Hello,
Is it possible to do SNI SSL per domain rather than per vhost? If not,
is there a feature request in for this?
Thank you!
-Felipe Gasper
Houston, TX
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
On 1 Feb 2016 12:16 PM, Oscar Knorn wrote:
On 2016/02/01 Felipe Gasper wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to do SNI SSL per domain rather than per vhost? If
not, is there a feature request in for this?
Thank you!
-Felipe Gasper
Houston, TX
name.
On Feb 1, 2016 11:21 AM, "Felipe Gasper" mailto:fel...@felipegasper.com>> wrote:
On 1 Feb 2016 12:16 PM, Oscar Knorn wrote:
On 2016/02/01 Felipe Gasper wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to do SNI SSL per domain rather than
mod_rewrite?
Thanks!
-Felipe Gasper
Houston, TX
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
On 15 Jul 2016, at 3:11 PM, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The following rules:
>
> ---
> RewriteRule ^never-redirect - [L]
>
> RewriteRule ^(.*) http://target-domain.com/$1
> ---
>
> … don’t work for what I want; i.e., a “b
>
> On 15 Jul 2016, at 3:11 PM, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The following rules:
>>
>> ---
>> RewriteRule ^never-redirect - [L]
>>
>> RewriteRule ^(.*) http://target-domain.com/$1
>> ---
>
;
>
> ServerName foo.tld
>
> SSLCertificateFile foo.pem
>
> Include common.con
>
>
> ServerName bar.tld
>
> SSLCertificateFile bar.pem
>
> Include common.con
>
>
>
>> Am 03.02.2016 um 11:45 schrieb Felipe Gasper :
>>
>> What if I have a
e’s no configuration
besides filesystem setup. It works beautifully and requires no restart of the
server to add/remove/update certificates.
-FG
> --
>
> With Best Regards,
> Marat Khalili
>
> On September 8, 2016 3:03:35 AM GMT+03:00, Felipe Gasper
> wrote:
> Revi
a bit not to need the restart.
-FG
> --
>
> With Best Regards,
> Marat Khalili
>
> On 08/09/16 06:04, Felipe Gasper wrote:
>>> On 7 Sep 2016, at 9:43 PM, Marat Khalili wrote:
>>>
>>> Did you consider having two instances of Apache: one for handling SSL w
see the response and forward it as
expected. Is this a bug in mod_proxy?
-Felipe Gasper
Mississauga, ON
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> On 15 May 2017, at 11:13 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Felipe Gasper
> wrote:
>>I’m noticing that mod_proxy sends its entire payload upstream without
>> checking for an early response (e.g., 308 or 404). If upstream sends
, unable to use httpd as a backend? Is there
a configuration option to tell httpd to serve such mismatched requests?
Thank you!
cheers,
-Felipe Gasper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For
Hi all,
Are there any existing httpd modules that allow for fully dynamic vhost
configurations via LDAP or some other query mechanism?
Kind of like mod_vhost_alias, but instead of looking on disk it would query a
socket?
If not, is such a thing possible to write via httpd’s existing plugin mec
> On Jan 8, 2022, at 10:01, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 9:49 AM Felipe Gasper wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Are there any existing httpd modules that allow for fully dynamic vhost
>> configurations via LDAP or some other query mechani
14 matches
Mail list logo