cating to their SMSC using SMPP. We estimate this platform
we'll have peaks of around 500 messages/sec.
The client is wondering what method does Kannel use for ACK/NACK over SMPP.
The truth is I don't even know where to start looking for this answer.
Could anyone please help me out?
Thanks!!
David Szanto
Thanks Nikos!!!
I'll check it out!
David Szanto
EL día Martes, 1 de Marzo de 2011 a las 11:35:07, Nikos Balkanas escribió:
> Hi,
>
> You can see them in debug SMSc (bb?) logs. For MT traffic this is in the
> submit_sm_resp PDU (from SMSc) and deliver_sm_resp (from BB, for a
s get passed to the SMSCs in groups of 10, 20 or whatever?
or does it pass messages one on one?
Any comment will be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!!!
David Szanto
:
How can we avoid this?
How can we assure kannel is able to match up DLR messages with their
corresponding MT records?
Any help will be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks!
David Szanto
me
use Dec for the same id. There is a parameter dlr-id-type (or
somenthing like that) that tells kannel in which format are the in/out
ids.
Regards
Alvaro
On 2/1/13, David Szanto wrote:
Hi everyone!
We have a scenario with a single SMSC (using SMPP) for which we have
created 4 binds.
So ba
-boun...@kannel.org] Im Auftrag
von David Szanto
Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Februar 2013 14:10
An: users@kannel.org
Betreff: Multiple SMSC connections to the same SMSC Instace DLR
inconsistency
Hi everyone!
We have a scenario with a single SMSC (using SMPP) for which we have
created 4 binds.
So basica
or just use same SMSC-ID.
2013/2/4 David Szanto <dsza...@genasys.com>
Hi Thomas!!
Thanks for the tips!!
We did try setting the same name for all smsc-id's, but
had no luck. We still got the error messa
learned a lot about how kannel sets IDs for messages and
matches them to the corresponding DLRs thanks to all your comments!
Thanks a lot people!!
David Szanto
05/02/13 10:02, David Szanto escribió:
Hi spameden!
Thanks for the info! that is VERY helpfull. We've been testing a lot
usin
ith the older version (version 1.4.3, tar.gz downloaded from the site),
DLRs work perfectly, but "throughput" doesn't. And now, after updating
to the last svn trunk, kannel can't match DLR messages to it's original
MT message.
Any clues anyone?
Thanks
David Szanto
or the help guys!!)
David Szanto
El 14/02/13 11:48, spameden escribió:
It might be the same problem when DLR comes before MT is registered.
Do you use sqlbox?
2013/2/14 David Szanto :
Hi everyone!
We have just updated kannel to the las svn in trunk version (since in our
current version "throug
ersion directly,
or if we should check out some specific branch.
Specifically, could we simply apply the following file in the originally
downloaded 1.4.3 stable version for it to work?
https://redmine.kannel.org/projects/kannel/repository/revisions/4772/entry/trunk/gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c
Cheer
iencing on my test environment and report back, but I'm
quite sure that problem lies somewhere else.
2013/2/14 David Szanto :
Hi again!!
We've also come to realize that the trunk version is Development, so we're
not using it... In which case, we have the throttling problem.
We
things
happen when we do this.
If anyone has a 1.4.3 revision with this problem solved, We'd very much
appreciate it if someone could point us on the right direction.
Thanks,
David Szanto
El 14/02/13 17:13, Rinor Hoxha escribió:
Out of curiosity,
1)What is the simulator? (some when in h
g/kannel/smsbox-box1.log
log-level = 4
access-log = /var/log/kannel/access-smsbox-box1.log
group = sendsms-user
username = news
password = news123
name = sendbox1
Thanks!!!
David Szanto
kannel/smsc-sim2.log' with level `4'.
2013-07-05 08:09:25 [63821] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 14
(gw/bb_smscconn.c:sms_router)
2013-07-05 08:09:25 [63821] [0] INFO:
2013-07-05 08:09:25 [63821] [0] INFO: Kannel bearerbox II version 1.4.3
starting
2013-07-05 08:09:25 [63821] [0] INFO: MAIN: Start-up done, entering mainloop
Thanks !!!
David Szanto
talking to works with SMPP3.4, so I'm a bit lost in
that respect also.
If anyone can help me solve this issues or at least help me understand what
they mean, I'd appreciate it very much.
Thanks,
---
David Szanto Cori
Genasys II Spain, S.A.U.
Ventura de la Vega,
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your prompt response!!
According to my operator they used to have a limit of 10 SMSs/second, but they
changed it to unlimited days ago.
Actually that's why I set the throughput to 10.
I'm quite lost with this. Besides I'm quite new to kannel. :-D
Any other ideas?
Thanks again
>
> Regards
>
> Alvaro
>
---
David Szanto Cori
Genasys II Spain, S.A.U.
Ventura de la Vega, 5
28014 - Madrid, SPAIN
Phone + 34 91 364 91 00
Fax + 34 91 364 91 19
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.genasys.com
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivame
information?
Thanks in advance,
David Szanto
, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it gets
overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in
queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory)
Hope this helps
Cheers,
David Szanto
El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió:
Hel
20 matches
Mail list logo
