Hi All,
I need your help to find out the reason of incorrectly saved messaged_id.
I use kannel 1.5.0 with sqlbox.
I have two smsc_smpp: smsc1 and smsc2.
The both smsc are configured with msg-id-type = 0x00 as they send message id
in decimal based format in submit_sm_resp and deliver_sm PDUs.
gr
remove this from your config file
*msg-id-type = 0x00*
0x00 defines long value for the message id, but message id comes larger and
doesn't fit into long. removing the line makes kannel to define a C literal
(string) which fits the long message id
Best Regards,
Mohammed M I Sleem
http://www.abu
hello all,
We use this value:ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0 &C1 &D2 for init-string. It works
well for sending message using kannel. but we can't receive MOs.
Nevertheless, as I googled around, It seems that I should set it
to:AT+CNMI=... but it couldn't find the device, by using this value.
We use Nokia N81. Wo
Hi
have you tried wvdial?
Use wvdial. Read UG about it. Or trial & error from other examples in
modems.conf.
On 26 May 2011 14:08, Amirali Shambayati wrote:
> hello all,
> We use this value:ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0 &C1 &D2 for init-string. It works
> well for sending message using kannel. but we can't re
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi
> have you tried wvdial?
>
> Use wvdial. Read UG about it. Or trial & error from other examples in
> modems.conf.
>
> On 26 May 2011 14:08, Amirali Shambayati
> wrote:
>>
>> hello all,
>> We use this value:ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0 &C1 &D2 for init-string.
Some Nokia mobiles do not accept CNMI. Best use minicom and test about it:
AT+CNMI?
This should tell you if your modem supports it. If it doesn't you may have
to change modem. There is a section devoted in UG about modem
initialization. Please read it.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
Thank you, Mohammed.
You are absolutely right. I removed msg-id-type and it started to work as
needed.
Best regards,
Miranda Weasley
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Mohammed Saleem
wrote:
> remove this from your config file
>
> *msg-id-type = 0x00*
>
> 0x00 defines long value for the message
Hi, thanks for the response. It works with smsbox-route. There is another
question i have, i don't know if i should make another thread. Well, here it
is: does opensmppbox support storing messages destined to an esme if this
esme is offline, and send it later to this esme when it's connected? How
Hi,
Opensmppbox doesn't have permanent storage, so it can't store SMS. There is
a commercial version by Stipe that does that. Having said that, your SMS
will be stored in bb's storage, until the ESME comes back on line. This will
work most of the time, but I am not sure if it is 100% reliable,
I have a patch which will add routing based on sender number.
Does anyone need it, I am happy to share ?
Should I submit it to cvs/svn ?
Thanks,
Imran
Ok. I would like to know how can i contact Stipe? I tried once some time ago
to know about his commercial version with no success, because i could be
interested in the commercial version. Well, Thanks a lot.
Denilson
Nikos Balkanas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Opensmppbox doesn't have permanent storage
Post in in de devel list.
== Rene
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Imran Aghayev
Sent: Thursday, 26 May, 2011 17:01
To: us...@vm1.kannel.org
Subject: smsbox-route sender patch
I have a patch which will add routing based on sender number.
Doe
You can always check kannel's web site under authors. There you can find 2
mails for Stipe. I am sure he won't mind you getting in touch with him.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Denilson Silva"
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: Route sms to different ESME's
Hi All,
I have a question I was unable to reconcile from the documentation
regarding the behavior of multiple binds with the same smsc-id. I have
2 pairs of TX an RX binds, with each pair connected to different data
centers of the same operator. If I assign the same smsc-id to all 4
binds, what is
It will load balance.
I believe it does it on a round robin fashion
On Thursday, May 26, 2011, Garth Patil wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have a question I was unable to reconcile from the documentation
> regarding the behavior of multiple binds with the same smsc-id. I have
> 2 pairs of TX an RX binds,
Hello, I have following Kanel's config file:
group = core
admin-port = 1310
smsbox-port = 1320
admin-password = ***
log-file = "/var/log/kannel/kannel.log"
log-level = 0
store-file = "/var/lib/kannel/kannel.store"
box-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1"
group = smsbox
bearerbox-host = "localhost"
send
Ok. Well, in my tests bearerbox can store the messages and send it later when
the esme is connected again. I hope i'm not bothering you too much, but i
have one more question. It's something i noticed, maybe is a concept about
opensmppbox that i'm not aware. It's like this: i have my smpp server w
Yes, it will load balance.
But as far as I recall, not in a round robin fashion.
Messages will be sent to the smsc with the least messages in queue. Which
will always be the first one, if load is low.
== Rene
> It will load balance.
>
> I believe it does it on a round robin fashion
>
>
> On Thu
If you don't need smsbox, you might just as well not start it.
However, as far as I remember you do need to group = smsbox in your
kannel.conf or else bearerbox won't start.
About your other question: I don't know, maybe somebody else does.
== Rene
>
> Ok. Well, in my tests bearerbox can store t
You're right!
On Thursday, May 26, 2011, Rene Kluwen wrote:
> Yes, it will load balance.
> But as far as I recall, not in a round robin fashion.
>
> Messages will be sent to the smsc with the least messages in queue. Which
> will always be the first one, if load is low.
>
> == Rene
>
>
>> It will
Hi everyone,
I've just finished the kannel instalation and configuration. Everything
seems to work fine, messages are being sent without any serious problems.
But, since one of my smsc's is HTTP based, I'm required to send my internal
MSG ID to the end SMS gateway. That¹s really necessary in orde
Actually bearerbox doesn't need an smsbox group or a connected one to start.
Let's not forget that for historical reasons it was first created for
wapbox.
The reason you are loosing your sms when connecting to an smsbox is probably
because you haven't configured correctly smsbox-route group. R
Thanks Rene. Can you point me to the part of the code that does this?
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Rene Kluwen wrote:
> Yes, it will load balance.
> But as far as I recall, not in a round robin fashion.
>
> Messages will be sent to the smsc with the least messages in queue. Which
> will alway
If I run an SMS gateway with Kannel, can I specify the outgoing phone number
to be one that isn't provided by my telecom?
Ryan
This depends upon the configuration of SMSC on operator side. If
alphanumeric masking is allowed over the account given to you, you can
pretty much put anything in the header and send to any number. If not, then
only the number of SMS account will go in the header, no matter what you
send via appli
Interesting, thanks. Do you know any specific telecoms in the US which will
allow me to do this? (I'm going to buy an unlocked modem, so I can go with
any US telecom.)
Also, will Kannel only work over GSM?
Ryan
On 27 May 2011 01:47, ha...@aeon.pk wrote:
> This depends upon the configuration
Kannel is independent of GSM. It depends upon protocol of SMSC which is
extended towards you. General protocols are SMPP and CIMD. Almost all SMSCs
support SMPP. The network behind SMSC (GSM, CDMA, etc) is transparent to
you.
If you are using modem and SIM, you would NOT be able to use masking
fea
Dear All,
Its request you to all please reply of all the mail on "users@kannel.org,
" except on group.
From:
"ha...@aeon.pk"
To:
Ryan Lester
Cc:
users@kannel.org
Date:
05/27/2011 11:26 AM
Subject:
Re: SMS number "spoofing"
Sent by:
users-boun...@kannel.org
Kannel is independent of GSM. It
28 matches
Mail list logo