It was thus said that the Great Dave Morrow once stated:
>
> Hi all. How can I rewrite port 80 to https? I know I have seen this
> somewhere, but cannot locate it.
>
> Basically, if someone comes in to http://www.mydomain.com I want to
> redirect them to https://www.mydomain.com
Try
Hello,
I've some problem implementing ProxyErrorOverride.
It does not work correctly with "302" (moved) errors.
In fact each first access time, the 302 error is printed instead of
redirecting the browser on the right page.
Any clue ?
I really don't like sql server and IIS server errors being p
Hello
I have the following problem:
I have a page with a grid that is very large (>5000
records). It is a report, the user can select to print this info to a PDF or
directly to the printer.
The problem is that when using Apache the memory grows and
the following error is raised:
S
That's a good starting point.
I've redone the vhost like that :
SSLEngine On
SSLProxyEngine on
SSLCACertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/cacert.pem
#SSLCertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/www.toto.net.crt
#SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/apache2/ssl/www.toto.net.key
Title: Redirect Port 80 requests to https
Thanks for the replies all.
Here's what I found as the best overall answer for my
situation (which is to redirect the entire site);
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !=on
RewriteRule ^/(.*) https://%{SERVER_NAME}/$1
[R,L]
David A. Morrow
Technical System
Jérôme Tytgat wrote:
> the " " are transformed in " "
no, the ampersand is entified. If you validated, you'd see that
" " means something very different from " ", which is what
you meant. Technically it's a browser bug if your browser doesn't
display the " " as the characters "&", "n", etc
>
> Since when is 302 an error?
Since it's interpreted as it ?
Anyway, the problem occurs WHEN and only WHEN I use ProxyErrorOverride
>
> You may need a proxyPassReverse directive. See
> http://www.apacheweek.com/features/reverseproxies
>
I use it... elsewhere my reverse proxy would not at
Jérôme Tytgat wrote:
Hello,
I've some problem implementing ProxyErrorOverride.
It does not work correctly with "302" (moved) errors.
Since when is 302 an error?
In fact each first access time, the 302 error is printed instead of
redirecting the browser on the right page.
Any clue ?
You m
On 8/24/05, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, if you want apache to select a file whose extension you haven't
> explicitly specified, then you need MultiViews. Without multiviews,
> apache has no way to find the .var file.
>
> There are a number of options here. One is to rename yo
I wonder whether the problem could be that your HTML code contains mis-spelled
special characters like " " which should have read " ". Unfortunately
such errors are hidden by the fact that MSIE is very tolerant about the lacking
semi-colon. Your problem is probably caused by the fact that proxy-
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit :
> I wonder whether the problem could be that your HTML code contains
> mis-spelled special characters like " " which should have read " ".
> Unfortunately such errors are hidden by the fact that MSIE is very tolerant
> about the lacking semi-colon. Your problem
You know what? Some applications build URLs based on the value of the Host
header. If you use ProxyPreserveHost, it may just turn out to solve your
problem altogether so you will not need to rewrite the HTML contents.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Jérôme Tytgat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
even after enabling mod_headers and mod_proxy_html I still get the problem
on Firefox.
This what I see before I do a refresh on the browser :
f4
302 Object Moved
Object Moved
The document has moved https://www.sevea.net/class/LYCEESEVEA/School/";>here.
0
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 20
Nick Kew a écrit :
> Jérôme Tytgat wrote:
>
> > the " " are transformed in " "
>
> no, the ampersand is entified. If you validated, you'd see that
> " " means something very different from " ", which is what
> you meant.
> Technically it's a browser bug if your browser doesn't
> displa
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV a écrit :
> You know what? Some applications build URLs based on the value of the Host
> header. If you use ProxyPreserveHost,
> it may just turn out to solve your problem altogether so you will not need to
> rewrite the HTML contents.
>
> -ascs
Once I activate "Proxy
Hi,
I am running apache 1.3.28 as a front end (proxy) to my application running on
WAS.
But I keep getting the following error in my error.log even if I load the
system with just 4 users.
"[Tue Aug 23 17:24:31 2005] [error] Server ran out of threads to serve
requests. Consider raising the Thre
Title: Redirect Port 80 requests to https
Hi
is working with a redirect (in asp), a header(location:...) (in php) or a
document.location(in _javascript_) not an option.
I
don't know if changing the portnumber for ssl will change anything (I think you
will still have to type the https://).
Hi,
I have made a program in Perl (which runs using mod_perl) and I have counted
the time it runs when it is accessed.
I have put at the beginning of the program:
my $begin = (times)[0];
And at the end I have put:
my $end = (times)[0] - $begin;
The value of $end is usually 0.2 seconds, but if
Posting yet again. Didn't change the subject line last time.
Hi,
I am running apache 1.3.28 as a front end (proxy) to my application running on
WAS.
But I keep getting the following error in my error.log even if I load the
system with just 4 users.
"[Tue Aug 23 17:24:31 2005] [error] Server ra
That is probably because the ProxyPassReverse are no longer adequate...
Unfortunately I am afraid this will be almost impossible to fix due to a
problem in Apache regarding the interpretation of ProxyPassReverse in
context.
Nick, correct me if I am wrong, but what Jerôme would probably need is
> This, however, will not work unless you apply a patch now available at
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10722 (but which I have not
> tested myself)
I've faked the user agent in Firefox and looked at the cookies set by the
server.
Three cookies are set :
NameMSCSTicke
> This, however, will not work unless you apply a patch now available at
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10722 (but which I have not
> tested myself)
>
I may be wrong but for me the cookies are sent... (at least livehttpheaders is
telling me that) :
GET https://www.toto.n
This is a known bug in the 2.0 version of
mod_aspdotnet. If you pull the latest version out of CVS this is fixed.
Heino R. Pull
Federated Software Group
From: Luis Fco.
Ramirez Daza Glez. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005
10:04 PM
To: cli-users@h
On 8/25/05, Christopher Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/05, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, if you want apache to select a file whose extension you haven't
> > explicitly specified, then you need MultiViews. Without multiviews,
> > apache has no way to find the .var f
Oh Oh.
Sorry about that. I did not make myself clear.
The problem is not about the Cookie Domain. It's about the interpretation of
ProxyPassReverse in a Location context. I was actually referring to the
attachement http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15543 "2.0.53,
mult cookie
Unfortunately, for the moment, I think that you cannot make it work unless you
apply Nick's patch to mod_proxy.
The problem is that you need to set ProxyPreserveHost On AND remove the /class
or /docs prefix from Location headers of redirections. If you set
ProxyPreserveHost On, the host part of
Hi,
I'm having quite some troubles recently with one of our 2.0.54 apaches.
At some point one child would eat up all memory available (RSS and VSZ)
and make the system almost unuseable.
The problem itself is probably related to some obscure headers issue
within apache, but that's not my question.
On 8/26/05, Udo Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yet of course I would like to know the exact time and circumstances when
> such a situtation occurs. When reaching the memory limit, apache
> produces log entries like this:
>
> ---CUT---
> [...]
> ^GOut of memory (Needed 8164 byte
> - Your HTML code is broken so mod_proxy_html cannot parse it correctly. That
> excludes using mod_proxy_html
That's a big problem for that particular application
> - You cannot execute ProxyPassReverse in context, which excludes
> setting ProxyPreserveHost On.
I don't see this point clear
Uh oh !
I think I was able to circumvenant that particular problem.
I've made some debug with firefox WITHOUT proxy_html activated and noted
that despite my rewriterule based on the HTTP_REFERER to correct the location,
the javascript was still loaded at the wrong location (that's why I should
ha
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 10:20 -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 8/26/05, Udo Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yet of course I would like to know the exact time and circumstances when
> > such a situtation occurs. When reaching the memory limit, apache
> > produces log entries like this:
> >
> > --
This problem has been solved by a rewriterule.
Thanks.
Jérôme Tytgat a écrit :
>
> Nick Kew a écrit :
>
>>Jérôme Tytgat wrote:
>>
>> > the " " are transformed in " "
>>
>>no, the ampersand is entified. If you validated, you'd see that
>>" " means something very different from " ", which is
I repost the vhost accordingly to some modification, proxyerroroverride
is still problematic under firefox
SSLEngine On
SSLProxyEngine on
SSLCACertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/cacert.pem
#SSLCertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/www.sevea.net.crt
#SSLCertificate
I am reporting the same error as posted by Bostjan Orter, back on 22 Jul
2005.
ASP.NET Version Mismatch Error "Visual Studio .NET has detected that web
server is running ASP.NET version 1.0.
The relevant configuration (httpd) sections contain:
#=
Allen Mayes wrote:
I am reporting the same error as posted by Bostjan Orter, back on 22 Jul
2005.
ASP.NET Version Mismatch Error "Visual Studio .NET has detected that web
server is running ASP.NET version 1.0.
It might be using 1.0 of the .NET framework. The current snapshot, soon
to be revisi
I know there used to be some information that mod_ssl should be compiled
statically rather than dynamically.
Is there still such a recommendation for 2.0.54?
Solaris 2.8+
GCC 3.3.4
Thanks...
"Mon aéroglisseur est plein d'anguilles"
John P. Dodge
Boeing S
[I posted this a few days ago and got no responses. Is there a better list
for this? I am stuck and getting a bit desperate. ]
Hi.
I am trying to get 2.0.54 running on RHEL3/x86.
I am running configure as follows:
./configure --enable-so --enable-shared=max --enable-proxy --enable-ssl
Configur
hello,
does anyone know the limitations specs for environment variables,
specifically when used via mod_rewrite prg ?
i am able to hardcode a variable with a value of more than 2048 bytes
# this will work
RewriteRule ^/(.*) - [E=VAR_1:long_string_more_than_2048]
RequestHeader set REQ_TEST_1 %
* allan juul wrote:
> does anyone know the limitations specs for environment variables,
> specifically when used via mod_rewrite prg ?
Yes. The read buffer for prg: is limited to 2K. This limitation has been
removed in 2.1/2.2.
nd
--
"Solides und umfangreiches Buch"
I've been debugging what is likely a simple problem, however irritating.
I have a fairly simple server installed that has a few VirtualHosts
configured - they all work properly, except there isn't any CGI
execution going on, at least for the "default" host. Something simple
like:
Optio
I have two Apache servers behind a firewall with one public IP.
I want to run SSL on both machines. One having a self generated certificate
and other having commerial cert.
The way I understand it is that because of the nature of the SSL protocol
you can only have one ssl site per IP.
Is there no w
Dan Carl wrote:
I have two Apache servers behind a firewall with one public IP.
I want to run SSL on both machines. One having a self generated certificate
and other having commerial cert.
The way I understand it is that because of the nature of the SSL protocol
you can only have one ssl site per
"Dan Carl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> The way I understand it is that because of the nature of the SSL protocol
> you can only have one ssl site per IP.
> Is there no way around this?
You can run the two SSL servers on two different ports, then use a URL
like:
https://example.com:4
How do I enable the FrontPage support for Apache 2.0?
My web server
Solaris X86 V9
Apache 2.0
I am using FrontPage to create a site and I would like to
make sure everything is ready and will run correctly.
FrontPage Web editor
Thanks in Advance for any assistance.
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Multiple SSL servers behind one public ip
> If you are buying a commercial cert, why do you even need a self signed
> cert? If it's self sign
45 matches
Mail list logo
