Now serving a self-imposed email probation of 24h for two flubbed
responses in the same thread.
--
Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apac
On 5/29/07, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Isn't this effectively:
Order deny,allow
Allow from 10.1.2.3
Deny from all
Allow from all
Mind the order that 'Order' will evaluate the merged directives.
That was all pretty poorly presented. Your 'allow all' is evaluated
after your 'deny
On 5/29/07, Pedro LaWrench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my main server, I allow all with
Order allow,deny
Allow all
Then in a virtual server (different port) I have
Order deny,allow
Allow from 10.1.2.3
Deny from all
Yet, it appears that all hosts can access /mydocs through the virtual
ser
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Pedro LaWrench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my main server, I allow all with
> >
> > Order allow,deny
> > Allow all
> >
> >
> > Then in a virtual server (different port) I have
> >
> > Order deny,allow
> > Allow from 10.1.2.3
> > D
On 5/29/07, Pedro LaWrench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my main server, I allow all with
Order allow,deny
Allow all
Then in a virtual server (different port) I have
Order deny,allow
Allow from 10.1.2.3
Deny from all
Yet, it appears that all hosts can access /mydocs through the virtual serv
In my main server, I allow all with
Order allow,deny
Allow all
Then in a virtual server (different port) I have
Order deny,allow
Allow from 10.1.2.3
Deny from all
Yet, it appears that all hosts can access /mydocs through the virtual server.
Even with a deny for / in a virtual server config,
