First, you can try ping the IP of the host
As you can require IP address from DNS, that is not represent the IP(host)
is activing.
2010/2/9 Tim Long
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded my work computer to Fedora 12 and I am having a
> weird DNS issue for an internal website in my organization.
>
> Pe
Hi,
I recently upgraded my work computer to Fedora 12 and I am having a
weird DNS issue for an internal website in my organization.
Performing a dig/nslookup for the web site returns a IP address but
trying to contact via a web browser/wget/telnet fails with a DNS error
(the actually web site an
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 13:23 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> squid_connect_any --> off
Probably not a good idea, the settings there as an aid to protect you
against maliciousness. If you want to add exceptions, that's a better
idea than just letting anything through.
I'd make an educated guess tha
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 14:26 -0200, Fernando Henrique wrote:
> I use gnome-applet-netspeed
Me too, and I'd like to continue to. It does what I want rather neatly
(shows a small gadget in the taskbar that I can keep an eye on, and can
easily click on for a bit more information).
--
[...@localhost
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 18:19 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
> Installed UserAgentSwitcher addon.
>
> I don't see any speed difference by changing the User Agent settings.
Depending on the site, that mayn't help you. Some will do all sorts of
silly things to decide what browser you have (set and chec
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:08 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> An awful lot of web sites check the user agent and load
> completely different content and/or redirect to different
> servers.
Or change some operating parameters. Just look at the configuration for
Apache, and you find /special/ differences
Ed Greshko wrote:
> r...@dwf.com wrote:
>
>> I dont know if these are known problems (with work arounds) but
>> I see at least two major problems with X11 (and the nouveau driver for
>> Nvidia
>> cards).
>>
>> (1) The driver no longer understands <+> and <-> to move
>> among the definit
r...@dwf.com wrote:
> I dont know if these are known problems (with work arounds) but
> I see at least two major problems with X11 (and the nouveau driver for Nvidia
> cards).
>
> (1) The driver no longer understands <+> and <-> to move
> among the definitions on the MODE line.
>
This fe
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 21:46:52 -0700,
r...@dwf.com wrote:
>
> So, others seeing this?
> Any fix?
Does your display do EDID? If the driver can't tell what the limits of the
display are it uses very conservative values so as not to destroy the
display. If that is the problem you can define appr
I dont know if these are known problems (with work arounds) but
I see at least two major problems with X11 (and the nouveau driver for Nvidia
cards).
(1) The driver no longer understands <+> and <-> to move
among the definitions on the MODE line.
(2) On two separate systems here, on start
Linuxguy123 wrote:
>
> It loads quickly now. Problem fixed. Thanks.
>
>
Good...
FYI... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563052
Ed
--
Your depth of comprehension may tend to make you lax in worldly ways.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing l
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 11:49 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 11:25 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> >
> >> That is starting to stir the synapse
> >>
> >> The problem is related to what is in the "syn, ack" packet coming from
> >> 12.17.249.39. In the TCP
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 11:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> > You can "cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling" to see it is
> > set to "1" by default.
> >
> Yes...I know you said that already. Sorry to repeatmy head still
> hurts :-(
No problem. Thanks for your
Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> You can "cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling" to see it is
> set to "1" by default.
>
Yes...I know you said that already. Sorry to repeatmy head still
hurts :-(
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedora
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 11:25 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
>> That is starting to stir the synapse
>>
>> The problem is related to what is in the "syn, ack" packet coming from
>> 12.17.249.39. In the TCP Options it is sending "Window scale: 0
>> (multiply by 1)". I think
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 11:25 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> That is starting to stir the synapse
>
> The problem is related to what is in the "syn, ack" packet coming from
> 12.17.249.39. In the TCP Options it is sending "Window scale: 0
> (multiply by 1)". I think this is causing problems since
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 08:21:33 +0800,
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> In the back of my mind, from a few years ago, I remember there an issue
>> with the linux TCP/IP stack and some "mis-configured" routers. I need
>> to get some coffee and hopefully my brain will get in
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 01:56 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>> Hi, at least the following packages are currently going to not be
>> available anymore in Fedora 13. If you still use them, please check at
>> the given URL, whether the owner for Fedora devel is or
On 02/08/2010 01:56 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi, at least the following packages are currently going to not be
> available anymore in Fedora 13. If you still use them, please check at
> the given URL, whether the owner for Fedora devel is orphan. If it is,
> please reply to this mail and mention the
Hi;
For what it is worth, I have the same kind of problem but ...
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 17:33 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> This has me scratching my head.
>
> My access to www.rv.net is extremely slow. With both Konqueror and
> Firefox. And yet others say they have good access times.
>
> I'm r
On 02/08/2010 05:25 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 06:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Linuxguy123 wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:38 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 02/05/2010 06:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> This has me scratching my
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 08:21:33 +0800,
Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> In the back of my mind, from a few years ago, I remember there an issue
> with the linux TCP/IP stack and some "mis-configured" routers. I need
> to get some coffee and hopefully my brain will get in gear
I believe that was ECN
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:45:04 -0800
Mike Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Would somebody be so kind as to try this link using Firefox
> (preferably 3.0.15) and let me know their result?
>
> https://servicing.capitalone.com/c1/login.aspx
>
> There is supposed to be a login block on the left
On 9 February 2010 00:10, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 00:04 +, Sam Sharpe wrote:
>> On 8 February 2010 23:41, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:38 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
>> >> On 02/05/2010 06:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>> >> > This has me scratching my head.
On 9 February 2010 00:12, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:08 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:58:39 -0800
>> Konstantin Svist wrote:
>>
>> > Confirmed
>> > Very interesting problem, indeed
>>
>> An awful lot of web sites check the user agent and load
>> completely
Works for me, Firefox 3.5.7. I suggesting clearing your browser cache.
- Jamie
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently on f10 using their firefox 3.0.15 build to which I've
> installed firebug. I don't know whether firebug or firefox is the
> culprit but
On 02/08/2010 06:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Linuxguy123 wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:38 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/05/2010 06:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>>>
This has me scratching my head.
My access to www.rv.net is extremely slow. With both Konqueror and
>
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:38 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
>
>> On 02/05/2010 06:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>>
>>> This has me scratching my head.
>>>
>>> My access to www.rv.net is extremely slow. With both Konqueror and
>>> Firefox. And yet others say they have good acce
On 02/08/2010 05:41 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:38 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
>> On 02/05/2010 06:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>>> This has me scratching my head.
>>>
>>> My access to www.rv.net is extremely slow. With both Konqueror and
>>> Firefox. And yet others say they hav
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:08 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:58:39 -0800
> Konstantin Svist wrote:
>
> > Confirmed
> > Very interesting problem, indeed
>
> An awful lot of web sites check the user agent and load
> completely different content and/or redirect to different
> serve
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:08 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:58:39 -0800
> Konstantin Svist wrote:
>
> > Confirmed
> > Very interesting problem, indeed
>
> An awful lot of web sites check the user agent and load
> completely different content and/or redirect to different
> serve
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 00:04 +, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> On 8 February 2010 23:41, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:38 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
> >> On 02/05/2010 06:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> >> > This has me scratching my head.
> >> >
> >> > My access to www.rv.net is extremely s
On Monday 08 February 2010, Rick Stevens wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > Would somebody be so kind as to try this link using Firefox
> > (preferably 3.0.15) and let me know their result?
> >
> > https://servicing.capitalone.com/c1/login.aspx
> >
> > There is supposed to be a login block on the left sid
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:58:39 -0800
Konstantin Svist wrote:
> Confirmed
> Very interesting problem, indeed
An awful lot of web sites check the user agent and load
completely different content and/or redirect to different
servers. You'd have to do something like get a tcpdump
to compare what conten
On 8 February 2010 23:41, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:38 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
>> On 02/05/2010 06:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>> > This has me scratching my head.
>> >
>> > My access to www.rv.net is extremely slow. With both Konqueror and
>> > Firefox. And yet others say t
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:58 -0800, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 03:41 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > Hate to burst your bubble, but this looks like a Linux problem.
> > I get the same speed you do loading rv.net. But it loads instantly on
> > my wife's laptop with Vista and IE. Instantly.
On 02/08/2010 03:41 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> Hate to burst your bubble, but this looks like a Linux problem.
> I get the same speed you do loading rv.net. But it loads instantly on
> my wife's laptop with Vista and IE. Instantly. Same network, same
> wireless router.
>
> Can you guys test access
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 15:38 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 02/05/2010 06:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > This has me scratching my head.
> >
> > My access to www.rv.net is extremely slow. With both Konqueror and
> > Firefox. And yet others say they have good access times.
> >
>
> It sucks a big
Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> Just got it about 10 min ago. I uninstalled WordPress and httpd.
> Cleaned the system and then reinstalled both. Now it works!
>
> I have no idea what it was (no error reports in any log) but, the tried
> and true shotgun approach worked.
>
> Mike
>
>>
At least
Larry Brower wrote:
> Mike Dwiggins wrote:
>
>
>> Yep, I can ping them, dig them and host them. This is a box stock
>> install using straight BIND and defaults all around. Am I looking at a
>> PHP problem?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>
> Mike
>
> Did you ever get this figured out ?
>
Just go
Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> Yep, I can ping them, dig them and host them. This is a box stock
> install using straight BIND and defaults all around. Am I looking at a
> PHP problem?
>
> Mike
>
Mike
Did you ever get this figured out ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
John Nissley wrote:
> I am running fedora 12 (2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP) and I am
> only showing pulseaudio as an output device for sound.
In what application or desktop environment?
Kevin Kofler
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change sub
On 02/08/2010 04:28 PM, John Nissley wrote:
> I am running fedora 12 (2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP) and I am
> only showing pulseaudio as an output device for sound.
>
> I have been trying to get a Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio card
> working with no luck but even when I go back to the
A. Boggiano wrote:
> Il 08/02/2010 13:56, Till Maas ha scritto:
>> showimg
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/showimg
>
> I use showimg.
The big problem with this one is that it's dead upstream (since 2006!) and
stuck at KDE 3 (which also i
I am running fedora 12 (2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP) and I am
only showing pulseaudio as an output device for sound.
I have been trying to get a Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio card working
with no luck but even when I go back to the on board chipset for audio I
only show pulseaudio as
On 02/08/2010 01:45 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently on f10 using their firefox 3.0.15 build to which I've
> installed firebug. I don't know whether firebug or firefox is the
> culprit but the site displays correctly using Galeon and Chrome (with
> firebug). I'd like to determin
On 08/02/10 16:32, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 03:16 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>> On 08/02/10 13:23, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>> .
>> Are you sure the boolean is turned on ?
>>
>> # getsebool squid_connect_any
>> squid_connect_any --> off
>>
>> Once you have set the boolean on it sho
Hi all,
I'm currently on f10 using their firefox 3.0.15 build to which I've
installed firebug. I don't know whether firebug or firefox is the
culprit but the site displays correctly using Galeon and Chrome (with
firebug). I'd like to determine if it's the site's problem or that of
Firefox/Fi
On 02/05/2010 06:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> This has me scratching my head.
>
> My access to www.rv.net is extremely slow. With both Konqueror and
> Firefox. And yet others say they have good access times.
>
It sucks a big time from Chicago on Comcast.
$ time curl 'http://www.rv.net'>/dev/nu
On 02/08/2010 03:16 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/02/10 13:23, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> .
> Are you sure the boolean is turned on ?
>
> # getsebool squid_connect_any
> squid_connect_any --> off
>
> Once you have set the boolean on it should stay that way permanently if
> you use the -P flag
>
On 02/08/2010 06:56 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> So why do you and I have extremely slow access when others have fast
> or decent access ?
Here's what I see:
time curl 'http://www.rv.net'>/dev/null
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time
Current
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>> Just to be clear, I am not complaining that real cdrecord is not included,
>>> I'm complaining that something else which works differently is called
>>> cdrecord, and if I forget to put in the real thing I wind up with f___ing
>
On 08/02/10 13:23, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
.
Are you sure the boolean is turned on ?
# getsebool squid_connect_any
squid_connect_any --> off
Once you have set the boolean on it should stay that way permanently if you use
the -P flag
# setsebool -P squid_connect_any 1
-
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:53 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'll try that, but since it just affects the logging, does this mean
> > that named is still trying to do ipv6 lookups all the time?
>
> Only if you are visiting a IPv6-capable site, but such lookups ret
On 02/08/2010 04:20 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Yesterday I began getting an "SELinux security alert" and Firefox began
> to operate erratically [became useless].
>
> I did "setsebool -P squid_connect_any=1" per the alert and Firefox began
> to work again, however now this morning I am getting a si
On Monday 08 February 2010 09:21 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
>
>
> Fernando Henrique wrote:
>>
>> I use gnome-applet-netspeed
>>
>>
>
> If this package is no longer to be available in F13 is there an alternate
> package/widget/applet that can be used to monitor download speed? I have
> always found t
James Roman wrote:
> We have what appears to be a single replication operation holding up all
> subsequent replication changes. We had a user who was added to our
> Active Directory with an incorrect name. The record was then synced down
> to our 389 DS server/FreeIPA. When the problem was disco
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I'll try that, but since it just affects the logging, does this mean
> that named is still trying to do ipv6 lookups all the time?
Only if you are visiting a IPv6-capable site, but such lookups return
immediately since you have no IPv6 route. There will not be any
in
We have what appears to be a single replication operation holding up all
subsequent replication changes. We had a user who was added to our
Active Directory with an incorrect name. The record was then synced down
to our 389 DS server/FreeIPA. When the problem was discovered, it
appears that som
On 02/08/2010 01:05 AM, serge.ste...@fmsb.be wrote:
Error adding object 'dn: cn=celem2,ou=machines,dc=fmsb,dc=be'. The
error sent by the server was 'Invalid syntax. description: value #0
invalid per syntax
'. The object is: LDAPEntry: cn=celem2,ou=machines,dc=fmsb,dc=be;
LDAPAttributeSet: LDA
On 10-02-08 10:20:42, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >> Well, the reason appears to be that cdrecord is not available in
> >> Fedora unless you install it yourself, Fedora has chosen to take
> >> he respected cdrecord name and put wodim in its place. This seems
> >> to me as ethical as
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 09:00 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I know ipv6 is going to be in all our futures, but for the moment it's
> > just a PITA. My ISP doesn't support it and my /var/log/messages is
> > overflowing with complaints from named (I run the basic ca
Does anyone know where this support is up to? The last notes I've read
were from 2008, which claimed that a "fix was in the pipeline"[1] but
it's obviously not here yet.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/147872
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
Hi Birgit,
>> Feb 5 12:31:43 st39ldap01 ns-slapd: pam_krb5[12937]: authentication
>> fails for 'k.thormann' (k.thorm...@st.redcross.or.at): Authentication
>> failure (Looping detected inside krb5_get_in_tkt)
Is there anything in the KDC logs?
Regards
Johannes
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...
Fernando Henrique wrote:
>
> I use gnome-applet-netspeed
>
>
If this package is no longer to be available in F13 is there an alternate
package/widget/applet that can be used to monitor download speed? I have
always found this really useful all the time
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> muine
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/muine
I use muine.
--
Marc Wilson
m...@cox.net
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options
Il 08/02/2010 13:56, Till Maas ha scritto:
> Hi, at least the following packages are currently going to not be
> available anymore in Fedora 13. If you still use them, please check at
> the given URL, whether the owner for Fedora devel is orphan. If it is,
> please reply to this mail and mention th
On 02/08/2010 08:16 AM, Giovanni Mancuso wrote:
Hi,
i have in my Directory Server the id2entry.db4 file that is 9,8GB:
# ls -hl id2entry.db4
-rw--- 1 nobody nobody 9.8G Feb 8 15:11 id2entry.db4
But in my ldap i have only 33 entry:
# ldapsearch -T -vvv -H ldaps://127.0.0.1 -x -Z -b
"o=
I use gnome-applet-netspeed
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 05:56 AM, Till Maas wrote:
>> Hi, at least the following packages are currently going to not be
>> available anymore in Fedora 13. If you still use them, please check at
>> the given URL, whether the
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:20:42 -0500
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >> Well, the reason appears to be that cdrecord is not available in Fedora
> >> unless
> >> you install it yourself, Fedora has chosen to take the respected cdrecord
> >> name
> >> and put wodim in its place. This see
On 02/08/2010 10:16 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> There's lots of variegated advice around on turning off ipv6, much of it
>> out of date. What's the canonical way of doing this in Fedora (12), or
>> at least getting named to shut up about it?
>>
> ipv6 is now compiled into the kernel so all the previo
On 02/08/2010 05:56 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi, at least the following packages are currently going to not be
> available anymore in Fedora 13. If you still use them, please check at
> the given URL, whether the owner for Fedora devel is orphan. If it is,
> please reply to this mail and mention the
On 02/08/2010 05:50 AM, Jatin K wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 06:03 PM, Arne Chr. Jorgensen wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> With 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64 and the above release, I am no
>> longer able to run programs under wine. It stopped working after
>> updates. Things used to run with wine32,
>> but n
Alan Cox wrote:
>> Well, the reason appears to be that cdrecord is not available in Fedora
>> unless
>> you install it yourself, Fedora has chosen to take the respected cdrecord
>> name
>> and put wodim in its place. This seems to me as ethical as selling replica
>> Rolex
>> watches, the user
> There's lots of variegated advice around on turning off ipv6, much of it
> out of date. What's the canonical way of doing this in Fedora (12), or
> at least getting named to shut up about it?
ipv6 is now compiled into the kernel so all the previous advice about
modprobe.conf, modprobe.d, and sys
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I know ipv6 is going to be in all our futures, but for the moment it's
> just a PITA. My ISP doesn't support it and my /var/log/messages is
> overflowing with complaints from named (I run the basic caching
> nameserver configuration).
Are you seeing messages like this?
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 18:08 -0800, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> On 02/05/2010 04:33 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > This has me scratching my head.
> >
> > My access to www.rv.net is extremely slow. With both Konqueror and
> > Firefox. And yet others say they have good access times.
> >
>
> Confirm lo
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:33 +0100, Zacharie Elcor wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > since I upgraded to F12, I can't read anymore html emails in
> > evolution. Many html portions of text are replaced by [?].
> > Hidden text is often embedded in "span" ta
I know ipv6 is going to be in all our futures, but for the moment it's
just a PITA. My ISP doesn't support it and my /var/log/messages is
overflowing with complaints from named (I run the basic caching
nameserver configuration).
There's lots of variegated advice around on turning off ipv6, much of
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:33 +0100, Zacharie Elcor wrote:
> HI,
>
> since I upgraded to F12, I can't read anymore html emails in
> evolution. Many html portions of text are replaced by [?].
> Hidden text is often embedded in "span" tags.
> Messages come from an exchange server but message source i
Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> I have plans to use python-pgsql:
[...]
> If having a maintainer would prevent its removal from Fedora 13, I
> could do that. However, while I know Python pretty well, I'm quite
> the newbie with SQL.
Yes, adopting it as a maintainer would be enough to prevent i
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi, at least the following packages are currently going to not be
> available anymore in Fedora 13. If you still use them, please check at
> the given URL, whether the owner for Fedora devel is orphan. If it is,
> please reply to this mail an
> Sine I am using the "default" driver that comes with F12, I am not
> sure how to do this.
>
> Any suggestions?
I've not used uucp for years so can't realy help there.
Does minicom talk to the modem ok on that port ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chang
Hi, at least the following packages are currently going to not be
available anymore in Fedora 13. If you still use them, please check at
the given URL, whether the owner for Fedora devel is orphan. If it is,
please reply to this mail and mention the package.
DMitry
On 02/08/2010 06:03 PM, Arne Chr. Jorgensen wrote:
> hi,
>
> With 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64 and the above release, I am no
> longer able to run programs under wine. It stopped working after
> updates. Things used to run with wine32,
> but no more. Have not been able to figure out the cause
hi,
With 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64 and the above release, I am no longer able
to run programs under wine. It stopped working after updates. Things used to
run with wine32,
but no more. Have not been able to figure out the cause.
Do others have this problem with x86_64 ?
//ARNE
--
user
At 05:50 2/8/2010, you wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:36:44 -0500
>CAS wrote:
>
> > I am using an FTDI232RL usb-to-serial converter for a serial port on
> > my laptop running Fedora 12. For some reason, this is recognized,
> > but I am unable to communicate with the device. When I plug in the
>
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:36:44 -0500
CAS wrote:
> I am using an FTDI232RL usb-to-serial converter for a serial port on
> my laptop running Fedora 12. For some reason, this is recognized,
> but I am unable to communicate with the device. When I plug in the
> device on my desktop running Fedora
HI,
since I upgraded to F12, I can't read anymore html emails in evolution. Many
html portions of text are replaced by [?].
Hidden text is often embedded in "span" tags.
Messages come from an exchange server but message source is valid html.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Yesterday I began getting an "SELinux security alert" and Firefox began
to operate erratically [became useless].
I did "setsebool -P squid_connect_any=1" per the alert and Firefox began
to work again, however now this morning I am getting a similar notice
although it appears to be making an exc
> Well, the reason appears to be that cdrecord is not available in Fedora
> unless
> you install it yourself, Fedora has chosen to take the respected cdrecord
> name
> and put wodim in its place. This seems to me as ethical as selling replica
> Rolex
> watches, the user get something other th
Krishna Chandra Prajapati wrote:
> I am getting the below error on my rhel server.
RHEL problems should be sent to an RHEL mailing list, or to Red Hat's paid
support if you have a valid support contract. This is the wrong mailing
list.
Kevin Kofler
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:04:33 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Ben did some updates tonight for rawhide and I am able to play tremulous now
> on an nVidia nv28 based card.
>
> It's pretty late so I didn't do much testing and there may be bugs. But if
> you have nv20 series or earlier cards yo
Hi Jatin,
Link is working fine now.
Already there is 24GB ram on that box. so there should not be memory
shortage.
It's already 64 bit system
# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga)
# free -m
total used free sharedbuffers
94 matches
Mail list logo
