.com/Etionlimited> |
Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/Etionlimited/>
From: Sönke Liebau
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 1:12 PM
To: users@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mirrormaker 2.0 and compacted topics
Hi Pirow,
records at the same offset as in the original topic is not possible for non
com
Etionlimited> | Instagram
> <https://www.instagram.com/Etionlimited/>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sönke Liebau
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:14 PM
> *To:* users@kafka.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Mirrormaker 2.0 and compacted topics
>
>
>
> Hi Pirow,
>
>
.youtube.com/channel/UCUY-5oeACtLk2uTsEjZCU6A> |
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/etionltd> |
Twitter<https://twitter.com/Etionlimited> |
Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/Etionlimited/>
From: Sönke Liebau
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:14 PM
To: users@kaf
Hi Pirow,
as far as I understand MirrorMaker 2.0 will not treat compacted topics any
different from uncompacted topics.
What that means for your scenario is that your replication may miss some
messages in the case of a long unavailability, if those messages were
compacted in the meantime. However
Hello,
We're currently trying to evaluate Mirrormaker 2.0 for future inter-cluster
replication, replacing our bespoke replicator. I understand that Mirrormaker
2.0 documentation is only slated to be released in Kafka 2.5.0, but I was
hoping that someone will know whether Mirrormaker 2.0 can be