[users@httpd] mod_proxy's ping= parameter.

2016-07-15 Thread dE
Hi, I was wondering about the ping worker parameter. It intends to looks as if the ping fails (timeout), the request must not be sent to the server. I've set the following ProxyPass -- ProxyPass / http://[fc00::1:4]/ ping=10 I've SIGSTOPed the apache process on the backend server, so I

[users@httpd] mod_proxy nofailover parameter.

2016-07-15 Thread dE
Hi, What I understand of nofailover is that in case a client is fetching from this proxy and the origin server goes to an error or disabled state, a reset packet won't be sent to the client, instead the backend will be changed and the client will continue the operation uninterrupted. Bu

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy nofailover parameter.

2016-07-16 Thread dE
I'll come back to this later. On 07/15/16 22:25, Daniel wrote: Failover is what you described, nofailover is for the opposite El 15 jul. 2016 3:27 p. m., "dE" <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> escribió: Hi, What I understand of nofailover is that in case

[users@httpd] mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-17 Thread dE
Hi, It appears that mod_proxy considers a backend as failed only when the transport layer connection to that backend fails. Is this expected? The backends are VMs and only when I SIGSTOP the VMs, the backend is considered in an error state and the retry= parameter has an affect. If I've

[users@httpd] Re: mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-19 Thread dE
Looks like this module is deprecated. On 07/17/16 13:11, dE wrote: Hi, It appears that mod_proxy considers a backend as failed only when the transport layer connection to that backend fails. Is this expected? The backends are VMs and only when I SIGSTOP the VMs, the backend is

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-24 Thread dE
On 07/19/16 17:54, Yann Ylavic wrote: Hello, On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 9:41 AM, dE wrote: It appears that mod_proxy considers a backend as failed only when the transport layer connection to that backend fails. Is this expected? Unless failonstatus/failontimeout is used, usually. Which

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-29 Thread dE
On 07/25/16 17:47, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:18 AM, dE wrote: Config -- [] ProxyPass / balancer://localbalance/ failontimeout=on timeout=10 failonstatus=502 You are defining a balancer here, so the timeout= parameter relates to the balancer (like the two others) However

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy: When does a backend be considered as failed?

2016-07-31 Thread dE
On 07/30/2016 04:37 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 8:36 AM, dE wrote: Yes, as you said I did try that before -- Your previous configuration had timeout=10 on the ProxyPass line, not the BalancerMember one as expected. BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:4

[users@httpd] mod_proxy: failonstatus does not work.

2016-07-31 Thread dE
Hi. I've set the following configs -- ProxyPass / balancer://localbalance/ failonstatus=200 forcerecovery=off BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:4]/ retry=600 loadfactor=99 BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:6]/ retry=600 Both the backends send a

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy: failonstatus does not work.

2016-08-05 Thread dE
Thanks for the info! I'll be waiting. On 08/03/16 20:08, Yann Ylavic wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, dE wrote: ProxyPass / balancer://localbalance/ failonstatus=200 forcerecovery=off BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:4]/ retry=600 loadfact

[users@httpd] [mod_proxy] status=E has no affect.

2016-08-06 Thread dE
Hi. I'm using the following config -- BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:4]/ retry=600 loadfactor=99 status=E BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:6]/ retry=600 ProxyPass / balancer://localbalance/ forcerecovery=off The member fc00::1:4 is manually set

[users@httpd] Understanding Apache Mutex directive.

2014-09-02 Thread dE
Hi. I was reading this -- http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/core.html#mutex Quoting what's written here -- Specify |default| as the first argument to change the settings for all mutexes As we know mutex is a mechanism; it appears Apache has settings for each mutex it implements. specif

Re: [users@httpd] Understanding Apache Mutex directive.

2014-09-04 Thread dE
On 09/03/14 22:26, Mike Rumph wrote: Hello dE, I can only give you my own interpretation of this document. First of all the Mutex directive in Apache httpd 2.4.x replaces several different directives from Apache httpd 2.2.x. The SVN commit for this is 883540. - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc

Re: [users@httpd] Understanding Apache Mutex directive.

2014-09-07 Thread dE
On 09/04/14 21:55, Mike Rumph wrote: Hi. I was reading this -- http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/core.html#mutex Before we continue, I would like to clarify another doubt that I have. There's a 'mutex mechanism' and then there's a 'mutex name'. What's the difference? The 'mutex

[users@httpd] event MPM:multiple clients per thread.

2014-09-10 Thread dE
Hi! I was configuring the MPM modules. As per my understanding, the event module can handle more than one client per thread; since session which are in a keep alive state will be managed by a common thread freeing up the thread to handle other clients. So, no. of threads per process is effec

Re: [users@httpd] event MPM:multiple clients per thread.

2014-09-10 Thread dE
On 09/10/14 16:57, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:13 AM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi! I was configuring the MPM modules. As per my understanding, the event module can handle more than one client per thread; since session which are in a k

[users@httpd] ServerLimit:What do you mean by "lifetime of the Apache httpd process"

2014-09-10 Thread dE
Do values of other directives change periodically, and for this one it remains constant? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Re: ServerLimit:What do you mean by "lifetime of the Apache httpd process"

2014-09-10 Thread dE
On 09/10/14 22:08, dE wrote: Do values of other directives change periodically, and for this one it remains constant? Sorry, but this can be seen here. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mpm_common.html#serverlimit - To

[users@httpd] Re: ServerLimit:What do you mean by "lifetime of the Apache httpd process"

2014-09-10 Thread dE
On 09/11/14 10:23, dE wrote: On 09/10/14 22:08, dE wrote: Do values of other directives change periodically, and for this one it remains constant? Sorry, but this can be seen here. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mpm_common.html#serverlimit Anyway, I got this one

[users@httpd] Apache without authz_core_module

2014-09-21 Thread dE
Hi. I'm experimenting with Apache authentication. It's very clear that without any authentication provider/directive the default is the fail the authorization, this can be seen in the error logs. However is the same true for authorization? If there's no authorization definition, then access

[users@httpd] Require all denied allows everyone access.

2014-09-22 Thread dE
I've the following in a directory section -- AuthType none Require all denied But Apache denies nothing. Anyone is able to open the location and read files in it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@ht

[users@httpd] Re: Require all denied allows everyone access.

2014-09-22 Thread dE
On 09/23/14 08:47, dE wrote: I've the following in a directory section -- AuthType none Require all denied But Apache denies nothing. Anyone is able to open the location and read files in it. Ok, my bad, the path of the was not co

[users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-06 Thread dE
Hi. I'm in a situation where I got 3 certificates server.pem -- the end user certificate which's sent by the server to the client. intermediate.pem -- server.pem is signed by intermediate.pem's private key. issuer.pem -- intermediate.pem is signed by issuer.pem's private key. combined.pem is

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-07 Thread dE
orked around it with the method I mention before. Until someone can tell you what may really be happening this may be worth a try for you. Good luck. 2014-10-06 17:51 GMT+02:00 dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>>: Hi. I'm in a situation where I got 3 certificates server.

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-07 Thread dE
On 10/07/14 18:12, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:51 AM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi. I'm in a situation where I got 3 certificates server.pem -- the end user certificate which's sent by the server to the client.

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-07 Thread dE
On 10/07/14 22:42, Daniel wrote: SSLCertificateChainFile is deprecated in 2.4 in favour of SSLCaCertificateFile 2014-10-07 16:59 GMT+02:00 dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>>: On 10/07/14 18:12, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:51 AM, dE mailto:de.tec...@gmail.co

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-07 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 05:18, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:59 AM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/07/14 18:12, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:51 AM, dE mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi. I'm in a sit

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 10:18, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:27 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/08/14 05:18, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:59 AM, dE mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/07/14 18:12, Igor Cicimov wrote

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 10:19, Igor Cicimov wrote: You can find more about openssl tool set here: https://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/s_client.html, its perfect for ssl troubleshooting. By the way, did you import the CA_chain.pem in the browsers? I thought browser only needs to have the self

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 14:35, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:05 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/08/14 10:19, Igor Cicimov wrote: You can find more about openssl tool set here: https://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/s_client.html, its perfect

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 14:33, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:03 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/08/14 10:18, Igor Cicimov wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 2:27 PM, dE mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 10/08/14 05:18, Igor Cicimov wrot

[users@httpd] Intended use of SSLCACertificateFile/SSLCACertificatePath

2014-10-08 Thread dE
In Apache 2.2, these can be used instead of SSLCertificateChainFile, but from it's documentation and mentioning of "clients", it looks like this's intended to be used in a situation where the client sends the server certificates for it's own authentication. This's what I get from -- "These are

Re: [users@httpd] Intended use of SSLCACertificateFile/SSLCACertificatePath

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 16:53, Eric Covener wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:46 AM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: Are all SSLCA* directives used for the same purpose (where client sends the public key for it's authentication)? ​No.​ Thanks for clarifying that.

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 17:53, Igor Cicimov wrote: On 08/10/2014 9:16 PM, "dE" <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 10/08/14 14:33, Igor Cicimov wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:03 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: &

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/08/14 21:36, Eric Covener wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:00 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: intermediate.pem must get installed automatically in the browsers (at least in FF), but instead these browsers don't see the certificate. ​No, servers a

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-08 Thread dE
On 10/09/14 03:29, Igor Cicimov wrote: On 09/10/2014 3:46 AM, "dE" <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 10/08/14 21:36, Eric Covener wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:00 PM, dE <mailto:de.tec...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-10 Thread dE
On 10/09/14 23:47, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 De, On 10/7/14 11:27 PM, dE wrote: $ openssl x509 -noout -in server.pem -text Certificate: Data: Version: 1 (0x0) Serial Number: 13192573755114198537 (0xb7156feedab91609) Signature Algorithm

Re: [users@httpd] Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-10 Thread dE
On 10/10/14 19:00, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 dE, On 10/10/14 6:30 AM, dE wrote: On 10/09/14 23:47, Christopher Schultz wrote: De, On 10/7/14 11:27 PM, dE wrote: $ openssl x509 -noout -in server.pem -text Certificate: Data: Version: 1 (0x0

[users@httpd] Re: Cannot get certificate chain to work.

2014-10-13 Thread dE
On 10/06/14 21:21, dE wrote: Hi. I'm in a situation where I got 3 certificates server.pem -- the end user certificate which's sent by the server to the client. intermediate.pem -- server.pem is signed by intermediate.pem's private key. issuer.pem -- intermediate.p

Re: [users@httpd] authorization (beginner)

2014-10-14 Thread dE
On 10/14/14 01:29, Patton, Billy wrote: I’m upgrading an app and have copied it from a production server to my macbook pro. On the production server when going to the site, it requires a login. On my mac It doesn’t and it also doesn’t get very far because it has no user in the system. Here’s th

Re: [us...@httpd] SSLProtocol vs SSLCipherSuite

2009-08-02 Thread De Ren
First time post. I am new to Apache, MySQL, and PHP. I've installed Apache (2.2.11), MySQL(5.1.36)and PHP(5.2.10) on my laptop (operating system: Windows XP Home Edition). I can see the Apache icon on the right lower corner, but when the mouse is moved to the icon, the prompt says: "No services

[us...@httpd] IPv6 and mod_proxy_balancer: a bug or my mistake

2009-06-29 Thread Luc de Louw
Dear all, I've got a public IPv6 Network for testing and I wanted to test it with some Apache reverse proxy stuff with loadbalancing. The loadbalancer is a Ubuntu with stock Apache 2.2.8. So I tried: BalancerMember http://192.168.100.240:8080/xwiki BalancerMember http://[2001:41e0:1234:0:123

[us...@httpd] Requiring authentication for the whole server

2009-08-12 Thread Nico De Ranter
Hi, I have an internal apache 2.2 server that serves a number of applications (trac, subversion, twiki, ...). Every application on the webserver requires LDAP authentication. To do this I added a 'AuthLDAP...' sections to each '' section in the apache config files. Unfortunately this means:

Re: [us...@httpd] Requiring authentication for the whole server

2009-08-12 Thread Nico De Ranter
a multiple pages opened appears to be a firefox issue indeed Nico On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 13:42 +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote: > Hi, > > I have an internal apache 2.2 server that serves a number of > applications (trac, subversion, twiki, ...). Every application on the > webser

Re: [us...@httpd] Requiring authentication for the whole server

2009-08-12 Thread Nico De Ranter
xx AuthLDAPBindPassword xx AuthLDAPURL xxx Require valid-user Require ldap-group cn=group1, Require ldap-group cn=group2,. Nico On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 16:47 +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote: > To answer my own questions partially: &g

Re: [us...@httpd] Requiring authentication for the whole server

2009-08-13 Thread Nico De Ranter
ctory in case you want to protect > file system that is local to the server. Is your server proxy? > > Thanks, > > Igor > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Nico De Ranter > wrote: > > Found it. I was mixing Location and Dire

[us...@httpd] How to fool a coockie with RewriteEngine

2009-08-13 Thread De Gang Thierry
ne. Regards. De Gang Thierry --- Email: de.gan...@scarlet.be Msn: euthana...@scarlet.be Mobile: (0032) 0 498/33.51.59 Phone: (0032) 0 2/751.04.58 Website: http://www.dgtnt.be Proud =[BBT]='r: http://www.bigbadteam.com http://www.RavenGames.com - Yo

RE: [us...@httpd] How to fool a coockie with RewriteEngine

2009-08-13 Thread De Gang Thierry
RewriteEngine Regards. De Gang Thierry --- Email: de.gan...@scarlet.be Msn: euthana...@scarlet.be Mobile: (0032) 0 498/33.51.59 Phone: (0032) 0 2/751.04.58 Website: http://www.dgtnt.be Proud =[BBT]='r: http://www.bigbadteam.com http://www.RavenGames.com - Your hub for all

Re: [us...@httpd] Allow directive - limitation?

2009-08-14 Thread Nico De Ranter
There is no need to have everything on one line, you can have multiple Allow lines. For instance we use something like this a lot: Order deny,allow Allow from 10.10.1.0/24 Allow from 10.10.5.0/24 Allow from 127.0.0.1 Nico On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 16:30 +1000, Stephen Vaughan wrote: > Hi, > > Is

[us...@httpd] .htaccess not honoured anymore

2009-09-16 Thread Nico De Ranter
Hi, I recently enabled access control on all folders of my apache server by adding the following section: AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthType Basic ... Require valid-user The idea is that I can refine this for every folder by adding some

Re: [us...@httpd] .htaccess not honoured anymore

2009-09-16 Thread Nico De Ranter
-09-16 at 17:10 +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote: > Hi, > > I recently enabled access control on all folders of my apache server by > adding the following section: > > > AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off > AuthBasicProvider ldap > AuthType Basic > ... >

Re: [us...@httpd] .htaccess not honoured anymore

2009-09-16 Thread Nico De Ranter
o allowoverride statement keeps me from using 'require', but it still doesn't work. Any ideas what else may be wrong? Nico On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 17:51 +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote: > Hmm, > > following the troubleshooting section on > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ho

Re: [us...@httpd] .htaccess not honoured anymore

2009-09-17 Thread Nico De Ranter
Doh, that explains a couple of things. Thanks for the link! Nico On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 18:22 +0200, Bob Ionescu wrote: > 2009/9/16 Nico De Ranter : > > however the 'require' directive doesn't seem to have any effect anymore? > > You're overriding i

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2 initgroups alert, Max OS X, abnormal exit in error log

2009-10-26 Thread Ignacio de Córdoba
Hello. I am having the same problem as you. It happens only after last upgrade to httpd (I use macports). It was working without any problems but now I get this initgroups warning followed by a Fatal error. And Apache exists. I use httpd 2.2.14 with mod_ssl and mod_jk (linked to jBoss) I know I c

[us...@httpd] ProxyHTMLURLMap issues

2009-11-18 Thread Peter de Groot
    /tv/    ProxyHTMLURLMap    /tv    /tv    RequestHeader    unset  Accept-Encoding     Thanks peter -- Peter de Groot Eastern Goldfields College Kalgoorlie 6430 Department of Education and Training Phone 90801800 Fax 90801866 Mob 0418915312

[us...@httpd] ProxyHTMLURLMap issues ... resent .. surely somebody can help with this

2009-11-19 Thread Peter de Groot
    /tv/    ProxyHTMLURLMap    /tv    /tv    RequestHeader    unset  Accept-Encoding     Thanks peter -- Peter de Groot Eastern Goldfields College Kalgoorlie 6430 Department of Education and Training Phone 90801800 Fax 90801866 Mob 0418915312

Re: [us...@httpd] ProxyHTMLURLMap issues ... resent .. surely somebody can help with this

2009-11-19 Thread Peter de Groot
I enabled comment pass through, and it still broke. Would not pass through the comments .. Non valid HTML .. if that is correct ? More complete listing of the front of the source at the end Regardless .. So from what you are saying proxy_html does NOT  filter comments, even if I if they were

[us...@httpd] [debug] proxy_util.c(1820): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized

2009-11-19 Thread Peter de Groot
2009] [debug] proxy_util.c(1820): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized -- Peter de Groot Eastern Goldfields College Kalgoorlie 6430 Department of Education and Training Phone 90801800 Fax 90801866 Mob 0418915312

Re: [us...@httpd] [debug] proxy_util.c(1820): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized

2009-11-20 Thread Peter de Groot
No ... Log Level is set to warn. André Warnier wrote: Peter de Groot wrote: Another question. Why does this in the config fill the log files with the errors below. Maybe just because you set the log level to "debug" ? They do not look like erro

Re: [us...@httpd] [debug] proxy_util.c(1820): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized

2009-11-20 Thread Peter de Groot
That was what I was hoping too... but no. I am wondering if it is a distro thingy .. as a google on it does bring up hits on Ubuntu LaunchPad .. but from a while ago. There is some discussion about max threads ? Cheer Tom Evans wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Peter de Groot

Re: [us...@httpd] [debug] proxy_util.c(1820): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized

2009-11-20 Thread Peter de Groot
Yep .. according to the doc.. this is the safest way to do a reverse proxy. Sometimes the thing proxies properly .. usually the first time .. and then a refresh give me a web site (the proxied one) unavailable. If course it is working now ... even with the errors in the log.. but I am the only

Re: [us...@httpd] authentication against active directory.

2009-11-24 Thread Peter de Groot
dap://***:3268/DC=***,DC=***?sAMAccountName?sub?(objectClass=user)"     AuthLDAPBindDN "*...@***.***"     AuthLDAPBindPassword "***"     AuthzLDAPAuthoritative Off     require valid-user     ... -- Peter de G

[us...@httpd] multipath proxy chaining (failover)

2010-02-02 Thread Romain De Rasse
Hi, I use the ProxyRemote Directive from the mod_proxy module. I try to do multipath proxy chaining. I mean : ProxyRemote * http://192.168.1.1:999 ProxyRemote * http://192.168.1.254:999 The desired effect is that Apache firstly tries the proxy "192.168.1.1" and forward the request to this prox

Re: RE: [us...@httpd] multipath proxy chaining (failover)

2010-02-02 Thread Romain De Rasse
=== Date du message : févr. 02 2010, 10:57 AM De : "Emmanuel Bailleul" A : "users@httpd.apache.org" Copie : Sujet : RE: [us...@httpd] multipath proxy chaining (failover) > -Message d'origine- > De : Romain De Rasse [mailto:romain.dera

Re: RE: RE: [us...@httpd] multipath proxy chaining (failover)

2010-02-03 Thread Romain De Rasse
e existing architecture too much (cost effectiveness :-) Thanks for your help. Regards, Romain Date du message : févr. 02 2010, 07:13 PM De : "Emmanuel Bailleul" A : "users@httpd.apache.org" Copie : Sujet : RE: RE: [us...@h

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors

2008-08-19 Thread Richard de Vries
Hello everyone; it's been a while since I wrote to this list since everything has been smooth sailing so far ... but I did stumble on an issue just now that requires ya'lls expertise. I don't want to go into too much detail on "why" we're trying to do what we're doing, but basically I configured

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors

2008-08-20 Thread Richard de Vries
ooking thru the code but have not yet been able to find it. :(    Richard - Original Message From: Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:34:47 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors Richard de

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lower cpu priority to perl scripts

2008-08-27 Thread Richard de Vries
If you are running on unix, the easiest way to probably do this is by calling the "setpriority" from within your perl script like this: setpriority(WHICH,WHO,PRIORITY); To set your current running perlscript to the lowest priority, you would call setpriority(0, $$, 20); $$ is your script's proces

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lower cpu priority to perl scripts

2008-08-28 Thread Richard de Vries
I found the following on google; you should be able to taylor it to your needs: http://techtasks.com/code/viewbookcode/567 # This code sets the priority of a process # --- # Adapted from VBScript code contained in the book: # "Window

[us...@httpd] apache balancermember not listening to max connections

2009-03-14 Thread Sander de Boer
Currently I am using a apache 2.2.6 instance with a balancer configuration: BalancerMember ajp://10.0.0.208:8009 route=tomcat01 max=100 smax=80 BalancerMember ajp://10.0.0.228:8009 route=tomcat02 max=100 smax=80 ProxyPass / balancer://patmos/ stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid nofailover=

[us...@httpd] Empty error_log

2009-04-19 Thread Martijn de Munnik
Hi, I'm running Apache 2.2.11 on Solaris 10_x86. I'm using webmin/ virtualmin to configure virtual hosts and there created fine. But al the error_logs are empty. Below is an example of the log lines in a config file of a virtualhost. ErrorLog "|/etc/webmin/virtual-server/writelogs.pl 12199

[us...@httpd] Re: Empty error_log

2009-04-25 Thread Martijn de Munnik
I really don't know why the error_logs of the virtualhosts stay empty. I don't have any clues where to look for :( Any ideas? regards, Martijn From: Eric Covener Date: April 19, 2009 3:51:59 PM GMT+02:00 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Empty error_log O

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Problem when mixing NameVirtualHost + non with SSL - "Oops, no RSA or DSA server certificate found?!"

2005-12-07 Thread Joost de Heer
> Under this configuration, when I try to start apache, it fails with > "[error] Oops, no RSA or DSA server certificate found?!". Even under > Debug, it fails to tell me which certificate it hit this on. You do need to specify the SSLCertificate(Key)File in all SSL vhosts. Joost ---

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Error message: Faulting application Apache.exe, version 0.0.0.0 faulting module php_oci8.dll

2005-12-18 Thread Joost de Heer
Todd Patrick wrote: > [stats] > Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.6.0 - 64bit Production > Windows XP > Apache 1.3.3 or Apache 1.3.4 installed as a service That's -antique-. Try a more recent version of Apache, preferrably 2.0.55. Joost --

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Double authentication for a website?

2006-01-06 Thread Joost de Heer
I have a reverse proxy which needs double authentication: First the reverse proxy itself has an authentication, and then the machine that is reverse proxied to has authentication. Software used: - Apache 2.2.0 on Linux (Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 6), running kernel 2.4.21

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2.2 - so - is it stable? How compatible is it?

2006-01-11 Thread Joost de Heer
Marc Perkel wrote: > I remember upgrading from 1.4 to 2.0 as being somewhat painful but well > worth it. So - I pose this question: > > How much pain is involved to go to 2.2 from 2.0.5x ? Relatively easy. The only thing you need to look out for is the new auth(z|n) structure. I.e. mod_access (whi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate

2006-01-11 Thread Joost de Heer
Arun G Nair wrote: > Hi all, > I get this error when trying to connect to my SSL enabled site with > openssl's s_client. > > "verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate" > > I have purchased a CRT signed by AddTrust External Root CA through Comodo. >

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Disabling PUT DELETE and TRACE on Apache?

2006-01-11 Thread Joost de Heer
Emmanuel E wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any way to disable PUT DELETE and TRACE methods on Apache? User > authentication is one way but then it still allows authenticated users to > use those methods. Untested: RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} (PUT|DELETE|TRACE) RewriteRule (.*) - [F] Joost

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache installation problem -socket address usage

2006-01-18 Thread Joost de Heer
Ian Western wrote: > Hi everyone, > can anyone out there help me. I'm trying to install Apache but whenever > I try to run it, I get a window with the text below: > > "(OS 10048) Only one usage of each socket address address/port> is normally permitted. :make_sockcould not bind to > addres

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPass and httptunnel

2006-01-23 Thread Christophe de Vienne
Hi, I am trying, without any success, to use gnu httptunnel (http://www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html). The client as well as the server (htc and hts) starts to dialog and then hang waiting for datas, as if httpd is waiting for more data before sending. Reading an old thread "reverseproxy u

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IndexIgnore is Ignored With Multiple Slashses

2006-01-23 Thread Joost de Heer
Robert Ionescu wrote: > David Wolever wrote: >> I have noticed that mod_autoindex ignores the IndexIgnore >> directive if there is more than one slash after the >> domain name. Dirty fix (untested): RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} (.*)/{2,}(.*) RewriteRule (.*)/{2,}(.*) $1/$2 [N] Joost

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache 2 and SSL on server with multiple IPs, SSL won't load...

2006-01-23 Thread Joost de Heer
> Listen 129.170.xxx.yyy:443 > SSLEngine on Use SSLEngine in the SSL vhost, not in the general configuration part. Joost - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/u

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: wrong virthost

2006-01-24 Thread Joost de Heer
> NameVirtualHost 217.114.218.63 > > You vhost definitions should match the definition of NameVirtualHost. Joost - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/u

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yet another Redirect/ RedirectMatch question

2006-01-27 Thread Joost de Heer
Mukarram Syed wrote: > Hi. > Thanks for replying Joshua. Sorry for delay in responding back. > > Here is my redirect: > > > ServerName maxim-toastmaster.com > Redirect / http://www.esalton.com/ > Here are the headers when I go to 'http://maxim-toastmaster.com': HTTP/1.x 301 Moved Permanently S

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: apache 2.2 mod_proxy failover/lb

2006-01-27 Thread Joost de Heer
> Does anyone know the syntax to disable a node in the balancer-member > config for mod_proxy? I'm currently using the following config: > BalancerMember http://ip2:80 status=D ( or status=d ) Should be 'status=disabled'. And yes, that's undocumented... Joost --

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Problem with Images not displaying.

2006-01-30 Thread Joost de Heer
> The problem I am having is that none of the .gif images appear on > any of the pages. Question: Most browsers have a setting to disable automatic image loading. (In IE it's called 'Show pictures', in FF it's called 'Load images'). Did you accidentally turn this off? Next thing to do, if the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: reverse proxy - forward ip

2006-01-30 Thread Joost de Heer
allan juul wrote: > hello, > > we have on the same machine an apache2 in front (80) of a backend web > server (8000) in a reverse proxy set up. the backend sees the proxied > requests from the apache as coming from localhost. > we are in a situation were we need the backend to see the request comin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Precompiled Mod_SSL binaries for Win32 and Apache 1.3

2006-02-01 Thread Joost de Heer
Jason J. Czerak wrote: > Anyone have a link to such a binary? I can't find one at all! Is there a reason why you still want to use 1.3? Active development for this version has been stopped for quite a while now. Joost - The off

[EMAIL PROTECTED] sumbol multiple-defined when compiling httpd 2.2.0 on Solaris 8

2006-02-03 Thread Nico De Ranter
been said that there are only two businesses that refer to customers as users: illegal drug trade and the computer industry." ----- Nico De Ranter Senior System Administrator Sony Service Center (NSCE) The Corporate Village, Da

[EMAIL PROTECTED] CustomLog logs/access_log combined not working from within

2006-02-04 Thread Richard de Vries
I am having the weirdest problem. Running Apache 2.0.55 on Solaris 9, I am unable to get Apache to generate and write to the access_log file while the CustomLog directive is enclosed in the tags. This is what I have: # # The following directives define some format nicknames for use wi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CustomLog logs/access_log combined not working from within

2006-02-05 Thread Richard de Vries
ave: > > > > > > > > Keith > > > In theory, theory and practice are the same; > In practice they are not. > > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Richard de Vries wrote: > > > To: users@httpd.apache.org > > From: Richard de Vries <[E

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CustomLog logs/access_log combined not working from within

2006-02-05 Thread Richard de Vries
be the "mod_real_name.c" ? --- Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm ... nope, that didn't work either :( > > Just for fun I used an directive from an > other module that is loaded ... i..e ssl_module> which I know works on other > configuratio

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sumbol multiple-defined when compiling httpd 2.2.0 on Solaris 8

2006-02-06 Thread Nico De Ranter
dom/unix/sha2.h.rej Nico On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 16:05 +, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:52:37PM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote: > > I'm trying to compile httpd 2.2.0 on Solaris 8. When I do 'make > > install' it s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sumbol multiple-defined when compiling httpd 2.2.0 on Solaris 8

2006-02-06 Thread Nico De Ranter
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:31 +, Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 09:51:10AM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote: > > thanks but I don't seem to be able to apply the patch (on a fresh > > httpd-2.2.0 directory) > > > > mena.[root]# cd httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RotateLogs in Apache 2.0

2006-02-08 Thread Joost de Heer
Nehal Sangoi wrote: > Hi > > I tried this option. But it is working differently then what i am thinking > for. > > I did follwoing entries in my httpd.conf file. > > CustomLog "|/appl/apache/bin/rotatelogs /appl/apache/logs/mod_jk.log 5M" The second arg to rotatelogs provided with Apache is the nu

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No go with Apache 2.0.55 and PHP 5.1.x

2006-02-10 Thread Joost de Heer
> If you are getting PHP code in the browser, have you set the > following in your httd.conf file: > > AddType application/x-httpd-php .php PHP should be configured with AddHandler and "anyone advocating in this century AddType for php needs a clue", to semi-quote Fajita. Joost

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite directive in main config does not trickle down into the https instance

2006-02-10 Thread Richard de Vries
Hey all, I configured a couple of mod_rewrite directives in the main configuration file to disable the TRACE/TRACK methods. However, these rules do not seem to make it into the HTTPS instance; even though I put them in the main config, and not in the virtual hosts. # Disable/Block TRACE/TRACK req

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite directive in main config does not trickle down into the https instance

2006-02-10 Thread Richard de Vries
ve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/10/06, Richard de Vries > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I configured a couple of mod_rewrite directives in > the > > main configuration file to disable the TRACE/TRACK > > methods. However, the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] email sending utility

2006-02-10 Thread Richard de Vries
Indigostar has a sendmail for Windows application. You can find it here: http://www.indigostar.com/sendmail.htm If you google, you may even find a similar free application somewhere. --- Shipra Mehta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am using Apache for windows XP v. 2.0.55. I would > lik

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installation / Permissions Problem Apache 1.3.31 with Mod_SSL

2006-02-13 Thread Richard de Vries
I had a similar problem once, though the explanation of the root cause is quite long. Try changing the path info to the 8.1 naming convention. i.e. c:\progra~1\apache\ etc instead of c:\program files\apache\ and see if that makes a difference for you. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ho

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >