[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache error_log [] file does not exist and the service hung

2007-11-29 Thread w . h
HI, Firstly i've done a lot job bye searching the web before this thread that did't give an answer.Recently ,my apache error_log always appear such errors: #do ignore the date# Thu Mar 9 10:50:30 2006] [error] [client 61.155.85.82] File does not exist: /home/online69/public_html/bbs/image/vzcard1/a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Http splitting does not work with mod_proxy

2007-11-29 Thread Gleb Paharenko
Hi list. Hope somebody will spent some time on my question :), or point me to the right list. Is http splitting still works in fresh version of common applications of apache? I've wrote sample application (cgi script) vulnerable to it, however apache mod_proxy just ignores the answer, and initia

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting mod_perl to run after mod_cache with Apache 2.2.6

2007-11-29 Thread Adam Woodworth
Hi Folks, I originally posted this message on the mod_perl mailing list, but I did not receive any responses, so I'm posting here in the hopes that someone can help me out. My current LAMP stack is using Apache 2.0.54 and mod_perl 2.0.0-RC4, and I'm doing something very much like what is mentione

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6, problem with mod_proxy: "ProxyPass|ProxyPassMatch can not have a path when defined in a location."

2007-11-29 Thread Werner Schalk
Hi, I am running the latest version of XAMMP provided by Apachefriends.org. The software includes Apache 2.2.6 and I am trying to configure a reverse proxy. The modules are loaded but the following lines makes Apache unhappy and complain about my configuration: ProxyPass /a/ http://localhost

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6, problem with mod_proxy: "ProxyPass|ProxyPassMatch can not have a path when defined in a location."

2007-11-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:12:12PM +0100, Werner Schalk wrote: > Hi, > > I am running the latest version of XAMMP provided by Apachefriends.org. The > software includes Apache 2.2.6 and I am trying to configure a reverse > proxy. The modules are loaded but the following lines makes Apache unhapp

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting mod_perl to run after mod_cache with Apache 2.2.6

2007-11-29 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:05:27 -0500 "Adam Woodworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In summary (taking from the above posting), here's a simple flow of > what we have happening: > > 1 - mod_cache [..got valid content in cache? If so, go to 4; if not, > go to 2] 2 - mod_proxy [fetch content from orig

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting mod_perl to run after mod_cache with Apache 2.2.6

2007-11-29 Thread Adam Woodworth
Hi Nick, Thanks for the response! > > 1 - mod_cache [..got valid content in cache? If so, go to 4; if not, > > go to 2] 2 - mod_proxy [fetch content from origin web] > > 3 - mod_cache [content cacheable? If so, cache it locally] > > 4 - *MY FILTER* > > 5 - deflate > > That makes sense if and only

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse SSL Proxy Question

2007-11-29 Thread Al Sparks
> I've configured a reverse SSL proxy using Apache 2.0. > > However, the application server serving the pages includes a > line that gets stripped out by the proxy. > > One thing I read was > http://www.apachetutor.org/admin/reverseproxies > and it makes mention of problems under "changing th

[EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL & Apache Scalability

2007-11-29 Thread Tony Anecito
Hi All, I have heard a strange story about how using 1 port for Apache SSL is not a good idea for performance. I heard if you have three sites usign the same SSL port it could really slow down performance as compared to putting those sites on separate ports for SSL. Should not each site have it's

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting mod_perl to run after mod_cache with Apache 2.2.6

2007-11-29 Thread Adam Woodworth
After some more digging, I've figured out (mostly) what is going on. It turns out that our mod_perl filter actually does get the body content from mod_cache -- originally I thought that our filter wasn't seeing the body at all. But, the Content-Type header is missing. In cache_storage.c, around l

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL & Apache Scalability

2007-11-29 Thread Dragon
Tony Anecito wrote: Hi All, I have heard a strange story about how using 1 port for Apache SSL is not a good idea for performance. I heard if you have three sites usign the same SSL port it could really slow down performance as compared to putting those sites on separate ports for SSL. Should n

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL & Apache Scalability

2007-11-29 Thread Sander Temme
On Nov 29, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: I have heard a strange story about how using 1 port for Apache SSL is not a good idea for performance. I Sounds like something for Mythbusters! heard if you have three sites usign the same SSL port it could really slow down performance as com

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL & Apache Scalability

2007-11-29 Thread Tony Anecito
Thanks. I will sendthese email feedbacks to the person who mentioned it to me and make sure I heard it right. Many Thanks! -Tony --- Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: > > > I have heard a strange story about how using 1 > port > > for

[EMAIL PROTECTED] strange expires problem

2007-11-29 Thread goommy
users,您好! I have a trouble with set expires time with apache! I want to expires statement to control the cache time,But there is a strange problem occurd! when i set ExpiresActive on ExpiresByType text/html A61 , the cache server (squid)work correctly and the expires time is 61 second

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] strange expires problem

2007-11-29 Thread Vincent Bray
On 30/11/2007, goommy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > users,您好! Uh, hi. > I have a trouble with set expires time with apache! > I want to expires statement to control the cache time,But there is a strange > problem occurd! > > when i set ExpiresActive on >ExpiresByType text/html A61 , >