Hi
Again, please cc kannel list.
Kannel now sees the modem but failed with CPIN command. This is the sim
PIN you have defined on your config. If the sim does not need a PIN to
work, just comment that line.
Regards
Alvaro
|---
Hi
Kannel still can´t access your modem. Might be a permissions issue? what
user is running kannel? check it has write permissions to /dev/tty*
Check internet on how to use vwdial. you will need to install it on your
system.
do a ls -l /dev/tty* to see what devices are available and send that in
Hi
Change config to this
#detect-string = "SIMCOM"
detect-string2 = "SIM900A"
BTW are you sure modem speed is 9600? maybe use auto instead.
Then restart kannel.
I assume the port is the correct. /dev/ttyS0 ?
Modem log shows kannel can´t connect to modem. Therefore, discarding hw
problem, iss
Hi
Always copy kannel list so everybody benefit from information and others
can help you.
Again, Kannel is not able to talk to your modem:
2014-10-17 15:13:13 [5316] [0] DEBUG: AT2[simcom]: Reading modem
definitions from 2014-10-17 15:13:13 [5316] [0]
DEBUG: AT2[simcom]: Found <1> modems in co
: Sunday, 26 September, 2010 17:40
To: Harbhag Singh Sohal; users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Queued for later delivery
Hi,
It will be if you use the following sqlbox configuration:
SMSc <- bearerbox <- sqlbox <- smsbox <- sendsms
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Harbhag
Hi,
It will be if you use the following sqlbox configuration:
SMSc <- bearerbox <- sqlbox <- smsbox <- sendsms
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Harbhag Singh Sohal"
To: "Nikos Balkanas" ;
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 4:01 PM
Subject: Re
> I must tell that I don't know much about SQLBox .
But even then you have cleared my lots of confusions. Thanks for the
reply once again.
--
Harbhag Singh Sohal
Website : http://harbhag.wordpress.com/
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 19:37, Harbhag Singh Sohal wrote:
> >
> > Should it be? Where did you read that the message which are sent over
> > HTTP interface are stored in any database?
> >
> > They are not stored by design.
> Thanks for your response. I think I misunderstood. But thank you for
> clarif
>
> Should it be? Where did you read that the message which are sent over
> HTTP interface are stored in any database?
>
> They are not stored by design.
Thanks for your response. I think I misunderstood. But thank you for
clarifying it for me.
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 18:31, Harbhag Singh Sohal wrote:
> I just executed the following SQL query
> INSERT INTO send_sms (
> momt, sender, receiver, msgdata, sms_type
> ) VALUES (
> 'MT', '1234', '1234567890', 'Hello world', 2
> );
>
> with proper values and my message sent successfully. The q
I just executed the following SQL query
INSERT INTO send_sms (
momt, sender, receiver, msgdata, sms_type
) VALUES (
'MT', '1234', '1234567890', 'Hello world', 2
);
with proper values and my message sent successfully. The query was
executed using phpmyadmin, and the data was stored in sent_sms
I am using sqlbox but my messages are not getting stored in the
database. What can be the problem now ?
What information is required from my side ?
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Harbhag Singh Sohal
wrote:
>> PS: When asking for "relevant to error" log, we mean not the whole log, just
>> an ex
> PS: When asking for "relevant to error" log, we mean not the whole log, just
> an excerpt that corresponds to your failed attempt.
Alright, I got it.
Thanks for your responses. You are really helpful. I really appreciate
your efforts.
pt.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Harbhag Singh Sohal"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Queued for later delivery
In group = modems I just commented out the variable speed = 460800.
And now I seeing message "0: Accepted for delivery&qu
nvenient for you.
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>> - Original Message - From: "Harbhag Singh Sohal"
>>
>> To:
>> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: Queued for later delivery
>>
>>
>>> Can I send
lkanas :
> Of course. Do whatever is more convenient for you.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message - From: "Harbhag Singh Sohal"
>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Queued for later delivery
>
>
>> Can I send t
Of course. Do whatever is more convenient for you.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Harbhag Singh Sohal"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: Queued for later delivery
Can I send the bb log as attachment too ?
2010/9/25 Nikos Balkanas :
H
Can I send the bb log as attachment too ?
2010/9/25 Nikos Balkanas :
> Hi,
>
> Please post maximum detail bb logs relevant to the error.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message - From: "Harbhag Singh Sohal"
>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:29 PM
> Subject: 3: Queued for later
Hi,
Please post maximum detail bb logs relevant to the error.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: "Harbhag Singh Sohal"
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:29 PM
Subject: 3: Queued for later delivery
I am getting "3: Queued for later delivery" when I try to send SMS from
bro
nt out the modems section and use the
>>> >> > include statement. Sorry Al, it seems you missed his smsc definitions
>>> >> > :-(.
>>> >> > This happens because your modem is inactive. Please repost bb logs at
>>> >> > maximu
; No. You had it right before. Comment out the modems section and use the
>> >> > include statement. Sorry Al, it seems you missed his smsc definitions
>> >> > :-(.
>> >> > This happens because your modem is inactive. Please repost bb logs at
>> >&
. Please repost bb logs at
> >> > maximum detail.
> >> >
> >> > BR,
> >> > Nikos
> >> >
> >> > - Original Message - From: "karanveer singh"
> >> >
> >> > To: "Alvaro Cornejo"
>
happens because your modem is inactive. Please repost bb logs at
>> > maximum detail.
>> >
>> > BR,
>> > Nikos
>> >
>> > - Original Message - From: "karanveer singh"
>> >
>> > To: "Alvaro Cornejo&quo
tail.
> >
> > BR,
> > Nikos
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "karanveer singh"
> >
> > To: "Alvaro Cornejo"
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 7:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: Queued for later delivery
> >
> &
our modem is inactive. Please repost bb logs
at
> > maximum detail.
> >
> > BR,
> > Nikos
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "karanveer singh"
> >
> > To: "Alvaro Cornejo"
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, January 11,
;
> BR,
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message - From: "karanveer singh"
>
> To: "Alvaro Cornejo"
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 7:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Queued for later delivery
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Alvaro Cornejo
> wrote:
nveer singh"
To: "Alvaro Cornejo"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: Queued for later delivery
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Alvaro Cornejo
wrote:
kannel does not find a route to send the message to .
You need at least one modem definition. Uncomment
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Alvaro Cornejo
wrote:
> kannel does not find a route to send the message to .
>
> You need at least one modem definition. Uncomment the group modems and
> adjust according to your modem
>
> Regards
>
> Alvaro
>
>
> |
kannel does not find a route to send the message to .
You need at least one modem definition. Uncomment the group modems and
adjust according to your modem
Regards
Alvaro
|-|
Envíe y
May be the commented wapbox-port in the configuration as says the log?
ERROR: Missing wapbox-port variable, cannot start WAP
El 11/01/2010 02:23 p.m., karanveer singh escribió:
Hey, I'm trying to use Kannel as an SMS gateway. I've been trying to
configure Kannel for a while and finaly got b
Clarification: By relevant logs, Alej propably means bearerbox logs at the max
debug level (0).
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: Alejandro Guerrieri
To: kaliya
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: Queued for later delivery, why
Please attach your conf file and relevant log entries. Also the url you're
using to enqueue the message.
Regards,
Alejandro
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:04 PM, kaliya wrote:
>
> I also getting same error,If you found that solutionmeans pls send me the
> solution to my email add (kaliyaperum...@gm
I also getting same error,If you found that solutionmeans pls send me the
solution to my email add (kaliyaperum...@gmail.com).
castord wrote:
>
> I am getting "3: Queued for later delivery"
> Bellow is the output of the smsbox.
>
> 2008-10-15 17:25:43 [25232] [3] INFO: smsbox: Got HTTP request
In fact it means that it found at least one route, but all of them are
unavailable at the moment.
If kannel can't find a route, it throws a clear error informing it.
Check if the SMSC connection catching the traffic is active at the moment of
enqueuing the message. Maybe some offline connection i
This might means that smsbox is working but kannel has no outgoing route
(SMSC) to send the message to.
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 17:31 -0400, Carlos Ruiz Diaz wrote:
> I am getting "3: Queued for later delivery"
> Bellow is the output of the smsbox.
>
> 2008-10-15 17:25:43 [25232] [3] INFO: smsbox:
Ok. I've checked the connections (I've got 2 tcp connections by smpp service
type so I've got 3 service types).
The problem started this morning, again, with service type associated to user
'kannel_c' , so I restarted the boxes and the queued messages were sent.
Now the problem It's happening ag
Did you check the smsc logs as opposed to the core logs?
It sounds a bit like the SMPP connection dropped out. This would not
show in the main core logs, but in the smsc logs.
Regards
Ben
On 30 Nov 2006, at 10:07, Fourat Zouari wrote:
did you reolve the problem ?
i've got the same issue th
did you reolve the problem ?
i've got the same issue than you.
I can't reproduce it.
On 11/8/06, Marcelo Aguila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
I'm recently started to work with an operator that use SMPP 3.4 so I'm
using
kannel 1.4.1 (CVS) in a Dell PowerEdge 2950 with one intel xeon dual core
38 matches
Mail list logo
