Ed Greshko wrote:
> Sam Sharpe wrote:
>
>>
>> What about this then?
>>
>> [...@samlap ~]$ echo $PATH
>> /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/opt/real/RealPlayer:/home/sam/.bin:/opt/real/RealPlayer:/home/sam/.bin
> r...@dwf.com writes:
>
> > I see a lot of comments about F12 and Nvidia video card, but no solution to
> > the problem (if there is one, PLEASE point me at it, Ive just upgraded to
> > F12)
> >
> > I have a hard time believing that the folks that produce Fedora Releases
> > would actually rele
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:23 PM, wrote:
> I see a lot of comments about F12 and Nvidia video card, but no solution to
> the problem (if there is one, PLEASE point me at it, Ive just upgraded to F12)
In case you're refering to my posts, my only problems with my 9400GT
card is enabling Twinview and
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> No DVD player? Digital outputs from a CD or DVD drive in the computer?
Of course, I have a DVD player, and it doesn't work anymore than
youtube: no sound.
I called Asus and their support is provided by shoe salesmen. (Skip)
I then called N
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:23:12 -0700, r...@dwf.com wrote:
> I see a lot of comments about F12 and Nvidia video card, but no
> solution to the problem (if there is one, PLEASE point me at it, Ive
> just upgraded to F12)
>
> I have a hard time believing that the folks that produce Fedora
> Releases w
--- On Thu, 2/4/10, r...@dwf.com wrote:
> I see a lot of comments about F12 and
> Nvidia video card, but no solution to
> the problem (if there is one, PLEASE point me at it, Ive
> just upgraded to F12)
>
> I have a hard time believing that the folks that produce
> Fedora Releases
> would actual
Frank Elsner:
>> You have seen the above line that reads "Wireless now disabled
>> by radio killswitch"?
Peter Lesterhuis:
> Yes, I have. But I don't know what it means. Please inform me.
There's a physical switch on your computer that lets you turn the
wireless network on and off. It may b
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:08:56 -0800
suvayu ali wrote:
> That Bugzilla says updates have been pushed to F10. Shouldn't that
> mean its fixed in F11 and F12?
That bugzilla just complained that sudo -V printed info
that conflicted with the behavior of sudo. Apparently the update
they pushed merely mad
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 17:01 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> what I want to know, is if you have a desktop that you use for normal
> every day computing (web browsing, email, update rpms and that type
> thing) is it worth running cpuspeed and letting your cpu's get
> throttled until needed
I can't sa
Sam Sharpe wrote:
> On 5 February 2010 01:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 February 2010 16:13, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
suvayu ali wrote:
> As far as I understand this, sudo still use
> I see a lot of comments about F12 and Nvidia video card, but no solution to
> the problem (if there is one, PLEASE point me at it, Ive just upgraded to
> F12)
>
> I have a hard time believing that the folks that produce Fedora Releases
> would actually release a version that does not support hi
r...@dwf.com writes:
I see a lot of comments about F12 and Nvidia video card, but no solution to
the problem (if there is one, PLEASE point me at it, Ive just upgraded to F12)
I have a hard time believing that the folks that produce Fedora Releases
would actually release a version that does not
On 4 February 2010 14:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Yes But, I think, is where the confusion came in.
>
> Even without the sftp.service file F11 would indicate sftp service
> availability. But, in both F11 and F12 there does exist a ssh.service
> file. So, apparently, the F11 client would presume
On 5 February 2010 01:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
> suvayu ali wrote:
>> On 4 February 2010 16:13, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
>>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>>
>>>
As far as I understand this, sudo still uses your (the regular user's)
$PATH.
>>> Nope, that's mere
On 4 February 2010 17:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
> suvayu ali wrote:
>> On 4 February 2010 16:13, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
>>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>>
>>>
As far as I understand this, sudo still uses your (the regular user's)
$PATH.
>>> Nope, that's mere
I see a lot of comments about F12 and Nvidia video card, but no solution to
the problem (if there is one, PLEASE point me at it, Ive just upgraded to F12)
I have a hard time believing that the folks that produce Fedora Releases
would actually release a version that does not support his very common
suvayu ali wrote:
> On 4 February 2010 16:13, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>
>>
>>> As far as I understand this, sudo still uses your (the regular user's)
>>> $PATH.
>>>
>> Nope, that's merely what the docs claim. In fact, the secur
On 4 February 2010 16:13, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
> suvayu ali wrote:
>
>> As far as I understand this, sudo still uses your (the regular user's)
>> $PATH.
>
> Nope, that's merely what the docs claim. In fact, the security geeks
> decided sudo absolutely needed to ha
FC12-x86_64/KDE
trying to connect to a NXserver across internet, it won't connect.
I'm getting to this point at "time out"
203 NXSSH running with pid:2163
285 Enabling skip of SSH config files
285 Enabling check 0n switch command
285 Setting the preferred NX options
If I do a "ssh t...@76.254
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:00:39 -0800
suvayu ali wrote:
> As far as I understand this, sudo still uses your (the regular user's)
> $PATH.
Nope, that's merely what the docs claim. In fact, the security geeks
decided sudo absolutely needed to have a hard coded PATH and as far
as I know the only way to
On 4 February 2010 15:01, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 14:57 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
>> /proc/cpuinfo shows the current clock speed. Many processors,
>> especially laptops, scale down the speed of idle processors to save
>> power.
>>
>> Try running a program that contains
On 4 February 2010 15:13, Richard R. Cahilig wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with my fedora 12 box. There is no /sbin and /usr/sbin PATH
> after using sudo. This is the output if I run the command echo $PATH.
> /usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
>
> I tried to add the /sbin an
On 4 February 2010 22:26, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some netx-based javaws, and I can't figure out how to clear
> the cache. Any one knows? Thanks!
rm -rf ~/.netx/cache/*
--
Sam
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription op
Hello,
I have a problem with my fedora 12 box. There is no /sbin and /usr/sbin PATH
after using sudo. This is the output if I run the command echo $PATH.
/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
I tried to add the /sbin and /usr/sbin PATH in .bash_profile but I still have
the same pro
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 14:57 -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> /proc/cpuinfo shows the current clock speed. Many processors,
> especially laptops, scale down the speed of idle processors to save
> power.
>
> Try running a program that contains a tight infinite loop and see what
> happens then.
Qu
Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>
> Yes, but be advised that the old copy was also a straight from OOo.org
> version, rarely have I tolerated the brokenness of the distro versions for
> very long. It is packed as rpms however and includes the real, 100%
> compatible java too, so the install seems to
On Thursday 04 February 2010, Mike Cloaked wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I just did, on an F10 system, works a treat.
>
>Did you uninstall the pre-existing OO first, and then install the new one?
>Would be interested to know of any gotchas too along the way?
>
Yes, but be advised that the old copy
How do any of you out there manage your wireless routers? I have a
GetNet 534W wireless router, and use knetworkermanager to control my
ethernet connection. Unfortunately I have yet to find a reliable way of
managing the wireless connection, especially as i would prefer some sort
of security. Just
Antonio M wrote:
> I am helping a friend of mine to set up his machine with Fedora 12
> 1) we installed by DVD and it was o.k
> 2) after rebooting we set up the user
> 3) we started to upgrade with latest updates (but at the moment we
> have not yet upgraded kernel) with Package kit
> 4) we are exp
Hello,
I have some netx-based javaws, and I can't figure out how to clear
the cache. Any one knows? Thanks!
Take care
Oliver
--
Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist
Systems Biology Linker at Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org/sybil)
Turning Knowledge Data into Models
Ce
Hi,
I've just switched from F7 to F11 and in general things went well. But I use
kmail as my pop client and when clicking on a URL in a mail I always get
Konquerer. I've gone into System | Preferences | Preferred Applications and
Firefox (my fave) is selected, but I conjecture I need to go else
> undoubtedly going to regret asking this, but i installed f12 on a
> gateway laptop, whose /proc/cpuinfo reads (in part):
>
> model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60
> stepping : 2
> cpu MHz : 800.000
> ...
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce c
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Andrew Commons
wrote:
> Tom Lanyon wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 04/02/2010, at 10:58 PM, Andrew Commons wrote:
>>
>>> (1) Create the user normally on the system.
>>
>> Can you define 'normally' ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tom
>
> Tom,
>
> I'm using System->Administration
I checked and it wasn't over heating ( I believe ) :
k8temp-pci-00c3
Adapter: PCI adapter
Core0 Temp: +23.0 °C
Core0 Temp: +22.0 °C
Core1 Temp: +33.0 °C
Core1 Temp: +18.0 °C
Last temp reading (using collectd every 10 seconds) before the machine
stopped responding, not super high... :
46.0
Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>
> I just did, on an F10 system, works a treat.
>
>
Did you uninstall the pre-existing OO first, and then install the new one?
Would be interested to know of any gotchas too along the way?
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/OpenOffice-and-password
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:14:16 -0700
Phil Meyer wrote:
> That will confirm or deny kvm loading correctly. If so, virtualization
> is functional on that cpu.
Except that if it is disabled in the bios, the /proc/cpuinfo still
says the cpu has the capability, yet the module loading won't work
(thoug
On Thursday 04 February 2010, Frank Cox wrote:
>On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 09:53 -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote:
>> If so that would be a real shame - does anyone have definite
>> confirmation of
>> this?
>
>You can install the OO directly from openoffice.org with relative ease
>on Fedora system. Or at leas
On 02/04/2010 01:06 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Steve Berg wrote:
>
>
>>
>>>undoubtedly going to regret asking this, but i installed f12 on a
>>> gateway laptop, whose /proc/cpuinfo reads (in part):
>>>
>>> model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Steve Berg wrote:
>
> >
> > undoubtedly going to regret asking this, but i installed f12 on a
> > gateway laptop, whose /proc/cpuinfo reads (in part):
> >
> > model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60
> > stepping: 2
> > cpu MHz : 800.000
On 02/04/2010 01:50 PM, Kevin Kempter wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> I've seen several of the below SELinux messages recently, I do have root
> logins disables in my /etc/ssh/sshd_config file:
>
>
> PermitRootLogin no
>
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on this? Is it cause for concern?
>
>
>
>
> ===
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 14:18 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> undoubtedly going to regret asking this, but i installed f12 on a
> gateway laptop, whose /proc/cpuinfo reads (in part):
>
> model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60
> stepping: 2
> cpu MHz : 800.00
>
> undoubtedly going to regret asking this, but i installed f12 on a
> gateway laptop, whose /proc/cpuinfo reads (in part):
>
> model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60
> stepping: 2
> cpu MHz : 800.000
> ...
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae m
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 10:51 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> Check your Gnome Session startup apps and see if there's a Bug Buddy
> item to uncheck. System>Preferences>Startup Apps.
I mentioned earlier in the thread (but forgot in the first posting) that
this I did find where the startup a
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:23:08 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
> And what lshw says?
And dmidecode?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/Mai
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Hiisi wrote:
> 2010/2/4 Robert P. J. Day :
> >
> > undoubtedly going to regret asking this, but i installed f12 on a
> > gateway laptop, whose /proc/cpuinfo reads (in part):
> >
> > model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60
> > stepping : 2
> > cpu
2010/2/4 Robert P. J. Day :
>
> undoubtedly going to regret asking this, but i installed f12 on a
> gateway laptop, whose /proc/cpuinfo reads (in part):
>
> model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60
> stepping : 2
> cpu MHz : 800.000
> ...
> flags : fp
undoubtedly going to regret asking this, but i installed f12 on a
gateway laptop, whose /proc/cpuinfo reads (in part):
model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 800.000
...
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr
> I will try and figure out how to get some console logging going on my
> windows 389 console client, since the Linux one never worked for me
> (the GUI was all messed up with no text on the buttons). I'll post
> the log output here if I can get it.
I got this working, if anyone else needs the so
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Frank Cox [via Fedora Users]
wrote:
> You can install the OO directly from openoffice.org with relative ease
> on Fedora system. Or at least you could, the last time I tried it.
If that is the case for F11/F12 it would be great - and hopefully run
without proble
Hi All;
I've seen several of the below SELinux messages recently, I do have root
logins disables in my /etc/ssh/sshd_config file:
PermitRootLogin no
Any thoughts on this? Is it cause for concern?
==
SELinux message:
==
Last night I was running X on two different ttys. When I shutdown the
system, a policy window came up saying that I had to enter the root password
to shutdown the system -- which I did. This morning -- X cannot find my
screens. I'm wondering if this is a HAL problem or not ? How do I
diagnosis/fix
On Wednesday 03 February 2010 21:29:11 Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> On 02/03/2010 09:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Kevin Kempter wrote:
> >>> Hi all ;
> >>>
> >>> I'm running a fully updated Fedora 12 laptop
> >>>
> >>> when I scp files to/from my laptop the system always freezes near the
> >>> end of th
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:10:43 +0100 Peter Lesterhuis wrote:
> >
> > I reinstalled fedora 12 ... and the card starts working again.
> > >But after installing updates an rebooting it stops working.
> > >Any clues would be wellcome.
> >
> > Give the list so
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> What would be the best place to ask a live person about installing
> Koji on a local server? I've tried to follow the wiki
> documentation[1], but my Kojiweb reports the service is offline. The
> koji CLI also reports the same. I am attempting to use Kerberos
> without
Mike Cloaked wrote:
> If so that would be a real shame - does anyone have definite confirmation of
> this?
Create an RFE bug or e-mail the maintainer. They have the last say.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapro
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 09:53 -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote:
> If so that would be a real shame - does anyone have definite
> confirmation of
> this?
You can install the OO directly from openoffice.org with relative ease
on Fedora system. Or at least you could, the last time I tried it.
--
MELVILLE
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>
> I doubt it. OO.org releases are usually held to major Fedora updates.
> You can try to create an RFE bug, but I bet you won't see it until F13.
>
>
If so that would be a real shame - does anyone have definite confirmation of
this?
--
View this message in co
We just use Linux Virtual Server (piranha and ipvsadm) to load balance
between two replicas, and use the supplier to handle the load balancing.
If we need to take the supplier offline for any reason, the load
balance duties are passed off to another system. Easy to setup and
fully documented by R
Francesco Fiore wrote:
> Hi,
> I've two directory server in multimaster configuration. I've to
> reinitialize all databases on 2 nd server (B) using the data of the 1st (A).
> After the synchronization, server B crash with an segmentation fault.
> There isn't any relevant message in the error log
Peter Schmidt wrote:
> I see 389-ds-base 1.2.4 in the epel repo and 1.2.6 in the epel-testing
> repo. I'm wondering where one can find 1.2.5
>
The way Fedora EPEL works is that packages do not go directly into
stable, they first go into testing, and have to actually be tested by
the communi
For those of you with multiple servers that use replication, how do
you do your load balancing and failover? DNS round robin? Some kind
of hardware load balancer like a Netscaler or BigIP F5?
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
Greg Woods wrote:
> I had considered the sledge hammer approach but I am concerned about
> what else might break if I do that. Perhaps I'll give it a try tonight.
Check your Gnome Session startup apps and see if there's a Bug Buddy
item to uncheck. System>Preferences>Startup Apps.
--
users maili
What would be the best place to ask a live person about installing Koji
on a local server? I've tried to follow the wiki documentation[1], but
my Kojiweb reports the service is offline. The koji CLI also reports the
same. I am attempting to use Kerberos without SSL. I've successfully
setup the
On 2/4/10, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:15 +0100, Andras Simon wrote:
>
>>
>> Javascript can be turned off in the preferences.
>
> That makes it safer, but it also removes all the extra functionality
> that would have motivated someone to install Adobe Reader on a Fedora
> box in t
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 14:50 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
> yum erase bug-buddy?
I had considered the sledge hammer approach but I am concerned about
what else might break if I do that. Perhaps I'll give it a try tonight.
--Greg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:24:38 -0500
Steve Malenfant wrote:
> Maybe the cause is heat or
> something else.
>
> What should I be looking for?
Well, if it is overheating, you could try running with
the case open and a fan blowing in to see if it manages to
run without hanging with the hacked up impro
Sam J Sharpe wrote:
>
>> Adding that file to the f12 side but not the f11 side will show an
>> icon for f12 on the f12 side and permit sftp access.
>>
>> Adding that file to both f12 and f122 will show icons for both on the
>> f12 side and allow sftp access to both.
>>
>> So, good job...great catch
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:15 +0100, Andras Simon wrote:
>
> Javascript can be turned off in the preferences.
That makes it safer, but it also removes all the extra functionality
that would have motivated someone to install Adobe Reader on a Fedora
box in the first place. This is what we found ev
On 04/02/10 14:47, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 08:19 -0600, Mikkel wrote:
>
>> System --> Preferences --> Startup Applications. Uncheck the box in
>> front of Automatic Bug Reporting Tool.
>
> My bad; I forgot to mention this is on Fedora 10. ABRT hadn't been
> introduced yet. I did
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:53:27 -0600, Aaron wrote:
> > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/nautilus
> Some of the points you are making are correct and some aren't.
They are the truth.
> Your
> suggestion that I should address my problems with nautilus to the
> nautilus group is wrong.
Nah, it isn't
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 08:19 -0600, Mikkel wrote:
> System --> Preferences --> Startup Applications. Uncheck the box in
> front of Automatic Bug Reporting Tool.
My bad; I forgot to mention this is on Fedora 10. ABRT hadn't been
introduced yet. I did find the startup applications menu but I didn't
I got a Shuttle XPC SN78SH7 with an AMD X2 4400+ which I have installed with
Fedora Core 12 (not much choice, the nvidia chipset doesn't work in released
before that, including Centos 5).
I've been trying to run Handbrake for about 3 times now, the machine just
completely stops responding with not
On 2/3/10, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Documents aren't actually documents but programs that are overly powerful,
> so
> that reading untrusted documents is not safe.
Javascript can be turned off in the preferences. That should help.
Andras
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
Mike Cloaked wrote:
> I presume that if that is the
> case then we would get an update package soon after for F11 and F12? Can
> anyone say whether this would be the case once OO 3.2 is released?
I doubt it. OO.org releases are usually held to major Fedora updates.
You can try to create an RFE b
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 15:34 +, Sam J Sharpe wrote:
> D'oh - don't usually post from work so my mail isn't set up to reply
> from the right address!
>
> Begin forwarded message:
> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:29:36 +
> From: Sam J Sharpe
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Cc: akons..
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:54:01 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Sam J Sharpe wrote:
> > I see machines running Mac OSX as you describe in Places->Network
> > when on my corporate network. After some experimentation, I
> > discovered that those machines displayed are the ones that are
> > advertising "SFTP
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 23:05 +, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> On 3 February 2010 22:53, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > This problem was minor but in the past I was the system administrator of
> > a network of 80 Linux computers and a problem with one of the system
> > components failed and its failure was cri
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:17 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:06:27 +0200
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 23:11 +0100, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
> > > How can I find out that someone is using it's network card in
> > > promiscuous mode in a subnet?
> > >
> > > Thank y
On 03/02/2010 20:39, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Huh? OpenJDK is practically identical to Sun Java except for the license.
> Except for the browser plugin (which OpenJDK does not include and which is
> provided by the IcedTea project), the code is almost 100% Sun code.
> Compatibility should be a non-is
On 04/02/2010 11:49, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Looking at the alternative install methods.
>
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/install-guide/fc6/en/sn-install-tcpip-config.html
>
> Couldn't see an exact method.
> Unles I'm missing something.
>
> Fedora-12.iso on NAS NFS share
>
> Can it be installed
Looking at the alternative install methods.
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/install-guide/fc6/en/sn-install-tcpip-config.html
Couldn't see an exact method.
Unles I'm missing something.
Fedora-12.iso on NAS NFS share
Can it be installed using network boot,
without the use of CD\DVD\USB sticks.
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:06:27 +0200
Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 23:11 +0100, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
> > How can I find out that someone is using it's network card in
> > promiscuous mode in a subnet?
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
>
> You can't.
> ... and even if you could, someone could
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 01:38 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:06:27 +0200,
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
> >
> > Having said all that, if your network is switched (as opposed to using
> > cheap FE hubs), only broadcast traffic (ARP/DHCP/etc) will be visible in
> > promisc mode
Mike Cloaked wrote:
>
>
> I have seen that support for opening password protected will be included
> in OO 3.2 which is due for release very soon, and that will resolve this
> issue - but I am not sure when soon will be! It did look like release was
> going to go ahead but then I saw at
> http:
> ...Since I don't have MS Office 2007 the question is whether
> I can open the file at all?
In such cases I ask the sender to export it as ".doc" and send it
again. I do not accept M$' immoral pressure for buying unneeded
new versions.
> Původní zpráva
> Od: Roger
>
Roger-11 wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2010 07:52 PM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
>> Can anyone advise me on the following problem?
>>
>> I have been sent a .docx which was created in MS Office 2007, and
>> encrypted
>> with a password that is needed to open it. In the past if anyone sent me
>> an
>> open .docx
On 02/04/2010 07:52 PM, Mike Cloaked wrote:
> Can anyone advise me on the following problem?
>
> I have been sent a .docx which was created in MS Office 2007, and encrypted
> with a password that is needed to open it. In the past if anyone sent me an
> open .docx file then OpenOffice in F12 would
Can anyone advise me on the following problem?
I have been sent a .docx which was created in MS Office 2007, and encrypted
with a password that is needed to open it. In the past if anyone sent me an
open .docx file then OpenOffice in F12 would open it without any problems.
However the password
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:10:43 +0100 Peter Lesterhuis wrote:
> >
> > I reinstalled fedora 12 ... and the card starts working again.
> > > But after installing updates an rebooting it stops working.
> > > Any clues would be wellcome.
> >
> > Give the list some logs to look at...
> >
> Here i
Peter Boy wrote:
> similiar question here, but regarding F12. Is there a chance to get an
> Netbeans 6.8 Fedora package as an update or does the Fedora policy
> prevent is (as it is in RHEL)?
The policy doesn't prevent it, but it may be impractical due to all the
dependencies needing upgrading. (
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Just to be clear, I am not complaining that real cdrecord is not included,
> I'm complaining that something else which works differently is called
> cdrecord, and if I forget to put in the real thing I wind up with f___ing
> $3 Blu-Ray coasters! I don't care if it is compatib
91 matches
Mail list logo
