Today Harald Hoyer did spake thusly:
> Am 26.05.2011 08:26, schrieb Scott van Looy:
>> Aha!
>>
>> For some reason the initramfs is missing from the Fedora 15 kernel on my
>> system. Any idea how to get it back? :)
>
> # dracut /boot/initramfs-.img
Thanks for this so far. Running the command
dra
Am 26.05.2011 08:26, schrieb Scott van Looy:
> Aha!
>
> For some reason the initramfs is missing from the Fedora 15 kernel on my
> system. Any idea how to get it back? :)
# dracut /boot/initramfs-.img
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
Currently the "New Window" option in gnome-shell starts another
application instance of emacs; I'd prefer it simply created a new frame
(in Emacs parlance). Presumably this requires some awareness that emacs
does not currently possess. But has anyone had success setting up
emacsclient to work thi
Aha!
For some reason the initramfs is missing from the Fedora 15 kernel on my
system. Any idea how to get it back? :)
On May 25 Sam Varshavchik did spake thusly:
> Scott van Looy writes:
>
>> I've upgraded my server, now when I boot it gets as far as this:
>> md: Waiting for all devices to be a
Hi all,
F15 is released since monday, but only the rpmfusion rawhide repos are
released.
Somebody has an explanation for that?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
On 05/25/2011 10:03 PM, Kam Leo wrote:
> You can indeed reduce memory once the system has been installed; but,
> you first need to be able to install. How do you install Fedora 15 if
> your system has less than 768MB of RAM?
If you have that little RAM, you've got to have swap, and once it's
init
I have a machine set up to do login authentication via NIS.
After I've upgraded to F15, ypbind no longer starts automatically at
boot time, so I can't log in.
# chkconfig|fgrep ypbind
ypbind 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on4:on5:on6:off
I can start ypbind manually:
# ypwhich
yp
On 05/25/11 22:49, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> Since I bought my computer and I installed Linux on it, I had this
> problem...
> Back in the day I never Found a REAL Solution and finally my solution
> (in Fedora)
> was installing "pavucontrol" to choose the Devices when I needed to
> Switch.
>
> Vi
Since I bought my computer and I installed Linux on it, I had this
problem...
Back in the day I never Found a REAL Solution and finally my solution (in
Fedora)
was installing "pavucontrol" to choose the Devices when I needed to Switch.
Via the Pulse Audio Volume Control I was able to Mute speakers
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:32 +0930, Tim wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:22 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> > Big flamewar in Bugzilla: minimum install requirements for F15
>> > are, depending on who claims it, either 768mb or 1gb of
Hi.
I wonder why they didn't use hibernation instead of suspension. That would have
caused less pain for the adherents of power saving.
--
Best regards,
Misha Shnurapet, Fedora Project Contributor
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shnurapet
shnurapet AT fedoraproject.org, GPG: 00217306
--
users m
Hi there,
I need acess to NFS shares secured by NFS. After installing Fedora 15 on my
notebook I replicated all configs I used on other machine with Fedora 14,
but rpcgssd doesn't start and so I cannot mount the NFS share.
I changed /etc/sysconfig/nfs so:
# Set to turn on Secure NFS mounts.
SECU
On 05/25/11 21:09, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 08:37 PM, JD wrote:
>> I wish I could do that - but the owner is not I :)
> Understood. Please note that I didn't suggest drilling any holes or
> anything like that. My sister and I share a house; I'd like to do some
> drilling to shorten cable-r
On 05/25/2011 10:51 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011 02:26:18 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
>
>> Juan R. de Silva gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the Shutdown
>>> and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
On 05/25/2011 08:37 PM, JD wrote:
> I wish I could do that - but the owner is not I :)
Understood. Please note that I didn't suggest drilling any holes or
anything like that. My sister and I share a house; I'd like to do some
drilling to shorten cable-runs but the house is in her name and she
I just installed F15, and am exited. Some may remember some of my
complaints regarding looks and wifi-workability for F14; all my wishes
seem to have come true. Well done developers; I'm a happy bunny. Learning
quickly though.
Two things though.
First: Is there a way to configure the deskto
On 05/25/11 20:22, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 08:11 PM, JD wrote:
>> If our house were wired for cat5 or cat6 in every room,
>> I would agree. Since that is not the case, 2 machines have
>> to be wireless, except for win7, which is a desktop and on
>> that desk is the router.
> It's not exact
On 05/25/2011 08:11 PM, JD wrote:
> If our house were wired for cat5 or cat6 in every room,
> I would agree. Since that is not the case, 2 machines have
> to be wireless, except for win7, which is a desktop and on
> that desk is the router.
It's not exactly hard to run the cable along the walls,
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:32 +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:22 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > Big flamewar in Bugzilla: minimum install requirements for F15
> > are, depending on who claims it, either 768mb or 1gb of ram.
>
> Geez, either is too much. How inefficient is the prog
On 05/25/2011 07:17 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Or GNOME folks assume people
> do not shutdown/restart their computers anymore?
Many of us who use Linux on their desktops leave them running 24/7, only
rebooting for a kernel update. If that's what the Gnome devs are doing
(as I do) they don't
On 05/25/11 18:46, Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 13:50 -0700, JD wrote:
>> My only conclusion is that someone at at&t or
>> a nearby is/are hacking our router, or the router's
>> firmware is buggy.
>> But I have never seen a bug like this that waits
>> 20 to 30 minutes before striking :)
> Or
On 05/25/2011 04:27 PM, Phil Meyer wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 12:17 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>
> Here is the output of mount:
>
>
>
Mount now gives you /proc/mounts.
Look at findmnt --help for the new way to review mounted filesystems,
etc. I use:
findmnt -m -u -o SOURCE,TARGET,FSTYPE -t ext2,e
On Thu, 26 May 2011 02:26:18 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Juan R. de Silva gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the Shutdown
>> and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
>> especially dangerous to use them nowadays? Or GNOME
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 23:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> There is a difference between how live images work and the non-live
> installation in Fedora. In the case of live images, you are
> essentially copying a full image to the disk and writing a boot loader.
> It is extremely fast. Maybe takes
On 05/26/2011 07:47 AM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the Shutdown
> and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
> especially dangerous to use them nowadays? Or GNOME folks assume people
> do not shutdown/restart their c
Juan R. de Silva gmail.com> writes:
> Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the Shutdown
> and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
> especially dangerous to use them nowadays? Or GNOME folks assume people
> do not shutdown/restart their computers a
Could anybody explain it, why GNOME folks decided to hide the Shutdown
and especially Restart buttons/options from a user so well? Is it
especially dangerous to use them nowadays? Or GNOME folks assume people
do not shutdown/restart their computers anymore?
This "feature" could drive crazy any
On 05/25/2011 06:53 PM, Tim wrote:
> I tell people to name theirs "george" or "fred" or something similarly
> easily identifiable, but not interesting to teenage hackers next door.
> It makes for amusing phone calls for help, "I need you to have a look at
> George, he's forgotten his password, agai
On 05/26/2011 07:40 AM, Kam Leo wrote:
> I create and run multiple virtual Fedora installs which are clones of
> each other. I do not feel it is proper to let Smolt report each
> instantiation because the hardware is virtual and identical. Does
> Fedora Project really need those virtual stats?
C
On 05/25/2011 06:47 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Why make the installer fiddle with dozens of RPMs then (which
> takes a lot of time) instead of copying a partition image of this
> "minium bootable system" from DVD to HD??.
Having a partition image on the DVD would make the .iso for it
considerab
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 06:49 AM, Tim wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 05:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> I would say, the average Fedora user has anywhere between 1 GB
>>> and 4 GB of RAM and with every release, the amount of people using
>>> sys
On 05/26/2011 07:30 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
> So I repeat my question: After partitioning is done, wouldn´t it be
> easier to copy a "base bootable image" to a volume?. Wasn´t that the
> big change in Windows installer from XP to 7?, the fact that the
> installer is much faster because it just
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 22:51, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I think you are grossly underestimating the complexity of a modern Linux
> distribution installer. ISCSI, LUN storage discovery, RAID, LVM,
> kickstart, network handling, kdump, mirror lists, storage
> handling, swap, partitioning,
On 05/26/2011 07:17 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> What kind of rocket science is needed by the average linux installer,
> besides extracting RPMs or .tar.gz files and copying files to the HD?
>
> Other than selecting different kernels based on architecture (say,
> i386, i686, etc) after hardware sni
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 09:57 +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> Maybe someone could try convincing linksys to randomise their default
> SSID, or include the BSSID in it, but I don't hold out much hope for
> that. It's always annoyed me. An identical SSID constitutes a promise
> that this is the same network
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 21:21, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> No problem. Not sure what you were laughing about but if you are
> running Fedora with 256 MB RAM, you are in a minority of Fedora
> users. I would say, the average Fedora user has anywhere between 1 GB
> and 4 GB of RAM and with every re
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 13:50 -0700, JD wrote:
> My only conclusion is that someone at at&t or
> a nearby is/are hacking our router, or the router's
> firmware is buggy.
> But I have never seen a bug like this that waits
> 20 to 30 minutes before striking :)
Or it's failing... Does it, or its powe
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 22:42 +0200, Lewis NH2 wrote:
> I plan to go for fetchmail to retrieve the email from the ISP and
> dovecot to provide the local IMAP server. Now I am a bit unsure about
> the setup. As far as I can see, it seems that most solutions found on
> the net involves a 3rd agent, for
On 05/26/2011 06:45 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I sometimes need to fiddle systems that are not running,
> either via poking around in an alternate boot partition
> or using guestfish in a virtual image.
>
> So, is the systemd information about which services are
> enabled or disabled in which targets
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:25:24 +0930
Tim wrote:
> I probably could do that on Linux, too. But I don't want to transcode
> the movie, which seems to be how every Linux solution I've seen works.
Ah, its simple on linux - you just need to fully understand and
memorize all the interacting meanings of
On 05/26/2011 06:46 AM, Tim wrote:
> I don't really agree.
>
> It will be known that at least some minimum is required (to do a minimal
> install), probably a higher minimum is required (to do one of the
> prepared list of packages;
If you have patches, Anaconda has a development mailing list, I
On 05/26/2011 06:49 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 05:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> I would say, the average Fedora user has anywhere between 1 GB
>> and 4 GB of RAM and with every release, the amount of people using
>> systems with even more RAM keep growing.
> Must be only the hard
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 05:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I would say, the average Fedora user has anywhere between 1 GB
> and 4 GB of RAM and with every release, the amount of people using
> systems with even more RAM keep growing.
Must be only the hard core users. Because it's still common to
Kevin J. Cummings:
>> Preupgrade should know about the limitation and refuse to run the
>> upgrade if insufficient ram exists in the system instead of waiting
>> for the reboot where it just hangs with no explanation
Rahul Sundaram:
> "Should know" is true in the ideal sense. However it is fa
I sometimes need to fiddle systems that are not running,
either via poking around in an alternate boot partition
or using guestfish in a virtual image.
So, is the systemd information about which services are
enabled or disabled in which targets stored somewhere
that it is possible for a human sysa
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 17:22 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Big flamewar in Bugzilla: minimum install requirements for F15
> are, depending on who claims it, either 768mb or 1gb of ram.
Geez, either is too much. How inefficient is the programming to require
that much?
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ un
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 14:13 -0400, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> There are still issues, often minor things like suspend / resume not
> working, wireless being less than 100% perfect, power management being
> less than perfect... etc.
Depending on your laptop... My ASUS laptop seems to work properly,
al
Scott van Looy writes:
I've upgraded my server, now when I boot it gets as far as this:
md: Waiting for all devices to be available before auto detect
md: If you don't use raid, use raid-noautodetect
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
md: Scanned 0 and added 0 devices.
Then it freezes and kernel pa
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 09:29 -0600, FHDATA wrote:
> After careful assessment, the dual/multi boot (unless i absolutely
> need it) is not worth the hassle. I try full hrdw install.
I came to that conclusion years ago, and all but one computer (here) is
Linux only. The sole use of Windows on one com
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 04:39 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> 2) I would have liked to choose KDE rather than Gnome,
>> but as far as I can see I was never asked which I would like?
>
> Normally, there's an option to customize your installation. Was it
> skipped?
Maybe I missed it.
I did c
On 05/26/2011 05:00 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Rahul,
>
> First of all I want to thank the whole team for their efforts. I surely
> appreciate not only the quality of work, but also the quality of the
> product. However, I had to laugh a little when I read your note. I
> have some units that
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 05:41 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 25/05/11 05:33, Jan Willies wrote:
> > 2011/5/25 Bob Goodwin
> >
> >New install F-15: When I attempted to change the inittab
> > setting
> >from 5 to 3 as I normally do I was told that was no longer
> > the
I've upgraded my server, now when I boot it gets as far as this:
md: Waiting for all devices to be available before auto detect
md: If you don't use raid, use raid-noautodetect
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
md: Scanned 0 and added 0 devices.
Then it freezes and kernel panics
I can boot using the
On 05/25/2011 04:39 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> 2) I would have liked to choose KDE rather than Gnome,
> but as far as I can see I was never asked which I would like?
Normally, there's an option to customize your installation. Was it skipped?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
I just installed Fedora-15 on my laptop using the netinstall CD.
1) I had the DVD ISO on my server, and I thought I would be asked
where I wanted to download from.
But as far as I could see, I wasn't asked for an IP address,
and F-15 was successfully installed from some unspecified remote site.
2
Subject: Re: Fedora 15 installer needs more than 512MB RAM
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 03:54:17 +0530
On 05/26/2011 03:50 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Unfortunately that's not something likely to be seen by potential
> newbies who are thinking of trying out this Fedora thing
I don't think we need
On 05/26/2011 04:06 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> Preupgrade should know about the limitation and refuse to run the
> upgrade if insufficient ram exists in the system instead of waiting for
> the reboot where it just hangs with no explanation...
One more thing. If the installation completes but
On 05/26/2011 04:06 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> Preupgrade should know about the limitation and refuse to run the
> upgrade if insufficient ram exists in the system instead of waiting for
> the reboot where it just hangs with no explanation
"Should know" is true in the ideal sense. However
On 05/25/2011 06:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 03:50 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> Unfortunately that's not something likely to be seen by potential
>> newbies who are thinking of trying out this Fedora thing
>
> I don't think we need to worry about newbies using the net
> insta
On 05/05/2011 12:52 AM, Eric B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a Maven 3.0+ rpm pkg for FC14. I found it precompiled
> for FC15, but if I tried to install it, it has a bunch of incompatible
> libs with FC14 (understandably).
>
> Any ideas if/where I might be able to find an rpm version of Mave
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> As already noted, this isn't related to systemd but in case, you are
> looking for systemd documentation, here is a comprehensive list of them
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd#systemd_documentation
>
Thanks Rahul, earlier I think
On 05/26/2011 03:53 AM, Kam Leo wrote:
>> QA works against a well documented and publicized release criteria that
>> gets frequent updates via test list
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Final_Release_Criteria
> Strange that being able to install on a system with minimum hardware
> requ
On 05/26/2011 03:50 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Unfortunately that's not something likely to be seen by potential
> newbies who are thinking of trying out this Fedora thing
I don't think we need to worry about newbies using the net
installation. They aren't likely to start with that. Also t
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 02:46 AM, Kam Leo wrote:
>> After reading the bug report I can only shake my head.
>>
>> 1. The problem was known at least a month before the release date.
>
> Yes. As noted in the bug report, a change in the installer and re
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 02:57 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > 3. Release Notes have long lead times and are no longer suitable for
> > flagging important last minute changes in system requirements.
>
> Fedora doesn't rely on only the release notes. There are other places
> including the common bug
On 05/26/2011 03:43 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>> Most of them are from the sandbox init script NOT from systemd!!
>> Yes, this was not documented in the release notes. It is part of
>> SELinux/pam_namespace usag
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Harald Hoyer wrote:
>> Most of them are from the sandbox init script NOT from systemd!!
>
> Yes, this was not documented in the release notes. It is part of
> SELinux/pam_namespace usage.
Is there any wiki or manpage I can look at
On 05/26/2011 03:35 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> That describes what I have been doing. It does not work! Step one fails.
>
> rm /etc/systemd/system/default.target
>
> Results in No such file or directory, however I can list it with ls.
The method documented in the wiki works fine
On 25/05/11 16:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 02:00 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> Once again this is making a major problem of what has always
>> been a routine configuration change.
> For fresh installations of Fedora 15, /etc/inittab has the
> documentation on how to do
On 05/25/2011 03:30 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 25/05/11 10:02, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>> After fixing this, you can replace inittab with the script I posted in
>> Issue 53, which is archived here:
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/392873/match=re+start+system+without+x
On 05/26/2011 03:19 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> I assume that the installer now checks the amount of available memory
> and displays a warning screen when you attempt an install on a 512MB
> RAM system, no?
>
> Or was that too considered "too disruptive"?. Disrupting the install
> without previous
Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Most of them are from the sandbox init script NOT from systemd!!
Yes, this was not documented in the release notes. It is part of
SELinux/pam_namespace usage.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://adm
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 16:20, Mike Williams wrote:
> There are more details here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682555
>
> Mike
I assume that the installer now checks the amount of available memory
and displays a warning screen when you attempt an install on a 512MB
RAM system, n
luis redondo hotmail.com> writes:
> I run Fedora13 i386 on my netbook 1GB RAM.I regularly use VirtualBox to run
Windows7.Right now,I allocate 512MB for Fedora13 and 512Mb for the
VirtualMachine,Windows7 runs relatively slowly but I can do the tasks with it.My
problem is: as the memory requirement
I suggest you try the LXDE spin of Fedora 15. That is, if it´s OK for
you to use LXDE instead of the more resource-hungry Gnome 3 or KDE
4...
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/lxde/
FC
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 18:18, luis redondo wrote:
> I run Fedora13 i386 on my netbook 1GB RAM.I regularly use Vi
On Wed, 25 May 2011 22:32:41 +0200
Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Most of them are from the sandbox init script NOT from systemd!!
>
> # chkconfig sandbox off
>
> Then reboot.
By golly, you are right! I turned off sandbox and now only
one directory is mounted on my root partition (the expected /).
On Wed, 25 May 2011 14:21:10 -0600
Phil Meyer wrote:
> On 05/25/2011 09:55 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I "preupgraded" my desktop to F15 from F13 today. Everything went
> > very smoothly except this issue with the ugly fonts. For some
> > reason for the same font settings I get
On 05/25/2011 02:16 PM, Kam Leo wrote:
> After reading the bug report I can only shake my head.
This is Yet Another Example of the Iron Law of Bureaucracy in action.
(http://www.jerrypournelle.com/reports/jerryp/iron.html) In this case,
the people running the project clearly see nothing wrong w
On 05/26/2011 02:46 AM, Kam Leo wrote:
> After reading the bug report I can only shake my head.
>
> 1. The problem was known at least a month before the release date.
Yes. As noted in the bug report, a change in the installer and related
components are going in for Fedora 16 but the amount of ch
On 05/25/2011 04:42 PM, Lewis NH2 wrote:
> Good Evening,
>
> I have a SOHO, and I like to access/answer my emails from every
> workstations. Of course everything should be kept up-to-sync.
> Furthermore, I'd like to avoid storing all emails on my ISP. Having a
> local IMAP server and fetching auto
Kevin J. Cummings writes:
Today, I tried to upgrade my F14 test machine to F15.
Machine in question: HP Pavilion 7490 desktop
PIII w/512MB ram.
There you go. Big flamewar in Bugzilla: minimum install requirements for F15
are, depending on who claims it, either 768mb
Once upon a time, I bought a laptop running FC6.i386. It ran well
enough at the time, but I wanted to unlock the 64 bit potential of my
laptop, so, when the time came to upgrade, I did some research on yum
upgrades and determined that there was a file buried in /etc that I
could change which would
On Wed, 25 May 2011 14:27:48 -0600
Phil Meyer wrote:
> Hha! That's nothing. I raise you.
Yea, I got all the cgroup stuff as well, but I figure that can be
explained. Four separate mounts of the same partition was
beyond my comprehension though :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproje
I run Fedora13 i386 on my netbook 1GB RAM.I regularly use VirtualBox to run
Windows7.Right now,I allocate 512MB for Fedora13 and 512Mb for the
VirtualMachine,Windows7 runs relatively slowly but I can do the tasks with
it.My problem is: as the memory requirements are 768MB minimum for Fedora15 a
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Mike Williams wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>> On 05/25/2011 10:44 AM, Kam Leo wrote:
>> > It seems that the installer files
>> > have gotten fatter and more memory is required.
>>
>> When I checked http://fedoraproject.org/ yesterd
2011/5/25 Michael Schwendt
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 13:38:00 -0500, ME wrote:
>
> > Just that.
> >
> > Anyone here knows when RPMFusion for F15 is going to jump into the stable
> > branch?
>
> It has built against Fedora 15 Branched + Updates the whole time, so far,
> and still does. What's missing
The other day, I had my cable modem drop its connection to the internet.
Ah, if I had only noticed it when it happened, instead, I played with
the network service on my home server first by issuing:
service network restart
The message that came back (and still does when I use that command, or
wh
On 05/25/2011 02:20 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> [bobg@box6]$ ln -s /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target
> /etc/systemd/system/default.target
> ln: failed to create symbolic link
> `/etc/systemd/system/default.target': File exists
Probably won't help much but to co
On 05/25/2011 11:50 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> [bobg@box6]$ ln -s /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target
> /etc/systemd/system/default.target
> ln: failed to create symbolic link
> `/etc/systemd/system/default.target': File exists
>
> And this is where I got in
On 05/24/11 22:07, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> Have you tried the ping tests after turning off your fedora firewall
> (iptables)? Are they any better or do they still fail?
> What about turning off your XP firewall, just to test the pinging?
>
I finally zeroed in on the culprit.
It is neither fedor
On 05/26/2011 02:00 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Once again this is making a major problem of what has always
> been a routine configuration change.
For fresh installations of Fedora 15, /etc/inittab has the
documentation on how to do this. On upgrades, it might get saved as
/etc/ini
Good Evening,
I have a SOHO, and I like to access/answer my emails from every
workstations. Of course everything should be kept up-to-sync.
Furthermore, I'd like to avoid storing all emails on my ISP. Having a
local IMAP server and fetching automatically the emails from my ISP
sounds quite promisi
On Wed, 25 May 2011 13:38:00 -0500, ME wrote:
> Just that.
>
> Anyone here knows when RPMFusion for F15 is going to jump into the stable
> branch?
It has built against Fedora 15 Branched + Updates the whole time, so far,
and still does. What's missing is the jump to Fedora 16 development.
--
us
Today, I tried to upgrade my F14 test machine to F15.
Machine in question: HP Pavilion 7490 desktop
PIII w/512MB ram.
Intel (something old) graphics
1st, I downloaded and burned (to a CD-R) the Live Desktop i686 CD.
It boots in the CD drive
Am 25.05.2011 um 20:39 schrieb Michael Cronenworth :
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>> Where on earth do those /tmp /var/tmp and /home entries come from?
>> They certainly aren't all mounted on top of the same filesystem root.
>> There are no entries for them in /etc/fstab. What is going on?
>
> systemd h
On 25/05/11 10:02, R. G. Newbury wrote:
>> 2011/5/25 Jan Willies
>>
2011/5/25 Bob Goodwin
In the kernel-line, where you did put '3'.
>> Ah sorry, you edited /etc/inittab. Yes, in the grub screen at the end of the
>> 'kernel-line'
> After fixing this, you can replace inittab with
On 05/25/2011 12:17 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I was checking to see if I had everything mounted that I wanted
> in a newly genned f15 system, and I see this insanity in
> the output from running "mount":
>
> /dev/sda2 on / type ext3
> (rw,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl,barrier=0,data=order
On 05/25/2011 09:55 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I "preupgraded" my desktop to F15 from F13 today. Everything went very
> smoothly except this issue with the ugly fonts. For some reason for the
> same font settings I get these ugly fonts after the upgrade to F15. I
> compared with my F1
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>> Where on earth do those /tmp /var/tmp and /home entries come from?
>> They certainly aren't all mounted on top of the same filesystem root.
>> There are no entries for them in /etc/fstab. What is going on?
>
> sy
Tom Horsley wrote:
> The mounts I see on f15 don't say "bind" anywhere, so they
> are terribly confusing and I really wonder if they are
> bind mounts.
Hey, don't shoot the messenger. :)
The release notes[1] don't make good light of the changes systemd[2]
brought, unfortunately. The times I've s
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
