Hello,
> Here is the output of : route -n :
>
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.50.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0
> 0 eth0
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0
> 0 eth0
> 172.16.2.6 192.168.50.184 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0
On 01/08/2012 11:57 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I'm running gdm and the session option showed up after I installed
> Xfce, i.e. it only shows up if you have more than one session
> installed. However language option or keyboard option don't show up.
It makes sense that the option only presents its
On 01/07/12 19:11, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/08/2012 09:48 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
Also in F14 after I select which user id I want to login as I can
choose which windowing environment I want, e.g. I can select Gnome,
KDE etc. This no longer seems to be an option. Does this option
exist in F16
On 07 January 2012 at 20:02:21 +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 06Jan2012 23:29, Dean S. Messing wrote:
> | In doing more experimenting with find, I discovered that
> | / is evidently fstype "rootfs", whatever that is.
>
> Interesting.
>
> | Looking in /etc/mtab I see:
> |rootfs / rootfs r
On 01/08/2012 09:48 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> Also in F14 after I select which user id I want to login as I can
> choose which windowing environment I want, e.g. I can select Gnome,
> KDE etc. This no longer seems to be an option. Does this option
> exist in F16? If so how do I set it up?
It
I installed gnome-tweak-tool so I could fix mouse behavior. When I select
Applications->Accessories->Advanced Settings and then choose Desktop it
shows the following:
Have file manager handle the desktop off
Computer Icon visible on desktop on
Home icon visible on desktop
On 2012/01/07 16:40, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/07/2012 04:28 PM, jdow wrote:
I've not really run across a forum that isn't very "flat"
in structure that leads to people reading it all or at least scanning it
all.
Both fora have a number of specialized sub-boards. As I'm not interested in
issues re
On 01/07/2012 03:26 PM, sean darcy wrote:
On 01/07/2012 06:07 PM, John Wendel wrote:
On 01/07/2012 10:28 AM, sean darcy wrote:
I've a recursive nameserver under no load taking 90% or more of the
cpu. I've restarted, no joy.
There's an rsync task in the background, but nothing else.
What's goi
On 01/07/2012 04:28 PM, jdow wrote:
I've not really run across a forum that isn't very "flat"
in structure that leads to people reading it all or at least scanning it
all.
Both fora have a number of specialized sub-boards. As I'm not
interested in issues related to servers, I don't look at th
On 2012/01/07 16:21, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/07/2012 04:01 PM, jdow wrote:
Most are
dreadful, like the Mozilla fora structure. You often can easily find a
dozen
people asking the same question and no answers.
Not only that, on the Mozilla forum, if you do get a reply, almost half the time
it won
On 2012/01/07 16:13, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/07/2012 03:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.01.2012 00:47, schrieb Joe Zeff:
On 01/07/2012 03:38 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
workflows can be highly dedicated, specific, and unique - one size
doesn't fit all
...and for some of us, fora fit better tha
Am 08.01.2012 01:13, schrieb Joe Zeff:
>>> ...and for some of us, fora fit better than email
>>
>> boah that was not the point
>>
>> you are hanging on the single word "login" and do
>> not realize the whole time that this was never the
>> point of the post you answered
>>
>
> And where, pray te
On 01/07/2012 04:01 PM, jdow wrote:
Most are
dreadful, like the Mozilla fora structure. You often can easily find a
dozen
people asking the same question and no answers.
Not only that, on the Mozilla forum, if you do get a reply, almost half
the time it won't be relevant to your question, or w
On 2012/01/07 15:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.01.2012 00:47, schrieb Joe Zeff:
On 01/07/2012 03:38 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
workflows can be highly dedicated, specific, and unique - one size
doesn't fit all
...and for some of us, fora fit better than email
boah that was not the point
yo
Thanks.
I'll test this tomorrow and get back to you.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask awa
On 01/07/2012 03:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.01.2012 00:47, schrieb Joe Zeff:
On 01/07/2012 03:38 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
workflows can be highly dedicated, specific, and unique - one size
doesn't fit all
...and for some of us, fora fit better than email
boah that was not the point
On 2012/01/07 15:47, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/07/2012 03:38 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
workflows can be highly dedicated, specific, and unique - one size
doesn't fit all
...and for some of us, fora fit better than email.
Indeed, I for one am not saying mailing lists are the one true way. Nor is th
On 2012/01/07 15:24, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/07/2012 02:01 PM, jdow wrote:
Seriously, Joe, you miss his point. Forget the login straw man. That is not
the issue. The issue is the clumsy navigation to get to 20 different fora
and then to each new thread you are interested in, which few forums
reme
Am 08.01.2012 00:47, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 01/07/2012 03:38 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
>> workflows can be highly dedicated, specific, and unique - one size
>> doesn't fit all
>
> ...and for some of us, fora fit better than email
boah that was not the point
you are hanging on the single word "lo
On 01/07/2012 03:38 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
workflows can be highly dedicated, specific, and unique - one size
doesn't fit all
...and for some of us, fora fit better than email.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedo
On 01/07/2012 05:01 PM, jdow wrote:
With email it's all staring me in the face, I can look at the subject, the
length of the thread since last visited, the list of posters, and decide if
I want to sample the thread. I sample a message and toss the thread or not.
It's quick. It's sitting there han
On 01/07/2012 04:29 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
No, it's you who missed the point: if you only use your own computer to
check the various fora, complaining about needing to log on every time
becomes a straw man. There may be other reasons not to use them, but
unless you're using public computers, the n
On 01/07/2012 06:07 PM, John Wendel wrote:
On 01/07/2012 10:28 AM, sean darcy wrote:
I've a recursive nameserver under no load taking 90% or more of the
cpu. I've restarted, no joy.
There's an rsync task in the background, but nothing else.
What's going on?
sean
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S
On 01/07/2012 02:01 PM, jdow wrote:
Seriously, Joe, you miss his point. Forget the login straw man. That is not
the issue. The issue is the clumsy navigation to get to 20 different fora
and then to each new thread you are interested in, which few forums
remember
for you.
As I may have written
On 01/07/2012 10:28 AM, sean darcy wrote:
I've a recursive nameserver under no load taking 90% or more of the
cpu. I've restarted, no joy.
There's an rsync task in the background, but nothing else.
What's going on?
sean
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
127
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 18:01 +0100, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Yes, 50.184 is another box on the network on which the tunnel has been
> setup via racoon.
> On 50.184 the access to 172.16.2.6 works fine. ANd I want to use 50.184
> as a gateway for this host on the network.
>
> What email address have I
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 17:18 +0100, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following problem.
>
> Here is the output of : route -n :
>
> 0.0.0.0192.168.50.20.0.0.0 UG0
> 00 eth0
> 169.254.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U
On 2012/01/07 14:04, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.01.2012 22:55, schrieb Joe Zeff:
On a side note, you seem to get very incensed by people not
understanding what you meant.
i get incensed by peopole who are not willing / able to read and understand
Whereas I seldom use incense.
{O,o}
--
us
Am 07.01.2012 22:55, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 01/07/2012 01:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> the point was not the single word "login"
>> the point was that you have MANUALLY navigate to them instead
>> get new messages AUTOMATICALLY - so what exactly did you not
>> understand in the text you quoted?
On 01/07/2012 02:46 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> OK, does anyone have any idea why README* is included in
> the default httpd config in the IndexIgnore setting?
>
> If I'm browsing a directory, I'd think that README files
> would scream "Hey! I have useful information you need
> to know about this dir
As I may have mentioned before, my laptop runs F16 but will only boot
properly from my last F14 kernel. All attempts to boot from a 3.X
kernel fail before gdm starts. Are there any logs that survive after I
reboot into the old 2.X kernel so that I can see just what's happening?
I presume tha
On 2012/01/07 13:29, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/07/2012 01:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
you did not understand the point
* a mailing-list comes to you
* a forum not
in this context it does not matter if you have to login
the point is you have to navigate somewhere to get the messages
No, it's you
On 01/07/2012 01:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
the point was not the single word "login"
the point was that you have MANUALLY navigate to them instead
get new messages AUTOMATICALLY - so what exactly did you not
understand in the text you quoted?
Which is not what you said; you made a Great Big F
Am 07.01.2012 22:29, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 01/07/2012 01:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> you did not understand the point
>>
>> * a mailing-list comes to you
>> * a forum not
>>
>> in this context it does not matter if you have to login
>> the point is you have to navigate somewhere to get the me
On 01/07/2012 01:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
you did not understand the point
* a mailing-list comes to you
* a forum not
in this context it does not matter if you have to login
the point is you have to navigate somewhere to get the messages
No, it's you who missed the point: if you only use
Am 07.01.2012 22:10, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 01/07/2012 12:57 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
>> The idea of having to go and log in to ten different forum sites on a
>> regular basis is not something I welcome.
>
> All of the fora I currently use allow you to log in automatically.
> Of course, I only
On 01/07/2012 12:57 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
The idea of having to go and log in to ten different forum sites on a
regular basis is not something I welcome.
All of the fora I currently use allow you to log in automatically. Of
course, I only use them from my own computers so there aren't any
On 01/07/2012 09:12 AM, Tim wrote:
Yes, they have the potential for archiving and search, but having to go
to them, instead of messages coming to you, makes them vastly inferior
for many people.
This is the main point for me. Mail lists come to me - I belong to ten
currently, but it's been mor
On 2012/01/07 06:12, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 20:48 +0100, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
Forums, when implemented properly, are superior to any kind of mailing
list.
Haven't seen one, yet... ;-p
Yes, they have the potential for archiving and search, but having to go
Generally the se
OK, does anyone have any idea why README* is included in
the default httpd config in the IndexIgnore setting?
If I'm browsing a directory, I'd think that README files
would scream "Hey! I have useful information you need
to know about this directory!"
Why would you want to hide those by default?
On Jan 7, 2012 11:19 AM, "Luc MAIGNAN" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the following problem.
>
> Here is the output of : route -n :
>
> 0.0.0.0192.168.50.20.0.0.0 UG0 0
0 eth0
> 169.254.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0
Dean S. Messing sharplabs.com> writes:
>
> On my F13 machine,
>
> find / \! -fstype ext4 -prune -o -print
>
> prints every file that is in an ext4 filesystem mounted on /, and prunes
> those in any other type of fs.
>
> On my F15 the same command prints nothing. Why might that be?
>
Le 07/01/2012 19:37, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:56 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Le 07/01/2012 18:53, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:49 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Le 07/01/2012 18:39, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:30 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Le 07/01/2012 18:21, Kevin
On 01/07/2012 11:56 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>
> Le 07/01/2012 18:53, Kevin Martin a écrit :
>>
>> On 01/07/2012 11:49 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>>> Le 07/01/2012 18:39, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:30 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Le 07/01/2012 18:21, Kevin Martin a écrit :
I've a recursive nameserver under no load taking 90% or more of the cpu.
I've restarted, no joy.
There's an rsync task in the background, but nothing else.
What's going on?
sean
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
12766 named 20 0 237m 27m 2732 S 90
Le 07/01/2012 18:53, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:49 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Le 07/01/2012 18:39, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:30 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Le 07/01/2012 18:21, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:01 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Yes, 50.184 is another bo
On 01/07/2012 11:49 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>
> Le 07/01/2012 18:39, Kevin Martin a écrit :
>>
>> On 01/07/2012 11:30 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>>> Le 07/01/2012 18:21, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:01 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Yes, 50.184 is another box on the network on which
Le 07/01/2012 18:39, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:30 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Le 07/01/2012 18:21, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:01 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Yes, 50.184 is another box on the network on which the tunnel has been setup
via racoon.
On 50.184 the access to 172
On 01/07/2012 11:30 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>
> Le 07/01/2012 18:21, Kevin Martin a écrit :
>>
>> On 01/07/2012 11:01 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>>> Yes, 50.184 is another box on the network on which the tunnel has been
>>> setup via racoon.
>>> On 50.184 the access to 172.16.2.6 works fine. ANd I w
Le 07/01/2012 18:21, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 11:01 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Yes, 50.184 is another box on the network on which the tunnel has been setup
via racoon.
On 50.184 the access to 172.16.2.6 works fine. ANd I want to use 50.184 as a
gateway for this host on the network.
On 01/07/2012 11:01 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Yes, 50.184 is another box on the network on which the tunnel has been setup
> via racoon.
> On 50.184 the access to 172.16.2.6 works fine. ANd I want to use 50.184 as a
> gateway for this host on the network.
>
> What email address have I to use to
Am 07.01.2012 18:01, schrieb Luc MAIGNAN:
> What email address have I to use to do not top post?
jesus christ put your answer BELOW and not on top as
others in this thread does so that after 10 replies
with 5 top and 5 bottom replied the whole thread
is not unreadable
Google -> top post
http:/
Yes, 50.184 is another box on the network on which the tunnel has been
setup via racoon.
On 50.184 the access to 172.16.2.6 works fine. ANd I want to use 50.184
as a gateway for this host on the network.
What email address have I to use to do not top post ?
Le 07/01/2012 17:53, Kevin Martin
On 01/07/2012 10:46 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> 192.168.50.184 is a gateway on which a IPSEC tunnel allow to access to host
> 172.16.2.6
>
>
>
> Le 07/01/2012 17:45, Kevin Martin a écrit :
>>
>> On 01/07/2012 10:18 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have the following problem.
>>>
>>> Here i
192.168.50.184 is a gateway on which a IPSEC tunnel allow to access to
host 172.16.2.6
Le 07/01/2012 17:45, Kevin Martin a écrit :
On 01/07/2012 10:18 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
I have the following problem.
Here is the output of : route -n :
0.0.0.0192.168.50.20.
On 01/07/2012 10:18 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following problem.
>
> Here is the output of : route -n :
>
> 0.0.0.0192.168.50.20.0.0.0 UG0 0
>0 eth0
> 169.254.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0
Hi,
I have the following problem.
Here is the output of : route -n :
0.0.0.0192.168.50.20.0.0.0 UG0
00 eth0
169.254.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002
00 eth0
172.16.2.6 192.168.50.184 255.255.255.
On 07/01/12 15:52, linux guy wrote:
Shouldn't the DVD install process install grub2 for me ?
What is the command sequence to do it manually ?
if you go rescue from the dvd.
yum grub2 install (should also install grub-efi,
as efi is handled by legacy)
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
grub
Shouldn't the DVD install process install grub2 for me ?
What is the command sequence to do it manually ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 20:48 +0100, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> Forums, when implemented properly, are superior to any kind of mailing
> list.
Haven't seen one, yet... ;-p
Yes, they have the potential for archiving and search, but having to go
to them, instead of messages coming to you, makes
On 07/01/12 13:28, Emilio Lopez wrote:
You didn't install grub.
grub2 for F16+
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://f
You didn't install grub.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.o
On 07/01/12 10:09, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
vim /etd/group
change group user to 1005
Thanks Louis
/etc/group
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admi
On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 09:55 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Fedora 16
>
> Just moved user from uid:gid 500 to 1005
>
> started in init 3
> vim /etc/passwd
> changed user:x:500:500 user:x:1005:1005
> chown -R /home/user
>
> reboot
> Login lxdm F16.Xfce
>
> Open Terminal see:
> id: cannot find name
Fedora 16
Just moved user from uid:gid 500 to 1005
started in init 3
vim /etc/passwd
changed user:x:500:500 user:x:1005:1005
chown -R /home/user
reboot
Login lxdm F16.Xfce
Open Terminal see:
id: cannot find name for group ID 1005
prompt immediatly below.
id -a
uid=1005(user) gid=1005 groups=
On 06Jan2012 23:29, Dean S. Messing wrote:
| In doing more experimenting with find, I discovered that
| / is evidently fstype "rootfs", whatever that is.
Interesting.
| Looking in /etc/mtab I see:
|rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
I was going to suggest you run the "mount" command, but I see you're
a
I downloaded the install x86_64 DVD and burned it to a DVD.
I removed the stock Windows drive and installed a new blank SSD.
The XPS17 will run the entire install process, with or without the
Fedora Upgrades selected.When complete it asks to reboot. When
it reboots, it gives a no operating
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Christopher Svanefalk
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Tim wrote:
>>
>> Tim:
>> >> I participate in no web forums, because they're such a pain. And I've
>> >> yet to see a single one to convince me otherwise.
>>
>> (insert word "able" between "one" an
68 matches
Mail list logo
