On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 19:37, Harbhag Singh Sohal wrote: > > > > Should it be? Where did you read that the message which are sent over > > HTTP interface are stored in any database? > > > > They are not stored by design. > Thanks for your response. I think I misunderstood. But thank you for > clarifying it for me.
You are welcome. Kannel can be compiled without support for any SQL backend. In that case if the message is sent over HTTP interface, kannel cannot store it in SQL because it don't have "knowledge" how to do that. If the message is sent over HTTP interface then sender (which is usually some program or script) should store sent message in the some sort of database, be it SQL, DBM or simple flat file. SQLBox is just add-on for kannel which can be used instead of HTTP interface to send messages. As an SQL box, it stores sent messages to another table (what is very good, for logging) as you have noticed. But that is done by SQLBox and not by bearerbox (the kannel core). I must tell that I don't know much about SQLBox because I never had necessity to use it. -- Kind regards, Milan -------------------------------------------------- Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code.
