If time permits, it would be great to have both KAFKA-2397 and KAFKA-2017 in 0.9.0 as both of them are trying to fix some regressions of the new consumer compared with the old consumer.
Priority-wise, I think 2017 is higher than 2397 since upon a broker shutdown / failure, all connected consumers to this broker will go through a full rebalance whereas for 2017, upon a consumer shutdown / failure it will only affect the consumers within the same group. Effort-wise, 2397 is simpler than 2017 since we need to consider what ZK data format to achieve good trade-off between storage / efficiency. For now we can work on both of them in parallel: Onur already has a patch for 2397 that Jason is reviewing, I will re-start working on 2017. Guozhang On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Rajiv Kurian <ra...@signalfx.com> wrote: > A bit off topic but does this release contain the new single threaded > consumer that supports the poll interface? > > Thanks! > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Hi, Everyone, > > > > As we are getting closer to the 0.9.0 release, we plan to cut an 0.9.0 > > release branch in about two weeks from now. In the meantime, we will try > to > > resolve most if not all 0.9.0 blockers listed below. > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC > > > > Are there any concerns? We will also discuss the 0.9.0 release in > > tomorrow's KIP meeting. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > > -- -- Guozhang
