RE: [users@httpd] overriding mod_auth_sspi from .htaccess

Plain text please... It looks like you are attempting to nest authentication realms. HTTP 1.1 doesn't support this (to be more precise, the protocol assumes a single layer of authentication). When the browser requests a URL aand gets a "401 Unauthorized" back, it logs the pathname part of the

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for a Favicon/Robots Solution

> -Original Message- > From: Justin Gehring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Montag, 9. Mai 2005 05:41 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Looking for a Favicon/Robots Solution > > > Hi all, > > I apologize if someone has posted on this but I did not find > it sea

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem building Apache with OpenSSL

Hi, I'm trying to build Apache 2.0.54 with openssl 0.9.7g I'm running on "Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon)" I built OpenSSL using the following commands: #./config threads shared -D_REENTRANT --openssldir=/home/inst/openssl #make #make install Then I tried to build apache with th

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem building Apache with OpenSSL

Hi, I defined: #LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/inst/openssl/lib #export LD_LIBRARY_PATH And this solved the issue. Sorry for the hassle. Yaron. -Original Message- From: Yaron Ruckenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 10:37 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RLimitNPROC overly agressive

André, Thanks for the reply. That explains what I'm seeing. -Original Message- From: André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RLimitNPROC overly agressive Date: Sun 8 May 2005 21:43 Size: 1K To: users@httpd.apache.org * Michael Johnson - MJ wrote: > User foo >

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Expires" and "Cache-Control" don't work properly

Actually "Expires" and "Cache-Control" do work properly. Don't you see those headers in the response received by your browser? Are the elements cached by your browser? I believe that the behaviour you observe may be due to the order in which mod_header and mod_cache process the response. My gu

[EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd process crash the server

Hello Sorry for newbie's question My server start crash couple times a day In the TOP I see HTTPD process take 399% of CPU I don't see any un regular activity in the error.log How I can determinate what crach my server. Thank You. Dual P4 / Xeon 2.8 Ghz 2 GB PC2100 ECC / REG DDR Apache 1.3.33

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd process crash the server

> -Original Message- > From: WEBGATE ADMIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My server start crash couple times a day > In the TOP I see HTTPD process take 399% of CPU > I don't see any un regular activity in the error.log > How I can determinate what crach my server. > Thank You. > Dual P4 / X

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd process crash the server

Hello Thank You for quick replay You are right "becomes extremely busy" Yes I also run tomcat, MySQL(4.0.24-0), PHP 4.3.2 (cgi), perl v5.8.0 access log mixed HTML and PHP requests Or I should look for any specific? Thank You. Best Regards Webgate Internet Solutions * Sales: [EMA

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd process crash the server

> -Original Message- > From: WEBGATE ADMIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Montag, 9. Mai 2005 13:10 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd process crash the server > > > Hello > Thank You for quick replay > You are right "becomes extremely busy" > Yes I a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd process crash the server

As Boyle mentioned, locate the last few records on the log file when it crashed. Also try to reproduce the behavior. Regards Aman Raheja WEBGATE ADMIN wrote: Hello Thank You for quick replay You are right "becomes extremely busy" Yes I also run tomcat, MySQL(4.0.24-0), PHP 4.3.2 (cgi), perl v5.8

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] beginner

Actually, I think the online apache doc is very clear. My experience has been that it is pretty easy to install and run. Perhaps if you have specific questions of clarification your could post them? John ganesan malairaja wrote: hi .. i am new apache as well new to linux i am involved in creat

[users@httpd] using CGI as DirectoryIndex with cgiwrap and rewriterules

Hi all! I am having a small issue with a setup I am experimenting with. I am using cgiwrap to provide my users with cgi functionality for PHP, Perl etc (as there is a need for all CGI to run as the user who owns the file, hence no mod_php but running php and a CGI instead) In order to ensure t

[EMAIL PROTECTED] group authentication failing with apache2mod_auth_pam and winbind

I am trying to setup apache authentication to use mod_auth_pam, winbind, and Active Directory. It works for 'Require user johns' But it fails for 'Require group developers' The logs indicate a fail and a pass: ==> /var/log/apache2/access.log <== 192.168.60.162 - - [09/May/2005:10:57:16 -0700

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite - Reverse Proxying CGIs with PATH_INFO to a Backend

On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:05:11AM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > Keith Bare wrote: > > > RewriteRule /(.*\.cgi)$ http://cgi-backend/$1 [P] > > > > but this fails for CGI scripts that use PATH_INFO. > > Of course it does. The $ means it matches only at the > end of a URL. If the string ".cgi" is suf

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't delete apache2's logfile under windows 2003

Hi all, Three days, I helped my friend to setup a server with apache2(IIS Sucks!) on Windows Server 2003. Everything runs fine. In httpd.conf I reset the configure of CustomLog to: CustomLog "|c:/apache/apache2/bin/cronolog.exe e:/logs/access%Y%m%d.log" combined Which can help him to manager his

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3x Secure Server

Is it possible to set up Apache 1.3x to boot with the secure server without having to re-enter the password? If so, how? Thanks. Bob Cohen - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3x Secure Server

Bob Cohen wrote: Is it possible to set up Apache 1.3x to boot with the secure server without having to re-enter the password? If so, how? Thanks. Bob Cohen Bob - This is covered in mod_ssl's FAQ. This would apply to you if you're using mod_ssl: http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.7/ssl_faq.html#rem

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3x Secure Server

dan wrote: > This is covered in mod_ssl's FAQ. This would apply to you if you're using mod_ssl: http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.7/ssl_faq.html#remove-passphrase Thank you Dan. I guess it isn't such a good idea to do this, eh? It's just that I've got an awful memory, occasional power outages, and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hacked the website replace the index.hm page

ScriptAlias /php5/ /dir/php5/ AddType application/x-httpd-php5 .php5 Action application/x-httpd-php5 "/php5/php.exe" Wouldn't that work without shebang line? Or would it not solve the problem/add some other problem? // DvDmanDT MSN: dvdmandt¤hotmail.com Mail: dvdmandt¤telia.com - Original M

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3x Secure Server

Bob Cohen wrote: dan wrote: > This is covered in mod_ssl's FAQ. This would apply to you if you're using mod_ssl: http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.7/ssl_faq.html#remove-passphrase Thank you Dan. I guess it isn't such a good idea to do this, eh? It's just that I've got an awful memory, occasional p

[users@httpd] Apache

We are using Apache 2.0 and Tomcat 5.0. We use JK2 AJP 1.3 Connector to communicate between Apache and Tomcat. We see a number of the following errors in the jk2 logs: [Mon May 09 18:52:59 2005] (error ) [mod_jk2.c (557)] mod_jk child init 1 0 [Mon May 09 18:54:43 2005] (error ) [mod_jk2.c (557)]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache

After something similar we moved to using Apache to ProxyPass the requests to Tomcat and skip mod_jk(2) altogether. Seems to have worked in a low load production environment. http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_proxy.html ciao! leam On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Sauparna Sark

[EMAIL PROTECTED] group authentication failing with apache2mod_auth_pam and winbind

I am trying to setup apache authentication to use: mod_auth_pam, winbind, and Active Directory. It works for 'Require user johns' But it fails for 'Require group developers' even though johns is a member. The logs indicate a fail and a pass: ==> /var/log/apache2/access.log <== 192.168.60.

[users@httpd] Bug? Or not? Accessing server with numeric IP produces error page... with VirtualHost setup

Good morning I have a problem with my Apache2 (2.0.52). While checking how to calculate numeric IPs from my own I found out that my webserver does not like it when I access it via the numeric IP. I have my webserver set up with virtual hosts, so I do understand that he has problems to figure

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hacked the website replace the index.hm page

Hi All Thanks you all for helping me to fix the problem. The user removed the old version of phpBB and will upgrade it later. Thanks Mathew >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/05/05 13:48:43 >>> That's the key right there. You probably need to think of multiple approaches to securing the files (suexec, c

Re: [users@httpd] Bug? Or not? Accessing server with numeric IP produces error page... with VirtualHost setup

A quick google search got me this: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34595 Chris SkyFlash wrote: Good morning I have a problem with my Apache2 (2.0.52). While checking how to calculate numeric IPs from my own I found out that my webserver does not like it when I access it via t

RE: [users@httpd] "Expires" and "Cache-Control" don't work proper ly

Title: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Expires" and "Cache-Control" don't work properly Hi Axel, Thanks for your answer. Running "httpd -l", I don't see neither mod_cache nor mod_disk_cache - can the problem be here? The elements are cached by the browser (both IE and NS 7). I'll try to clarify: -

[users@httpd] Can I use COM in Apache modules?

I am attempting to call Windows COM functions (CoCreate and such) from an Apache module. It sometimes works but eventually becomes unstable, especially when secondary threads are used, crashing in low-level memory routines. Are there known issues using COM or other issues reguarding the memory poo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Possible bug in httpd-2.1.3-beta mod_proxy_balancer (URL arguments omitted)

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:03:28PM -0400, Dave O'Hair wrote: > I may have found a bug in httpd-2.1.3-beta mod_proxy_balancer. Or more > likely I just don't have it configured properly. Here's the entries > from httpd.conf: ... > The proxy/balance thing works great until I pass this URL to Apache: