Right.
But for http connection the kannel's clients is forked (at least it
looks like according to the logs: 'DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient').
Such fork is almost the same as exec'ing external process.
So I prefer exec my script rather than kannel's http client. This way
the are no resources co
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 09:26, dorian wrote:
> Right.
> But for http connection the kannel's clients is forked (at least it
> looks like according to the logs: 'DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient').
> Such fork is almost the same as exec'ing external process.
How do you know it is fork?
It could be t
Hi Guys,
We have just connected to a Namibian Provider, We are sending message's
correctly however we are getting the following error "Couldnot parse DLR
string sscanf way,fallback to old way. Please report!", any ideas on how
to process the DLR correctly
Below is the full debug
2010-09-17
Hi Jarratt,
For me it looks like your provider isn't following the official protocol.
If we look at the message you are sending, they give it the msgid 31D44D55:
> 2010-09-17 10:26:34 [16954] [12] DEBUG: message_id: "31D44D55"
Later on you receive the DLR, but the ID is only given in the mess
1. See DEBUG line. Even if it is thread it takes time and RAM to create,
the thread running take time preparing http request, my http server
waste time to handle the request etc.
2. I need dlr feedback
> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 09:26, dorian wrote:
>
>> Right.
>> But for http connection the kannel
Hi Mads,
Thanks for the response i though it would be as such, the provider is
MTC Namibia in case anybody else has the same issue, I have asked them
for a response but as usual in Africa Everybody is on African time :)
If i get a response i will update the list
Thanks
Jarratt
On 09/17/20
Dorian,
Kannel uses threads. It doesn't fork.
There's a _huge_ difference in terms of cost between a thread and fork.
Using "exec" is a very bad idea in terms of performance and security.
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, dorian wrote:
> 1. See DEBUG line. Even if it is thread
Well. I know the difference between fork and pthread_create.
Anyway the http client work (even if it is thread not a process) is
waste of time for me.
Additionally I am forced to have working http server also which also do
a silly work for me (taking CPU time and RAM).
I am trying to find out the
Hi All,
I have managed to contact MTC they had to make amendments and we had to
split our TX and RX into seperate binds and set the message id type as
0x01 for both.
Thanks again
Jarratt
On 09/17/2010 10:45 AM, "Mads N. Vestergaard – CoolSMS A/S" wrote:
Hi Jarratt,
For me it looks like y
Of course you're free to use whatever setup it fits your taste. I'm just
telling that even with the http overhead it'll perform way better than
spawning a new process on each SMS you get.
Regarding dlr report, if you get the DLR's on sqlbox, you could add a unique
identifier inside dlr-url and par
Hello Rene,
I have tried out what yu suggested and added something else I read but
to no avail. See below:
Sms-service
#Mt Zion
group = sms-service
keyword = prayer
get-url = "http://...";
omit-empty = true
allowed-prefix = 4321
allowed-smsc-id =C43211
#accepted-smsc = "C44991;C44992;
Oh... thanks for letting me know, I just corrected to "keyword = default" and
it works.
One more question, like how can I have Kannel to distinguish between matching
default SMS-services? Let's say I have to create one for weather and other for
translation just to say something.
Thanks,
Ald
Better check against the sources. What is printed in the logs (Created &
destroyed) are malloc operations, not thread_create or join. If you need to
convince yourself, there are 2 numbers in brackets in front of each log
message. The first one is pid, the second one is thread id. Thread id does
Please read User Guide about configuring sms-service.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Aldo Zavala"
To: "Nikos Balkanas" ;
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: multiple default SMS-service's. Is it possible?
Oh... thanks for letting me know, I just corrected to
Hi All,
Just wanted to put it in the list archive that when using
message_payload to send plain text messages via GET from my testing the
message body should be double URL encoded, in order to transmit
"special" chars such as = and & which have a special meaning with
regards to HTTP GET.
I haven
Hi
We have experienced this problem again. A couple of our binds to one
particular smsc (the rest were okay) had connectivity issues last night at
12 AM. The binds were re-established and reported as being online from the
status pages. However a queue for one of the binds built up on the
bearerbox
Hi,
Why that? Payload should not be that different than submit in terms of
encoding. Are you using an HTTP smsc?
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Kyriacos Sakkas"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 2:34 PM
Subject: message_payload TLV possible Gotcha
Hi All,
Just wanted
If you are going to change this frequently, It would be better if you
do send all MO to an specific script and have that script do whatever
you want to. This way you don't need to restart kannel each time you
make a modification or add a new keyword.
|--
Hi All,
How many Max and Min Client (SMPP) Connections SMPPbox can handle ?
Regards,
KRNRDB
AFAIK there is no limit (other than OS limits).
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: krnrd b
To: users
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 5:32 PM
Subject: Max and Min Client Connections with SMPPbox
Hi All,
How many Max and Min Client (SMPP) Connections SMPPbox can handle ?
Regards,
I was thinking on that, but really needed an opinion, thanks a way guys!!!
Thanks,
Aldo Zavala
24/7 (760).890.4221
Mobile (760).556.5050
Office (760).234.0015
- Original Message -
From: Alvaro Cornejo
[mailto:cornejo.alv...@gmail.com]
To: Aldo Zavala
[mailto:a...@cleartalk.net]
Cc: u
The thing that you might be looking for:
If -instead of using smsbox- you use sqlbox to send messages, then you can set
dlr-url to whatever you want. It doesn't necessarily have to be a http url.
After that, you get your DLR's in the sent_sms table with the value you passed
as drl-url.
But sinc
True... min limit is 0... max limit is as many as your system can handle.
== Rene
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf
Of Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Friday, 17 September, 2010 17:27
To: krnrd b; users
Subject: Re: Max and Min Client Conne
Sorry.. Maybe you should look at allowed-receiver-prefix. My bad!
== Rene
From: Anthony Musaluke [mailto:goof2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 17 September, 2010 16:26
To: mwamba chishimba
Cc: Rene Kluwen
Subject: Re: Running Short Codes on Kannel (fwd)
Mwamba
its best if you send whol
Hi,
I'm trying to understand which replacement parameters are supported in
the get-url versus the dlr-url. The documentation table doesn't seem
to distinguish which parameters are actually available when using the
get-url from an sms-service versus sending a DLR to the specified
dlr-url. Is there a
hy,
how i read the message from SIM card and how i store the messages.
I want to see when a new message has arrived and store in a database.
please help me...
best regards,
Constantin Zaharia
26 matches
Mail list logo
