On 05/30/11 23:13, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 02:08 PM, JD wrote:
>> Sorry for the false alarm.
>> I had forgotten that I had moved those 2 directories
>> to a different location, so when I did not see my collection
>> there, I thought shotwell clobbered them all.
>> Apologies to the shotwel
Thank you Alessandro. l'll do that :)
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Alessandro Brezzi <
alessandro.bre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/5/31 Nermin Celik
>
>> hi,
>>
>> firstly apologies to all members for asking a non-fedora question here...
>>
>> i'm a newbie to octave and would like to plot a b
On 05/31/2011 02:08 PM, JD wrote:
> Sorry for the false alarm.
> I had forgotten that I had moved those 2 directories
> to a different location, so when I did not see my collection
> there, I thought shotwell clobbered them all.
> Apologies to the shotwell developers
This was test of the emergency
On 05/30/11 22:44, JD wrote:
> I can view the list of photos in my Kodak Camera in
> /sdb3/home/jd/.gvfs/gphoto2 mount on
> usb%3A003,008/store_00010001/DCIM/100V1253
>
> I used shotwell (shotwell-0.8.1-3.fc14.i686)
> to import all of them.
>
> I already had 2 large directories of photos in ~/Pict
2011/5/31 Nermin Celik
> hi,
>
> firstly apologies to all members for asking a non-fedora question here...
>
> i'm a newbie to octave and would like to plot a bar/frequency graph.
> however experiencing
> some problems due to my data.
> ...
nc
>
Hi Nemim,
you can subscribe to the octave specifi
I can view the list of photos in my Kodak Camera in
/sdb3/home/jd/.gvfs/gphoto2 mount on
usb%3A003,008/store_00010001/DCIM/100V1253
I used shotwell (shotwell-0.8.1-3.fc14.i686)
to import all of them.
I already had 2 large directories of photos in ~/Pictures/2011 and in
~/Pictures/2010
However,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel
wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 01:13 AM, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2) I see (using 'mount') that the root is btrfs along with some (what
>> appear to be) subvolumes for /tmp, /var/tmp and /home yet 'btrfs
>> device scan' shows no information. Does '
On 05/30/2011 09:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 05:42 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>>> If would be real convenient to have a known string to
>>> search for that always precedes the rest of the messages
>>> in a new boot.
>>
>> I agree.
>> Even a couple of blank lines w
On 05/30/2011 09:17 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> I would be happy to be shown incorrect.
Your understanding is, on the whole, correct. However, you can always
use akmod-nvidia instead. If there's not a kmod for the current kernel,
akmod builds it on the fly at boot. It's not a panacea by any mean
hi,
firstly apologies to all members for asking a non-fedora question here...
i'm a newbie to octave and would like to plot a bar/frequency graph. however
experiencing
some problems due to my data.
x-values y-values
--- --
[1-9] 9
[10-19]
On Mon, 30 May 2011 19:56:02 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 07:49 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>> If not, then I will have to wait until NVidia fixes their drivers
>> (again).
>
> Or, you can uninstall the binary blob, and follow the instructions here
> to install akmond-nvidia and be done with
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 19:07 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 05:42 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > Tom Horsley wrote:
> >
> >> If would be real convenient to have a known string to
> >> search for that always precedes the rest of the messages
> >> in a new boot.
> >
> > I agree.
> > Even a coup
On 05/31/2011 08:09 AM, H Xu wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 10:21 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> chkconfig --list sshd
>
> I misunderstood your meaning, sorry.
>
> The output is:
> 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off
>
> "chkconfig sshd off" works.
That seems weird as ntsysv is just a fr
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 18:36 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Just for curiosity, why has no one ever arranged to
> log something like "Hey! I'm booting the system again!"
> as the very first line in that goes to /var/log/messages
> when the system is booting?
I used to do something like that back when
On 05/30/2011 07:49 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> If not, then I will have to wait until NVidia fixes their drivers
> (again).
Or, you can uninstall the binary blob, and follow the instructions here
to install akmond-nvidia and be done with it once and for all:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthrea
31.05.2011, 10:12, "H Xu" :
> Hello,
>
> I've used the "setup" program to uncheck "sshd", however, sshd still
> starts up after I reboot. This doesn't happen on FC14. Then I tried to
> use setup to disable other daemons, it seems that they all disobeyed.
> Anyone knows what's going on here? Thanks.
On Tue, 31 May 2011 01:18:47 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Montag, den 30.05.2011, 09:11 +0100 schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>> To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
>> TRY!!!
>
> After reading this thread I still don't know what exactly you did to
> upgrade yo
On 05/31/2011 10:21 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> chkconfig --list sshd
I misunderstood your meaning, sorry.
The output is:
0:off 1:off 2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off
"chkconfig sshd off" works.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
On 05/31/2011 07:42 AM, H Xu wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 09:22 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 05/31/2011 06:42 AM, H Xu wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've used the "setup" program to uncheck "sshd", however, sshd still
>>> starts up after I reboot. This doesn't happen on FC14. Then I tried to
>>> use setup
On 05/30/2011 07:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 05:42 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>>> If would be real convenient to have a known string to
>>> search for that always precedes the rest of the messages
>>> in a new boot.
>>
>> I agree.
>> Even a couple of blank lines w
On 05/30/2011 05:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 08:05 AM, john wendel wrote:
>> I just did an F15 LXDE install on an old laptop (incidently, best
>> install I've ever done, bravo LXDE quys).
>>
>> Now I see 9 processes with "hald" in their name, and 3 processes named
>> "udevd" running. I
On 05/31/2011 09:22 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 06:42 AM, H Xu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've used the "setup" program to uncheck "sshd", however, sshd still
>> starts up after I reboot. This doesn't happen on FC14. Then I tried to
>> use setup to disable other daemons, it seems that the
On 05/30/2011 06:56 PM, Alex wrote:
> So to confirm, what is the preferred method to upgrade? I usually update
> daily, so in F14 most likely I'd have the latest and greatest updates when I
> decided to move to F15.
Same here. I've been using preupgrade since (I think) F11 with good
results.
-
On 05/30/2011 05:42 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>> If would be real convenient to have a known string to
>> search for that always precedes the rest of the messages
>> in a new boot.
>
> I agree.
> Even a couple of blank lines would help.
>
>
Indeed. Am I the only one on the
So to confirm, what is the preferred method to upgrade? I usually update daily,
so in F14 most likely I'd have the latest and greatest updates when I decided
to move to F15. Do I just need to bite the bullet and do a clean install? On a
clean install is it safe to keep your /home partition and
On 05/30/2011 01:13 AM, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
>
>
> 2) I see (using 'mount') that the root is btrfs along with some (what
> appear to be) subvolumes for /tmp, /var/tmp and /home yet 'btrfs
> device scan' shows no information. Does 'btrfs device scan' only scan
> unmounted devices or is this a bug
Hi,
My team and I are working on an
open-source cross-platform multi-player
Tetris(R) game called:
"TetriCrisis 3 100% C.P.U."...
Was hoping some people can
help test it on their Fedora systems?
Game requires the following:
- SDL 1.2
- SDL_Image
- SDL_Mixer
- SDL_TTF
- G++
- OpenGL(R) w/ hardwar
On 05/31/2011 06:57 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 05/31/2011 06:42 AM, H Xu wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've used the "setup" program to uncheck "sshd", however, sshd still
>>> starts up after I reboot. This doesn't happen on FC14. Then I tried
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 06:42 AM, H Xu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've used the "setup" program to uncheck "sshd", however, sshd still
>> starts up after I reboot. This doesn't happen on FC14. Then I tried to
>> use setup to disable other daemons, it seem
On 05/31/2011 06:42 AM, H Xu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've used the "setup" program to uncheck "sshd", however, sshd still
> starts up after I reboot. This doesn't happen on FC14. Then I tried to
> use setup to disable other daemons, it seems that they all disobeyed.
> Anyone knows what's going on he
Hello,
I've used the "setup" program to uncheck "sshd", however, sshd still
starts up after I reboot. This doesn't happen on FC14. Then I tried to
use setup to disable other daemons, it seems that they all disobeyed.
Anyone knows what's going on here? Thanks.
Regards,
H Xu
05/31/2011
--
users
On 05/30/2011 08:40 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>> Updating the F14 prior to upgrading it to F15 may be a mistake
>> already, given that F14 updates may be newer than F15 release. Do you
>> enable the "updates" network repo during F15 upgrade?
>
> Is that true?
> I thoug
Tom Horsley wrote:
> If would be real convenient to have a known string to
> search for that always precedes the rest of the messages
> in a new boot.
I agree.
Even a couple of blank lines would help.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-m
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Updating the F14 prior to upgrading it to F15 may be a mistake
> already, given that F14 updates may be newer than F15 release. Do you
> enable the "updates" network repo during F15 upgrade?
Is that true?
I thought I'd read somewhere that one should update the old system
n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> The yum upgrade from the minimal Fedora 14 KDE ran smoothly, (no
> conflicts or removals). Unfortunately on rebooting I cannot boot at all,
> (inittab 3 or 5), and when I just tried the Fedora 14 rescue DVD, that
> failed as well!!
I'm probably being a bit slow, but
On 05/31/2011 08:05 AM, john wendel wrote:
> I just did an F15 LXDE install on an old laptop (incidently, best
> install I've ever done, bravo LXDE quys).
>
> Now I see 9 processes with "hald" in their name, and 3 processes named
> "udevd" running. I thought hal was supposed to be gone. I also see
I just did an F15 LXDE install on an old laptop (incidently, best
install I've ever done, bravo LXDE quys).
Now I see 9 processes with "hald" in their name, and 3 processes named
"udevd" running. I thought hal was supposed to be gone. I also see
udisk-daemon and hald-addon-storage both polling
> Oh, what you wanted was sympathy? Why didn't you say so? And here we
> were all thinking you wanted help. Silly us!
I hope when you need help and ask in the wrong way you are treated the
same way you treat others. At that point maybe you'll learn some useful
lessons.
Alan
--
users mailing
On 05/30/2011 04:34 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>
> The original post was obviously a mistake and I'm an hysterical, fud
> spreading troll who deserves no sympathy. Sorry for wasting all of your
> time.
>
> Regards
>
> cpp4ever
Actually, you seems to have provided entertainment for lots of user
On 05/30/2011 04:34 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> The original post was obviously a mistake and I'm an hysterical, fud
> spreading troll who deserves no sympathy. Sorry for wasting all of your
> time.
Oh, what you wanted was sympathy? Why didn't you say so? And here we
were all thinking you
On 05/30/2011 04:05 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> On 30/05/11 09:11, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>>
>> To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
>> TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally resulting
>> in being unable to boot up any kernel version a
The original post was obviously a mistake and I'm an hysterical, fud
spreading troll who deserves no sympathy. Sorry for wasting all of your
time.
Regards
cpp4ever
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Mon, 30 May 2011 16:05:07 -0700
Peter Gordon wrote:
> imklog 5.7.9, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Yea, the same thing starts mine, but I just thought
it would be nice to have something more obvious
(and perhaps less likely to change someday :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproj
Am Montag, den 30.05.2011, 09:11 +0100 schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
> To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
> TRY!!!
After reading this thread I still don't know what exactly you did to
upgrade your system. Can you please give us more details ? What commands
did you r
On 05/30/2011 04:05 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> Certainly, I'll be more reluctant
> to post problems here if that's the type of response I can expect.
And besides, the grapes are probably sour anyway.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
On 30/05/11 09:11, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>
> To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
> TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally resulting
> in being unable to boot up any kernel version at all, using inittab mode
> 1,3, or 5. In view of this i
On 05/30/2011 03:36 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> If would be real convenient to have a known string to
> search for that always precedes the rest of the messages
> in a new boot.
You could try grep'ing for the Linux version string, always one of the
first several lines printed during kernel startup. T
Just for curiosity, why has no one ever arranged to
log something like "Hey! I'm booting the system again!"
as the very first line in that goes to /var/log/messages
when the system is booting?
If would be real convenient to have a known string to
search for that always precedes the rest of the mes
> People, who later seemingly know what they are doing, should know better
> and be responsible for their reporting. In this case, the OP later
> seems to know what he is doing, making the first FUD based posting even
> more believable by individuals susceptible to FUD.
>
> FUD is FUD no matte
On 05/31/2011 03:09 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> No, upgrading F15 is a pain. Beware, expect danger!
That statement is not FUD. That statement is measured and reasonable.
That statement would normally be followed by "Make backups before
proceeding with any upgrade".
--
users mailing
On 30/05/11 08:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 30/05/11 13:19, Rick Sewill wrote:
>
After re-installing F-15 and losing all my earlier configuration
work I still had no ethernet connection! The reason was that,
for reasons I don't recall, I had enabled the main board
On 30 May 2011 22:30, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
wrote:
> On 30/05/11 20:46, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 05/30/2011 12:28 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>>> Easy for you to say when you don't have the problem, and I wish you
>>> never have a similar problem. Then I'd be interested to see your
>>> response. In
On 05/31/2011 03:03 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I think you are doing the same thing that you are accusing the other
> person of doing IMO. You can just point out what is wrong.
>
The OP specifically told people "DON'T EVEN TRY!!!" to upgrade from F14
to F15. No details, no suggestion as to wha
On 05/31/2011 03:09 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> I wish I could say the same, it's failed twice for me now, even from a
> minimal Fedora 14 KDE reinstall/update. Might be FUD in your world,but I
> hope for your sake you never come across a similar problem. Rest assured
> if our places are ever
On 05/30/2011 02:30 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> Well, I could say the same, but this problem is an order of magnitude
> more complicated than anything I have experienced using Fedora in 8+
> years, is that chicken little?.
Yes, it is. Starting out with the assumption that F15 is at fault --
OK, updated to F15, no major complains so far, except for the
extremelly round window corner borders, and excessive Mac-ism of it
all (and super large app title bar, what's with that?).
Getting acquainted with Gnome 3... It's not very annoying... just will
take a while to get used to it, I think.
On 05/27/2011 02:01 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
> I tried also loading nvidia proprietary module but it looks it doesn't
> support latest X in Fedora 15.
>
> I'm willing to work with devels to track down bugs and make Fedora 15
> and GNOME Shell better but need some guidance
Best thing fo
On 05/27/2011 06:13 PM, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Hi, on my f14 I had place on my panel the system monitor, witch show me
> the CPU and network usage.
>
> How to do that into F15+Gnome3?
>
> Many thanks.
>
You can use a extension
http://www.webupd8.org/2011/05/system-monitor-extension-puts-ram-swap.ht
On 05/28/2011 09:10 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I installed gnome-shell-extensions-user-theme. Based on my Googling,
> this should get me a "Themes" tab under Activities. But there's
> nothing there. No change after a reboot. Somebody give me a clue on
> how to use it.
User theme extension doesn'
On 30/05/11 20:46, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 12:28 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>> Easy for you to say when you don't have the problem, and I wish you
>> never have a similar problem. Then I'd be interested to see your
>> response. In the meant time please see my other posts.
>
> I've had
On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 13:21 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On 28/05/11 09:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 05/28/2011 06:26 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> >> I solaved the problem by adding a comment=systemd.automount
> >> for the NFS mounts in fstab. See man systmd.automount
> >> Louis
> >
> > That
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 00:12, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> I was looking at gnome3.org today, and their FAQ says that "The traditional
> GNOME 2 desktop will not disappear overnight, however: releases of GNOME 2
> will
> continue to be supported by distributions for years to come." so clearly they
> d
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 19:20:55 +0100
> "n2xssvv.g02gfr12930" wrote:
>
>> Failed completely means I cannot even boot to a console, (inittab 3).
>
> ok. What are the messages on the screen when this fails?
> Screenshot?
Maybe the OP is missing t
On Mon, 30 May 2011 20:16:09 +0100, NG wrote:
> How to collect technical information when Fedora 15 fails to boot?
To check whether your theory of SELinux problems could be true, try
booting with the enforcing=0 kernel arg.
Descriptions such as "cannot boot at all" are useless, because certain
On 05/30/2011 01:09 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> multi-user.target and graphical.target are symlinked to runlevel3.target
> and runlevel5.target
Thank you. Change for the sake of clarity is a Good Thing. Change for
its own sake often isn't.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> I have FC15 installed on two machines:
> 1) an old dell i686 machine
> 2) a newer x86_64 machine as server
>
> when the server machine is running FC14, NFS mounts from the i686 machine
> work fine.
> Under FC15 on the server machine, t
On Mon, 30 May 2011 19:20:55 +0100, NG wrote:
> Failed completely means I cannot even boot to a console, (inittab 3).
F15 doesn't use inittab anymore, so what do you mean?
In case you refer to the kernel boot args, you would need to
read up on systemd run-level args.
--
users mailing list
users@
On Mon, 30 May 2011 18:44:01 +0100, NG wrote:
> OK, folks I have just reinstalled Fedora 14, (KDE minimal and working),
> updated, (working) , then upgraded to Fedora 15 and it still fails
> completely.
Updating the F14 prior to upgrading it to F15 may be a mistake
already, given that F14 updates
On 05/31/2011 01:34 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I presume the names were changed to make it easier to know what they
> mean? If so, it's a good idea, especially if there's a comment
> somewhere that tells you how they correspond so that all of us oldpharts
> can adjust.
multi-user.target and graphic
On 30/05/11 21:04, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> I presume the names were changed to make it easier to know what they
> mean? If so, it's a good idea, especially if there's a comment
> somewhere that tells you how they correspond so that all of us oldpharts
> can adjust.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysV
On 05/30/2011 12:50 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> 3. The first boot ended at multiuser.target instead of
> graphical.target. (That's init level 3 instead of level 5 in
> oldspeak.) I have never touched the inittab on either machine. They
> were both set to boot into the graphical login.
I pre
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 15:14 -0400, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
> The way to get other VT's in Virtual Box is "right control"+"F"
Thanks for the tip, works like a champ!
--Greg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapr
On Monday, May 30, 2011 04:11:26 n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>
> To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
> TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally
> resulting in being unable to boot up any kernel version at all,
> using inittab mode 1,3, or 5. In
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 16:40, Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Kindly point me in the right direction to enable oracle repos
> OR
> kindly provide info howto do it please.
> Thanks
> Johan
Hi Johan,
It´s pointed out here... for Debian, Ubuntu, and RPM based distros
like Fedora/OpenSUSE, etc
http://www
On 05/30/2011 12:28 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> Easy for you to say when you don't have the problem, and I wish you
> never have a similar problem. Then I'd be interested to see your
> response. In the meant time please see my other posts.
I've had problems with upgrades, installations and up
On 30/05/2011 20:46, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:41, wrote:
>> I was hoping someone with actual experience running a recent VirtualBox on
>> Fedora would step in and either tell "it's ok to use the Oracle repos" or
>> "using the Oracle repos causes X, you have to do Y do
On 30/05/11 20:16, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 11:49 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>> If you consider my response as
>> hysteria, so be it.
>
> Coming out of nowhere and saying that because the upgrade didn't work
> for you on one machine it wouldn't work for anybody was, at the least, a
>
On 30/05/11 19:52, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 01:20 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>>
>> Failed completely means I cannot even boot to a console, (inittab 3).
>> Currently I'm trying to boot the last Fedora 14 kernel and it's having
>> to do some SELinux filesystem update. So the ne
On 05/30/2011 11:49 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> If you consider my response as
> hysteria, so be it.
Coming out of nowhere and saying that because the upgrade didn't work
for you on one machine it wouldn't work for anybody was, at the least, a
tad over-the-top, don't you think?
--
users ma
On 30/05/11 20:08, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 08:35 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>> As I've said elsewhere I will[snip]
>>
>> Based on my experience,[snip]
>
> Your continued repeating of your anti-F15 "recommendations" and the lack
> of actual technical information and/or screenshots
On 05/30/2011 01:33 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> running with F14 as the host OS, and I can repeat this phenomenon with
> the System Info. Very weird. CTRL-Alt-Backspace (sends you back to the
> login screen) also works for recovery. I have yet to figure out how to
> do a CTRL-ALT-F2 in a Vbox guest, as
On 30/05/11 19:35, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>
> Based on my experience, even with a minimal Fedora 14 installation, I
> cannot recommend trying to upgrade Fedora 14 -> 15 via yum.
>
Know that there will be people here to give a hand when your ready.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
F
On 30/05/11 19:50, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 04:11 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>> To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
>> TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally resulting
>> in being unable to boot up any kernel version at all, using
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 04:11 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>> To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
>> TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally resulting
>> in being unable to boot up any kernel version at all, using inittab mode
>> 1,
On 05/30/2011 10:43 AM, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> I made the leap to a btrfs root partition for my netbook with a fresh
> install of F15.
>
> Everything seems to work fine and I have done some fair amount of
> Googling for information and come across
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Getting
On 05/30/2011 08:35 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> As I've said elsewhere I will[snip]
>
> Based on my experience,[snip]
Your continued repeating of your anti-F15 "recommendations" and the lack
of actual technical information and/or screenshots other than it did not
work makes you look like a
On 05/31/2011 12:28 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 02:53 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Come on. Let's assume good will. His warning might not be helpful with
>> more details but he is certainly just trying to warn users.
> Over reaction to a personal experience is *never* a good thing not
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 06:54, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> and the VBox-provided drivers for
> the WinXP client need to be installed when the client is in safe-mode, if they
> are to work. Or something like that, I don't remember exactly.
I don´t remember having to to boot into safe mode. The only t
On 30/05/11 19:37, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 30/05/11 19:35, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>
>
>> Based on my experience, even with a minimal Fedora 14 installation, I
>> cannot recommend trying to upgrade Fedora 14 -> 15 via yum.
>>
>
> what size boot partition do you have on the laptop?
>
The s
On Monday, May 30, 2011 01:13:10 Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> I made the leap to a btrfs root partition for my netbook with a fresh
> install of F15.
>
> 1) Is there any kind of integration of btrfs with the included apps
> (For example: automatic snapshots before yum updates allowing easy
> rollbacks
On 05/31/2011 02:53 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Come on. Let's assume good will. His warning might not be helpful with
> more details but he is certainly just trying to warn users.
Over reaction to a personal experience is *never* a good thing not
matter how well intended.
FUD is FUD.
--
user
On 05/31/2011 12:20 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 04:11 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>> To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
>> TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally resulting
>> in being unable to boot up any kernel version at all,
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Vikram Goyal wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 02:15:02PM +0200, sguazt wrote:
>>
>> So, what is the right tool to use?
>>
OK!
I found it.
You have to go to the "Applications" menu and select the "Other" submenu.
There, you can find the "Network Connections" applic
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:20, Misha Shnurapet
wrote:
> VMs don't have a working 3D support. I don't know why you keep trying.
Virtualbox does. At least when using Windows as the host.
http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/475
FC
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On 05/30/2011 01:20 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>
> Failed completely means I cannot even boot to a console, (inittab 3).
> Currently I'm trying to boot the last Fedora 14 kernel and it's having
> to do some SELinux filesystem update. So the next thing to try is to
> install from a Fedora 15 in
On 05/30/2011 04:11 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
> To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
> TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally resulting
> in being unable to boot up any kernel version at all, using inittab mode
> 1,3, or 5. In view of this
On 30/05/11 19:31, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/30/2011 10:44 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
>> Based on this experience I'm loathe to recommend Fedora 15,
>> and I suspect that even a Fedora 15 DVD install will give the same
>> result.
>
> Going from a specific example to a general rule is called "ind
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:41, wrote:
> I was hoping someone with actual experience running a recent VirtualBox on
> Fedora would step in and either tell "it's ok to use the Oracle repos" or
> "using the Oracle repos causes X, you have to do Y do workaround or use the
> repos from Y as they al
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:41, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was hoping someone with actual experience running a recent VirtualBox on
> Fedora would step in and either tell "it's ok to use the Oracle repos" or
> "using the Oracle repos causes X, you have to do Y do workaround or use the
> repos from Y as
Hi,
I was hoping someone with actual experience running a recent VirtualBox on
Fedora would step in and either tell "it's ok to use the Oracle repos" or
"using the Oracle repos causes X, you have to do Y do workaround or use the
repos from Y as they already solve X".
[]s, Fernando Lozano
>--
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
