Just assigned reviewers for all the blocker issues. Please always feel free
to reassign, the purpose is to drive the review process towards the release.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> If time permits, it would be great to have both KAFKA-2397 and KAFKA-2017
> in 0.9.0 as
If time permits, it would be great to have both KAFKA-2397 and KAFKA-2017
in 0.9.0 as both of them are trying to fix some regressions of the new
consumer compared with the old consumer.
Priority-wise, I think 2017 is higher than 2397 since upon a broker
shutdown / failure, all connected consumers
Yes, 0.9 will include the new consumer.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Rajiv Kurian wrote:
> A bit off topic but does this release contain the new single threaded
> consumer that supports the poll interface?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
>
> > Hi, Everyone,
A bit off topic but does this release contain the new single threaded
consumer that supports the poll interface?
Thanks!
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Everyone,
>
> As we are getting closer to the 0.9.0 release, we plan to cut an 0.9.0
> release branch in about two weeks
Not sure if I'd call it a blocker, but if we can get it in I would *really*
like to see some solution to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2397 committed. Without an
explicit leave group, even normal operation of groups can leave some
partitions unprocessed for 30-60s at a time under *nor
Hi, Everyone,
As we are getting closer to the 0.9.0 release, we plan to cut an 0.9.0
release branch in about two weeks from now. In the meantime, we will try to
resolve most if not all 0.9.0 blockers listed below.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20i
