not. Without this guarantee, it would have to be called ACI.
>
> Eugen
>
>
> 差出人: Alexandre Dupriez
> 送信日時: 2020年3月8日 0:10
> 宛先: users@kafka.apache.org
> 件名: Re: synchronously flushing messages to disk
>
> Hi Eugen,
>
> The first lin
all, this is what all ACID databases rely on,
replicated or not. Without this guarantee, it would have to be called ACI.
Eugen
差出人: Alexandre Dupriez
送信日�r: 2020年3月8日 0:10
宛先: users@kafka.apache.org
件名: Re: synchronously flushing messages to disk
Hi Eugen,
The
uires.
>
> As I have heard other opinions on that, I'd like to know if someone in the
> Kafka community can clarify.
>
> Best regards
> Eugen
>
> 差出人: Eugen Dueck
> 送信日時: 2020年2月26日 13:28
> 宛先: users@kafka.apache.org
> 件名: synchr
I have heard other opinions on that, I'd like to know if someone in the
Kafka community can clarify.
Best regards
Eugen
差出人: Eugen Dueck
送信日時: 2020年2月26日 13:28
宛先: users@kafka.apache.org
件名: synchronously flushing messages to disk
Hi
I want to benchmark
Hi
I want to benchmark Kafka, configured such that a message that has been acked
by the broker to the producer is guaranteed to have been persisted to disk. I
changed the broker settings:
log.flush.interval.messages=1
log.flush.interval.ms=0
(Is this the proper way to do it?)
The impact is ve
