On 01/07/2012 11:01 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote: > Yes, 50.184 is another box on the network on which the tunnel has been setup > via racoon. > On 50.184 the access to 172.16.2.6 works fine. ANd I want to use 50.184 as a > gateway for this host on the network. > > What email address have I to use to do not top post ? > > > > Le 07/01/2012 17:53, Kevin Martin a écrit : >> >> On 01/07/2012 10:46 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote: >>> 192.168.50.184 is a gateway on which a IPSEC tunnel allow to access to host >>> 172.16.2.6 >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 07/01/2012 17:45, Kevin Martin a écrit : >>>> On 01/07/2012 10:18 AM, Luc MAIGNAN wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have the following problem. >>>>> >>>>> Here is the output of : route -n : >>>>> >>>>> 0.0.0.0 192.168.50.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 >>>>> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0 >>>>> 172.16.2.6 192.168.50.184 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 >>>>> 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> When I try to ping 172.16.2.6, it doesn't work while the first available >>>>> route is used (0.0.0.0 via 192.168.50.2) >>>>> >>>>> How can I modify the order of the route table to force use of the right >>>>> route ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for any help >>>> What is 192.168.50.184? From the routing table, its the same ethernet nic >>>> so it's no wonder the route to 172.16.2.6 is using the >>>> 0.0.0.0 (default) route (even though it looks like you've tried to force >>>> it to a different route). If you want to split the >>>> 192.168.50 network you'll need two nics, you'll need to set the netmask >>>> correctly to split it between them, then you will be >>>> able to >>>> set the 172.16.2.6 host to route a different way. >>>> >>>> Kevin >> So the 50.184 address is another box which you have an ipsec tunnel to from >> the machine that this network route is on? How are you >> creating the tunnel? >> >> And please don't top post, it makes it hard to consistently read the thread. >> >> Kevin Do you have ip forwarding turned on on the host that you are trying to route over the tunnel (the one with the 172.16.2.6 route)? And not top-posting (or bottom posting) is simply done by posting your replies at the bottom of the thread, not the top. That way people can read from top-to-bottom of a thread (like a book). Makes the threads much easier to follow then top posting (the Microsoft Outlook default).
Kevin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
