 01/21/2012 08:54 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/21/2012 07:57 PM, Jim wrote:
On 01/21/2012 06:57 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/21/2012 05:12 PM, Jim wrote:
Samsung's installer believes CUPS expects to find file
/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertosamsungsplc , but he is wrong: CUPS
expects
to f
On 01/21/2012 08:50 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/21/2012 07:57 PM, Jim wrote:
On 01/21/2012 06:57 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/21/2012 05:12 PM, Jim wrote:
Samsung's installer believes CUPS expects to find file
/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertosamsungsplc , but he is wrong: CUPS
expects
to f
On 01/21/2012 07:57 PM, Jim wrote:
On 01/21/2012 06:57 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/21/2012 05:12 PM, Jim wrote:
Samsung's installer believes CUPS expects to find file
/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertosamsungsplc , but he is wrong: CUPS expects
to find those file in /usr/libexec/cups/filter.
Is
#replace the java version name for the one you have downloaded
#This have worked for me:
1. Download jre-6u27-linux-i586.bin from the SUN site.
2. su-->pwd-->mv jre-6u27-linux-i586.bin to /usr/local
3. chmod u+x jre-6u27-linux-i586.bin
4. verify permissions: ls -l
5. ./jre-6u27-linux-i586.bin
6. D
On 01/21/2012 07:57 PM, Jim wrote:
On 01/21/2012 06:57 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/21/2012 05:12 PM, Jim wrote:
Samsung's installer believes CUPS expects to find file
/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertosamsungsplc , but he is wrong: CUPS expects
to find those file in /usr/libexec/cups/filter.
Is
On 01/21/2012 06:57 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/21/2012 05:12 PM, Jim wrote:
Samsung's installer believes CUPS expects to find file
/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertosamsungsplc , but he is wrong: CUPS expects
to find those file in /usr/libexec/cups/filter.
Is this a true statement as for Fedora
On 01/21/2012 05:12 PM, Jim wrote:
Samsung's installer believes CUPS expects to find file
/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertosamsungsplc , but he is wrong: CUPS expects
to find those file in /usr/libexec/cups/filter.
Is this a true statement as for Fedora 16 ? does cups look at
/usr/libexec/cups/filte
linux guy wrote:
> I updated our server (i5, 8 GB, F16-KDE-64) from F16-32 last week.
So, if I understand correctly, on the server side went from 32 to 64 bit,
and then remotes are now slow?
-- rex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
Samsung's installer believes CUPS expects to find file
/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertosamsungsplc , but he is wrong: CUPS expects
to find those file in /usr/libexec/cups/filter.
Is this a true statement as for Fedora 16 ? does cups look at
/usr/libexec/cups/filter ? Instead of /usr/lib/cups/f
On 1/21/2012 6:32 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 21/01/12 11:21, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The problem is that my UID on the server is 500,
while it is 1000 on the laptop.
Either up the server to UID:1000
or the laptop down to UID:500
Is there some simple way of overcoming this?
No, been there
g wrote:
> viewing "source", "header" can be read, but not able to read "body"
> because of 'base64'.
For what it’s worth, you can read base64 encoded text by piping it to
openssl enc -d -base64
James
--
E-mail: james@ | You can accept the existence of rain without denying the
aprilcottage
On 21 Jan 2012, at 16:19, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/21/2012 02:36 AM, Scott van Looy wrote:
>> I had some problems with dracut on my server, upgrading kernels led to a
>> "non fatal" error when using yum, which was dracut not writing out an
>> initramfs, in turn making my server unbootable. Non f
On 01/21/2012 02:49 PM, linux guy wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:42 AM, linux guy wrote:
I seemed to have fixed the problem with
yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk.i686
yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64
Actually, it didn't solve all of them. I have less of them, none on
one particularly
On 21 January 2012 14:10, Tim wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 13:07 +, Ian Malone wrote:
>> Base64 expands (necessarily since it tries to represent full octets
>> with a subset), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base64#MIME there isn't
>> much of a rationale for using it in email text (though encod
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:42 AM, linux guy wrote:
> I seemed to have fixed the problem with
>
> yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk.i686
> yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64
Actually, it didn't solve all of them. I have less of them, none on
one particularly problematic page, but there are still
On 01/21/2012 02:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.01.2012 20:08, schrieb Mark LaPierre:
On 01/21/2012 04:30 AM, Markku Kolkka wrote:
21.1.2012 10:08, Jatin K kirjoitti:
I've Dell Latitiude E5620 Laptop with intel HD 3000 graphics card [1],
According glxinfo [2] that direct rendering is enabl
Am 21.01.2012 20:08, schrieb Mark LaPierre:
> On 01/21/2012 04:30 AM, Markku Kolkka wrote:
>> 21.1.2012 10:08, Jatin K kirjoitti:
>>> I've Dell Latitiude E5620 Laptop with intel HD 3000 graphics card [1],
>>> According glxinfo [2] that direct rendering is enabled but glxgear[3]
>>> output shows v
On 01/21/2012 04:30 AM, Markku Kolkka wrote:
21.1.2012 10:08, Jatin K kirjoitti:
I've Dell Latitiude E5620 Laptop with intel HD 3000 graphics card [1],
According glxinfo [2] that direct rendering is enabled but glxgear[3]
output shows very low FPS
The answer is included in the glxinfo output:
I seemed to have fixed the problem with
yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk.i686
yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk.x86_64
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproj
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 21:17 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 01:37 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 December 2011 19:41:38 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > This looks like a regression. Under F15 when I wrote large files to a
> > > pendrive, the system would
I updated our server (i5, 8 GB, F16-KDE-64) from F16-32 last week.
Previously remote X apps (ie ssh -X me@server) were fast.Now they
are exceedingly slow.
ping server shows a very fast response time and no missing packets.
The client computer is i7, 16 GB, F16-64, KDE.
Any ideas on why remo
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 11:02 -0700, linux guy wrote:
> I am getting vague Additional Plugins Required errors in Firefox.
> When I press the Install Plugins button, it states No Suitable plugins
> found.
>
> After some investigation, I'm thinking that the web page is trying to
> run a Java Script.
>
I am getting vague Additional Plugins Required errors in Firefox.
When I press the Install Plugins button, it states No Suitable plugins
found.
After some investigation, I'm thinking that the web page is trying to
run a Java Script.
yum list \*java\* and yum list \*ice\* do not turn up any instal
On 01/21/2012 02:36 AM, Scott van Looy wrote:
I had some problems with dracut on my server, upgrading kernels led to a "non
fatal" error when using yum, which was dracut not writing out an initramfs, in turn
making my server unbootable. Non fatal it was not.
Interesting. From my experience o
Hi there,
is the publican toolchain still the recommended vehicle for docbook
authoring in Fedora?
- Gergely
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 13:07 +, Ian Malone wrote:
> Base64 expands (necessarily since it tries to represent full octets
> with a subset), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base64#MIME there isn't
> much of a rationale for using it in email text (though encoding is
> required for binary attachments),
g:
>}> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9)
> dose Evolution convert 'base64' to 'text' during view source?
I wouldn't think any mailer would do so. That wouldn't be viewing the
source, or "raw message," under those circumstances. The normal mail
viewer would, it's job is to show you
On 20 January 2012 19:48, g wrote:
>
> On 01/20/2012 10:48 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> <>
>
>> Don't know why you conclude that, spam links can have a short lifetime
>> as they get shut down.
> -=-
>
> i must be smoking something stronger than you. B=D
>
> i do not recall, nor see where i made such st
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 16:31 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> be careful with rewrite mailbody
> this will break all sorts of signed mails
Though that problem exists, anyway, even if you do nothing. Because
mail comes to you through more than one server, any of which may
transform an email in transit
On 21/01/12 11:21, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The problem is that my UID on the server is 500,
while it is 1000 on the laptop.
Either up the server to UID:1000
or the laptop down to UID:500
Is there some simple way of overcoming this?
No, been there done that.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_
I have a server running CentOS-6,
and a laptop running Fedora-16.
I'd like to say, on my laptop,
mount server:/common /common
and then keep some personal data on the server.
The problem is that my UID on the server is 500,
while it is 1000 on the laptop.
This means that my files on the serv
Hello!
I had some problems with dracut on my server, upgrading kernels led to a "non
fatal" error when using yum, which was dracut not writing out an initramfs, in
turn making my server unbootable. Non fatal it was not.
I spent some time manually installing kernels, then with the help of (the?
21.1.2012 10:08, Jatin K kirjoitti:
> I've Dell Latitiude E5620 Laptop with intel HD 3000 graphics card [1],
> According glxinfo [2] that direct rendering is enabled but glxgear[3]
> output shows very low FPS
The answer is included in the glxinfo output:
> [3]-- glxgears
>
> Running synchron
On Saturday 21 January 2012 01:42 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Jatin K wrote:
Dear All
I've Dell Latitiude E5620 Laptop with intel HD 3000 graphics card [1],
According glxinfo [2] that direct rendering is enabled but glxgear[3] output
shows very low FPS
glxge
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Jatin K wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I've Dell Latitiude E5620 Laptop with intel HD 3000 graphics card [1],
> According glxinfo [2] that direct rendering is enabled but glxgear[3] output
> shows very low FPS
>
> is there anything wrong with Xorg configuration on my laptop
Dear All
I've Dell Latitiude E5620 Laptop with intel HD 3000 graphics card [1],
According glxinfo [2] that direct rendering is enabled but glxgear[3]
output shows very low FPS
is there anything wrong with Xorg configuration on my laptop ??? if
direct rendering is enabled then FPS should (mu
36 matches
Mail list logo
